Democracy in the Country but not in the Home? Religion, politics and women's rights in Chile
This article explores the influence of religious actors on the elaboration of two public policies that are key to the advancement of women's rights and have long formed part of the women's movement's agenda in Chile: the introduction of sexual education in secondary schools in the 199...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Third world quarterly 2010-09, Vol.31 (6), p.971-988 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 988 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 971 |
container_title | Third world quarterly |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Guzmán, Virginia Seibert, Ute Staab, Silke |
description | This article explores the influence of religious actors on the elaboration of two public policies that are key to the advancement of women's rights and have long formed part of the women's movement's agenda in Chile: the introduction of sexual education in secondary schools in the 1990s and the distribution of emergency contraception in the 2000s. Our analysis of how different actors-from a variety of ideological and power positions-have influenced the two policy debates suggests that their discourses and strategies are highly contingent on the political environment. While conservative religious forces retain an enormous capacity to hinder policy making and implementation in the arena of family and sexuality, the government's determination to confront such interference seems to have grown in a context of fewer authoritarian enclaves, a more pluralist society and a strong sexual and reproductive rights movement. The diversification of religious positions on issues of family and sexuality has also affected the room for manoeuvre in the policy arena. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/01436597.2010.502730 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_818803165</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27896592</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27896592</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-72c2b9cbfb1f177c963865741e9a01bd41b1b69fe5e8a5b08e82af460188e8813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1rFDEYhYModlv9ByrBm944Ncnk86rIWq1QEETvhJDJZrpZZpI1yVD235thugpe2F4lvOc5hzfhAPAKowuMJHqPMG05U-KCoDpiiIgWPQEr3HLUEELxU7CakWZmTsBpzjuEEKdSPgcnBEkmmCAr8POjG6NNxh6gD7BsHVzHKZR0gN1UYIjlOL6Oo7uE39zgb30M7-A-Dr54m6EJG3hXxXCeYfK325Jny3rrB_cCPOvNkN3L-_MM_Ph09X193dx8_fxl_eGmsZSr0ghiSads13e4x0JYxVvJmaDYKYNwt6G4wx1XvWNOGtYh6SQxPeUIy3qVuD0D50vuPsVfk8tFjz5bNwwmuDhlLSuIOZP0USRqK_sYUiis1MOkYIoRRGvuwyTDSrZcVvLtP-QuTinUT6wQFYQoPD-bLpBNMefker1PfjTpoDHSc0f0sSN67oheOlJtb-6zp250mz-mYykq8HoBdrnE9FcXUtWwWb9cdB_6mEZzF9Ow0cUchpj6ZIL1Wbf_XeE3313QxA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>754722911</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Democracy in the Country but not in the Home? Religion, politics and women's rights in Chile</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><creator>Guzmán, Virginia ; Seibert, Ute ; Staab, Silke</creator><creatorcontrib>Guzmán, Virginia ; Seibert, Ute ; Staab, Silke</creatorcontrib><description>This article explores the influence of religious actors on the elaboration of two public policies that are key to the advancement of women's rights and have long formed part of the women's movement's agenda in Chile: the introduction of sexual education in secondary schools in the 1990s and the distribution of emergency contraception in the 2000s. Our analysis of how different actors-from a variety of ideological and power positions-have influenced the two policy debates suggests that their discourses and strategies are highly contingent on the political environment. While conservative religious forces retain an enormous capacity to hinder policy making and implementation in the arena of family and sexuality, the government's determination to confront such interference seems to have grown in a context of fewer authoritarian enclaves, a more pluralist society and a strong sexual and reproductive rights movement. The diversification of religious positions on issues of family and sexuality has also affected the room for manoeuvre in the policy arena.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-6597</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1360-2241</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2010.502730</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20857572</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TWQUDW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Routledge</publisher><subject>Birth Control ; Catholicism ; Chile ; Chile - ethnology ; Conservatism ; Contraception, Postcoital - history ; Contraception, Postcoital - psychology ; Cultural Characteristics - history ; Democracy ; Discourse ; Emergencies ; Emergency contraception ; Equal rights ; Equality ; Families & family life ; Family ; Family - ethnology ; Family - history ; Family - psychology ; Family relations ; Females ; Feminism ; Gender roles ; Government Policy ; History of medicine ; History, 20th Century ; History, 21st Century ; Human rights ; Implementation ; Policy Making ; Political parties ; Politics ; Public policy ; Religion ; Religion & politics ; Religion - history ; Religion Politics Relationship ; Religious Movements ; Reproductive rights ; Rights ; Roman Catholic Church ; Schools - economics ; Schools - history ; Schools - legislation & jurisprudence ; Sex education ; Sex Education - history ; Sexuality ; Sexuality - ethnology ; Sexuality - history ; Sexuality - physiology ; Sexuality - psychology ; Social Change - history ; Social norms ; Social policy ; Women ; Women's Rights - economics ; Women's Rights - education ; Women's Rights - history ; Women's Rights - legislation & jurisprudence ; Womens Rights ; Womens rights movements</subject><ispartof>Third world quarterly, 2010-09, Vol.31 (6), p.971-988</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2010</rights><rights>Copyright © 2010 Third World Quarterly</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Ltd. 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-72c2b9cbfb1f177c963865741e9a01bd41b1b69fe5e8a5b08e82af460188e8813</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27896592$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27896592$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27865,27924,27925,33774,33775,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20857572$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guzmán, Virginia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seibert, Ute</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staab, Silke</creatorcontrib><title>Democracy in the Country but not in the Home? Religion, politics and women's rights in Chile</title><title>Third world quarterly</title><addtitle>Third World Q</addtitle><description>This article explores the influence of religious actors on the elaboration of two public policies that are key to the advancement of women's rights and have long formed part of the women's movement's agenda in Chile: the introduction of sexual education in secondary schools in the 1990s and the distribution of emergency contraception in the 2000s. Our analysis of how different actors-from a variety of ideological and power positions-have influenced the two policy debates suggests that their discourses and strategies are highly contingent on the political environment. While conservative religious forces retain an enormous capacity to hinder policy making and implementation in the arena of family and sexuality, the government's determination to confront such interference seems to have grown in a context of fewer authoritarian enclaves, a more pluralist society and a strong sexual and reproductive rights movement. The diversification of religious positions on issues of family and sexuality has also affected the room for manoeuvre in the policy arena.</description><subject>Birth Control</subject><subject>Catholicism</subject><subject>Chile</subject><subject>Chile - ethnology</subject><subject>Conservatism</subject><subject>Contraception, Postcoital - history</subject><subject>Contraception, Postcoital - psychology</subject><subject>Cultural Characteristics - history</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Discourse</subject><subject>Emergencies</subject><subject>Emergency contraception</subject><subject>Equal rights</subject><subject>Equality</subject><subject>Families & family life</subject><subject>Family</subject><subject>Family - ethnology</subject><subject>Family - history</subject><subject>Family - psychology</subject><subject>Family relations</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Feminism</subject><subject>Gender roles</subject><subject>Government Policy</subject><subject>History of medicine</subject><subject>History, 20th Century</subject><subject>History, 21st Century</subject><subject>Human rights</subject><subject>Implementation</subject><subject>Policy Making</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Religion & politics</subject><subject>Religion - history</subject><subject>Religion Politics Relationship</subject><subject>Religious Movements</subject><subject>Reproductive rights</subject><subject>Rights</subject><subject>Roman Catholic Church</subject><subject>Schools - economics</subject><subject>Schools - history</subject><subject>Schools - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Sex education</subject><subject>Sex Education - history</subject><subject>Sexuality</subject><subject>Sexuality - ethnology</subject><subject>Sexuality - history</subject><subject>Sexuality - physiology</subject><subject>Sexuality - psychology</subject><subject>Social Change - history</subject><subject>Social norms</subject><subject>Social policy</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Women's Rights - economics</subject><subject>Women's Rights - education</subject><subject>Women's Rights - history</subject><subject>Women's Rights - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Womens Rights</subject><subject>Womens rights movements</subject><issn>0143-6597</issn><issn>1360-2241</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl1rFDEYhYModlv9ByrBm944Ncnk86rIWq1QEETvhJDJZrpZZpI1yVD235thugpe2F4lvOc5hzfhAPAKowuMJHqPMG05U-KCoDpiiIgWPQEr3HLUEELxU7CakWZmTsBpzjuEEKdSPgcnBEkmmCAr8POjG6NNxh6gD7BsHVzHKZR0gN1UYIjlOL6Oo7uE39zgb30M7-A-Dr54m6EJG3hXxXCeYfK325Jny3rrB_cCPOvNkN3L-_MM_Ph09X193dx8_fxl_eGmsZSr0ghiSads13e4x0JYxVvJmaDYKYNwt6G4wx1XvWNOGtYh6SQxPeUIy3qVuD0D50vuPsVfk8tFjz5bNwwmuDhlLSuIOZP0USRqK_sYUiis1MOkYIoRRGvuwyTDSrZcVvLtP-QuTinUT6wQFYQoPD-bLpBNMefker1PfjTpoDHSc0f0sSN67oheOlJtb-6zp250mz-mYykq8HoBdrnE9FcXUtWwWb9cdB_6mEZzF9Ow0cUchpj6ZIL1Wbf_XeE3313QxA</recordid><startdate>20100901</startdate><enddate>20100901</enddate><creator>Guzmán, Virginia</creator><creator>Seibert, Ute</creator><creator>Staab, Silke</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Routledge Journals</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100901</creationdate><title>Democracy in the Country but not in the Home? Religion, politics and women's rights in Chile</title><author>Guzmán, Virginia ; Seibert, Ute ; Staab, Silke</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-72c2b9cbfb1f177c963865741e9a01bd41b1b69fe5e8a5b08e82af460188e8813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Birth Control</topic><topic>Catholicism</topic><topic>Chile</topic><topic>Chile - ethnology</topic><topic>Conservatism</topic><topic>Contraception, Postcoital - history</topic><topic>Contraception, Postcoital - psychology</topic><topic>Cultural Characteristics - history</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Discourse</topic><topic>Emergencies</topic><topic>Emergency contraception</topic><topic>Equal rights</topic><topic>Equality</topic><topic>Families & family life</topic><topic>Family</topic><topic>Family - ethnology</topic><topic>Family - history</topic><topic>Family - psychology</topic><topic>Family relations</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Feminism</topic><topic>Gender roles</topic><topic>Government Policy</topic><topic>History of medicine</topic><topic>History, 20th Century</topic><topic>History, 21st Century</topic><topic>Human rights</topic><topic>Implementation</topic><topic>Policy Making</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Religion & politics</topic><topic>Religion - history</topic><topic>Religion Politics Relationship</topic><topic>Religious Movements</topic><topic>Reproductive rights</topic><topic>Rights</topic><topic>Roman Catholic Church</topic><topic>Schools - economics</topic><topic>Schools - history</topic><topic>Schools - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Sex education</topic><topic>Sex Education - history</topic><topic>Sexuality</topic><topic>Sexuality - ethnology</topic><topic>Sexuality - history</topic><topic>Sexuality - physiology</topic><topic>Sexuality - psychology</topic><topic>Social Change - history</topic><topic>Social norms</topic><topic>Social policy</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Women's Rights - economics</topic><topic>Women's Rights - education</topic><topic>Women's Rights - history</topic><topic>Women's Rights - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Womens Rights</topic><topic>Womens rights movements</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guzmán, Virginia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seibert, Ute</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staab, Silke</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Third world quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guzmán, Virginia</au><au>Seibert, Ute</au><au>Staab, Silke</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Democracy in the Country but not in the Home? Religion, politics and women's rights in Chile</atitle><jtitle>Third world quarterly</jtitle><addtitle>Third World Q</addtitle><date>2010-09-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>971</spage><epage>988</epage><pages>971-988</pages><issn>0143-6597</issn><eissn>1360-2241</eissn><coden>TWQUDW</coden><abstract>This article explores the influence of religious actors on the elaboration of two public policies that are key to the advancement of women's rights and have long formed part of the women's movement's agenda in Chile: the introduction of sexual education in secondary schools in the 1990s and the distribution of emergency contraception in the 2000s. Our analysis of how different actors-from a variety of ideological and power positions-have influenced the two policy debates suggests that their discourses and strategies are highly contingent on the political environment. While conservative religious forces retain an enormous capacity to hinder policy making and implementation in the arena of family and sexuality, the government's determination to confront such interference seems to have grown in a context of fewer authoritarian enclaves, a more pluralist society and a strong sexual and reproductive rights movement. The diversification of religious positions on issues of family and sexuality has also affected the room for manoeuvre in the policy arena.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><pmid>20857572</pmid><doi>10.1080/01436597.2010.502730</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0143-6597 |
ispartof | Third world quarterly, 2010-09, Vol.31 (6), p.971-988 |
issn | 0143-6597 1360-2241 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_818803165 |
source | MEDLINE; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Jstor Complete Legacy; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete |
subjects | Birth Control Catholicism Chile Chile - ethnology Conservatism Contraception, Postcoital - history Contraception, Postcoital - psychology Cultural Characteristics - history Democracy Discourse Emergencies Emergency contraception Equal rights Equality Families & family life Family Family - ethnology Family - history Family - psychology Family relations Females Feminism Gender roles Government Policy History of medicine History, 20th Century History, 21st Century Human rights Implementation Policy Making Political parties Politics Public policy Religion Religion & politics Religion - history Religion Politics Relationship Religious Movements Reproductive rights Rights Roman Catholic Church Schools - economics Schools - history Schools - legislation & jurisprudence Sex education Sex Education - history Sexuality Sexuality - ethnology Sexuality - history Sexuality - physiology Sexuality - psychology Social Change - history Social norms Social policy Women Women's Rights - economics Women's Rights - education Women's Rights - history Women's Rights - legislation & jurisprudence Womens Rights Womens rights movements |
title | Democracy in the Country but not in the Home? Religion, politics and women's rights in Chile |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T18%3A54%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Democracy%20in%20the%20Country%20but%20not%20in%20the%20Home?%20Religion,%20politics%20and%20women's%20rights%20in%20Chile&rft.jtitle=Third%20world%20quarterly&rft.au=Guzm%C3%A1n,%20Virginia&rft.date=2010-09-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=971&rft.epage=988&rft.pages=971-988&rft.issn=0143-6597&rft.eissn=1360-2241&rft.coden=TWQUDW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/01436597.2010.502730&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27896592%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=754722911&rft_id=info:pmid/20857572&rft_jstor_id=27896592&rfr_iscdi=true |