Influence of MT effects on T(2) quantification with 3D balanced steady-state free precession imaging

Signal from balanced steady-state free precession is affected by magnetization transfer. To investigate the possible effects on derived T(2) values using variable nutation steady-state free precession, magnetization transfer-effects were modulated by varying the radiofrequency pulse duration only or...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Magnetic resonance in medicine 2011-01, Vol.65 (1), p.195-201
Hauptverfasser: Crooijmans, Hendrikus J A, Gloor, Monika, Bieri, Oliver, Scheffler, Klaus
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 201
container_issue 1
container_start_page 195
container_title Magnetic resonance in medicine
container_volume 65
creator Crooijmans, Hendrikus J A
Gloor, Monika
Bieri, Oliver
Scheffler, Klaus
description Signal from balanced steady-state free precession is affected by magnetization transfer. To investigate the possible effects on derived T(2) values using variable nutation steady-state free precession, magnetization transfer-effects were modulated by varying the radiofrequency pulse duration only or in combination with variable pulse repetition time. Simulations reveal a clear magnetization transfer dependency of T(2) when decreasing radiofrequency pulse duration, reaching maximal deviation of 34.6% underestimation with rectangular pulses of 300 μs duration. The observed T(2) deviation evaluated in the frontal white matter and caudate nucleus shows a larger underestimation than expected by numerical simulations. However, this observed difference between simulation and measurement is also observed in an aqueous probe and can therefore not be attributed to magnetization transfer: it is an unexpected sensitivity of derived T(2) to radiofrequency pulse modulation. As expected, the limit of sufficiently long radiofrequency pulse duration to suppress magnetization transfer-related signal modulations allows for proper T(2) estimation with variable nutation steady-state free precession.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/mrm.22326
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_820788578</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>820788578</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p125t-d83d4222fe89ea1455c6278da216c3dcedca876f9165a6aae99c3e95b09817a63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kEtPwzAQhC0kREvhwB9AvgGHFHsTJ_YRlVelIi7lHG3tdQnKo40dof57wus00uqb3dlh7EKKuRQCbpu-mQOkkB-xqVQACSiTTdhpCB9CCGOK7IRNQBgtC5VNmVu2vh6otcQ7z1_WnLwnGwPvWr6-hhu-H7CNla8sxmqcfVbxnaf3fIM1jibHQyR0hyREjMR9T8R3PVkK4ZuuGtxW7faMHXusA53_6Yy9PT6sF8_J6vVpubhbJTsJKiZOpy4DAE_aEMpMKZtDoR2CzG3qxmsWdZF7I3OFOSIZY1MyavPzDebpjF397t313X6gEMumCpbqMSp1Qyg1iEJrVeiRvPwjh01Drtz1Y9T-UP4Xk34BlnJiTA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>820788578</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of MT effects on T(2) quantification with 3D balanced steady-state free precession imaging</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><creator>Crooijmans, Hendrikus J A ; Gloor, Monika ; Bieri, Oliver ; Scheffler, Klaus</creator><creatorcontrib>Crooijmans, Hendrikus J A ; Gloor, Monika ; Bieri, Oliver ; Scheffler, Klaus</creatorcontrib><description>Signal from balanced steady-state free precession is affected by magnetization transfer. To investigate the possible effects on derived T(2) values using variable nutation steady-state free precession, magnetization transfer-effects were modulated by varying the radiofrequency pulse duration only or in combination with variable pulse repetition time. Simulations reveal a clear magnetization transfer dependency of T(2) when decreasing radiofrequency pulse duration, reaching maximal deviation of 34.6% underestimation with rectangular pulses of 300 μs duration. The observed T(2) deviation evaluated in the frontal white matter and caudate nucleus shows a larger underestimation than expected by numerical simulations. However, this observed difference between simulation and measurement is also observed in an aqueous probe and can therefore not be attributed to magnetization transfer: it is an unexpected sensitivity of derived T(2) to radiofrequency pulse modulation. As expected, the limit of sufficiently long radiofrequency pulse duration to suppress magnetization transfer-related signal modulations allows for proper T(2) estimation with variable nutation steady-state free precession.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1522-2594</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22326</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20981754</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Brain - anatomy &amp; histology ; Humans ; Image Enhancement - methods ; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2011-01, Vol.65 (1), p.195-201</ispartof><rights>2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20981754$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Crooijmans, Hendrikus J A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gloor, Monika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bieri, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheffler, Klaus</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of MT effects on T(2) quantification with 3D balanced steady-state free precession imaging</title><title>Magnetic resonance in medicine</title><addtitle>Magn Reson Med</addtitle><description>Signal from balanced steady-state free precession is affected by magnetization transfer. To investigate the possible effects on derived T(2) values using variable nutation steady-state free precession, magnetization transfer-effects were modulated by varying the radiofrequency pulse duration only or in combination with variable pulse repetition time. Simulations reveal a clear magnetization transfer dependency of T(2) when decreasing radiofrequency pulse duration, reaching maximal deviation of 34.6% underestimation with rectangular pulses of 300 μs duration. The observed T(2) deviation evaluated in the frontal white matter and caudate nucleus shows a larger underestimation than expected by numerical simulations. However, this observed difference between simulation and measurement is also observed in an aqueous probe and can therefore not be attributed to magnetization transfer: it is an unexpected sensitivity of derived T(2) to radiofrequency pulse modulation. As expected, the limit of sufficiently long radiofrequency pulse duration to suppress magnetization transfer-related signal modulations allows for proper T(2) estimation with variable nutation steady-state free precession.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Brain - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Enhancement - methods</subject><subject>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>1522-2594</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kEtPwzAQhC0kREvhwB9AvgGHFHsTJ_YRlVelIi7lHG3tdQnKo40dof57wus00uqb3dlh7EKKuRQCbpu-mQOkkB-xqVQACSiTTdhpCB9CCGOK7IRNQBgtC5VNmVu2vh6otcQ7z1_WnLwnGwPvWr6-hhu-H7CNla8sxmqcfVbxnaf3fIM1jibHQyR0hyREjMR9T8R3PVkK4ZuuGtxW7faMHXusA53_6Yy9PT6sF8_J6vVpubhbJTsJKiZOpy4DAE_aEMpMKZtDoR2CzG3qxmsWdZF7I3OFOSIZY1MyavPzDebpjF397t313X6gEMumCpbqMSp1Qyg1iEJrVeiRvPwjh01Drtz1Y9T-UP4Xk34BlnJiTA</recordid><startdate>201101</startdate><enddate>201101</enddate><creator>Crooijmans, Hendrikus J A</creator><creator>Gloor, Monika</creator><creator>Bieri, Oliver</creator><creator>Scheffler, Klaus</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201101</creationdate><title>Influence of MT effects on T(2) quantification with 3D balanced steady-state free precession imaging</title><author>Crooijmans, Hendrikus J A ; Gloor, Monika ; Bieri, Oliver ; Scheffler, Klaus</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p125t-d83d4222fe89ea1455c6278da216c3dcedca876f9165a6aae99c3e95b09817a63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Brain - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Enhancement - methods</topic><topic>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Crooijmans, Hendrikus J A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gloor, Monika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bieri, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheffler, Klaus</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Magnetic resonance in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Crooijmans, Hendrikus J A</au><au>Gloor, Monika</au><au>Bieri, Oliver</au><au>Scheffler, Klaus</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of MT effects on T(2) quantification with 3D balanced steady-state free precession imaging</atitle><jtitle>Magnetic resonance in medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Magn Reson Med</addtitle><date>2011-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>195</spage><epage>201</epage><pages>195-201</pages><eissn>1522-2594</eissn><abstract>Signal from balanced steady-state free precession is affected by magnetization transfer. To investigate the possible effects on derived T(2) values using variable nutation steady-state free precession, magnetization transfer-effects were modulated by varying the radiofrequency pulse duration only or in combination with variable pulse repetition time. Simulations reveal a clear magnetization transfer dependency of T(2) when decreasing radiofrequency pulse duration, reaching maximal deviation of 34.6% underestimation with rectangular pulses of 300 μs duration. The observed T(2) deviation evaluated in the frontal white matter and caudate nucleus shows a larger underestimation than expected by numerical simulations. However, this observed difference between simulation and measurement is also observed in an aqueous probe and can therefore not be attributed to magnetization transfer: it is an unexpected sensitivity of derived T(2) to radiofrequency pulse modulation. As expected, the limit of sufficiently long radiofrequency pulse duration to suppress magnetization transfer-related signal modulations allows for proper T(2) estimation with variable nutation steady-state free precession.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>20981754</pmid><doi>10.1002/mrm.22326</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1522-2594
ispartof Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2011-01, Vol.65 (1), p.195-201
issn 1522-2594
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_820788578
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)
subjects Algorithms
Brain - anatomy & histology
Humans
Image Enhancement - methods
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods
Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Phantoms, Imaging
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
title Influence of MT effects on T(2) quantification with 3D balanced steady-state free precession imaging
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T22%3A29%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20MT%20effects%20on%20T(2)%20quantification%20with%203D%20balanced%20steady-state%20free%20precession%20imaging&rft.jtitle=Magnetic%20resonance%20in%20medicine&rft.au=Crooijmans,%20Hendrikus%20J%20A&rft.date=2011-01&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=195&rft.epage=201&rft.pages=195-201&rft.eissn=1522-2594&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mrm.22326&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E820788578%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=820788578&rft_id=info:pmid/20981754&rfr_iscdi=true