Field evaluation of the accuracy of vaccine deposition by two different commercially available in ovo injection systems

The location of injection and vaccine deposition in ovo is known to be critical to the efficacy of Marek's disease (MD) vaccine protection against MD viral challenge. Vaccine deposition into the amniotic sac or a s.c. or i.m. site of the embryo is required for MD vaccine efficacy. Vaccine depos...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Poultry science 2011, Vol.90 (1), p.223-226
Hauptverfasser: Williams, C.J, Hopkins, B.A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 226
container_issue 1
container_start_page 223
container_title Poultry science
container_volume 90
creator Williams, C.J
Hopkins, B.A
description The location of injection and vaccine deposition in ovo is known to be critical to the efficacy of Marek's disease (MD) vaccine protection against MD viral challenge. Vaccine deposition into the amniotic sac or a s.c. or i.m. site of the embryo is required for MD vaccine efficacy. Vaccine deposition into the air cell or allantoic fluid results in chicks that are not adequately protected against subsequent MD viral challenge. A study was conducted in 2 commercial broiler hatcheries to evaluate the ability of 2 in ovo injection systems, the Embrex Inovoject system (Pfizer Poultry Health, Research Triangle Park, NC) and the Intelliject system (Avitech, Salisbury, MD; distributed by Merial Ltd., Gainesville, GA) to deliver a vaccine approved for use in ovo accurately and properly. A standard MD vaccine diluent mixed with a protein-staining dye was delivered through each machine to simulate in ovo vaccination. The location of the dye within the egg determined whether the vaccine was delivered correctly. Each egg was also evaluated for normal embryo development (normal eggs). Correct vaccine delivery included eggs in which the vaccine was injected into the amniotic sac or into s.c. or i.m. regions of the embryo. Incorrect vaccine delivery was defined as delivery into the air cell; allantoic sac; any combinations including air cell or allantois; the abdominal, cranial, orbital, or thoracic cavities of the embryo; or no vaccine delivery at all. In hatchery 1 (Chick Master, Newton, MS) 1,171 normal eggs were processed through the Inovoject system and 1,138 eggs were processed by the Intelliject system. The Inovoject system correctly vaccinated 94.62% of the normal eggs as compared with 61.16% delivery accuracy of normal eggs with the Intelliject system. In hatchery 2 (Jamesway Super J, Magee, MS) 926 normal eggs were processed by the Inovoject system and 910 normal eggs were processed by the Intelliject system. The Inovoject system correctly vaccinated 91.04% of the normal eggs, whereas the Intelliject system correctly vaccinated 71.98% of the normal eggs. The results of this study clearly demonstrate that the Inovoject system accurately delivered in ovo vaccine at a significantly higher rate than the Intelliject system.
doi_str_mv 10.3382/ps.2010-00759
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_821197369</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.3382/ps.2010-00759</oup_id><sourcerecordid>821197369</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-1cee817773aba3ca0b8b9fe47ffb3fbf056c2ee221a0e8a6031aa28c36f2ef4b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFv1DAQRi0EokvhyBV8g0vK2E7i5IiqFpAqcYCerbF3DK6cdbCTrfLvye62cILTaDTPb0b-GHst4EKpTn4Yy4UEARWAbvonbCMa2VRKaPGUbQCUrBrdizP2opQ7ACnaVj9nZ1IIretWbdj9daC45bTHOOMU0o4nz6efxNG5OaNbDv1-bcKO-JbGVMKRsguf7hPfBu8p027iLg0DZRcwxoXjHkNEG4mHVbhPa7kjd3xYljLRUF6yZx5joVcP9ZzdXl99v_xc3Xz99OXy403laimmSjiibr1VK7SoHILtbO-p1t5b5a2HpnWSSEqBQB22oASi7JxqvSRfW3XO3p28Y06_ZiqTGUJxFCPuKM3FdOtX9Fq1_Uq-_y8p6rZuoIEjWp1Ql1MpmbwZcxgwL0aAOaRixmIOqZhjKiv_5kE924G2f-jHGP7uTvP4L1f16Hp7Qj0mgz9yKOb22zpXIHoplK7Vb8NboAM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1464505069</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Field evaluation of the accuracy of vaccine deposition by two different commercially available in ovo injection systems</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Williams, C.J ; Hopkins, B.A</creator><creatorcontrib>Williams, C.J ; Hopkins, B.A</creatorcontrib><description>The location of injection and vaccine deposition in ovo is known to be critical to the efficacy of Marek's disease (MD) vaccine protection against MD viral challenge. Vaccine deposition into the amniotic sac or a s.c. or i.m. site of the embryo is required for MD vaccine efficacy. Vaccine deposition into the air cell or allantoic fluid results in chicks that are not adequately protected against subsequent MD viral challenge. A study was conducted in 2 commercial broiler hatcheries to evaluate the ability of 2 in ovo injection systems, the Embrex Inovoject system (Pfizer Poultry Health, Research Triangle Park, NC) and the Intelliject system (Avitech, Salisbury, MD; distributed by Merial Ltd., Gainesville, GA) to deliver a vaccine approved for use in ovo accurately and properly. A standard MD vaccine diluent mixed with a protein-staining dye was delivered through each machine to simulate in ovo vaccination. The location of the dye within the egg determined whether the vaccine was delivered correctly. Each egg was also evaluated for normal embryo development (normal eggs). Correct vaccine delivery included eggs in which the vaccine was injected into the amniotic sac or into s.c. or i.m. regions of the embryo. Incorrect vaccine delivery was defined as delivery into the air cell; allantoic sac; any combinations including air cell or allantois; the abdominal, cranial, orbital, or thoracic cavities of the embryo; or no vaccine delivery at all. In hatchery 1 (Chick Master, Newton, MS) 1,171 normal eggs were processed through the Inovoject system and 1,138 eggs were processed by the Intelliject system. The Inovoject system correctly vaccinated 94.62% of the normal eggs as compared with 61.16% delivery accuracy of normal eggs with the Intelliject system. In hatchery 2 (Jamesway Super J, Magee, MS) 926 normal eggs were processed by the Inovoject system and 910 normal eggs were processed by the Intelliject system. The Inovoject system correctly vaccinated 91.04% of the normal eggs, whereas the Intelliject system correctly vaccinated 71.98% of the normal eggs. The results of this study clearly demonstrate that the Inovoject system accurately delivered in ovo vaccine at a significantly higher rate than the Intelliject system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-5791</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3171</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3382/ps.2010-00759</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21177463</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Poultry Science Association</publisher><subject>accuracy ; Allantoic fluid ; amnion ; amniotic sac ; Animals ; Chick Embryo ; chickens ; differential staining ; Drug Administration Routes - veterinary ; drug injection ; embryo (animal) ; equipment performance ; injection site ; injectors ; intramuscular injection ; Marek disease ; Marek Disease - immunology ; Marek Disease - prevention &amp; control ; Marek Disease Vaccines - administration &amp; dosage ; Marek Disease Vaccines - immunology ; methodology ; ova ; Ovum ; product evaluation ; subcutaneous injection ; tissue distribution ; vaccination ; Vaccination - instrumentation ; Vaccination - methods ; Vaccination - veterinary ; vaccines</subject><ispartof>Poultry science, 2011, Vol.90 (1), p.223-226</ispartof><rights>2011 Poultry Science Association Inc. 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-1cee817773aba3ca0b8b9fe47ffb3fbf056c2ee221a0e8a6031aa28c36f2ef4b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-1cee817773aba3ca0b8b9fe47ffb3fbf056c2ee221a0e8a6031aa28c36f2ef4b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,4010,27904,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21177463$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Williams, C.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopkins, B.A</creatorcontrib><title>Field evaluation of the accuracy of vaccine deposition by two different commercially available in ovo injection systems</title><title>Poultry science</title><addtitle>Poult Sci</addtitle><description>The location of injection and vaccine deposition in ovo is known to be critical to the efficacy of Marek's disease (MD) vaccine protection against MD viral challenge. Vaccine deposition into the amniotic sac or a s.c. or i.m. site of the embryo is required for MD vaccine efficacy. Vaccine deposition into the air cell or allantoic fluid results in chicks that are not adequately protected against subsequent MD viral challenge. A study was conducted in 2 commercial broiler hatcheries to evaluate the ability of 2 in ovo injection systems, the Embrex Inovoject system (Pfizer Poultry Health, Research Triangle Park, NC) and the Intelliject system (Avitech, Salisbury, MD; distributed by Merial Ltd., Gainesville, GA) to deliver a vaccine approved for use in ovo accurately and properly. A standard MD vaccine diluent mixed with a protein-staining dye was delivered through each machine to simulate in ovo vaccination. The location of the dye within the egg determined whether the vaccine was delivered correctly. Each egg was also evaluated for normal embryo development (normal eggs). Correct vaccine delivery included eggs in which the vaccine was injected into the amniotic sac or into s.c. or i.m. regions of the embryo. Incorrect vaccine delivery was defined as delivery into the air cell; allantoic sac; any combinations including air cell or allantois; the abdominal, cranial, orbital, or thoracic cavities of the embryo; or no vaccine delivery at all. In hatchery 1 (Chick Master, Newton, MS) 1,171 normal eggs were processed through the Inovoject system and 1,138 eggs were processed by the Intelliject system. The Inovoject system correctly vaccinated 94.62% of the normal eggs as compared with 61.16% delivery accuracy of normal eggs with the Intelliject system. In hatchery 2 (Jamesway Super J, Magee, MS) 926 normal eggs were processed by the Inovoject system and 910 normal eggs were processed by the Intelliject system. The Inovoject system correctly vaccinated 91.04% of the normal eggs, whereas the Intelliject system correctly vaccinated 71.98% of the normal eggs. The results of this study clearly demonstrate that the Inovoject system accurately delivered in ovo vaccine at a significantly higher rate than the Intelliject system.</description><subject>accuracy</subject><subject>Allantoic fluid</subject><subject>amnion</subject><subject>amniotic sac</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Chick Embryo</subject><subject>chickens</subject><subject>differential staining</subject><subject>Drug Administration Routes - veterinary</subject><subject>drug injection</subject><subject>embryo (animal)</subject><subject>equipment performance</subject><subject>injection site</subject><subject>injectors</subject><subject>intramuscular injection</subject><subject>Marek disease</subject><subject>Marek Disease - immunology</subject><subject>Marek Disease - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Marek Disease Vaccines - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Marek Disease Vaccines - immunology</subject><subject>methodology</subject><subject>ova</subject><subject>Ovum</subject><subject>product evaluation</subject><subject>subcutaneous injection</subject><subject>tissue distribution</subject><subject>vaccination</subject><subject>Vaccination - instrumentation</subject><subject>Vaccination - methods</subject><subject>Vaccination - veterinary</subject><subject>vaccines</subject><issn>0032-5791</issn><issn>1525-3171</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUFv1DAQRi0EokvhyBV8g0vK2E7i5IiqFpAqcYCerbF3DK6cdbCTrfLvye62cILTaDTPb0b-GHst4EKpTn4Yy4UEARWAbvonbCMa2VRKaPGUbQCUrBrdizP2opQ7ACnaVj9nZ1IIretWbdj9daC45bTHOOMU0o4nz6efxNG5OaNbDv1-bcKO-JbGVMKRsguf7hPfBu8p027iLg0DZRcwxoXjHkNEG4mHVbhPa7kjd3xYljLRUF6yZx5joVcP9ZzdXl99v_xc3Xz99OXy403laimmSjiibr1VK7SoHILtbO-p1t5b5a2HpnWSSEqBQB22oASi7JxqvSRfW3XO3p28Y06_ZiqTGUJxFCPuKM3FdOtX9Fq1_Uq-_y8p6rZuoIEjWp1Ql1MpmbwZcxgwL0aAOaRixmIOqZhjKiv_5kE924G2f-jHGP7uTvP4L1f16Hp7Qj0mgz9yKOb22zpXIHoplK7Vb8NboAM</recordid><startdate>2011</startdate><enddate>2011</enddate><creator>Williams, C.J</creator><creator>Hopkins, B.A</creator><general>Poultry Science Association</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>TOX</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2011</creationdate><title>Field evaluation of the accuracy of vaccine deposition by two different commercially available in ovo injection systems</title><author>Williams, C.J ; Hopkins, B.A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-1cee817773aba3ca0b8b9fe47ffb3fbf056c2ee221a0e8a6031aa28c36f2ef4b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>accuracy</topic><topic>Allantoic fluid</topic><topic>amnion</topic><topic>amniotic sac</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Chick Embryo</topic><topic>chickens</topic><topic>differential staining</topic><topic>Drug Administration Routes - veterinary</topic><topic>drug injection</topic><topic>embryo (animal)</topic><topic>equipment performance</topic><topic>injection site</topic><topic>injectors</topic><topic>intramuscular injection</topic><topic>Marek disease</topic><topic>Marek Disease - immunology</topic><topic>Marek Disease - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Marek Disease Vaccines - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Marek Disease Vaccines - immunology</topic><topic>methodology</topic><topic>ova</topic><topic>Ovum</topic><topic>product evaluation</topic><topic>subcutaneous injection</topic><topic>tissue distribution</topic><topic>vaccination</topic><topic>Vaccination - instrumentation</topic><topic>Vaccination - methods</topic><topic>Vaccination - veterinary</topic><topic>vaccines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Williams, C.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopkins, B.A</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Poultry science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Williams, C.J</au><au>Hopkins, B.A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Field evaluation of the accuracy of vaccine deposition by two different commercially available in ovo injection systems</atitle><jtitle>Poultry science</jtitle><addtitle>Poult Sci</addtitle><date>2011</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>223</spage><epage>226</epage><pages>223-226</pages><issn>0032-5791</issn><eissn>1525-3171</eissn><abstract>The location of injection and vaccine deposition in ovo is known to be critical to the efficacy of Marek's disease (MD) vaccine protection against MD viral challenge. Vaccine deposition into the amniotic sac or a s.c. or i.m. site of the embryo is required for MD vaccine efficacy. Vaccine deposition into the air cell or allantoic fluid results in chicks that are not adequately protected against subsequent MD viral challenge. A study was conducted in 2 commercial broiler hatcheries to evaluate the ability of 2 in ovo injection systems, the Embrex Inovoject system (Pfizer Poultry Health, Research Triangle Park, NC) and the Intelliject system (Avitech, Salisbury, MD; distributed by Merial Ltd., Gainesville, GA) to deliver a vaccine approved for use in ovo accurately and properly. A standard MD vaccine diluent mixed with a protein-staining dye was delivered through each machine to simulate in ovo vaccination. The location of the dye within the egg determined whether the vaccine was delivered correctly. Each egg was also evaluated for normal embryo development (normal eggs). Correct vaccine delivery included eggs in which the vaccine was injected into the amniotic sac or into s.c. or i.m. regions of the embryo. Incorrect vaccine delivery was defined as delivery into the air cell; allantoic sac; any combinations including air cell or allantois; the abdominal, cranial, orbital, or thoracic cavities of the embryo; or no vaccine delivery at all. In hatchery 1 (Chick Master, Newton, MS) 1,171 normal eggs were processed through the Inovoject system and 1,138 eggs were processed by the Intelliject system. The Inovoject system correctly vaccinated 94.62% of the normal eggs as compared with 61.16% delivery accuracy of normal eggs with the Intelliject system. In hatchery 2 (Jamesway Super J, Magee, MS) 926 normal eggs were processed by the Inovoject system and 910 normal eggs were processed by the Intelliject system. The Inovoject system correctly vaccinated 91.04% of the normal eggs, whereas the Intelliject system correctly vaccinated 71.98% of the normal eggs. The results of this study clearly demonstrate that the Inovoject system accurately delivered in ovo vaccine at a significantly higher rate than the Intelliject system.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Poultry Science Association</pub><pmid>21177463</pmid><doi>10.3382/ps.2010-00759</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-5791
ispartof Poultry science, 2011, Vol.90 (1), p.223-226
issn 0032-5791
1525-3171
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_821197369
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects accuracy
Allantoic fluid
amnion
amniotic sac
Animals
Chick Embryo
chickens
differential staining
Drug Administration Routes - veterinary
drug injection
embryo (animal)
equipment performance
injection site
injectors
intramuscular injection
Marek disease
Marek Disease - immunology
Marek Disease - prevention & control
Marek Disease Vaccines - administration & dosage
Marek Disease Vaccines - immunology
methodology
ova
Ovum
product evaluation
subcutaneous injection
tissue distribution
vaccination
Vaccination - instrumentation
Vaccination - methods
Vaccination - veterinary
vaccines
title Field evaluation of the accuracy of vaccine deposition by two different commercially available in ovo injection systems
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T23%3A02%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Field%20evaluation%20of%20the%20accuracy%20of%20vaccine%20deposition%20by%20two%20different%20commercially%20available%20in%20ovo%20injection%20systems&rft.jtitle=Poultry%20science&rft.au=Williams,%20C.J&rft.date=2011&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=223&rft.epage=226&rft.pages=223-226&rft.issn=0032-5791&rft.eissn=1525-3171&rft_id=info:doi/10.3382/ps.2010-00759&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E821197369%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1464505069&rft_id=info:pmid/21177463&rft_oup_id=10.3382/ps.2010-00759&rfr_iscdi=true