Democracy in the Country but not in the Home? Religion, politics and women's rights in Chile

This article explores the influence of religious actors on the elaboration of two public policies that are key to the advancement of women's rights and have long formed part of the women's movement's agenda in Chile: the introduction of sexual education in secondary schools in the 199...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Third world quarterly 2010-09, Vol.31 (6), p.971-988
Hauptverfasser: Guzmán, Virginia, Seibert, Ute, Staab, Silke
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 988
container_issue 6
container_start_page 971
container_title Third world quarterly
container_volume 31
creator Guzmán, Virginia
Seibert, Ute
Staab, Silke
description This article explores the influence of religious actors on the elaboration of two public policies that are key to the advancement of women's rights and have long formed part of the women's movement's agenda in Chile: the introduction of sexual education in secondary schools in the 1990s and the distribution of emergency contraception in the 2000s. Our analysis of how different actors-from a variety of ideological and power positions-have influenced the two policy debates suggests that their discourses and strategies are highly contingent on the political environment. While conservative religious forces retain an enormous capacity to hinder policy making and implementation in the arena of family and sexuality, the government's determination to confront such interference seems to have grown in a context of fewer authoritarian enclaves, a more pluralist society and a strong sexual and reproductive rights movement. The diversification of religious positions on issues of family and sexuality has also affected the room for manoeuvre in the policy arena.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/01436597.2010.502730
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_818803165</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27896592</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27896592</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-72c2b9cbfb1f177c963865741e9a01bd41b1b69fe5e8a5b08e82af460188e8813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1rFDEYhYModlv9ByrBm944Ncnk86rIWq1QEETvhJDJZrpZZpI1yVD235thugpe2F4lvOc5hzfhAPAKowuMJHqPMG05U-KCoDpiiIgWPQEr3HLUEELxU7CakWZmTsBpzjuEEKdSPgcnBEkmmCAr8POjG6NNxh6gD7BsHVzHKZR0gN1UYIjlOL6Oo7uE39zgb30M7-A-Dr54m6EJG3hXxXCeYfK325Jny3rrB_cCPOvNkN3L-_MM_Ph09X193dx8_fxl_eGmsZSr0ghiSads13e4x0JYxVvJmaDYKYNwt6G4wx1XvWNOGtYh6SQxPeUIy3qVuD0D50vuPsVfk8tFjz5bNwwmuDhlLSuIOZP0USRqK_sYUiis1MOkYIoRRGvuwyTDSrZcVvLtP-QuTinUT6wQFYQoPD-bLpBNMefker1PfjTpoDHSc0f0sSN67oheOlJtb-6zp250mz-mYykq8HoBdrnE9FcXUtWwWb9cdB_6mEZzF9Ow0cUchpj6ZIL1Wbf_XeE3313QxA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>754722911</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Democracy in the Country but not in the Home? Religion, politics and women's rights in Chile</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><creator>Guzmán, Virginia ; Seibert, Ute ; Staab, Silke</creator><creatorcontrib>Guzmán, Virginia ; Seibert, Ute ; Staab, Silke</creatorcontrib><description>This article explores the influence of religious actors on the elaboration of two public policies that are key to the advancement of women's rights and have long formed part of the women's movement's agenda in Chile: the introduction of sexual education in secondary schools in the 1990s and the distribution of emergency contraception in the 2000s. Our analysis of how different actors-from a variety of ideological and power positions-have influenced the two policy debates suggests that their discourses and strategies are highly contingent on the political environment. While conservative religious forces retain an enormous capacity to hinder policy making and implementation in the arena of family and sexuality, the government's determination to confront such interference seems to have grown in a context of fewer authoritarian enclaves, a more pluralist society and a strong sexual and reproductive rights movement. The diversification of religious positions on issues of family and sexuality has also affected the room for manoeuvre in the policy arena.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-6597</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1360-2241</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2010.502730</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20857572</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TWQUDW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Routledge</publisher><subject>Birth Control ; Catholicism ; Chile ; Chile - ethnology ; Conservatism ; Contraception, Postcoital - history ; Contraception, Postcoital - psychology ; Cultural Characteristics - history ; Democracy ; Discourse ; Emergencies ; Emergency contraception ; Equal rights ; Equality ; Families &amp; family life ; Family ; Family - ethnology ; Family - history ; Family - psychology ; Family relations ; Females ; Feminism ; Gender roles ; Government Policy ; History of medicine ; History, 20th Century ; History, 21st Century ; Human rights ; Implementation ; Policy Making ; Political parties ; Politics ; Public policy ; Religion ; Religion &amp; politics ; Religion - history ; Religion Politics Relationship ; Religious Movements ; Reproductive rights ; Rights ; Roman Catholic Church ; Schools - economics ; Schools - history ; Schools - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Sex education ; Sex Education - history ; Sexuality ; Sexuality - ethnology ; Sexuality - history ; Sexuality - physiology ; Sexuality - psychology ; Social Change - history ; Social norms ; Social policy ; Women ; Women's Rights - economics ; Women's Rights - education ; Women's Rights - history ; Women's Rights - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Womens Rights ; Womens rights movements</subject><ispartof>Third world quarterly, 2010-09, Vol.31 (6), p.971-988</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2010</rights><rights>Copyright © 2010 Third World Quarterly</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd. 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-72c2b9cbfb1f177c963865741e9a01bd41b1b69fe5e8a5b08e82af460188e8813</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27896592$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27896592$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27865,27924,27925,33774,33775,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20857572$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guzmán, Virginia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seibert, Ute</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staab, Silke</creatorcontrib><title>Democracy in the Country but not in the Home? Religion, politics and women's rights in Chile</title><title>Third world quarterly</title><addtitle>Third World Q</addtitle><description>This article explores the influence of religious actors on the elaboration of two public policies that are key to the advancement of women's rights and have long formed part of the women's movement's agenda in Chile: the introduction of sexual education in secondary schools in the 1990s and the distribution of emergency contraception in the 2000s. Our analysis of how different actors-from a variety of ideological and power positions-have influenced the two policy debates suggests that their discourses and strategies are highly contingent on the political environment. While conservative religious forces retain an enormous capacity to hinder policy making and implementation in the arena of family and sexuality, the government's determination to confront such interference seems to have grown in a context of fewer authoritarian enclaves, a more pluralist society and a strong sexual and reproductive rights movement. The diversification of religious positions on issues of family and sexuality has also affected the room for manoeuvre in the policy arena.</description><subject>Birth Control</subject><subject>Catholicism</subject><subject>Chile</subject><subject>Chile - ethnology</subject><subject>Conservatism</subject><subject>Contraception, Postcoital - history</subject><subject>Contraception, Postcoital - psychology</subject><subject>Cultural Characteristics - history</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Discourse</subject><subject>Emergencies</subject><subject>Emergency contraception</subject><subject>Equal rights</subject><subject>Equality</subject><subject>Families &amp; family life</subject><subject>Family</subject><subject>Family - ethnology</subject><subject>Family - history</subject><subject>Family - psychology</subject><subject>Family relations</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Feminism</subject><subject>Gender roles</subject><subject>Government Policy</subject><subject>History of medicine</subject><subject>History, 20th Century</subject><subject>History, 21st Century</subject><subject>Human rights</subject><subject>Implementation</subject><subject>Policy Making</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Religion &amp; politics</subject><subject>Religion - history</subject><subject>Religion Politics Relationship</subject><subject>Religious Movements</subject><subject>Reproductive rights</subject><subject>Rights</subject><subject>Roman Catholic Church</subject><subject>Schools - economics</subject><subject>Schools - history</subject><subject>Schools - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Sex education</subject><subject>Sex Education - history</subject><subject>Sexuality</subject><subject>Sexuality - ethnology</subject><subject>Sexuality - history</subject><subject>Sexuality - physiology</subject><subject>Sexuality - psychology</subject><subject>Social Change - history</subject><subject>Social norms</subject><subject>Social policy</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Women's Rights - economics</subject><subject>Women's Rights - education</subject><subject>Women's Rights - history</subject><subject>Women's Rights - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Womens Rights</subject><subject>Womens rights movements</subject><issn>0143-6597</issn><issn>1360-2241</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl1rFDEYhYModlv9ByrBm944Ncnk86rIWq1QEETvhJDJZrpZZpI1yVD235thugpe2F4lvOc5hzfhAPAKowuMJHqPMG05U-KCoDpiiIgWPQEr3HLUEELxU7CakWZmTsBpzjuEEKdSPgcnBEkmmCAr8POjG6NNxh6gD7BsHVzHKZR0gN1UYIjlOL6Oo7uE39zgb30M7-A-Dr54m6EJG3hXxXCeYfK325Jny3rrB_cCPOvNkN3L-_MM_Ph09X193dx8_fxl_eGmsZSr0ghiSads13e4x0JYxVvJmaDYKYNwt6G4wx1XvWNOGtYh6SQxPeUIy3qVuD0D50vuPsVfk8tFjz5bNwwmuDhlLSuIOZP0USRqK_sYUiis1MOkYIoRRGvuwyTDSrZcVvLtP-QuTinUT6wQFYQoPD-bLpBNMefker1PfjTpoDHSc0f0sSN67oheOlJtb-6zp250mz-mYykq8HoBdrnE9FcXUtWwWb9cdB_6mEZzF9Ow0cUchpj6ZIL1Wbf_XeE3313QxA</recordid><startdate>20100901</startdate><enddate>20100901</enddate><creator>Guzmán, Virginia</creator><creator>Seibert, Ute</creator><creator>Staab, Silke</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Routledge Journals</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100901</creationdate><title>Democracy in the Country but not in the Home? Religion, politics and women's rights in Chile</title><author>Guzmán, Virginia ; Seibert, Ute ; Staab, Silke</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-72c2b9cbfb1f177c963865741e9a01bd41b1b69fe5e8a5b08e82af460188e8813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Birth Control</topic><topic>Catholicism</topic><topic>Chile</topic><topic>Chile - ethnology</topic><topic>Conservatism</topic><topic>Contraception, Postcoital - history</topic><topic>Contraception, Postcoital - psychology</topic><topic>Cultural Characteristics - history</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Discourse</topic><topic>Emergencies</topic><topic>Emergency contraception</topic><topic>Equal rights</topic><topic>Equality</topic><topic>Families &amp; family life</topic><topic>Family</topic><topic>Family - ethnology</topic><topic>Family - history</topic><topic>Family - psychology</topic><topic>Family relations</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Feminism</topic><topic>Gender roles</topic><topic>Government Policy</topic><topic>History of medicine</topic><topic>History, 20th Century</topic><topic>History, 21st Century</topic><topic>Human rights</topic><topic>Implementation</topic><topic>Policy Making</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Religion &amp; politics</topic><topic>Religion - history</topic><topic>Religion Politics Relationship</topic><topic>Religious Movements</topic><topic>Reproductive rights</topic><topic>Rights</topic><topic>Roman Catholic Church</topic><topic>Schools - economics</topic><topic>Schools - history</topic><topic>Schools - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Sex education</topic><topic>Sex Education - history</topic><topic>Sexuality</topic><topic>Sexuality - ethnology</topic><topic>Sexuality - history</topic><topic>Sexuality - physiology</topic><topic>Sexuality - psychology</topic><topic>Social Change - history</topic><topic>Social norms</topic><topic>Social policy</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Women's Rights - economics</topic><topic>Women's Rights - education</topic><topic>Women's Rights - history</topic><topic>Women's Rights - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Womens Rights</topic><topic>Womens rights movements</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guzmán, Virginia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seibert, Ute</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staab, Silke</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Third world quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guzmán, Virginia</au><au>Seibert, Ute</au><au>Staab, Silke</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Democracy in the Country but not in the Home? Religion, politics and women's rights in Chile</atitle><jtitle>Third world quarterly</jtitle><addtitle>Third World Q</addtitle><date>2010-09-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>971</spage><epage>988</epage><pages>971-988</pages><issn>0143-6597</issn><eissn>1360-2241</eissn><coden>TWQUDW</coden><abstract>This article explores the influence of religious actors on the elaboration of two public policies that are key to the advancement of women's rights and have long formed part of the women's movement's agenda in Chile: the introduction of sexual education in secondary schools in the 1990s and the distribution of emergency contraception in the 2000s. Our analysis of how different actors-from a variety of ideological and power positions-have influenced the two policy debates suggests that their discourses and strategies are highly contingent on the political environment. While conservative religious forces retain an enormous capacity to hinder policy making and implementation in the arena of family and sexuality, the government's determination to confront such interference seems to have grown in a context of fewer authoritarian enclaves, a more pluralist society and a strong sexual and reproductive rights movement. The diversification of religious positions on issues of family and sexuality has also affected the room for manoeuvre in the policy arena.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><pmid>20857572</pmid><doi>10.1080/01436597.2010.502730</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0143-6597
ispartof Third world quarterly, 2010-09, Vol.31 (6), p.971-988
issn 0143-6597
1360-2241
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_818803165
source MEDLINE; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Jstor Complete Legacy; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete
subjects Birth Control
Catholicism
Chile
Chile - ethnology
Conservatism
Contraception, Postcoital - history
Contraception, Postcoital - psychology
Cultural Characteristics - history
Democracy
Discourse
Emergencies
Emergency contraception
Equal rights
Equality
Families & family life
Family
Family - ethnology
Family - history
Family - psychology
Family relations
Females
Feminism
Gender roles
Government Policy
History of medicine
History, 20th Century
History, 21st Century
Human rights
Implementation
Policy Making
Political parties
Politics
Public policy
Religion
Religion & politics
Religion - history
Religion Politics Relationship
Religious Movements
Reproductive rights
Rights
Roman Catholic Church
Schools - economics
Schools - history
Schools - legislation & jurisprudence
Sex education
Sex Education - history
Sexuality
Sexuality - ethnology
Sexuality - history
Sexuality - physiology
Sexuality - psychology
Social Change - history
Social norms
Social policy
Women
Women's Rights - economics
Women's Rights - education
Women's Rights - history
Women's Rights - legislation & jurisprudence
Womens Rights
Womens rights movements
title Democracy in the Country but not in the Home? Religion, politics and women's rights in Chile
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T18%3A54%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Democracy%20in%20the%20Country%20but%20not%20in%20the%20Home?%20Religion,%20politics%20and%20women's%20rights%20in%20Chile&rft.jtitle=Third%20world%20quarterly&rft.au=Guzm%C3%A1n,%20Virginia&rft.date=2010-09-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=971&rft.epage=988&rft.pages=971-988&rft.issn=0143-6597&rft.eissn=1360-2241&rft.coden=TWQUDW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/01436597.2010.502730&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27896592%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=754722911&rft_id=info:pmid/20857572&rft_jstor_id=27896592&rfr_iscdi=true