Ecological–economic assessment of aquaculture options: Comparison between abalone monoculture and integrated multi-trophic aquaculture of abalone and seaweeds
Integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA) possesses ecological and socio-economic advantages, relative to single-species aquaculture. The promotion of a sustainable aquaculture industry requires that decision-makers, ecosystem managers and farmers have sufficient quantitative information associate...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Aquaculture 2010-08, Vol.306 (1), p.116-126 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 126 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 116 |
container_title | Aquaculture |
container_volume | 306 |
creator | Nobre, A.M. Robertson-Andersson, D. Neori, A. Sankar, K. |
description | Integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA) possesses ecological and socio-economic advantages, relative to single-species aquaculture. The promotion of a sustainable aquaculture industry requires that decision-makers, ecosystem managers and farmers have sufficient quantitative information associated with its implementation from both public and private perspectives. The present paper applies the Differential Drivers–Pressure–State–Impact–Response (ΔDPSIR) methodological approach to an ecological and economic comparison between mono-aquaculture and IMTA. Data from a South African 240-ton
year
−
1
abalone farm were used as a case study. Three operation schemes were considered: abalone monoculture in a flow-through system; and two IMTA schemes, which recycle water and replace 10% and 30% of kelp consumption with on-farm-grown seaweed. The analysis indicates a decrease in the aquaculture generated ecological pressures with the incorporation of seaweeds, mainly a reduction in nitrogen discharges into the adjacent coastal ecosystem (by 3.7 to 5.0
tons
year
−
1
), a reduction in harvest of natural kelp beds (by 2.2 to 6.6
ha
year
−
1
) and a reduction of GHG emissions (by 290 to 350
tons CO
2e
year
−
1
). Adopting an IMTA configuration raised farm profits by 1.4 to 5%. The corresponding overall gain from using IMTA in the case study is several folds larger than the net gain in profit, and is estimated between 1.1 and 3.0
million U.S. dollar per annum. This range of values reflects the gains of adopting IMTA on (i) economic value of the aquaculture, i.e. farm's profit, (ii) value of environmental externalities, and (iii) implementation costs. The analysis suggests that the value of the benefits to the public by adopting the IMTA configurations can be larger than the gains in farm's profitability. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.06.002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_821734670</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0044848610003674</els_id><sourcerecordid>2101273561</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-9813d2cc71052b8ddd280f07b57c0e20cd9ccdcba5de29a63d835a338c88fa2e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU2O1DAQhSMEEs3AHQwSYpWmbCeOww61hh9pJDawtpxyZXArsXvsBDQ77sAFOBsnwa0eRi1WrEoqfe-9sl9VPeew5cDV6_3W3qwW12lZE20FlD2oLYB4UG247mTdKiEeVhuApql1o9Xj6knOewBQquWb6tclxilee7TT7x8_CWOIs0dmc6acZwoLiyM7i2DxsPgY8hu2i_PBJp9jYAMt34kCs4OdYiA2F5e_vA2O-bDQdbILOTaXta-XFA9fjzHnxuO9_qjJZIuny0-rR6OdMj27mxfVl3eXn3cf6qtP7z_u3l7V2Ci11L3m0gnEjkMrBu2cExpG6Ia2QyAB6HpEh4NtHYneKum0bK2UGrUerSB5Ub06-R5SvFkpL2b2GWmabKC4ZqMF72SjOijki3_IfVxTKMeZTnagoOt5gfoThCnmnGg0h-Rnm24NB3NszuzN2evNsTkDypTmivblXYDNpZcx2YA-3xsIWRIE9IXbnTgq__LNUzIZPQUk5xPhYlz0_5H2B4iyu5U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>737060791</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ecological–economic assessment of aquaculture options: Comparison between abalone monoculture and integrated multi-trophic aquaculture of abalone and seaweeds</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Nobre, A.M. ; Robertson-Andersson, D. ; Neori, A. ; Sankar, K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nobre, A.M. ; Robertson-Andersson, D. ; Neori, A. ; Sankar, K.</creatorcontrib><description>Integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA) possesses ecological and socio-economic advantages, relative to single-species aquaculture. The promotion of a sustainable aquaculture industry requires that decision-makers, ecosystem managers and farmers have sufficient quantitative information associated with its implementation from both public and private perspectives. The present paper applies the Differential Drivers–Pressure–State–Impact–Response (ΔDPSIR) methodological approach to an ecological and economic comparison between mono-aquaculture and IMTA. Data from a South African 240-ton
year
−
1
abalone farm were used as a case study. Three operation schemes were considered: abalone monoculture in a flow-through system; and two IMTA schemes, which recycle water and replace 10% and 30% of kelp consumption with on-farm-grown seaweed. The analysis indicates a decrease in the aquaculture generated ecological pressures with the incorporation of seaweeds, mainly a reduction in nitrogen discharges into the adjacent coastal ecosystem (by 3.7 to 5.0
tons
year
−
1
), a reduction in harvest of natural kelp beds (by 2.2 to 6.6
ha
year
−
1
) and a reduction of GHG emissions (by 290 to 350
tons CO
2e
year
−
1
). Adopting an IMTA configuration raised farm profits by 1.4 to 5%. The corresponding overall gain from using IMTA in the case study is several folds larger than the net gain in profit, and is estimated between 1.1 and 3.0
million U.S. dollar per annum. This range of values reflects the gains of adopting IMTA on (i) economic value of the aquaculture, i.e. farm's profit, (ii) value of environmental externalities, and (iii) implementation costs. The analysis suggests that the value of the benefits to the public by adopting the IMTA configurations can be larger than the gains in farm's profitability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0044-8486</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5622</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.06.002</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AQCLAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Algae ; Animal aquaculture ; Animal productions ; Aquaculture ; Aquatic resources management ; Biological and medical sciences ; Comparative studies ; Differential Drivers–Pressure–State–Impact–Response ; Economic valuation ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Haliotis ; IMTA ; Integrated Environmental Assessment ; Invertebrates ; Marine ; Mollusca ; Mollusks ; Seaweed biofilters ; Sustainable aquaculture ; Sustainable development</subject><ispartof>Aquaculture, 2010-08, Vol.306 (1), p.116-126</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Aug 15, 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-9813d2cc71052b8ddd280f07b57c0e20cd9ccdcba5de29a63d835a338c88fa2e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-9813d2cc71052b8ddd280f07b57c0e20cd9ccdcba5de29a63d835a338c88fa2e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0044848610003674$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23079209$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nobre, A.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson-Andersson, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neori, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sankar, K.</creatorcontrib><title>Ecological–economic assessment of aquaculture options: Comparison between abalone monoculture and integrated multi-trophic aquaculture of abalone and seaweeds</title><title>Aquaculture</title><description>Integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA) possesses ecological and socio-economic advantages, relative to single-species aquaculture. The promotion of a sustainable aquaculture industry requires that decision-makers, ecosystem managers and farmers have sufficient quantitative information associated with its implementation from both public and private perspectives. The present paper applies the Differential Drivers–Pressure–State–Impact–Response (ΔDPSIR) methodological approach to an ecological and economic comparison between mono-aquaculture and IMTA. Data from a South African 240-ton
year
−
1
abalone farm were used as a case study. Three operation schemes were considered: abalone monoculture in a flow-through system; and two IMTA schemes, which recycle water and replace 10% and 30% of kelp consumption with on-farm-grown seaweed. The analysis indicates a decrease in the aquaculture generated ecological pressures with the incorporation of seaweeds, mainly a reduction in nitrogen discharges into the adjacent coastal ecosystem (by 3.7 to 5.0
tons
year
−
1
), a reduction in harvest of natural kelp beds (by 2.2 to 6.6
ha
year
−
1
) and a reduction of GHG emissions (by 290 to 350
tons CO
2e
year
−
1
). Adopting an IMTA configuration raised farm profits by 1.4 to 5%. The corresponding overall gain from using IMTA in the case study is several folds larger than the net gain in profit, and is estimated between 1.1 and 3.0
million U.S. dollar per annum. This range of values reflects the gains of adopting IMTA on (i) economic value of the aquaculture, i.e. farm's profit, (ii) value of environmental externalities, and (iii) implementation costs. The analysis suggests that the value of the benefits to the public by adopting the IMTA configurations can be larger than the gains in farm's profitability.</description><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Animal aquaculture</subject><subject>Animal productions</subject><subject>Aquaculture</subject><subject>Aquatic resources management</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Differential Drivers–Pressure–State–Impact–Response</subject><subject>Economic valuation</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Haliotis</subject><subject>IMTA</subject><subject>Integrated Environmental Assessment</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Mollusca</subject><subject>Mollusks</subject><subject>Seaweed biofilters</subject><subject>Sustainable aquaculture</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><issn>0044-8486</issn><issn>1873-5622</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU2O1DAQhSMEEs3AHQwSYpWmbCeOww61hh9pJDawtpxyZXArsXvsBDQ77sAFOBsnwa0eRi1WrEoqfe-9sl9VPeew5cDV6_3W3qwW12lZE20FlD2oLYB4UG247mTdKiEeVhuApql1o9Xj6knOewBQquWb6tclxilee7TT7x8_CWOIs0dmc6acZwoLiyM7i2DxsPgY8hu2i_PBJp9jYAMt34kCs4OdYiA2F5e_vA2O-bDQdbILOTaXta-XFA9fjzHnxuO9_qjJZIuny0-rR6OdMj27mxfVl3eXn3cf6qtP7z_u3l7V2Ci11L3m0gnEjkMrBu2cExpG6Ia2QyAB6HpEh4NtHYneKum0bK2UGrUerSB5Ub06-R5SvFkpL2b2GWmabKC4ZqMF72SjOijki3_IfVxTKMeZTnagoOt5gfoThCnmnGg0h-Rnm24NB3NszuzN2evNsTkDypTmivblXYDNpZcx2YA-3xsIWRIE9IXbnTgq__LNUzIZPQUk5xPhYlz0_5H2B4iyu5U</recordid><startdate>20100815</startdate><enddate>20100815</enddate><creator>Nobre, A.M.</creator><creator>Robertson-Andersson, D.</creator><creator>Neori, A.</creator><creator>Sankar, K.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7UA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100815</creationdate><title>Ecological–economic assessment of aquaculture options: Comparison between abalone monoculture and integrated multi-trophic aquaculture of abalone and seaweeds</title><author>Nobre, A.M. ; Robertson-Andersson, D. ; Neori, A. ; Sankar, K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-9813d2cc71052b8ddd280f07b57c0e20cd9ccdcba5de29a63d835a338c88fa2e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Animal aquaculture</topic><topic>Animal productions</topic><topic>Aquaculture</topic><topic>Aquatic resources management</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Differential Drivers–Pressure–State–Impact–Response</topic><topic>Economic valuation</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Haliotis</topic><topic>IMTA</topic><topic>Integrated Environmental Assessment</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Mollusca</topic><topic>Mollusks</topic><topic>Seaweed biofilters</topic><topic>Sustainable aquaculture</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nobre, A.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson-Andersson, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neori, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sankar, K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Aquaculture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nobre, A.M.</au><au>Robertson-Andersson, D.</au><au>Neori, A.</au><au>Sankar, K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ecological–economic assessment of aquaculture options: Comparison between abalone monoculture and integrated multi-trophic aquaculture of abalone and seaweeds</atitle><jtitle>Aquaculture</jtitle><date>2010-08-15</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>306</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>116</spage><epage>126</epage><pages>116-126</pages><issn>0044-8486</issn><eissn>1873-5622</eissn><coden>AQCLAL</coden><abstract>Integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA) possesses ecological and socio-economic advantages, relative to single-species aquaculture. The promotion of a sustainable aquaculture industry requires that decision-makers, ecosystem managers and farmers have sufficient quantitative information associated with its implementation from both public and private perspectives. The present paper applies the Differential Drivers–Pressure–State–Impact–Response (ΔDPSIR) methodological approach to an ecological and economic comparison between mono-aquaculture and IMTA. Data from a South African 240-ton
year
−
1
abalone farm were used as a case study. Three operation schemes were considered: abalone monoculture in a flow-through system; and two IMTA schemes, which recycle water and replace 10% and 30% of kelp consumption with on-farm-grown seaweed. The analysis indicates a decrease in the aquaculture generated ecological pressures with the incorporation of seaweeds, mainly a reduction in nitrogen discharges into the adjacent coastal ecosystem (by 3.7 to 5.0
tons
year
−
1
), a reduction in harvest of natural kelp beds (by 2.2 to 6.6
ha
year
−
1
) and a reduction of GHG emissions (by 290 to 350
tons CO
2e
year
−
1
). Adopting an IMTA configuration raised farm profits by 1.4 to 5%. The corresponding overall gain from using IMTA in the case study is several folds larger than the net gain in profit, and is estimated between 1.1 and 3.0
million U.S. dollar per annum. This range of values reflects the gains of adopting IMTA on (i) economic value of the aquaculture, i.e. farm's profit, (ii) value of environmental externalities, and (iii) implementation costs. The analysis suggests that the value of the benefits to the public by adopting the IMTA configurations can be larger than the gains in farm's profitability.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.06.002</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0044-8486 |
ispartof | Aquaculture, 2010-08, Vol.306 (1), p.116-126 |
issn | 0044-8486 1873-5622 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_821734670 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Algae Animal aquaculture Animal productions Aquaculture Aquatic resources management Biological and medical sciences Comparative studies Differential Drivers–Pressure–State–Impact–Response Economic valuation Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects Haliotis IMTA Integrated Environmental Assessment Invertebrates Marine Mollusca Mollusks Seaweed biofilters Sustainable aquaculture Sustainable development |
title | Ecological–economic assessment of aquaculture options: Comparison between abalone monoculture and integrated multi-trophic aquaculture of abalone and seaweeds |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-20T07%3A18%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ecological%E2%80%93economic%20assessment%20of%20aquaculture%20options:%20Comparison%20between%20abalone%20monoculture%20and%20integrated%20multi-trophic%20aquaculture%20of%20abalone%20and%20seaweeds&rft.jtitle=Aquaculture&rft.au=Nobre,%20A.M.&rft.date=2010-08-15&rft.volume=306&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=116&rft.epage=126&rft.pages=116-126&rft.issn=0044-8486&rft.eissn=1873-5622&rft.coden=AQCLAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.06.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2101273561%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=737060791&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0044848610003674&rfr_iscdi=true |