The quality of patient education evaluated by the health personnel

Scand J Caring Sci; 2010; 24; 548–556 
 The quality of patient education evaluated by the health personnel The purpose of the study was to describe the quality of patient education evaluated by health personnel. The sample consisted of 916 nurses and physicians working in one hospital in Finland. Th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scandinavian journal of caring sciences 2010-09, Vol.24 (3), p.548-556
Hauptverfasser: Kaariainen, M, Kyngas, H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 556
container_issue 3
container_start_page 548
container_title Scandinavian journal of caring sciences
container_volume 24
creator Kaariainen, M
Kyngas, H
description Scand J Caring Sci; 2010; 24; 548–556 
 The quality of patient education evaluated by the health personnel The purpose of the study was to describe the quality of patient education evaluated by health personnel. The sample consisted of 916 nurses and physicians working in one hospital in Finland. The data were gathered with a questionnaire developed specifically for this study. The questionnaire measured patient education quality as two dimensions: patient education resources and implementation. The data were analysed using basic and multivariate methods. The overall resources of patient education were quite good. The problems were related to the possibilities for patient education, such as the lack of time, the unsuitability of conditions and the shortage of equipment. In addition, 54% had inadequate knowledge of patients’ posttreatment condition and 29% of the impact the illness had on patients’ everyday lives. Furthermore, 47% were less skilled in supporting self‐care. On the other hand, health personnel’s attitudes towards patient education were positive. They were able to use verbal and individual patient education very well, whilst other methods of patient education were used less well and more infrequently. The patient education was implemented largely as patient‐centred and interactive. However, the patient was not always taken into account in the planning and evaluation of patient education. Several background variables of the health personnel had a statistically significant connection to patient education resources and implementation. These findings indicate that patient education is largely well implemented, although the resources need to be developed somewhat further.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2009.00747.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_818737768</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>818737768</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-3df3d70c8fdbd48a24ca23218674cb1c21b813c5339d319d74bd8ffc467df3593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkT1PwzAURS0EoqXwF5A3pgR_JXYkFqhoQapgaBESi-XYjpriJm0-oPn3OLR0xct70jvHw70AQIxC7N_tKsSM4yDmmIQEoSREiDMe7k7A8Hg4BUNEBA0SisUAXNT1CiEURQifgwFBDCUookPwsFhauG2Vy5sOlhncqCa3RQOtabVfywLaL-Va1VgD0w42nl5a5Zol3NiqLovCuktwlilX26vDHIG3yeNi_BTMXqfP4_tZoKkQPKAmo4YjLTKTGiYUYVoRSrCIOdMp1gSnAlMdUZoYihPDWWpElmkWc29GCR2Bm_2_m6rctrZu5DqvtXVOFbZsaymw4JTzWPxL8pjEgnNCPXl9INt0bY3cVPlaVZ38C8gDd3vgO3e2O94xkn0RciX7vGWft-yLkL9FyJ2cj-d-8Xqw1_O6sbujrqpP71AeyfeXqfzAeEaS-UQy-gPkHomZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>762687723</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The quality of patient education evaluated by the health personnel</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Kaariainen, M ; Kyngas, H</creator><creatorcontrib>Kaariainen, M ; Kyngas, H</creatorcontrib><description>Scand J Caring Sci; 2010; 24; 548–556 
 The quality of patient education evaluated by the health personnel The purpose of the study was to describe the quality of patient education evaluated by health personnel. The sample consisted of 916 nurses and physicians working in one hospital in Finland. The data were gathered with a questionnaire developed specifically for this study. The questionnaire measured patient education quality as two dimensions: patient education resources and implementation. The data were analysed using basic and multivariate methods. The overall resources of patient education were quite good. The problems were related to the possibilities for patient education, such as the lack of time, the unsuitability of conditions and the shortage of equipment. In addition, 54% had inadequate knowledge of patients’ posttreatment condition and 29% of the impact the illness had on patients’ everyday lives. Furthermore, 47% were less skilled in supporting self‐care. On the other hand, health personnel’s attitudes towards patient education were positive. They were able to use verbal and individual patient education very well, whilst other methods of patient education were used less well and more infrequently. The patient education was implemented largely as patient‐centred and interactive. However, the patient was not always taken into account in the planning and evaluation of patient education. Several background variables of the health personnel had a statistically significant connection to patient education resources and implementation. These findings indicate that patient education is largely well implemented, although the resources need to be developed somewhat further.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0283-9318</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-6712</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2009.00747.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20409053</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; counselling ; Female ; Health Personnel ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nursing ; patient education ; Patient Education as Topic - standards ; quality</subject><ispartof>Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 2010-09, Vol.24 (3), p.548-556</ispartof><rights>2010 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2010 Nordic College of Caring Science</rights><rights>2010 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2010 Nordic College of Caring Science.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-3df3d70c8fdbd48a24ca23218674cb1c21b813c5339d319d74bd8ffc467df3593</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1471-6712.2009.00747.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1471-6712.2009.00747.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20409053$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kaariainen, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kyngas, H</creatorcontrib><title>The quality of patient education evaluated by the health personnel</title><title>Scandinavian journal of caring sciences</title><addtitle>Scand J Caring Sci</addtitle><description>Scand J Caring Sci; 2010; 24; 548–556 
 The quality of patient education evaluated by the health personnel The purpose of the study was to describe the quality of patient education evaluated by health personnel. The sample consisted of 916 nurses and physicians working in one hospital in Finland. The data were gathered with a questionnaire developed specifically for this study. The questionnaire measured patient education quality as two dimensions: patient education resources and implementation. The data were analysed using basic and multivariate methods. The overall resources of patient education were quite good. The problems were related to the possibilities for patient education, such as the lack of time, the unsuitability of conditions and the shortage of equipment. In addition, 54% had inadequate knowledge of patients’ posttreatment condition and 29% of the impact the illness had on patients’ everyday lives. Furthermore, 47% were less skilled in supporting self‐care. On the other hand, health personnel’s attitudes towards patient education were positive. They were able to use verbal and individual patient education very well, whilst other methods of patient education were used less well and more infrequently. The patient education was implemented largely as patient‐centred and interactive. However, the patient was not always taken into account in the planning and evaluation of patient education. Several background variables of the health personnel had a statistically significant connection to patient education resources and implementation. These findings indicate that patient education is largely well implemented, although the resources need to be developed somewhat further.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>counselling</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Personnel</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>patient education</subject><subject>Patient Education as Topic - standards</subject><subject>quality</subject><issn>0283-9318</issn><issn>1471-6712</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkT1PwzAURS0EoqXwF5A3pgR_JXYkFqhoQapgaBESi-XYjpriJm0-oPn3OLR0xct70jvHw70AQIxC7N_tKsSM4yDmmIQEoSREiDMe7k7A8Hg4BUNEBA0SisUAXNT1CiEURQifgwFBDCUookPwsFhauG2Vy5sOlhncqCa3RQOtabVfywLaL-Va1VgD0w42nl5a5Zol3NiqLovCuktwlilX26vDHIG3yeNi_BTMXqfP4_tZoKkQPKAmo4YjLTKTGiYUYVoRSrCIOdMp1gSnAlMdUZoYihPDWWpElmkWc29GCR2Bm_2_m6rctrZu5DqvtXVOFbZsaymw4JTzWPxL8pjEgnNCPXl9INt0bY3cVPlaVZ38C8gDd3vgO3e2O94xkn0RciX7vGWft-yLkL9FyJ2cj-d-8Xqw1_O6sbujrqpP71AeyfeXqfzAeEaS-UQy-gPkHomZ</recordid><startdate>201009</startdate><enddate>201009</enddate><creator>Kaariainen, M</creator><creator>Kyngas, H</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201009</creationdate><title>The quality of patient education evaluated by the health personnel</title><author>Kaariainen, M ; Kyngas, H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-3df3d70c8fdbd48a24ca23218674cb1c21b813c5339d319d74bd8ffc467df3593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>counselling</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Personnel</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>patient education</topic><topic>Patient Education as Topic - standards</topic><topic>quality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kaariainen, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kyngas, H</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of caring sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kaariainen, M</au><au>Kyngas, H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The quality of patient education evaluated by the health personnel</atitle><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of caring sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Scand J Caring Sci</addtitle><date>2010-09</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>548</spage><epage>556</epage><pages>548-556</pages><issn>0283-9318</issn><eissn>1471-6712</eissn><abstract>Scand J Caring Sci; 2010; 24; 548–556 
 The quality of patient education evaluated by the health personnel The purpose of the study was to describe the quality of patient education evaluated by health personnel. The sample consisted of 916 nurses and physicians working in one hospital in Finland. The data were gathered with a questionnaire developed specifically for this study. The questionnaire measured patient education quality as two dimensions: patient education resources and implementation. The data were analysed using basic and multivariate methods. The overall resources of patient education were quite good. The problems were related to the possibilities for patient education, such as the lack of time, the unsuitability of conditions and the shortage of equipment. In addition, 54% had inadequate knowledge of patients’ posttreatment condition and 29% of the impact the illness had on patients’ everyday lives. Furthermore, 47% were less skilled in supporting self‐care. On the other hand, health personnel’s attitudes towards patient education were positive. They were able to use verbal and individual patient education very well, whilst other methods of patient education were used less well and more infrequently. The patient education was implemented largely as patient‐centred and interactive. However, the patient was not always taken into account in the planning and evaluation of patient education. Several background variables of the health personnel had a statistically significant connection to patient education resources and implementation. These findings indicate that patient education is largely well implemented, although the resources need to be developed somewhat further.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>20409053</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1471-6712.2009.00747.x</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0283-9318
ispartof Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 2010-09, Vol.24 (3), p.548-556
issn 0283-9318
1471-6712
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_818737768
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adult
Attitude of Health Personnel
counselling
Female
Health Personnel
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Nursing
patient education
Patient Education as Topic - standards
quality
title The quality of patient education evaluated by the health personnel
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T00%3A11%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20quality%20of%20patient%20education%20evaluated%20by%20the%20health%20personnel&rft.jtitle=Scandinavian%20journal%20of%20caring%20sciences&rft.au=Kaariainen,%20M&rft.date=2010-09&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=548&rft.epage=556&rft.pages=548-556&rft.issn=0283-9318&rft.eissn=1471-6712&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1471-6712.2009.00747.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E818737768%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=762687723&rft_id=info:pmid/20409053&rfr_iscdi=true