Preventive home visits to older home-dwelling people in Denmark: are invitational procedures of importance?

Since 1998 all municipalities in Denmark have been required by law to offer two annual preventive home visits to all home‐dwelling citizens aged 75 or over. The influence of invitational procedures on acceptance rates has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to describe and investigate w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Health & social care in the community 2010-11, Vol.18 (6), p.563-571
Hauptverfasser: Ekmann, A., Vass, M., Avlund, K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 571
container_issue 6
container_start_page 563
container_title Health & social care in the community
container_volume 18
creator Ekmann, A.
Vass, M.
Avlund, K.
description Since 1998 all municipalities in Denmark have been required by law to offer two annual preventive home visits to all home‐dwelling citizens aged 75 or over. The influence of invitational procedures on acceptance rates has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to describe and investigate whether different invitational procedures were associated with first preventive home visit acceptance rates. The study was based on secondary analyses of data from the Danish Intervention Study on Preventive Home Visits. Data were collected from 1998 to 2002. Of the 4060 participants in the main study, 3245 reported receiving an offer for an identifiable preventive home visit, of whom 2399 (73.9%) provided complete data for the main analyses in the present study. Invitational procedures were categorised as: (1) a letter with a proposed date and time for the visit, (2) a visitor telephone call, and (3) a letter with encouragement to phone the visitor for appointment (letter without a proposed date). Covariates included sex, age, experience with preventive interventions, functional ability, self rated health, social relations and psychosocial characteristics. Statistical analyses included chi‐square tests, and bi‐ and multivariable logistic regression analyses. Different invitational procedures were associated with first preventive home visit acceptance rates. Significantly more men (75.1%) than women (62.8%) declined the first preventive home visit regardless of the invitational procedure. Compared to ‘letter with a proposed date’, men had an odds ratio of 1.78 (95% CI: 1.16–2.74) for declining visits when ‘telephone call’ was used and an odds ratio 2.81 (95% CI: 1.79–4.40) when ‘letter without a proposed date’ was used as the invitational procedure. In women the odds ratios were 1.23 (95% CI: 0.91–1.68) and 1.87 (95% CI: 1.37–2.55), respectively.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2010.00941.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_818739320</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>818739320</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4201-87af62575a90fb23323cbeeb289e0572effcfa4f0fbdf4aeabdf6ee2fb4e45d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUV1v0zAUtRCIlcFfQH7jKcXfThASYh1bkSpA2gePlpNcg7skDnHadf9-zrr1dfjl2vecc-V7DkKYkjlN5-N6TrmSGZNMzBlJXUIKQee7F2h2AF6iGSmUyoig5Ai9iXFNCOWM6NfoiBHFNRFshm5-DbCFbvRbwH9DC3jrox8jHgMOTQ3DQzOrb6FpfPcH9xD6BrDv8Cl0rR1uPmE7TO-tH-3oQ2cb3A-hgnozQMTBYd_2YRhtV8GXt-iVs02Ed4_1GF2dfbtcLLPVz_Pvi6-rrBJpmSzX1ikmtbQFcSXjnPGqBChZXgCRmoFzlbPCJbB2woJNRQEwVwoQsub8GH3Yz00_-beBOJrWxyptYDsIm2hymmteJCueZWolBFWkYP_BZCznisvEfP_I3JQt1KYffDLqzjx5ngif94Rb38DdAafETNmatZkiNFOEZsrWPGRrdmZ5sUiXJM_2ch9H2B3kKQujNNfS_P5xbi5PrperU3JtJL8HSW6oSw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>762283635</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Preventive home visits to older home-dwelling people in Denmark: are invitational procedures of importance?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Ekmann, A. ; Vass, M. ; Avlund, K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ekmann, A. ; Vass, M. ; Avlund, K.</creatorcontrib><description>Since 1998 all municipalities in Denmark have been required by law to offer two annual preventive home visits to all home‐dwelling citizens aged 75 or over. The influence of invitational procedures on acceptance rates has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to describe and investigate whether different invitational procedures were associated with first preventive home visit acceptance rates. The study was based on secondary analyses of data from the Danish Intervention Study on Preventive Home Visits. Data were collected from 1998 to 2002. Of the 4060 participants in the main study, 3245 reported receiving an offer for an identifiable preventive home visit, of whom 2399 (73.9%) provided complete data for the main analyses in the present study. Invitational procedures were categorised as: (1) a letter with a proposed date and time for the visit, (2) a visitor telephone call, and (3) a letter with encouragement to phone the visitor for appointment (letter without a proposed date). Covariates included sex, age, experience with preventive interventions, functional ability, self rated health, social relations and psychosocial characteristics. Statistical analyses included chi‐square tests, and bi‐ and multivariable logistic regression analyses. Different invitational procedures were associated with first preventive home visit acceptance rates. Significantly more men (75.1%) than women (62.8%) declined the first preventive home visit regardless of the invitational procedure. Compared to ‘letter with a proposed date’, men had an odds ratio of 1.78 (95% CI: 1.16–2.74) for declining visits when ‘telephone call’ was used and an odds ratio 2.81 (95% CI: 1.79–4.40) when ‘letter without a proposed date’ was used as the invitational procedure. In women the odds ratios were 1.23 (95% CI: 0.91–1.68) and 1.87 (95% CI: 1.37–2.55), respectively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0966-0410</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2010.00941.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20637042</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HSCCEL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Age Factors ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aging ; Citizens ; community health care ; Community Health Services - organization &amp; administration ; Confidence Intervals ; Delivery of Health Care - organization &amp; administration ; Denmark ; Female ; Females ; gender and community care ; Geriatric Assessment - methods ; Health Services Accessibility - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Health Services for the Aged - organization &amp; administration ; Home Care Services ; House Calls ; Humans ; Intervention ; Interview, Psychological ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Males ; Multivariate Analysis ; Odds Ratio ; older people ; Preventive Health Services - methods ; preventive home visit ; Psychosocial Factors ; Risk Factors ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Health &amp; social care in the community, 2010-11, Vol.18 (6), p.563-571</ispartof><rights>2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4201-87af62575a90fb23323cbeeb289e0572effcfa4f0fbdf4aeabdf6ee2fb4e45d33</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2524.2010.00941.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2524.2010.00941.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,33775,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20637042$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ekmann, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vass, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avlund, K.</creatorcontrib><title>Preventive home visits to older home-dwelling people in Denmark: are invitational procedures of importance?</title><title>Health &amp; social care in the community</title><addtitle>Health Soc Care Community</addtitle><description>Since 1998 all municipalities in Denmark have been required by law to offer two annual preventive home visits to all home‐dwelling citizens aged 75 or over. The influence of invitational procedures on acceptance rates has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to describe and investigate whether different invitational procedures were associated with first preventive home visit acceptance rates. The study was based on secondary analyses of data from the Danish Intervention Study on Preventive Home Visits. Data were collected from 1998 to 2002. Of the 4060 participants in the main study, 3245 reported receiving an offer for an identifiable preventive home visit, of whom 2399 (73.9%) provided complete data for the main analyses in the present study. Invitational procedures were categorised as: (1) a letter with a proposed date and time for the visit, (2) a visitor telephone call, and (3) a letter with encouragement to phone the visitor for appointment (letter without a proposed date). Covariates included sex, age, experience with preventive interventions, functional ability, self rated health, social relations and psychosocial characteristics. Statistical analyses included chi‐square tests, and bi‐ and multivariable logistic regression analyses. Different invitational procedures were associated with first preventive home visit acceptance rates. Significantly more men (75.1%) than women (62.8%) declined the first preventive home visit regardless of the invitational procedure. Compared to ‘letter with a proposed date’, men had an odds ratio of 1.78 (95% CI: 1.16–2.74) for declining visits when ‘telephone call’ was used and an odds ratio 2.81 (95% CI: 1.79–4.40) when ‘letter without a proposed date’ was used as the invitational procedure. In women the odds ratios were 1.23 (95% CI: 0.91–1.68) and 1.87 (95% CI: 1.37–2.55), respectively.</description><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Citizens</subject><subject>community health care</subject><subject>Community Health Services - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Confidence Intervals</subject><subject>Delivery of Health Care - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Denmark</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>gender and community care</subject><subject>Geriatric Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Health Services Accessibility - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Health Services for the Aged - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Home Care Services</subject><subject>House Calls</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Interview, Psychological</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>older people</subject><subject>Preventive Health Services - methods</subject><subject>preventive home visit</subject><subject>Psychosocial Factors</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0966-0410</issn><issn>1365-2524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUV1v0zAUtRCIlcFfQH7jKcXfThASYh1bkSpA2gePlpNcg7skDnHadf9-zrr1dfjl2vecc-V7DkKYkjlN5-N6TrmSGZNMzBlJXUIKQee7F2h2AF6iGSmUyoig5Ai9iXFNCOWM6NfoiBHFNRFshm5-DbCFbvRbwH9DC3jrox8jHgMOTQ3DQzOrb6FpfPcH9xD6BrDv8Cl0rR1uPmE7TO-tH-3oQ2cb3A-hgnozQMTBYd_2YRhtV8GXt-iVs02Ed4_1GF2dfbtcLLPVz_Pvi6-rrBJpmSzX1ikmtbQFcSXjnPGqBChZXgCRmoFzlbPCJbB2woJNRQEwVwoQsub8GH3Yz00_-beBOJrWxyptYDsIm2hymmteJCueZWolBFWkYP_BZCznisvEfP_I3JQt1KYffDLqzjx5ngif94Rb38DdAafETNmatZkiNFOEZsrWPGRrdmZ5sUiXJM_2ch9H2B3kKQujNNfS_P5xbi5PrperU3JtJL8HSW6oSw</recordid><startdate>201011</startdate><enddate>201011</enddate><creator>Ekmann, A.</creator><creator>Vass, M.</creator><creator>Avlund, K.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201011</creationdate><title>Preventive home visits to older home-dwelling people in Denmark: are invitational procedures of importance?</title><author>Ekmann, A. ; Vass, M. ; Avlund, K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4201-87af62575a90fb23323cbeeb289e0572effcfa4f0fbdf4aeabdf6ee2fb4e45d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Citizens</topic><topic>community health care</topic><topic>Community Health Services - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Confidence Intervals</topic><topic>Delivery of Health Care - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Denmark</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>gender and community care</topic><topic>Geriatric Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Health Services Accessibility - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Health Services for the Aged - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Home Care Services</topic><topic>House Calls</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Interview, Psychological</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>older people</topic><topic>Preventive Health Services - methods</topic><topic>preventive home visit</topic><topic>Psychosocial Factors</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ekmann, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vass, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avlund, K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><jtitle>Health &amp; social care in the community</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ekmann, A.</au><au>Vass, M.</au><au>Avlund, K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Preventive home visits to older home-dwelling people in Denmark: are invitational procedures of importance?</atitle><jtitle>Health &amp; social care in the community</jtitle><addtitle>Health Soc Care Community</addtitle><date>2010-11</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>563</spage><epage>571</epage><pages>563-571</pages><issn>0966-0410</issn><eissn>1365-2524</eissn><coden>HSCCEL</coden><abstract>Since 1998 all municipalities in Denmark have been required by law to offer two annual preventive home visits to all home‐dwelling citizens aged 75 or over. The influence of invitational procedures on acceptance rates has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to describe and investigate whether different invitational procedures were associated with first preventive home visit acceptance rates. The study was based on secondary analyses of data from the Danish Intervention Study on Preventive Home Visits. Data were collected from 1998 to 2002. Of the 4060 participants in the main study, 3245 reported receiving an offer for an identifiable preventive home visit, of whom 2399 (73.9%) provided complete data for the main analyses in the present study. Invitational procedures were categorised as: (1) a letter with a proposed date and time for the visit, (2) a visitor telephone call, and (3) a letter with encouragement to phone the visitor for appointment (letter without a proposed date). Covariates included sex, age, experience with preventive interventions, functional ability, self rated health, social relations and psychosocial characteristics. Statistical analyses included chi‐square tests, and bi‐ and multivariable logistic regression analyses. Different invitational procedures were associated with first preventive home visit acceptance rates. Significantly more men (75.1%) than women (62.8%) declined the first preventive home visit regardless of the invitational procedure. Compared to ‘letter with a proposed date’, men had an odds ratio of 1.78 (95% CI: 1.16–2.74) for declining visits when ‘telephone call’ was used and an odds ratio 2.81 (95% CI: 1.79–4.40) when ‘letter without a proposed date’ was used as the invitational procedure. In women the odds ratios were 1.23 (95% CI: 0.91–1.68) and 1.87 (95% CI: 1.37–2.55), respectively.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>20637042</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2524.2010.00941.x</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0966-0410
ispartof Health & social care in the community, 2010-11, Vol.18 (6), p.563-571
issn 0966-0410
1365-2524
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_818739320
source MEDLINE; Sociological Abstracts; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Age Factors
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aging
Citizens
community health care
Community Health Services - organization & administration
Confidence Intervals
Delivery of Health Care - organization & administration
Denmark
Female
Females
gender and community care
Geriatric Assessment - methods
Health Services Accessibility - statistics & numerical data
Health Services for the Aged - organization & administration
Home Care Services
House Calls
Humans
Intervention
Interview, Psychological
Logistic Models
Male
Males
Multivariate Analysis
Odds Ratio
older people
Preventive Health Services - methods
preventive home visit
Psychosocial Factors
Risk Factors
Surveys and Questionnaires
title Preventive home visits to older home-dwelling people in Denmark: are invitational procedures of importance?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T03%3A53%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preventive%20home%20visits%20to%20older%20home-dwelling%20people%20in%20Denmark:%20are%20invitational%20procedures%20of%20importance?&rft.jtitle=Health%20&%20social%20care%20in%20the%20community&rft.au=Ekmann,%20A.&rft.date=2010-11&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=563&rft.epage=571&rft.pages=563-571&rft.issn=0966-0410&rft.eissn=1365-2524&rft.coden=HSCCEL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2524.2010.00941.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E818739320%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=762283635&rft_id=info:pmid/20637042&rfr_iscdi=true