Tympanoplasty: Long-term hearing results with incus grafts

The purpose of this study was to analyze long‐term hearing results in 122 tympanoplasties with incus repositioning and in 64 tympanoplasties using a homograft incus. The mean postoperative follow‐up period in the autograft incus group was 56 months (range 18 to 95 months) and in the homograft incus...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Laryngoscope 1973-06, Vol.83 (6), p.852-864
Hauptverfasser: Cody, D Thane R., Taylor, William F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 864
container_issue 6
container_start_page 852
container_title The Laryngoscope
container_volume 83
creator Cody, D Thane R.
Taylor, William F.
description The purpose of this study was to analyze long‐term hearing results in 122 tympanoplasties with incus repositioning and in 64 tympanoplasties using a homograft incus. The mean postoperative follow‐up period in the autograft incus group was 56 months (range 18 to 95 months) and in the homograft incus group 54 months (range 28 to 87 months). Results were compared after incus placement between the tympanic membrane‐malleus complex and stapes head and placement between the tympanic membrane‐malleus complex and stapes footplate. In each group, hearing results tended to be better after malleus‐to‐stapes head placement. There was no statistically significant difference in the results achieved when similar incus placements in the two groups were compared. When the data on malleus‐to‐stapes head tympanoplasty (152 patients) and malleus‐to‐stapes footplate tympanoplasty (34 patients) in each group were combined, the results with malleus‐to‐stapes head placements were considerably better (P = 0.01). The best hearing results were not satisfactory, however, with only 54 percent of the malleus‐to‐stapes head placements achieving a socially adequate hearing level and the air‐bone gap being closed to within 15 db on only 32 percent. Hearing results were also analyzed for three subgroups. The autograft and homograft incus groups were combined. The first subgroup consisted of 30 patients who had no additional surgery other than ossicular chain reconstruction; the second subgroup consisted of 53 patients who in addition to ossicular chain reconstruction had closure of the tympanic membrane perforation; the third subgroup consisted of 103 patients who in addition to ossicular chain reconstruction had tympanic membrane perforation repair and mastoidectomy. There was no statistically significant difference in the hearing results among the three subgroups. Eleven percent of the autograft incus group and 13 percent of the homograft incus group initially had excellent hearing results and then, at various times after the operation, developed gradual deterioration in auditory acuity, which eventually resulted in an unsatisfactory hearing level. In revision operations, the most common cause of failure was non‐attachment of the incus to the head of the stapes. Second in frequency was fixation of the ossicular chain by fibrous tissue and impaction of the incus against the posterior bony annular rim. The most serious complication was depression in cochlear reserve, which occurred in 5 pe
doi_str_mv 10.1288/00005537-197306000-00002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_81930951</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57905799</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4402-e5ac7786451c9a6a4ae3ed8dbbd02a8c6559d4439ade600d612cdbc4b1b7c2713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUMtOwzAQtBAISuETkHLiZvAztrnxBlGBVJUCJ8tx3BLICzsR9O9JaOkVVlqtdnZ2VjsARBgdYSLlMeqCcyogVoKiuOtgD5ENMMCcYsiU4ptg0CEUSk6ed8BuCG8IYUE52gbbTGBMCRuAk8miqE1Z1bkJzeIkGlXlHDbOF9GrMz4r55F3oc2bEH1mzWuUlbYN0dybWRP2wNbM5MHtr-oQPF5dTs5v4Ojh-vb8dAQtY4hAx40VQsaMY6tMbJhx1KUyTZIUESNtzLlKGaPKpK57JI0xsWliWYITYYnAdAgOl7q1rz5aFxpdZMG6PDelq9qgJVYUKf43kQuFulQdUS6J1lcheDfTtc8K4xcaI937q3_91Wt_fyDSrR6sbrRJ4dL14srQbn6xnH9muVv8W1ePTscvnDMke7Q_A5cyWWjc11rG-HcdCyq4frq_1mM-FSienuk7-g3dDpcu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57905799</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tympanoplasty: Long-term hearing results with incus grafts</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Cody, D Thane R. ; Taylor, William F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cody, D Thane R. ; Taylor, William F.</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to analyze long‐term hearing results in 122 tympanoplasties with incus repositioning and in 64 tympanoplasties using a homograft incus. The mean postoperative follow‐up period in the autograft incus group was 56 months (range 18 to 95 months) and in the homograft incus group 54 months (range 28 to 87 months). Results were compared after incus placement between the tympanic membrane‐malleus complex and stapes head and placement between the tympanic membrane‐malleus complex and stapes footplate. In each group, hearing results tended to be better after malleus‐to‐stapes head placement. There was no statistically significant difference in the results achieved when similar incus placements in the two groups were compared. When the data on malleus‐to‐stapes head tympanoplasty (152 patients) and malleus‐to‐stapes footplate tympanoplasty (34 patients) in each group were combined, the results with malleus‐to‐stapes head placements were considerably better (P = 0.01). The best hearing results were not satisfactory, however, with only 54 percent of the malleus‐to‐stapes head placements achieving a socially adequate hearing level and the air‐bone gap being closed to within 15 db on only 32 percent. Hearing results were also analyzed for three subgroups. The autograft and homograft incus groups were combined. The first subgroup consisted of 30 patients who had no additional surgery other than ossicular chain reconstruction; the second subgroup consisted of 53 patients who in addition to ossicular chain reconstruction had closure of the tympanic membrane perforation; the third subgroup consisted of 103 patients who in addition to ossicular chain reconstruction had tympanic membrane perforation repair and mastoidectomy. There was no statistically significant difference in the hearing results among the three subgroups. Eleven percent of the autograft incus group and 13 percent of the homograft incus group initially had excellent hearing results and then, at various times after the operation, developed gradual deterioration in auditory acuity, which eventually resulted in an unsatisfactory hearing level. In revision operations, the most common cause of failure was non‐attachment of the incus to the head of the stapes. Second in frequency was fixation of the ossicular chain by fibrous tissue and impaction of the incus against the posterior bony annular rim. The most serious complication was depression in cochlear reserve, which occurred in 5 percent of the 186 tympanoplasties. This analysis of the long‐term hearing results achieved with incus grafts revealed that the results were far from satisfactory.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-852X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-4995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1288/00005537-197306000-00002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 4711324</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LARYA8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Audiometry ; Auditory Threshold ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Ear Ossicles - surgery ; Ear Ossicles - transplantation ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hearing ; Humans ; Male ; Methods ; Middle Aged ; Prognosis ; Time Factors ; Transplantation, Autologous ; Transplantation, Homologous ; Tympanic Membrane - surgery ; Tympanoplasty</subject><ispartof>The Laryngoscope, 1973-06, Vol.83 (6), p.852-864</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1973 The Triological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4402-e5ac7786451c9a6a4ae3ed8dbbd02a8c6559d4439ade600d612cdbc4b1b7c2713</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4402-e5ac7786451c9a6a4ae3ed8dbbd02a8c6559d4439ade600d612cdbc4b1b7c2713</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4711324$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cody, D Thane R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, William F.</creatorcontrib><title>Tympanoplasty: Long-term hearing results with incus grafts</title><title>The Laryngoscope</title><addtitle>The Laryngoscope</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to analyze long‐term hearing results in 122 tympanoplasties with incus repositioning and in 64 tympanoplasties using a homograft incus. The mean postoperative follow‐up period in the autograft incus group was 56 months (range 18 to 95 months) and in the homograft incus group 54 months (range 28 to 87 months). Results were compared after incus placement between the tympanic membrane‐malleus complex and stapes head and placement between the tympanic membrane‐malleus complex and stapes footplate. In each group, hearing results tended to be better after malleus‐to‐stapes head placement. There was no statistically significant difference in the results achieved when similar incus placements in the two groups were compared. When the data on malleus‐to‐stapes head tympanoplasty (152 patients) and malleus‐to‐stapes footplate tympanoplasty (34 patients) in each group were combined, the results with malleus‐to‐stapes head placements were considerably better (P = 0.01). The best hearing results were not satisfactory, however, with only 54 percent of the malleus‐to‐stapes head placements achieving a socially adequate hearing level and the air‐bone gap being closed to within 15 db on only 32 percent. Hearing results were also analyzed for three subgroups. The autograft and homograft incus groups were combined. The first subgroup consisted of 30 patients who had no additional surgery other than ossicular chain reconstruction; the second subgroup consisted of 53 patients who in addition to ossicular chain reconstruction had closure of the tympanic membrane perforation; the third subgroup consisted of 103 patients who in addition to ossicular chain reconstruction had tympanic membrane perforation repair and mastoidectomy. There was no statistically significant difference in the hearing results among the three subgroups. Eleven percent of the autograft incus group and 13 percent of the homograft incus group initially had excellent hearing results and then, at various times after the operation, developed gradual deterioration in auditory acuity, which eventually resulted in an unsatisfactory hearing level. In revision operations, the most common cause of failure was non‐attachment of the incus to the head of the stapes. Second in frequency was fixation of the ossicular chain by fibrous tissue and impaction of the incus against the posterior bony annular rim. The most serious complication was depression in cochlear reserve, which occurred in 5 percent of the 186 tympanoplasties. This analysis of the long‐term hearing results achieved with incus grafts revealed that the results were far from satisfactory.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Audiometry</subject><subject>Auditory Threshold</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Ear Ossicles - surgery</subject><subject>Ear Ossicles - transplantation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Hearing</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Transplantation, Autologous</subject><subject>Transplantation, Homologous</subject><subject>Tympanic Membrane - surgery</subject><subject>Tympanoplasty</subject><issn>0023-852X</issn><issn>1531-4995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1973</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUMtOwzAQtBAISuETkHLiZvAztrnxBlGBVJUCJ8tx3BLICzsR9O9JaOkVVlqtdnZ2VjsARBgdYSLlMeqCcyogVoKiuOtgD5ENMMCcYsiU4ptg0CEUSk6ed8BuCG8IYUE52gbbTGBMCRuAk8miqE1Z1bkJzeIkGlXlHDbOF9GrMz4r55F3oc2bEH1mzWuUlbYN0dybWRP2wNbM5MHtr-oQPF5dTs5v4Ojh-vb8dAQtY4hAx40VQsaMY6tMbJhx1KUyTZIUESNtzLlKGaPKpK57JI0xsWliWYITYYnAdAgOl7q1rz5aFxpdZMG6PDelq9qgJVYUKf43kQuFulQdUS6J1lcheDfTtc8K4xcaI937q3_91Wt_fyDSrR6sbrRJ4dL14srQbn6xnH9muVv8W1ePTscvnDMke7Q_A5cyWWjc11rG-HcdCyq4frq_1mM-FSienuk7-g3dDpcu</recordid><startdate>197306</startdate><enddate>197306</enddate><creator>Cody, D Thane R.</creator><creator>Taylor, William F.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197306</creationdate><title>Tympanoplasty: Long-term hearing results with incus grafts</title><author>Cody, D Thane R. ; Taylor, William F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4402-e5ac7786451c9a6a4ae3ed8dbbd02a8c6559d4439ade600d612cdbc4b1b7c2713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1973</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Audiometry</topic><topic>Auditory Threshold</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Ear Ossicles - surgery</topic><topic>Ear Ossicles - transplantation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Hearing</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Transplantation, Autologous</topic><topic>Transplantation, Homologous</topic><topic>Tympanic Membrane - surgery</topic><topic>Tympanoplasty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cody, D Thane R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, William F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>The Laryngoscope</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cody, D Thane R.</au><au>Taylor, William F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tympanoplasty: Long-term hearing results with incus grafts</atitle><jtitle>The Laryngoscope</jtitle><addtitle>The Laryngoscope</addtitle><date>1973-06</date><risdate>1973</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>852</spage><epage>864</epage><pages>852-864</pages><issn>0023-852X</issn><eissn>1531-4995</eissn><coden>LARYA8</coden><abstract>The purpose of this study was to analyze long‐term hearing results in 122 tympanoplasties with incus repositioning and in 64 tympanoplasties using a homograft incus. The mean postoperative follow‐up period in the autograft incus group was 56 months (range 18 to 95 months) and in the homograft incus group 54 months (range 28 to 87 months). Results were compared after incus placement between the tympanic membrane‐malleus complex and stapes head and placement between the tympanic membrane‐malleus complex and stapes footplate. In each group, hearing results tended to be better after malleus‐to‐stapes head placement. There was no statistically significant difference in the results achieved when similar incus placements in the two groups were compared. When the data on malleus‐to‐stapes head tympanoplasty (152 patients) and malleus‐to‐stapes footplate tympanoplasty (34 patients) in each group were combined, the results with malleus‐to‐stapes head placements were considerably better (P = 0.01). The best hearing results were not satisfactory, however, with only 54 percent of the malleus‐to‐stapes head placements achieving a socially adequate hearing level and the air‐bone gap being closed to within 15 db on only 32 percent. Hearing results were also analyzed for three subgroups. The autograft and homograft incus groups were combined. The first subgroup consisted of 30 patients who had no additional surgery other than ossicular chain reconstruction; the second subgroup consisted of 53 patients who in addition to ossicular chain reconstruction had closure of the tympanic membrane perforation; the third subgroup consisted of 103 patients who in addition to ossicular chain reconstruction had tympanic membrane perforation repair and mastoidectomy. There was no statistically significant difference in the hearing results among the three subgroups. Eleven percent of the autograft incus group and 13 percent of the homograft incus group initially had excellent hearing results and then, at various times after the operation, developed gradual deterioration in auditory acuity, which eventually resulted in an unsatisfactory hearing level. In revision operations, the most common cause of failure was non‐attachment of the incus to the head of the stapes. Second in frequency was fixation of the ossicular chain by fibrous tissue and impaction of the incus against the posterior bony annular rim. The most serious complication was depression in cochlear reserve, which occurred in 5 percent of the 186 tympanoplasties. This analysis of the long‐term hearing results achieved with incus grafts revealed that the results were far from satisfactory.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, NJ</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>4711324</pmid><doi>10.1288/00005537-197306000-00002</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0023-852X
ispartof The Laryngoscope, 1973-06, Vol.83 (6), p.852-864
issn 0023-852X
1531-4995
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_81930951
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Audiometry
Auditory Threshold
Child
Child, Preschool
Ear Ossicles - surgery
Ear Ossicles - transplantation
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Hearing
Humans
Male
Methods
Middle Aged
Prognosis
Time Factors
Transplantation, Autologous
Transplantation, Homologous
Tympanic Membrane - surgery
Tympanoplasty
title Tympanoplasty: Long-term hearing results with incus grafts
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T20%3A24%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tympanoplasty:%20Long-term%20hearing%20results%20with%20incus%20grafts&rft.jtitle=The%20Laryngoscope&rft.au=Cody,%20D%20Thane%20R.&rft.date=1973-06&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=852&rft.epage=864&rft.pages=852-864&rft.issn=0023-852X&rft.eissn=1531-4995&rft.coden=LARYA8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1288/00005537-197306000-00002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57905799%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57905799&rft_id=info:pmid/4711324&rfr_iscdi=true