Clinical Learning Environment Inventory: factor analysis

newton j.m., jolly b.c., ockerby c.m. & cross w.m. (2010) Clinical Learning Environment Inventory: factor analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing 66(6), 1371–1381. Title.  Clinical Learning Environment Inventory: factor analysis. Aim.  This paper is a report of the psychometric testing of the Clin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of advanced nursing 2010-06, Vol.66 (6), p.1371-1381
Hauptverfasser: Newton, Jennifer M., Jolly, Brian C., Ockerby, Cherene M., Cross, Wendy M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1381
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1371
container_title Journal of advanced nursing
container_volume 66
creator Newton, Jennifer M.
Jolly, Brian C.
Ockerby, Cherene M.
Cross, Wendy M.
description newton j.m., jolly b.c., ockerby c.m. & cross w.m. (2010) Clinical Learning Environment Inventory: factor analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing 66(6), 1371–1381. Title.  Clinical Learning Environment Inventory: factor analysis. Aim.  This paper is a report of the psychometric testing of the Clinical Learning Environment Inventory. Background.  The clinical learning environment is a complex socio‐cultural entity that offers a variety of opportunities to engage or disengage in learning. The Clinical Learning Environment Inventory is a self‐report instrument consisting of 42 items classified into six scales: personalization, student involvement, task orientation, innovation, satisfaction and individualization. It was developed to examine undergraduate nursing students’ perceptions of the learning environment whilst on placement in clinical settings. Method.  As a component of a longitudinal project, Bachelor of Nursing students (n = 659) from two campuses of a university in Australia, completed the Clinical Learning Environment Inventory from 2006 to 2008. Principal components analysis using varimax rotation was conducted to explore the factor structure of the inventory. Results.  Data for 513 students (77%) were eligible for inclusion. Constraining data to a 6‐factor solution explained 51% of the variance. The factors identified were: student‐centredness, affordances and engagement, individualization, fostering workplace learning, valuing nurses’ work, and innovative and adaptive workplace culture. These factors were reviewed against recent theoretical developments in the literature. Conclusion.  The study offers an empirically based and theoretically informed extension of the original Clinical Learning Environment Inventory, which had previously relied on ad hoc clustering of items and the use of internal reliability of its sub‐scales. Further research is required to establish the consistency of these new factors.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05303.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_818736476</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>733339858</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4653-80d80160d4897a9ca2d89b2780452b106ae546f73404b293d38eb6f9ebcfcf013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1vEzEQhi1URNPAX0ArLj1tOv5Y24vUQxVKWxSFD4GQuIy8u17kdONN7aRN_j1eUnLg0s5lRuPnfTWeISSjMKEpzhYTymWRMyn0hEHqQsGBT7YvyOjwcERGwKHMmQB2TE5iXABQzhh7RY4ZFEJyqUZETzvnXW26bGZN8M7_zi79vQu9X1q_zm78fUp92L3PWlOnIjPedLvo4mvysjVdtG8e85j8-Hj5fXqdzz5f3UwvZnktZMFzDY0GKqERulSmrA1rdFkxpUEUrKIgjU2jtIoLEBUrecO1rWRb2qpu6zYNPCane99V6O82Nq5x6WJtu854228iaqoVl0LJJ0nFU5S60Il89x-56DchfSwi40yUXCiWIL2H6tDHGGyLq-CWJuyQAg5XwAUOy8Zh2ThcAf9eAbdJ-vbRf1MtbXMQ_lt7As73wIPr7O7ZxvjpYj5USZ_v9S6u7fagN-EWk7sq8Of8Cr-KD-Ib_fUFZ_wPaD2iag</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>232493472</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical Learning Environment Inventory: factor analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Newton, Jennifer M. ; Jolly, Brian C. ; Ockerby, Cherene M. ; Cross, Wendy M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Newton, Jennifer M. ; Jolly, Brian C. ; Ockerby, Cherene M. ; Cross, Wendy M.</creatorcontrib><description>newton j.m., jolly b.c., ockerby c.m. &amp; cross w.m. (2010) Clinical Learning Environment Inventory: factor analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing 66(6), 1371–1381. Title.  Clinical Learning Environment Inventory: factor analysis. Aim.  This paper is a report of the psychometric testing of the Clinical Learning Environment Inventory. Background.  The clinical learning environment is a complex socio‐cultural entity that offers a variety of opportunities to engage or disengage in learning. The Clinical Learning Environment Inventory is a self‐report instrument consisting of 42 items classified into six scales: personalization, student involvement, task orientation, innovation, satisfaction and individualization. It was developed to examine undergraduate nursing students’ perceptions of the learning environment whilst on placement in clinical settings. Method.  As a component of a longitudinal project, Bachelor of Nursing students (n = 659) from two campuses of a university in Australia, completed the Clinical Learning Environment Inventory from 2006 to 2008. Principal components analysis using varimax rotation was conducted to explore the factor structure of the inventory. Results.  Data for 513 students (77%) were eligible for inclusion. Constraining data to a 6‐factor solution explained 51% of the variance. The factors identified were: student‐centredness, affordances and engagement, individualization, fostering workplace learning, valuing nurses’ work, and innovative and adaptive workplace culture. These factors were reviewed against recent theoretical developments in the literature. Conclusion.  The study offers an empirically based and theoretically informed extension of the original Clinical Learning Environment Inventory, which had previously relied on ad hoc clustering of items and the use of internal reliability of its sub‐scales. Further research is required to establish the consistency of these new factors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0309-2402</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2648</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05303.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20546367</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Australia ; Clinical Learning Environment Inventory ; College students ; Discriminant analysis ; Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate - methods ; Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate - standards ; factor analysis ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Humans ; Learning ; Nurses ; Nursing ; Nursing Education Research ; nursing students ; Perceptions ; Psychoanalysis ; Psychometrics - methods ; Students, Nursing - psychology ; Workplace ; workplace learning</subject><ispartof>Journal of advanced nursing, 2010-06, Vol.66 (6), p.1371-1381</ispartof><rights>2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Jun 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4653-80d80160d4897a9ca2d89b2780452b106ae546f73404b293d38eb6f9ebcfcf013</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4653-80d80160d4897a9ca2d89b2780452b106ae546f73404b293d38eb6f9ebcfcf013</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2648.2010.05303.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2648.2010.05303.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,27931,27932,31006,45581,45582</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20546367$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Newton, Jennifer M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jolly, Brian C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ockerby, Cherene M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cross, Wendy M.</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical Learning Environment Inventory: factor analysis</title><title>Journal of advanced nursing</title><addtitle>J Adv Nurs</addtitle><description>newton j.m., jolly b.c., ockerby c.m. &amp; cross w.m. (2010) Clinical Learning Environment Inventory: factor analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing 66(6), 1371–1381. Title.  Clinical Learning Environment Inventory: factor analysis. Aim.  This paper is a report of the psychometric testing of the Clinical Learning Environment Inventory. Background.  The clinical learning environment is a complex socio‐cultural entity that offers a variety of opportunities to engage or disengage in learning. The Clinical Learning Environment Inventory is a self‐report instrument consisting of 42 items classified into six scales: personalization, student involvement, task orientation, innovation, satisfaction and individualization. It was developed to examine undergraduate nursing students’ perceptions of the learning environment whilst on placement in clinical settings. Method.  As a component of a longitudinal project, Bachelor of Nursing students (n = 659) from two campuses of a university in Australia, completed the Clinical Learning Environment Inventory from 2006 to 2008. Principal components analysis using varimax rotation was conducted to explore the factor structure of the inventory. Results.  Data for 513 students (77%) were eligible for inclusion. Constraining data to a 6‐factor solution explained 51% of the variance. The factors identified were: student‐centredness, affordances and engagement, individualization, fostering workplace learning, valuing nurses’ work, and innovative and adaptive workplace culture. These factors were reviewed against recent theoretical developments in the literature. Conclusion.  The study offers an empirically based and theoretically informed extension of the original Clinical Learning Environment Inventory, which had previously relied on ad hoc clustering of items and the use of internal reliability of its sub‐scales. Further research is required to establish the consistency of these new factors.</description><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Clinical Learning Environment Inventory</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Discriminant analysis</subject><subject>Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate - methods</subject><subject>Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate - standards</subject><subject>factor analysis</subject><subject>Factor Analysis, Statistical</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing Education Research</subject><subject>nursing students</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Psychoanalysis</subject><subject>Psychometrics - methods</subject><subject>Students, Nursing - psychology</subject><subject>Workplace</subject><subject>workplace learning</subject><issn>0309-2402</issn><issn>1365-2648</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1vEzEQhi1URNPAX0ArLj1tOv5Y24vUQxVKWxSFD4GQuIy8u17kdONN7aRN_j1eUnLg0s5lRuPnfTWeISSjMKEpzhYTymWRMyn0hEHqQsGBT7YvyOjwcERGwKHMmQB2TE5iXABQzhh7RY4ZFEJyqUZETzvnXW26bGZN8M7_zi79vQu9X1q_zm78fUp92L3PWlOnIjPedLvo4mvysjVdtG8e85j8-Hj5fXqdzz5f3UwvZnktZMFzDY0GKqERulSmrA1rdFkxpUEUrKIgjU2jtIoLEBUrecO1rWRb2qpu6zYNPCane99V6O82Nq5x6WJtu854228iaqoVl0LJJ0nFU5S60Il89x-56DchfSwi40yUXCiWIL2H6tDHGGyLq-CWJuyQAg5XwAUOy8Zh2ThcAf9eAbdJ-vbRf1MtbXMQ_lt7As73wIPr7O7ZxvjpYj5USZ_v9S6u7fagN-EWk7sq8Of8Cr-KD-Ib_fUFZ_wPaD2iag</recordid><startdate>201006</startdate><enddate>201006</enddate><creator>Newton, Jennifer M.</creator><creator>Jolly, Brian C.</creator><creator>Ockerby, Cherene M.</creator><creator>Cross, Wendy M.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201006</creationdate><title>Clinical Learning Environment Inventory: factor analysis</title><author>Newton, Jennifer M. ; Jolly, Brian C. ; Ockerby, Cherene M. ; Cross, Wendy M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4653-80d80160d4897a9ca2d89b2780452b106ae546f73404b293d38eb6f9ebcfcf013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Clinical Learning Environment Inventory</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Discriminant analysis</topic><topic>Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate - methods</topic><topic>Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate - standards</topic><topic>factor analysis</topic><topic>Factor Analysis, Statistical</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing Education Research</topic><topic>nursing students</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Psychoanalysis</topic><topic>Psychometrics - methods</topic><topic>Students, Nursing - psychology</topic><topic>Workplace</topic><topic>workplace learning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Newton, Jennifer M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jolly, Brian C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ockerby, Cherene M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cross, Wendy M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of advanced nursing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Newton, Jennifer M.</au><au>Jolly, Brian C.</au><au>Ockerby, Cherene M.</au><au>Cross, Wendy M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical Learning Environment Inventory: factor analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of advanced nursing</jtitle><addtitle>J Adv Nurs</addtitle><date>2010-06</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1371</spage><epage>1381</epage><pages>1371-1381</pages><issn>0309-2402</issn><eissn>1365-2648</eissn><abstract>newton j.m., jolly b.c., ockerby c.m. &amp; cross w.m. (2010) Clinical Learning Environment Inventory: factor analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing 66(6), 1371–1381. Title.  Clinical Learning Environment Inventory: factor analysis. Aim.  This paper is a report of the psychometric testing of the Clinical Learning Environment Inventory. Background.  The clinical learning environment is a complex socio‐cultural entity that offers a variety of opportunities to engage or disengage in learning. The Clinical Learning Environment Inventory is a self‐report instrument consisting of 42 items classified into six scales: personalization, student involvement, task orientation, innovation, satisfaction and individualization. It was developed to examine undergraduate nursing students’ perceptions of the learning environment whilst on placement in clinical settings. Method.  As a component of a longitudinal project, Bachelor of Nursing students (n = 659) from two campuses of a university in Australia, completed the Clinical Learning Environment Inventory from 2006 to 2008. Principal components analysis using varimax rotation was conducted to explore the factor structure of the inventory. Results.  Data for 513 students (77%) were eligible for inclusion. Constraining data to a 6‐factor solution explained 51% of the variance. The factors identified were: student‐centredness, affordances and engagement, individualization, fostering workplace learning, valuing nurses’ work, and innovative and adaptive workplace culture. These factors were reviewed against recent theoretical developments in the literature. Conclusion.  The study offers an empirically based and theoretically informed extension of the original Clinical Learning Environment Inventory, which had previously relied on ad hoc clustering of items and the use of internal reliability of its sub‐scales. Further research is required to establish the consistency of these new factors.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>20546367</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05303.x</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0309-2402
ispartof Journal of advanced nursing, 2010-06, Vol.66 (6), p.1371-1381
issn 0309-2402
1365-2648
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_818736476
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Australia
Clinical Learning Environment Inventory
College students
Discriminant analysis
Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate - methods
Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate - standards
factor analysis
Factor Analysis, Statistical
Humans
Learning
Nurses
Nursing
Nursing Education Research
nursing students
Perceptions
Psychoanalysis
Psychometrics - methods
Students, Nursing - psychology
Workplace
workplace learning
title Clinical Learning Environment Inventory: factor analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-05T07%3A40%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20Learning%20Environment%20Inventory:%20factor%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20advanced%20nursing&rft.au=Newton,%20Jennifer%20M.&rft.date=2010-06&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1371&rft.epage=1381&rft.pages=1371-1381&rft.issn=0309-2402&rft.eissn=1365-2648&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05303.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733339858%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=232493472&rft_id=info:pmid/20546367&rfr_iscdi=true