Towards Accountability in Social Work: One Year's Intake to an Area Office

Monitoring one year's referrals to an area office of a social services department, we found that of the 2,436 referrals representing 2,057 cases, about half were already known to the area office. Demographically the clientele fell largely into three groups—the elderly, young families and childr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The British journal of social work 1977-01, Vol.7 (3), p.257-283
Hauptverfasser: GOLDBERG, E. MATILDA, WARBURTON, R. WILLIAM, McGUINNESS, BRENDAN, ROWLANDS, JOHN H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 283
container_issue 3
container_start_page 257
container_title The British journal of social work
container_volume 7
creator GOLDBERG, E. MATILDA
WARBURTON, R. WILLIAM
McGUINNESS, BRENDAN
ROWLANDS, JOHN H.
description Monitoring one year's referrals to an area office of a social services department, we found that of the 2,436 referrals representing 2,057 cases, about half were already known to the area office. Demographically the clientele fell largely into three groups—the elderly, young families and children. The main problem groupings consisted of those with physical disabilities or suffering from frailty in old age, those with financial and environmental problems, and families with disturbed relationships and child care problems. Most of the clients had short-term help and at the end of six months only 11% of the referrals were still open. Distinctive profiles emerged when comparing the routes by which clients with different types of problems reached the area office and the help they got once they had passed its threshold: (a) The elderly and disabled, mainly referred by the health services, received predominantly practical help. (b) Those with financial and material problems, largely self-referred, received information, advice and referral to other agencies. (c) The disturbed families, referred by many different sources, received detailed exploration, assessment and casework. Those clients who were passed on for more extended help to the long-term teams—some 10% of the intake—were mainly the very vulnerable elderly and disabled persons, and children who had been taken into care or who were in need of surveillance and protection for other reasons. The study raises questions about the methods of service delivery in response to the demands made on the area office and discusses possible changes in approach towards more community-oriented preventive work.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_818795041</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23696815</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23696815</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j268t-1bac68ec7cc0e2b66d60a3e12a2c2a20d08da2c9307d8ca931e56dc97413d5f93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9z0FLwzAYBuAgCs7pTxACgjsVviRNmnobQ-dk0IMT9VSyJIV0XTOTFtm_NzBPHjx8vO_h4YXvDE1ILmRGBfs4RxOAnGeMAL1EVzG2AFBwIBP0svHfKpiI51r7sR_U1nVuOGLX41evnerwuw-7B1z1Fn9aFWYRr5LaWTx4rHo8D1bhqmmcttfoolFdtDe_OUVvT4-bxXO2rparxXydtVTIISNbpYW0utAaLN0KYQQoZglVVKcDA9KkWjIojNSqZMRyYXRZ5IQZ3pRsiman3UPwX6ONQ713UduuU731Y6wlkUXJIfEpuv9XCsJozplI8O4PbP0Y-vRFTRjQXJKC0KRuT6qNgw_1Ibi9CseaMlEKSTj7Ad3ebUc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1302481712</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Towards Accountability in Social Work: One Year's Intake to an Area Office</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive legacy</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>GOLDBERG, E. MATILDA ; WARBURTON, R. WILLIAM ; McGUINNESS, BRENDAN ; ROWLANDS, JOHN H.</creator><creatorcontrib>GOLDBERG, E. MATILDA ; WARBURTON, R. WILLIAM ; McGUINNESS, BRENDAN ; ROWLANDS, JOHN H.</creatorcontrib><description>Monitoring one year's referrals to an area office of a social services department, we found that of the 2,436 referrals representing 2,057 cases, about half were already known to the area office. Demographically the clientele fell largely into three groups—the elderly, young families and children. The main problem groupings consisted of those with physical disabilities or suffering from frailty in old age, those with financial and environmental problems, and families with disturbed relationships and child care problems. Most of the clients had short-term help and at the end of six months only 11% of the referrals were still open. Distinctive profiles emerged when comparing the routes by which clients with different types of problems reached the area office and the help they got once they had passed its threshold: (a) The elderly and disabled, mainly referred by the health services, received predominantly practical help. (b) Those with financial and material problems, largely self-referred, received information, advice and referral to other agencies. (c) The disturbed families, referred by many different sources, received detailed exploration, assessment and casework. Those clients who were passed on for more extended help to the long-term teams—some 10% of the intake—were mainly the very vulnerable elderly and disabled persons, and children who had been taken into care or who were in need of surveillance and protection for other reasons. The study raises questions about the methods of service delivery in response to the demands made on the area office and discusses possible changes in approach towards more community-oriented preventive work.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-3102</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-263X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: ACADEMIC PRESS</publisher><subject>Child care ; Child neglect ; Communities ; Housing ; Indexing in process ; Older adults ; Physical disabilities ; Police ; Social services ; Social Work ; Youths at risk</subject><ispartof>The British journal of social work, 1977-01, Vol.7 (3), p.257-283</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23696815$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23696815$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27846,33752,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>GOLDBERG, E. MATILDA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WARBURTON, R. WILLIAM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGUINNESS, BRENDAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROWLANDS, JOHN H.</creatorcontrib><title>Towards Accountability in Social Work: One Year's Intake to an Area Office</title><title>The British journal of social work</title><description>Monitoring one year's referrals to an area office of a social services department, we found that of the 2,436 referrals representing 2,057 cases, about half were already known to the area office. Demographically the clientele fell largely into three groups—the elderly, young families and children. The main problem groupings consisted of those with physical disabilities or suffering from frailty in old age, those with financial and environmental problems, and families with disturbed relationships and child care problems. Most of the clients had short-term help and at the end of six months only 11% of the referrals were still open. Distinctive profiles emerged when comparing the routes by which clients with different types of problems reached the area office and the help they got once they had passed its threshold: (a) The elderly and disabled, mainly referred by the health services, received predominantly practical help. (b) Those with financial and material problems, largely self-referred, received information, advice and referral to other agencies. (c) The disturbed families, referred by many different sources, received detailed exploration, assessment and casework. Those clients who were passed on for more extended help to the long-term teams—some 10% of the intake—were mainly the very vulnerable elderly and disabled persons, and children who had been taken into care or who were in need of surveillance and protection for other reasons. The study raises questions about the methods of service delivery in response to the demands made on the area office and discusses possible changes in approach towards more community-oriented preventive work.</description><subject>Child care</subject><subject>Child neglect</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Housing</subject><subject>Indexing in process</subject><subject>Older adults</subject><subject>Physical disabilities</subject><subject>Police</subject><subject>Social services</subject><subject>Social Work</subject><subject>Youths at risk</subject><issn>0045-3102</issn><issn>1468-263X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1977</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9z0FLwzAYBuAgCs7pTxACgjsVviRNmnobQ-dk0IMT9VSyJIV0XTOTFtm_NzBPHjx8vO_h4YXvDE1ILmRGBfs4RxOAnGeMAL1EVzG2AFBwIBP0svHfKpiI51r7sR_U1nVuOGLX41evnerwuw-7B1z1Fn9aFWYRr5LaWTx4rHo8D1bhqmmcttfoolFdtDe_OUVvT4-bxXO2rparxXydtVTIISNbpYW0utAaLN0KYQQoZglVVKcDA9KkWjIojNSqZMRyYXRZ5IQZ3pRsiman3UPwX6ONQ713UduuU731Y6wlkUXJIfEpuv9XCsJozplI8O4PbP0Y-vRFTRjQXJKC0KRuT6qNgw_1Ibi9CseaMlEKSTj7Ad3ebUc</recordid><startdate>19770101</startdate><enddate>19770101</enddate><creator>GOLDBERG, E. MATILDA</creator><creator>WARBURTON, R. WILLIAM</creator><creator>McGUINNESS, BRENDAN</creator><creator>ROWLANDS, JOHN H.</creator><general>ACADEMIC PRESS</general><general>British Association of Social Workers</general><scope>EGZRM</scope><scope>HGTKA</scope><scope>HVZBN</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>~OX</scope><scope>~OY</scope><scope>~P0</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19770101</creationdate><title>Towards Accountability in Social Work: One Year's Intake to an Area Office</title><author>GOLDBERG, E. MATILDA ; WARBURTON, R. WILLIAM ; McGUINNESS, BRENDAN ; ROWLANDS, JOHN H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j268t-1bac68ec7cc0e2b66d60a3e12a2c2a20d08da2c9307d8ca931e56dc97413d5f93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1977</creationdate><topic>Child care</topic><topic>Child neglect</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Housing</topic><topic>Indexing in process</topic><topic>Older adults</topic><topic>Physical disabilities</topic><topic>Police</topic><topic>Social services</topic><topic>Social Work</topic><topic>Youths at risk</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GOLDBERG, E. MATILDA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WARBURTON, R. WILLIAM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGUINNESS, BRENDAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROWLANDS, JOHN H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 3.1</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 18</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 24</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>PAO Collection 3 (purchase pre Aug/2005)</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 3.4</collection><collection>PAO Collection 3 (purchase pre Aug/2005+extra titles)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The British journal of social work</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GOLDBERG, E. MATILDA</au><au>WARBURTON, R. WILLIAM</au><au>McGUINNESS, BRENDAN</au><au>ROWLANDS, JOHN H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Towards Accountability in Social Work: One Year's Intake to an Area Office</atitle><jtitle>The British journal of social work</jtitle><date>1977-01-01</date><risdate>1977</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>257</spage><epage>283</epage><pages>257-283</pages><issn>0045-3102</issn><eissn>1468-263X</eissn><abstract>Monitoring one year's referrals to an area office of a social services department, we found that of the 2,436 referrals representing 2,057 cases, about half were already known to the area office. Demographically the clientele fell largely into three groups—the elderly, young families and children. The main problem groupings consisted of those with physical disabilities or suffering from frailty in old age, those with financial and environmental problems, and families with disturbed relationships and child care problems. Most of the clients had short-term help and at the end of six months only 11% of the referrals were still open. Distinctive profiles emerged when comparing the routes by which clients with different types of problems reached the area office and the help they got once they had passed its threshold: (a) The elderly and disabled, mainly referred by the health services, received predominantly practical help. (b) Those with financial and material problems, largely self-referred, received information, advice and referral to other agencies. (c) The disturbed families, referred by many different sources, received detailed exploration, assessment and casework. Those clients who were passed on for more extended help to the long-term teams—some 10% of the intake—were mainly the very vulnerable elderly and disabled persons, and children who had been taken into care or who were in need of surveillance and protection for other reasons. The study raises questions about the methods of service delivery in response to the demands made on the area office and discusses possible changes in approach towards more community-oriented preventive work.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>ACADEMIC PRESS</pub><tpages>27</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0045-3102
ispartof The British journal of social work, 1977-01, Vol.7 (3), p.257-283
issn 0045-3102
1468-263X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_818795041
source Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive legacy; Jstor Complete Legacy; Sociological Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Child care
Child neglect
Communities
Housing
Indexing in process
Older adults
Physical disabilities
Police
Social services
Social Work
Youths at risk
title Towards Accountability in Social Work: One Year's Intake to an Area Office
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T03%3A31%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Towards%20Accountability%20in%20Social%20Work:%20One%20Year's%20Intake%20to%20an%20Area%20Office&rft.jtitle=The%20British%20journal%20of%20social%20work&rft.au=GOLDBERG,%20E.%20MATILDA&rft.date=1977-01-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=257&rft.epage=283&rft.pages=257-283&rft.issn=0045-3102&rft.eissn=1468-263X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23696815%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1302481712&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=23696815&rfr_iscdi=true