Factors affecting recognition of scintigraphic abnormalities

Predicting the recognition of marginally detectable abnormalities in scintigrams by the physician is a key weakness in our present capability for evaluating the effectiveness of nuclear medicine imaging systems. Development of a method for evaluating scintigraphic systems and for predicting lesion-d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Seminars in nuclear medicine 1973-10, Vol.3 (4), p.327-341
Hauptverfasser: Schulz, Alvin G., Kohlenstein, Lawrence C., Knowles, Lloyd G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 341
container_issue 4
container_start_page 327
container_title Seminars in nuclear medicine
container_volume 3
creator Schulz, Alvin G.
Kohlenstein, Lawrence C.
Knowles, Lloyd G.
description Predicting the recognition of marginally detectable abnormalities in scintigrams by the physician is a key weakness in our present capability for evaluating the effectiveness of nuclear medicine imaging systems. Development of a method for evaluating scintigraphic systems and for predicting lesion-detection performance has been impeded by lack of knowledge of the visual response of the observer to the poor resolution, low contrast, and random intensity fluctuations that are characteristic qualities of scintigrams. Three parameters of the image appear to govern visual recognition of abnormalities: count density in the general area of the lesion, contrast between the suspected area of the image and adjacent normal areas, and the lateral dimension of the perturbation in count density caused by the lesion. The effects of various characteristics of the clinical problem, the radiopharmaceutical, and the imaging system on these image parameters are discussed. Available data on the role of each image parameter in detection of localized lesions are presented. Tradeoffs involving features of the clinical problem and image system that affect more than one of these image parameters simultaneously are discussed. Experimental measurements of the performance of observers in detecting simulated localized lesions are reviewed, and a model is developed from these data that predicts the values of lesion contrast, count density, and image lesion size required for a 50% probability of detection. These data are compared to the detection achieved by a statistical mathematical observer constrained to the same average false positive rate to determine how close an observer comes to taking full advantage of the statistical information in the image.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0001-2998(73)80026-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_82063149</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0001299873800261</els_id><sourcerecordid>82063149</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-863a30e0c259d46b71265090164854b28f506e4981d0266abeeaee311bbcaac53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMotVZ_QmFWoovRPCaZDAgixapQcKGuQyZzp0ZmJjVJBf-96YNuXd3FOecezofQlOAbgom4fcMYk5xWlbwq2bXEmIqcHKEx4VzmhaDsGI0PllN0FsJX8nBe8REaFSUnuMRjdDfXJjofMt22YKIdlpkH45aDjdYNmWuzYOwQ7dLr1ac1ma4H53vdJRnCOTppdRfgYn8n6GP--D57zhevTy-zh0VuaMljLgXTDAM2lFdNIeqSUMFxlUYUkhc1lS3HAopKkiaNELoG0ACMkLo2WhvOJuhy93fl3fcaQlS9DQa6Tg_g1kFJigUjRZWMfGc03oXgoVUrb3vtfxXBakNNbampDRJVMrWlpkjKTfcF67qH5pDaY0r6_U6HtPLHgleJCgwGGptoRdU4-0_DHz1je8k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>82063149</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors affecting recognition of scintigraphic abnormalities</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Schulz, Alvin G. ; Kohlenstein, Lawrence C. ; Knowles, Lloyd G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Schulz, Alvin G. ; Kohlenstein, Lawrence C. ; Knowles, Lloyd G.</creatorcontrib><description>Predicting the recognition of marginally detectable abnormalities in scintigrams by the physician is a key weakness in our present capability for evaluating the effectiveness of nuclear medicine imaging systems. Development of a method for evaluating scintigraphic systems and for predicting lesion-detection performance has been impeded by lack of knowledge of the visual response of the observer to the poor resolution, low contrast, and random intensity fluctuations that are characteristic qualities of scintigrams. Three parameters of the image appear to govern visual recognition of abnormalities: count density in the general area of the lesion, contrast between the suspected area of the image and adjacent normal areas, and the lateral dimension of the perturbation in count density caused by the lesion. The effects of various characteristics of the clinical problem, the radiopharmaceutical, and the imaging system on these image parameters are discussed. Available data on the role of each image parameter in detection of localized lesions are presented. Tradeoffs involving features of the clinical problem and image system that affect more than one of these image parameters simultaneously are discussed. Experimental measurements of the performance of observers in detecting simulated localized lesions are reviewed, and a model is developed from these data that predicts the values of lesion contrast, count density, and image lesion size required for a 50% probability of detection. These data are compared to the detection achieved by a statistical mathematical observer constrained to the same average false positive rate to determine how close an observer comes to taking full advantage of the statistical information in the image.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-2998</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-4623</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0001-2998(73)80026-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 4751070</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Computers ; Diagnostic Errors ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Models, Theoretical ; Radionuclide Imaging - instrumentation</subject><ispartof>Seminars in nuclear medicine, 1973-10, Vol.3 (4), p.327-341</ispartof><rights>1973 Grune &amp; Stratton, Inc., Publishers 111 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-863a30e0c259d46b71265090164854b28f506e4981d0266abeeaee311bbcaac53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-863a30e0c259d46b71265090164854b28f506e4981d0266abeeaee311bbcaac53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001299873800261$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4751070$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schulz, Alvin G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kohlenstein, Lawrence C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knowles, Lloyd G.</creatorcontrib><title>Factors affecting recognition of scintigraphic abnormalities</title><title>Seminars in nuclear medicine</title><addtitle>Semin Nucl Med</addtitle><description>Predicting the recognition of marginally detectable abnormalities in scintigrams by the physician is a key weakness in our present capability for evaluating the effectiveness of nuclear medicine imaging systems. Development of a method for evaluating scintigraphic systems and for predicting lesion-detection performance has been impeded by lack of knowledge of the visual response of the observer to the poor resolution, low contrast, and random intensity fluctuations that are characteristic qualities of scintigrams. Three parameters of the image appear to govern visual recognition of abnormalities: count density in the general area of the lesion, contrast between the suspected area of the image and adjacent normal areas, and the lateral dimension of the perturbation in count density caused by the lesion. The effects of various characteristics of the clinical problem, the radiopharmaceutical, and the imaging system on these image parameters are discussed. Available data on the role of each image parameter in detection of localized lesions are presented. Tradeoffs involving features of the clinical problem and image system that affect more than one of these image parameters simultaneously are discussed. Experimental measurements of the performance of observers in detecting simulated localized lesions are reviewed, and a model is developed from these data that predicts the values of lesion contrast, count density, and image lesion size required for a 50% probability of detection. These data are compared to the detection achieved by a statistical mathematical observer constrained to the same average false positive rate to determine how close an observer comes to taking full advantage of the statistical information in the image.</description><subject>Computers</subject><subject>Diagnostic Errors</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Radionuclide Imaging - instrumentation</subject><issn>0001-2998</issn><issn>1558-4623</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1973</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMotVZ_QmFWoovRPCaZDAgixapQcKGuQyZzp0ZmJjVJBf-96YNuXd3FOecezofQlOAbgom4fcMYk5xWlbwq2bXEmIqcHKEx4VzmhaDsGI0PllN0FsJX8nBe8REaFSUnuMRjdDfXJjofMt22YKIdlpkH45aDjdYNmWuzYOwQ7dLr1ac1ma4H53vdJRnCOTppdRfgYn8n6GP--D57zhevTy-zh0VuaMljLgXTDAM2lFdNIeqSUMFxlUYUkhc1lS3HAopKkiaNELoG0ACMkLo2WhvOJuhy93fl3fcaQlS9DQa6Tg_g1kFJigUjRZWMfGc03oXgoVUrb3vtfxXBakNNbampDRJVMrWlpkjKTfcF67qH5pDaY0r6_U6HtPLHgleJCgwGGptoRdU4-0_DHz1je8k</recordid><startdate>197310</startdate><enddate>197310</enddate><creator>Schulz, Alvin G.</creator><creator>Kohlenstein, Lawrence C.</creator><creator>Knowles, Lloyd G.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197310</creationdate><title>Factors affecting recognition of scintigraphic abnormalities</title><author>Schulz, Alvin G. ; Kohlenstein, Lawrence C. ; Knowles, Lloyd G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-863a30e0c259d46b71265090164854b28f506e4981d0266abeeaee311bbcaac53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1973</creationdate><topic>Computers</topic><topic>Diagnostic Errors</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Radionuclide Imaging - instrumentation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schulz, Alvin G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kohlenstein, Lawrence C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knowles, Lloyd G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Seminars in nuclear medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schulz, Alvin G.</au><au>Kohlenstein, Lawrence C.</au><au>Knowles, Lloyd G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors affecting recognition of scintigraphic abnormalities</atitle><jtitle>Seminars in nuclear medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Semin Nucl Med</addtitle><date>1973-10</date><risdate>1973</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>327</spage><epage>341</epage><pages>327-341</pages><issn>0001-2998</issn><eissn>1558-4623</eissn><abstract>Predicting the recognition of marginally detectable abnormalities in scintigrams by the physician is a key weakness in our present capability for evaluating the effectiveness of nuclear medicine imaging systems. Development of a method for evaluating scintigraphic systems and for predicting lesion-detection performance has been impeded by lack of knowledge of the visual response of the observer to the poor resolution, low contrast, and random intensity fluctuations that are characteristic qualities of scintigrams. Three parameters of the image appear to govern visual recognition of abnormalities: count density in the general area of the lesion, contrast between the suspected area of the image and adjacent normal areas, and the lateral dimension of the perturbation in count density caused by the lesion. The effects of various characteristics of the clinical problem, the radiopharmaceutical, and the imaging system on these image parameters are discussed. Available data on the role of each image parameter in detection of localized lesions are presented. Tradeoffs involving features of the clinical problem and image system that affect more than one of these image parameters simultaneously are discussed. Experimental measurements of the performance of observers in detecting simulated localized lesions are reviewed, and a model is developed from these data that predicts the values of lesion contrast, count density, and image lesion size required for a 50% probability of detection. These data are compared to the detection achieved by a statistical mathematical observer constrained to the same average false positive rate to determine how close an observer comes to taking full advantage of the statistical information in the image.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>4751070</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0001-2998(73)80026-1</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-2998
ispartof Seminars in nuclear medicine, 1973-10, Vol.3 (4), p.327-341
issn 0001-2998
1558-4623
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_82063149
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Computers
Diagnostic Errors
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Models, Theoretical
Radionuclide Imaging - instrumentation
title Factors affecting recognition of scintigraphic abnormalities
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T08%3A11%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20affecting%20recognition%20of%20scintigraphic%20abnormalities&rft.jtitle=Seminars%20in%20nuclear%20medicine&rft.au=Schulz,%20Alvin%20G.&rft.date=1973-10&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=327&rft.epage=341&rft.pages=327-341&rft.issn=0001-2998&rft.eissn=1558-4623&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0001-2998(73)80026-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E82063149%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=82063149&rft_id=info:pmid/4751070&rft_els_id=S0001299873800261&rfr_iscdi=true