Bioethical concepts in theory and practice: an exploratory study of prenatal screening in Iceland

A hallmark of good antenatal care is to respect prospective parent’s choices and provide information in a way that encourages their autonomy and informed decision making. In this paper, we analyse the meaning of autonomous and informed decision making from the theoretical perspective and attempt to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medicine, health care, and philosophy health care, and philosophy, 2011-02, Vol.14 (1), p.53-61
Hauptverfasser: Gottfreðsdóttir, Helga, Arnason, Vilhjálmur
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 61
container_issue 1
container_start_page 53
container_title Medicine, health care, and philosophy
container_volume 14
creator Gottfreðsdóttir, Helga
Arnason, Vilhjálmur
description A hallmark of good antenatal care is to respect prospective parent’s choices and provide information in a way that encourages their autonomy and informed decision making. In this paper, we analyse the meaning of autonomous and informed decision making from the theoretical perspective and attempt to show how those concepts are described among prospective parents in early pregnancy and in the public media in a society where NT screening is almost a norm. We use interviews with Icelandic prospective parents in early pregnancy (N = 40) and material covering the discourse around prenatal screening in the media over 5 years period. Our analysis indicates that both prospective parents and the public media include ethical terms in their rhetoric around prenatal screening although those concepts differ in their expression. We conclude that the context in which these decisions are taken does not encourage moral reflection. Prospective parents describe that there is a lack of dialogue with professionals when decisions are made about screening. With routine offer of screening the conceptualization of bioethical concepts finds its own way through a mainstream discourse which has limited connections to the theoretical notions. This has been neglected in the implementation of screening, as limited effort has been subject to audit with reference to explore how the offer of screening and informed choice is experienced among prospective parents.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11019-010-9291-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_822361135</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>822361135</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-8ad1cd8fb880846b8c89bc131cad884882ef8f3ce6f4bafed3cd30cfdba0331f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9P3DAQxS0EYmHhA3CpIi6cUjx2NjvhVlBpkVbqpZwtxx5DVrtxajtS8-3xardUQuLiP5rfe_P0GLsC_hU4X95GAA5NyYGXjWignI7YGSyWosRayuP8lliXy0rIGTuPcc05B-SLUzYTvKkaKeCM6fvOU3rtjN4UxveGhhSLri_SK_kwFbq3xRC0SZ2hu_wr6O-w8UGn3TCm0U6Fd5mgXqfsEE0g6rv-ZWfxZGiT9RfsxOlNpMvDPWfPj99_P_wsV79-PD18W5VGLnkqUVswFl2LyLGqWzTYtAYkGG0RK0RBDp00VLuq1Y6sNFZy42yruZTg5Jzd7H2H4P-MFJPadjFHyBnIj1GhELIGkItMXn8g134MfQ6XIUDZYD7mDPaQCT7GQE4NodvqMCngate-2revcvtq176asubLwXhst2TfFf_qzoDYAzGP-hcK_zd_7voG3aWR3g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>821839818</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bioethical concepts in theory and practice: an exploratory study of prenatal screening in Iceland</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Gottfreðsdóttir, Helga ; Arnason, Vilhjálmur</creator><creatorcontrib>Gottfreðsdóttir, Helga ; Arnason, Vilhjálmur</creatorcontrib><description>A hallmark of good antenatal care is to respect prospective parent’s choices and provide information in a way that encourages their autonomy and informed decision making. In this paper, we analyse the meaning of autonomous and informed decision making from the theoretical perspective and attempt to show how those concepts are described among prospective parents in early pregnancy and in the public media in a society where NT screening is almost a norm. We use interviews with Icelandic prospective parents in early pregnancy (N = 40) and material covering the discourse around prenatal screening in the media over 5 years period. Our analysis indicates that both prospective parents and the public media include ethical terms in their rhetoric around prenatal screening although those concepts differ in their expression. We conclude that the context in which these decisions are taken does not encourage moral reflection. Prospective parents describe that there is a lack of dialogue with professionals when decisions are made about screening. With routine offer of screening the conceptualization of bioethical concepts finds its own way through a mainstream discourse which has limited connections to the theoretical notions. This has been neglected in the implementation of screening, as limited effort has been subject to audit with reference to explore how the offer of screening and informed choice is experienced among prospective parents.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1386-7423</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-8633</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11019-010-9291-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20949321</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Bioethical Issues ; Bioethics ; Choice Behavior - ethics ; Decision making ; Diagnostic tests ; Education ; Ethics ; Female ; Genetic Testing - ethics ; Guidelines as Topic ; Health Policy ; Humans ; Iceland ; Informed Consent - ethics ; Medical Law ; Parents - psychology ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of Biology ; Philosophy of Medicine ; Pregnancy ; Prenatal care ; Prenatal Diagnosis - ethics ; Professional ethics ; Scientific Contribution ; Theory of Medicine/Bioethics ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Medicine, health care, and philosophy, 2011-02, Vol.14 (1), p.53-61</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-8ad1cd8fb880846b8c89bc131cad884882ef8f3ce6f4bafed3cd30cfdba0331f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-8ad1cd8fb880846b8c89bc131cad884882ef8f3ce6f4bafed3cd30cfdba0331f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11019-010-9291-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11019-010-9291-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20949321$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gottfreðsdóttir, Helga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnason, Vilhjálmur</creatorcontrib><title>Bioethical concepts in theory and practice: an exploratory study of prenatal screening in Iceland</title><title>Medicine, health care, and philosophy</title><addtitle>Med Health Care and Philos</addtitle><addtitle>Med Health Care Philos</addtitle><description>A hallmark of good antenatal care is to respect prospective parent’s choices and provide information in a way that encourages their autonomy and informed decision making. In this paper, we analyse the meaning of autonomous and informed decision making from the theoretical perspective and attempt to show how those concepts are described among prospective parents in early pregnancy and in the public media in a society where NT screening is almost a norm. We use interviews with Icelandic prospective parents in early pregnancy (N = 40) and material covering the discourse around prenatal screening in the media over 5 years period. Our analysis indicates that both prospective parents and the public media include ethical terms in their rhetoric around prenatal screening although those concepts differ in their expression. We conclude that the context in which these decisions are taken does not encourage moral reflection. Prospective parents describe that there is a lack of dialogue with professionals when decisions are made about screening. With routine offer of screening the conceptualization of bioethical concepts finds its own way through a mainstream discourse which has limited connections to the theoretical notions. This has been neglected in the implementation of screening, as limited effort has been subject to audit with reference to explore how the offer of screening and informed choice is experienced among prospective parents.</description><subject>Bioethical Issues</subject><subject>Bioethics</subject><subject>Choice Behavior - ethics</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Diagnostic tests</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genetic Testing - ethics</subject><subject>Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Health Policy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Iceland</subject><subject>Informed Consent - ethics</subject><subject>Medical Law</subject><subject>Parents - psychology</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of Biology</subject><subject>Philosophy of Medicine</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prenatal care</subject><subject>Prenatal Diagnosis - ethics</subject><subject>Professional ethics</subject><subject>Scientific Contribution</subject><subject>Theory of Medicine/Bioethics</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1386-7423</issn><issn>1572-8633</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>88H</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2N</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9P3DAQxS0EYmHhA3CpIi6cUjx2NjvhVlBpkVbqpZwtxx5DVrtxajtS8-3xardUQuLiP5rfe_P0GLsC_hU4X95GAA5NyYGXjWignI7YGSyWosRayuP8lliXy0rIGTuPcc05B-SLUzYTvKkaKeCM6fvOU3rtjN4UxveGhhSLri_SK_kwFbq3xRC0SZ2hu_wr6O-w8UGn3TCm0U6Fd5mgXqfsEE0g6rv-ZWfxZGiT9RfsxOlNpMvDPWfPj99_P_wsV79-PD18W5VGLnkqUVswFl2LyLGqWzTYtAYkGG0RK0RBDp00VLuq1Y6sNFZy42yruZTg5Jzd7H2H4P-MFJPadjFHyBnIj1GhELIGkItMXn8g134MfQ6XIUDZYD7mDPaQCT7GQE4NodvqMCngate-2revcvtq176asubLwXhst2TfFf_qzoDYAzGP-hcK_zd_7voG3aWR3g</recordid><startdate>20110201</startdate><enddate>20110201</enddate><creator>Gottfreðsdóttir, Helga</creator><creator>Arnason, Vilhjálmur</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88H</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110201</creationdate><title>Bioethical concepts in theory and practice: an exploratory study of prenatal screening in Iceland</title><author>Gottfreðsdóttir, Helga ; Arnason, Vilhjálmur</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-8ad1cd8fb880846b8c89bc131cad884882ef8f3ce6f4bafed3cd30cfdba0331f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Bioethical Issues</topic><topic>Bioethics</topic><topic>Choice Behavior - ethics</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Diagnostic tests</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genetic Testing - ethics</topic><topic>Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Health Policy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Iceland</topic><topic>Informed Consent - ethics</topic><topic>Medical Law</topic><topic>Parents - psychology</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of Biology</topic><topic>Philosophy of Medicine</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prenatal care</topic><topic>Prenatal Diagnosis - ethics</topic><topic>Professional ethics</topic><topic>Scientific Contribution</topic><topic>Theory of Medicine/Bioethics</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gottfreðsdóttir, Helga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnason, Vilhjálmur</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Religion Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Religion Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medicine, health care, and philosophy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gottfreðsdóttir, Helga</au><au>Arnason, Vilhjálmur</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bioethical concepts in theory and practice: an exploratory study of prenatal screening in Iceland</atitle><jtitle>Medicine, health care, and philosophy</jtitle><stitle>Med Health Care and Philos</stitle><addtitle>Med Health Care Philos</addtitle><date>2011-02-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>53</spage><epage>61</epage><pages>53-61</pages><issn>1386-7423</issn><eissn>1572-8633</eissn><abstract>A hallmark of good antenatal care is to respect prospective parent’s choices and provide information in a way that encourages their autonomy and informed decision making. In this paper, we analyse the meaning of autonomous and informed decision making from the theoretical perspective and attempt to show how those concepts are described among prospective parents in early pregnancy and in the public media in a society where NT screening is almost a norm. We use interviews with Icelandic prospective parents in early pregnancy (N = 40) and material covering the discourse around prenatal screening in the media over 5 years period. Our analysis indicates that both prospective parents and the public media include ethical terms in their rhetoric around prenatal screening although those concepts differ in their expression. We conclude that the context in which these decisions are taken does not encourage moral reflection. Prospective parents describe that there is a lack of dialogue with professionals when decisions are made about screening. With routine offer of screening the conceptualization of bioethical concepts finds its own way through a mainstream discourse which has limited connections to the theoretical notions. This has been neglected in the implementation of screening, as limited effort has been subject to audit with reference to explore how the offer of screening and informed choice is experienced among prospective parents.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>20949321</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11019-010-9291-y</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1386-7423
ispartof Medicine, health care, and philosophy, 2011-02, Vol.14 (1), p.53-61
issn 1386-7423
1572-8633
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_822361135
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library
subjects Bioethical Issues
Bioethics
Choice Behavior - ethics
Decision making
Diagnostic tests
Education
Ethics
Female
Genetic Testing - ethics
Guidelines as Topic
Health Policy
Humans
Iceland
Informed Consent - ethics
Medical Law
Parents - psychology
Philosophy
Philosophy of Biology
Philosophy of Medicine
Pregnancy
Prenatal care
Prenatal Diagnosis - ethics
Professional ethics
Scientific Contribution
Theory of Medicine/Bioethics
Womens health
title Bioethical concepts in theory and practice: an exploratory study of prenatal screening in Iceland
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T21%3A48%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bioethical%20concepts%20in%20theory%20and%20practice:%20an%20exploratory%20study%20of%20prenatal%20screening%20in%20Iceland&rft.jtitle=Medicine,%20health%20care,%20and%20philosophy&rft.au=Gottfre%C3%B0sd%C3%B3ttir,%20Helga&rft.date=2011-02-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=53&rft.epage=61&rft.pages=53-61&rft.issn=1386-7423&rft.eissn=1572-8633&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11019-010-9291-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E822361135%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=821839818&rft_id=info:pmid/20949321&rfr_iscdi=true