Classification and mapping forest sites using geographic information system (GIS): a case study in Artvin Province

The productivity of forest sites has been indirectly determined with solo wood production objective in forest management. Forest site productivity should, however, be determined directly in order to implement ecosystem based multipurpose forest management philosophy. This article tackles the problem...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental monitoring and assessment 2008-02, Vol.137 (1-3), p.149-161
Hauptverfasser: Altun, Lokman, Baskent, Emin Zeki, Gunlu, Alkan, Kadiogullari, Ali Ihsan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 161
container_issue 1-3
container_start_page 149
container_title Environmental monitoring and assessment
container_volume 137
creator Altun, Lokman
Baskent, Emin Zeki
Gunlu, Alkan
Kadiogullari, Ali Ihsan
description The productivity of forest sites has been indirectly determined with solo wood production objective in forest management. Forest site productivity should, however, be determined directly in order to implement ecosystem based multipurpose forest management philosophy. This article tackles the problem in distinguishing and mapping forest sites using both direct method and indirect method in Genya Mountain located in central of Artvin State Forest Enterprise. About 112 sample plots were designed and distributed over the area. In each sample plot, soil samples were collected and the classical timber inventory measurements were taken. According to direct method, Soil Moisture Regime (SMR) method is preferred due to a water deficiency in the study area. Water holding capacity was used as an essential criterion for the classification of the forest site. Forest site classifications were assigned regarding the physiographic factors such as landform, aspect, and slope. Five different forest sites classes; dry, moderate fresh, fresh, humid and hygric were determined. According to direct method, the guiding curve was used to generate anamorphic site index (SI) equations and three site index classes; good (SI=I-II), medium (SI=III) and low (SI=IV-V) were determined. Some important differences between the methods were realized. The forest sites determined with site index estimation method indicate that site index I and II is 505.99 ha, III 1095.79 ha and IV and V 992.95 ha, whereas forest sites determined with direct method related to dry site of 937.58 ha, moderate fresh site of 931.90 ha, fresh site of 1,797.71 ha, humid site of 80.48 ha and hygric site of 356.55 ha. The forest site maps of both methods were created using GIS functions. The forest sites of open and degraded areas should be determined according to direct method.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10661-007-9735-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_822522635</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1777096654</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c646t-22accb089951a7457a543a25671d39770c9e7c5dc8683f11e9938768f6e169713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhi0EosvCD-ACFhJQDgGPv82tWkGpVAmk0nPkOk5ItUm2ngR1_z1eZaWVOGx7mpHnmRnPzEvIa2CfgTHzBYFpDUV2C2eEKu6fkAUoIwrulHtKFgy0KbTQ7oS8QLxljDkj3XNyAkZpaZlckLRae8S2boMf26Gnvq9o5zebtm9oPaSII8V2jEgn3D01cWiS3_xpA237HO_mLNziGDt6en5x9ekr9TR4jBTHqdpmjJ6l8W82v9KQTYgvybParzG-2tsluf7-7ffqR3H58_xidXZZBC31WHDuQ7hh1jkF3khlvJLCc6UNVMIZw4KLJqgqWG1FDRCdE9ZoW-sI2hkQS_JxrrtJw92UJym7FkNcr30fhwlLy7niXAv1IGmUE2CtYpn8cJTk8FiQaSsZiAyeHgXBGANMKq4ehTKndd7TQ-1BWikV7Gq--w-8HabU57uUnINzebcmQzBDIQ2IKdblJrWdT9sSWLlTYjkrsdy5OyWW9znnzb7wdNPF6pCxl14G3u8Bj8Gv6-T70OKBc84Znm-6JHzmMIf6JqbDD491fzsn1X4ofZNy4esrnvfNWB5cci7-AXgW_BM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>221996837</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Classification and mapping forest sites using geographic information system (GIS): a case study in Artvin Province</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Altun, Lokman ; Baskent, Emin Zeki ; Gunlu, Alkan ; Kadiogullari, Ali Ihsan</creator><creatorcontrib>Altun, Lokman ; Baskent, Emin Zeki ; Gunlu, Alkan ; Kadiogullari, Ali Ihsan</creatorcontrib><description>The productivity of forest sites has been indirectly determined with solo wood production objective in forest management. Forest site productivity should, however, be determined directly in order to implement ecosystem based multipurpose forest management philosophy. This article tackles the problem in distinguishing and mapping forest sites using both direct method and indirect method in Genya Mountain located in central of Artvin State Forest Enterprise. About 112 sample plots were designed and distributed over the area. In each sample plot, soil samples were collected and the classical timber inventory measurements were taken. According to direct method, Soil Moisture Regime (SMR) method is preferred due to a water deficiency in the study area. Water holding capacity was used as an essential criterion for the classification of the forest site. Forest site classifications were assigned regarding the physiographic factors such as landform, aspect, and slope. Five different forest sites classes; dry, moderate fresh, fresh, humid and hygric were determined. According to direct method, the guiding curve was used to generate anamorphic site index (SI) equations and three site index classes; good (SI=I-II), medium (SI=III) and low (SI=IV-V) were determined. Some important differences between the methods were realized. The forest sites determined with site index estimation method indicate that site index I and II is 505.99 ha, III 1095.79 ha and IV and V 992.95 ha, whereas forest sites determined with direct method related to dry site of 937.58 ha, moderate fresh site of 931.90 ha, fresh site of 1,797.71 ha, humid site of 80.48 ha and hygric site of 356.55 ha. The forest site maps of both methods were created using GIS functions. The forest sites of open and degraded areas should be determined according to direct method.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-6369</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2959</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10661-007-9735-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17564804</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EMASDH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Biological and medical sciences ; Case studies ; Classification ; Direct method ; Drying ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecologists ; Ecology ; Ecosystem ; Ecosystems ; Ecotoxicology ; Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution ; Environment ; Environmental Management ; Environmental monitoring ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Forest management ; Forest sites classification ; Forestry ; Forests ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; General forest ecology ; Generalities. Production, biomass. Quality of wood and forest products. General forest ecology ; Geographic Information Systems ; GIS ; Indirect method ; Mathematical analysis ; Monitoring/Environmental Analysis ; Mountains ; Natural resources ; Organizational Case Studies ; Production capacity ; Productivity ; Remote sensing ; Satellite navigation systems ; Soil moisture ; Studies ; Sustainable development ; Timber ; Topography ; Trees - classification ; Turkey ; Vegetation ; water holding capacity</subject><ispartof>Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2008-02, Vol.137 (1-3), p.149-161</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c646t-22accb089951a7457a543a25671d39770c9e7c5dc8683f11e9938768f6e169713</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c646t-22accb089951a7457a543a25671d39770c9e7c5dc8683f11e9938768f6e169713</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10661-007-9735-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10661-007-9735-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=19997299$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17564804$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Altun, Lokman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baskent, Emin Zeki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gunlu, Alkan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kadiogullari, Ali Ihsan</creatorcontrib><title>Classification and mapping forest sites using geographic information system (GIS): a case study in Artvin Province</title><title>Environmental monitoring and assessment</title><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><description>The productivity of forest sites has been indirectly determined with solo wood production objective in forest management. Forest site productivity should, however, be determined directly in order to implement ecosystem based multipurpose forest management philosophy. This article tackles the problem in distinguishing and mapping forest sites using both direct method and indirect method in Genya Mountain located in central of Artvin State Forest Enterprise. About 112 sample plots were designed and distributed over the area. In each sample plot, soil samples were collected and the classical timber inventory measurements were taken. According to direct method, Soil Moisture Regime (SMR) method is preferred due to a water deficiency in the study area. Water holding capacity was used as an essential criterion for the classification of the forest site. Forest site classifications were assigned regarding the physiographic factors such as landform, aspect, and slope. Five different forest sites classes; dry, moderate fresh, fresh, humid and hygric were determined. According to direct method, the guiding curve was used to generate anamorphic site index (SI) equations and three site index classes; good (SI=I-II), medium (SI=III) and low (SI=IV-V) were determined. Some important differences between the methods were realized. The forest sites determined with site index estimation method indicate that site index I and II is 505.99 ha, III 1095.79 ha and IV and V 992.95 ha, whereas forest sites determined with direct method related to dry site of 937.58 ha, moderate fresh site of 931.90 ha, fresh site of 1,797.71 ha, humid site of 80.48 ha and hygric site of 356.55 ha. The forest site maps of both methods were created using GIS functions. The forest sites of open and degraded areas should be determined according to direct method.</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Direct method</subject><subject>Drying</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecologists</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forest sites classification</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>General forest ecology</subject><subject>Generalities. Production, biomass. Quality of wood and forest products. General forest ecology</subject><subject>Geographic Information Systems</subject><subject>GIS</subject><subject>Indirect method</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</subject><subject>Mountains</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Organizational Case Studies</subject><subject>Production capacity</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Satellite navigation systems</subject><subject>Soil moisture</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Timber</subject><subject>Topography</subject><subject>Trees - classification</subject><subject>Turkey</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>water holding capacity</subject><issn>0167-6369</issn><issn>1573-2959</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhi0EosvCD-ACFhJQDgGPv82tWkGpVAmk0nPkOk5ItUm2ngR1_z1eZaWVOGx7mpHnmRnPzEvIa2CfgTHzBYFpDUV2C2eEKu6fkAUoIwrulHtKFgy0KbTQ7oS8QLxljDkj3XNyAkZpaZlckLRae8S2boMf26Gnvq9o5zebtm9oPaSII8V2jEgn3D01cWiS3_xpA237HO_mLNziGDt6en5x9ekr9TR4jBTHqdpmjJ6l8W82v9KQTYgvybParzG-2tsluf7-7ffqR3H58_xidXZZBC31WHDuQ7hh1jkF3khlvJLCc6UNVMIZw4KLJqgqWG1FDRCdE9ZoW-sI2hkQS_JxrrtJw92UJym7FkNcr30fhwlLy7niXAv1IGmUE2CtYpn8cJTk8FiQaSsZiAyeHgXBGANMKq4ehTKndd7TQ-1BWikV7Gq--w-8HabU57uUnINzebcmQzBDIQ2IKdblJrWdT9sSWLlTYjkrsdy5OyWW9znnzb7wdNPF6pCxl14G3u8Bj8Gv6-T70OKBc84Znm-6JHzmMIf6JqbDD491fzsn1X4ofZNy4esrnvfNWB5cci7-AXgW_BM</recordid><startdate>20080201</startdate><enddate>20080201</enddate><creator>Altun, Lokman</creator><creator>Baskent, Emin Zeki</creator><creator>Gunlu, Alkan</creator><creator>Kadiogullari, Ali Ihsan</creator><general>Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080201</creationdate><title>Classification and mapping forest sites using geographic information system (GIS): a case study in Artvin Province</title><author>Altun, Lokman ; Baskent, Emin Zeki ; Gunlu, Alkan ; Kadiogullari, Ali Ihsan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c646t-22accb089951a7457a543a25671d39770c9e7c5dc8683f11e9938768f6e169713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Direct method</topic><topic>Drying</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecologists</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Environmental monitoring</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forest sites classification</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>General forest ecology</topic><topic>Generalities. Production, biomass. Quality of wood and forest products. General forest ecology</topic><topic>Geographic Information Systems</topic><topic>GIS</topic><topic>Indirect method</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</topic><topic>Mountains</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Organizational Case Studies</topic><topic>Production capacity</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Satellite navigation systems</topic><topic>Soil moisture</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Timber</topic><topic>Topography</topic><topic>Trees - classification</topic><topic>Turkey</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>water holding capacity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Altun, Lokman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baskent, Emin Zeki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gunlu, Alkan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kadiogullari, Ali Ihsan</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental monitoring and assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Altun, Lokman</au><au>Baskent, Emin Zeki</au><au>Gunlu, Alkan</au><au>Kadiogullari, Ali Ihsan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Classification and mapping forest sites using geographic information system (GIS): a case study in Artvin Province</atitle><jtitle>Environmental monitoring and assessment</jtitle><stitle>Environ Monit Assess</stitle><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><date>2008-02-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>137</volume><issue>1-3</issue><spage>149</spage><epage>161</epage><pages>149-161</pages><issn>0167-6369</issn><eissn>1573-2959</eissn><coden>EMASDH</coden><abstract>The productivity of forest sites has been indirectly determined with solo wood production objective in forest management. Forest site productivity should, however, be determined directly in order to implement ecosystem based multipurpose forest management philosophy. This article tackles the problem in distinguishing and mapping forest sites using both direct method and indirect method in Genya Mountain located in central of Artvin State Forest Enterprise. About 112 sample plots were designed and distributed over the area. In each sample plot, soil samples were collected and the classical timber inventory measurements were taken. According to direct method, Soil Moisture Regime (SMR) method is preferred due to a water deficiency in the study area. Water holding capacity was used as an essential criterion for the classification of the forest site. Forest site classifications were assigned regarding the physiographic factors such as landform, aspect, and slope. Five different forest sites classes; dry, moderate fresh, fresh, humid and hygric were determined. According to direct method, the guiding curve was used to generate anamorphic site index (SI) equations and three site index classes; good (SI=I-II), medium (SI=III) and low (SI=IV-V) were determined. Some important differences between the methods were realized. The forest sites determined with site index estimation method indicate that site index I and II is 505.99 ha, III 1095.79 ha and IV and V 992.95 ha, whereas forest sites determined with direct method related to dry site of 937.58 ha, moderate fresh site of 931.90 ha, fresh site of 1,797.71 ha, humid site of 80.48 ha and hygric site of 356.55 ha. The forest site maps of both methods were created using GIS functions. The forest sites of open and degraded areas should be determined according to direct method.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>17564804</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10661-007-9735-x</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-6369
ispartof Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2008-02, Vol.137 (1-3), p.149-161
issn 0167-6369
1573-2959
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_822522635
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied ecology
Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution
Biological and medical sciences
Case studies
Classification
Direct method
Drying
Earth and Environmental Science
Ecologists
Ecology
Ecosystem
Ecosystems
Ecotoxicology
Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution
Environment
Environmental Management
Environmental monitoring
Environmental Monitoring - methods
Forest management
Forest sites classification
Forestry
Forests
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
General forest ecology
Generalities. Production, biomass. Quality of wood and forest products. General forest ecology
Geographic Information Systems
GIS
Indirect method
Mathematical analysis
Monitoring/Environmental Analysis
Mountains
Natural resources
Organizational Case Studies
Production capacity
Productivity
Remote sensing
Satellite navigation systems
Soil moisture
Studies
Sustainable development
Timber
Topography
Trees - classification
Turkey
Vegetation
water holding capacity
title Classification and mapping forest sites using geographic information system (GIS): a case study in Artvin Province
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T00%3A35%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Classification%20and%20mapping%20forest%20sites%20using%20geographic%20information%20system%20(GIS):%20a%20case%20study%20in%20Artvin%20Province&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20monitoring%20and%20assessment&rft.au=Altun,%20Lokman&rft.date=2008-02-01&rft.volume=137&rft.issue=1-3&rft.spage=149&rft.epage=161&rft.pages=149-161&rft.issn=0167-6369&rft.eissn=1573-2959&rft.coden=EMASDH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10661-007-9735-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1777096654%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=221996837&rft_id=info:pmid/17564804&rfr_iscdi=true