Problematic Modes and the Mughal Social Formation
Analysis of structural features shows that the characterization of Mughal India as 'feudal' is inadequate. As an alternative characterization, introduced is the notion of the 'tributary mode of production.' An empirical analysis is developed, & it is argued that the tributary...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Insurgent Sociologist 1980-04, Vol.9 (4), p.9-21 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 21 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 9 |
| container_title | The Insurgent Sociologist |
| container_volume | 9 |
| creator | Currie, Kate |
| description | Analysis of structural features shows that the characterization of Mughal India as 'feudal' is inadequate. As an alternative characterization, introduced is the notion of the 'tributary mode of production.' An empirical analysis is developed, & it is argued that the tributary mode of production constitutes a viable alternative model for understanding productive relations in Mughal India & that a variant of the mode was dominant between the sixteenth & eighteenth centuries. Modified AA. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/089692058000900402 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_818796025</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_089692058000900402</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1308068742</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c213t-fa45b6fdb580f8adc0233538b8965703baaf7775ebdbbffc6e883d139319c6d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PwzAYhD2ARCn8AaZIDEyhr-0ktkdUUUBqBRIwW_5sU6VxsZOBf4-rMiAQ093w3Ol0CF1huMWYsRlw0QgCNQcAAVABOUGTrKwEyqszdJ7SFrIlopog_BKD7txODa0pVsG6VKjeFsPGFatxvVFd8RpMm2UR4gEK_QU69apL7vJbp-h9cf82fyyXzw9P87tlaQimQ-lVVevGW513eK6sAUJpTbnO62oGVCvlGWO101Zr703jOKcWU0GxMI0VdIpujr37GD5Glwa5a5NxXad6F8YkOeZMNEDqTF7_IrdhjH0eJzEFDg1nFckUOVImhpSi83If252KnxKDPBwn_x6XQ7NjKKm1-1H7f-ILfzJtzg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1308068742</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Problematic Modes and the Mughal Social Formation</title><source>SAGE Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Currie, Kate</creator><creatorcontrib>Currie, Kate</creatorcontrib><description>Analysis of structural features shows that the characterization of Mughal India as 'feudal' is inadequate. As an alternative characterization, introduced is the notion of the 'tributary mode of production.' An empirical analysis is developed, & it is argued that the tributary mode of production constitutes a viable alternative model for understanding productive relations in Mughal India & that a variant of the mode was dominant between the sixteenth & eighteenth centuries. Modified AA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0047-0384</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0896-9205</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/089692058000900402</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ISSLAX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>India/Indian/Indians ; Production/Productivity/ Producer/ Producers ; Social structure/Social structures</subject><ispartof>The Insurgent Sociologist, 1980-04, Vol.9 (4), p.9-21</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c213t-fa45b6fdb580f8adc0233538b8965703baaf7775ebdbbffc6e883d139319c6d93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/089692058000900402$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/089692058000900402$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,21800,27850,27905,27906,33756,43602,43603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Currie, Kate</creatorcontrib><title>Problematic Modes and the Mughal Social Formation</title><title>The Insurgent Sociologist</title><description>Analysis of structural features shows that the characterization of Mughal India as 'feudal' is inadequate. As an alternative characterization, introduced is the notion of the 'tributary mode of production.' An empirical analysis is developed, & it is argued that the tributary mode of production constitutes a viable alternative model for understanding productive relations in Mughal India & that a variant of the mode was dominant between the sixteenth & eighteenth centuries. Modified AA.</description><subject>India/Indian/Indians</subject><subject>Production/Productivity/ Producer/ Producers</subject><subject>Social structure/Social structures</subject><issn>0047-0384</issn><issn>0896-9205</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1980</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ACFII</sourceid><sourceid>AKNXY</sourceid><sourceid>HYQOX</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>~P3</sourceid><sourceid>~PJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kD1PwzAYhD2ARCn8AaZIDEyhr-0ktkdUUUBqBRIwW_5sU6VxsZOBf4-rMiAQ093w3Ol0CF1huMWYsRlw0QgCNQcAAVABOUGTrKwEyqszdJ7SFrIlopog_BKD7txODa0pVsG6VKjeFsPGFatxvVFd8RpMm2UR4gEK_QU69apL7vJbp-h9cf82fyyXzw9P87tlaQimQ-lVVevGW513eK6sAUJpTbnO62oGVCvlGWO101Zr703jOKcWU0GxMI0VdIpujr37GD5Glwa5a5NxXad6F8YkOeZMNEDqTF7_IrdhjH0eJzEFDg1nFckUOVImhpSi83If252KnxKDPBwn_x6XQ7NjKKm1-1H7f-ILfzJtzg</recordid><startdate>198004</startdate><enddate>198004</enddate><creator>Currie, Kate</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Dept. of Sociology, University of Oregon</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ACFII</scope><scope>AKNXY</scope><scope>HYQOX</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>SFNNT</scope><scope>~P2</scope><scope>~P3</scope><scope>~PJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198004</creationdate><title>Problematic Modes and the Mughal Social Formation</title><author>Currie, Kate</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c213t-fa45b6fdb580f8adc0233538b8965703baaf7775ebdbbffc6e883d139319c6d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1980</creationdate><topic>India/Indian/Indians</topic><topic>Production/Productivity/ Producer/ Producers</topic><topic>Social structure/Social structures</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Currie, Kate</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection 1 (2022)</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 4 (2022)</collection><collection>ProQuest Historical Periodicals</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 44</collection><collection>PAO Collection 4</collection><collection>PAO ProQuest</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>The Insurgent Sociologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Currie, Kate</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Problematic Modes and the Mughal Social Formation</atitle><jtitle>The Insurgent Sociologist</jtitle><date>1980-04</date><risdate>1980</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>9</spage><epage>21</epage><pages>9-21</pages><issn>0047-0384</issn><issn>0896-9205</issn><coden>ISSLAX</coden><abstract>Analysis of structural features shows that the characterization of Mughal India as 'feudal' is inadequate. As an alternative characterization, introduced is the notion of the 'tributary mode of production.' An empirical analysis is developed, & it is argued that the tributary mode of production constitutes a viable alternative model for understanding productive relations in Mughal India & that a variant of the mode was dominant between the sixteenth & eighteenth centuries. Modified AA.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/089692058000900402</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0047-0384 |
| ispartof | The Insurgent Sociologist, 1980-04, Vol.9 (4), p.9-21 |
| issn | 0047-0384 0896-9205 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_818796025 |
| source | SAGE Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Sociological Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online |
| subjects | India/Indian/Indians Production/Productivity/ Producer/ Producers Social structure/Social structures |
| title | Problematic Modes and the Mughal Social Formation |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T19%3A02%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Problematic%20Modes%20and%20the%20Mughal%20Social%20Formation&rft.jtitle=The%20Insurgent%20Sociologist&rft.au=Currie,%20Kate&rft.date=1980-04&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=9&rft.epage=21&rft.pages=9-21&rft.issn=0047-0384&rft.coden=ISSLAX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/089692058000900402&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1308068742%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1308068742&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_089692058000900402&rfr_iscdi=true |