Arboreal habitat structure affects route choice by rat snakes

In arboreal habitats gaps between branches and branch structure profoundly affect the ability of animals to move; hence, an ability to perceive such attributes could facilitate choosing routes that enhance the speed and ease of locomotion. Although many snakes are arboreal, no previous study has det...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Comparative Physiology 2011, Vol.197 (1), p.119-129
Hauptverfasser: Mansfield, Rachel H, Jayne, Bruce C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 129
container_issue 1
container_start_page 119
container_title Journal of Comparative Physiology
container_volume 197
creator Mansfield, Rachel H
Jayne, Bruce C
description In arboreal habitats gaps between branches and branch structure profoundly affect the ability of animals to move; hence, an ability to perceive such attributes could facilitate choosing routes that enhance the speed and ease of locomotion. Although many snakes are arboreal, no previous study has determined whether they can perceive structural variation of branches that is mechanically relevant to their locomotion. We tested whether the gap distance, location, and attributes of two destination perches on the far side of a crossable gap affected the route travelled by North American rat snakes (Pantherophis), which are proficient climbers. Snakes usually chose routes with shorter gaps. Within a horizontal plane, the snakes usually went straight rather than crossing an equal distance gap with a 90° turn, which was consistent with our finding that crossing a straight gap was easier. However, decreasing the distance of the gap with a 90° turn eliminated the preference for going straight. Additional factors, such as the width of the landing surface and the complexity of branching of the destination perches, resulted in non-random route choice. Thus, many of the observed biases in route choice suggested abilities to perceive structural variation and select routes that are mechanically beneficial.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00359-010-0593-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_822360623</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>822360623</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-492e5e3589059740af2df1072150183225d68554400a9a3a692e4282777663d03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDtP7DAQRi0EguXxA2guEQ1VYB5-xAXFCvGSkCiA2vJmHQh3dwN2UvDv8Spwr0RBNcWc75vREeIQ4RQBzFkCYGVLQChBWS71hpigZCqRFW6KCbCE0igrd8RuSq8AQEi4LXYIrDJseCLOp3HWxeAXxYuftb3vi9THoe6HGArfNKHuUxG7oQ9F_dK1dShmH0VcUyv_N6R9sdX4RQoHX3NPPF1dPl7clHf317cX07uyZiv7UloKKrCqbH7TSPANzRsEQ6gAKyZSc10pJSWAt569zrykiowxWvMceE-cjL1vsXsfQurdsk11WCz8KnRDchURa9DEmTz-Qb52Q1zl5zKERrLGNYQjVMcupRga9xbbpY8fDsGtzbrRrMtm3dqs0znz56t4mC3D_F_iW2UGaARSXq2eQ_x_-bfWozHU-M7559gm9_RAgAxoiWWl-BMtDIjd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>821743613</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Arboreal habitat structure affects route choice by rat snakes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Mansfield, Rachel H ; Jayne, Bruce C</creator><creatorcontrib>Mansfield, Rachel H ; Jayne, Bruce C</creatorcontrib><description>In arboreal habitats gaps between branches and branch structure profoundly affect the ability of animals to move; hence, an ability to perceive such attributes could facilitate choosing routes that enhance the speed and ease of locomotion. Although many snakes are arboreal, no previous study has determined whether they can perceive structural variation of branches that is mechanically relevant to their locomotion. We tested whether the gap distance, location, and attributes of two destination perches on the far side of a crossable gap affected the route travelled by North American rat snakes (Pantherophis), which are proficient climbers. Snakes usually chose routes with shorter gaps. Within a horizontal plane, the snakes usually went straight rather than crossing an equal distance gap with a 90° turn, which was consistent with our finding that crossing a straight gap was easier. However, decreasing the distance of the gap with a 90° turn eliminated the preference for going straight. Additional factors, such as the width of the landing surface and the complexity of branching of the destination perches, resulted in non-random route choice. Thus, many of the observed biases in route choice suggested abilities to perceive structural variation and select routes that are mechanically beneficial.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0340-7594</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1351</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00359-010-0593-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20957373</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Animal Physiology ; Animals ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Choice Behavior - physiology ; Ecosystem ; Life Sciences ; Light ; Locomotion - physiology ; Neurosciences ; Orientation - physiology ; Original Paper ; Regression Analysis ; Snakes - physiology ; Spatial Behavior - physiology ; Videotape Recording ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Journal of Comparative Physiology, 2011, Vol.197 (1), p.119-129</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2010</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-492e5e3589059740af2df1072150183225d68554400a9a3a692e4282777663d03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-492e5e3589059740af2df1072150183225d68554400a9a3a692e4282777663d03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00359-010-0593-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00359-010-0593-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20957373$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mansfield, Rachel H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jayne, Bruce C</creatorcontrib><title>Arboreal habitat structure affects route choice by rat snakes</title><title>Journal of Comparative Physiology</title><addtitle>J Comp Physiol A</addtitle><addtitle>J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol</addtitle><description>In arboreal habitats gaps between branches and branch structure profoundly affect the ability of animals to move; hence, an ability to perceive such attributes could facilitate choosing routes that enhance the speed and ease of locomotion. Although many snakes are arboreal, no previous study has determined whether they can perceive structural variation of branches that is mechanically relevant to their locomotion. We tested whether the gap distance, location, and attributes of two destination perches on the far side of a crossable gap affected the route travelled by North American rat snakes (Pantherophis), which are proficient climbers. Snakes usually chose routes with shorter gaps. Within a horizontal plane, the snakes usually went straight rather than crossing an equal distance gap with a 90° turn, which was consistent with our finding that crossing a straight gap was easier. However, decreasing the distance of the gap with a 90° turn eliminated the preference for going straight. Additional factors, such as the width of the landing surface and the complexity of branching of the destination perches, resulted in non-random route choice. Thus, many of the observed biases in route choice suggested abilities to perceive structural variation and select routes that are mechanically beneficial.</description><subject>Animal Physiology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Choice Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Light</subject><subject>Locomotion - physiology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Orientation - physiology</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Snakes - physiology</subject><subject>Spatial Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Videotape Recording</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0340-7594</issn><issn>1432-1351</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kDtP7DAQRi0EguXxA2guEQ1VYB5-xAXFCvGSkCiA2vJmHQh3dwN2UvDv8Spwr0RBNcWc75vREeIQ4RQBzFkCYGVLQChBWS71hpigZCqRFW6KCbCE0igrd8RuSq8AQEi4LXYIrDJseCLOp3HWxeAXxYuftb3vi9THoe6HGArfNKHuUxG7oQ9F_dK1dShmH0VcUyv_N6R9sdX4RQoHX3NPPF1dPl7clHf317cX07uyZiv7UloKKrCqbH7TSPANzRsEQ6gAKyZSc10pJSWAt569zrykiowxWvMceE-cjL1vsXsfQurdsk11WCz8KnRDchURa9DEmTz-Qb52Q1zl5zKERrLGNYQjVMcupRga9xbbpY8fDsGtzbrRrMtm3dqs0znz56t4mC3D_F_iW2UGaARSXq2eQ_x_-bfWozHU-M7559gm9_RAgAxoiWWl-BMtDIjd</recordid><startdate>2011</startdate><enddate>2011</enddate><creator>Mansfield, Rachel H</creator><creator>Jayne, Bruce C</creator><general>Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2011</creationdate><title>Arboreal habitat structure affects route choice by rat snakes</title><author>Mansfield, Rachel H ; Jayne, Bruce C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-492e5e3589059740af2df1072150183225d68554400a9a3a692e4282777663d03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Animal Physiology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Choice Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Light</topic><topic>Locomotion - physiology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Orientation - physiology</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Snakes - physiology</topic><topic>Spatial Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Videotape Recording</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mansfield, Rachel H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jayne, Bruce C</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of Comparative Physiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mansfield, Rachel H</au><au>Jayne, Bruce C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Arboreal habitat structure affects route choice by rat snakes</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Comparative Physiology</jtitle><stitle>J Comp Physiol A</stitle><addtitle>J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol</addtitle><date>2011</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>197</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>119</spage><epage>129</epage><pages>119-129</pages><issn>0340-7594</issn><eissn>1432-1351</eissn><abstract>In arboreal habitats gaps between branches and branch structure profoundly affect the ability of animals to move; hence, an ability to perceive such attributes could facilitate choosing routes that enhance the speed and ease of locomotion. Although many snakes are arboreal, no previous study has determined whether they can perceive structural variation of branches that is mechanically relevant to their locomotion. We tested whether the gap distance, location, and attributes of two destination perches on the far side of a crossable gap affected the route travelled by North American rat snakes (Pantherophis), which are proficient climbers. Snakes usually chose routes with shorter gaps. Within a horizontal plane, the snakes usually went straight rather than crossing an equal distance gap with a 90° turn, which was consistent with our finding that crossing a straight gap was easier. However, decreasing the distance of the gap with a 90° turn eliminated the preference for going straight. Additional factors, such as the width of the landing surface and the complexity of branching of the destination perches, resulted in non-random route choice. Thus, many of the observed biases in route choice suggested abilities to perceive structural variation and select routes that are mechanically beneficial.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>20957373</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00359-010-0593-6</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0340-7594
ispartof Journal of Comparative Physiology, 2011, Vol.197 (1), p.119-129
issn 0340-7594
1432-1351
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_822360623
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Animal Physiology
Animals
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Choice Behavior - physiology
Ecosystem
Life Sciences
Light
Locomotion - physiology
Neurosciences
Orientation - physiology
Original Paper
Regression Analysis
Snakes - physiology
Spatial Behavior - physiology
Videotape Recording
Zoology
title Arboreal habitat structure affects route choice by rat snakes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T16%3A39%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Arboreal%20habitat%20structure%20affects%20route%20choice%20by%20rat%20snakes&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Comparative%20Physiology&rft.au=Mansfield,%20Rachel%20H&rft.date=2011&rft.volume=197&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=119&rft.epage=129&rft.pages=119-129&rft.issn=0340-7594&rft.eissn=1432-1351&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00359-010-0593-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E822360623%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=821743613&rft_id=info:pmid/20957373&rfr_iscdi=true