A method for individualising the risk of a negative lymph node classification error in cancer of the colon

In cancer of the colon, the number of lymph nodes that should be analysed before a patient is classified as free of lymph node involvement has been widely discussed. A mathematical model is proposed which is based on the Bayes Theorem for calculating the probability of error (PE) similar to that nor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cirugia Española 2010-12, Vol.88 (6), p.383-389
Hauptverfasser: Martínez-Ramos, David, Escrig-Sos, Javier, Hoashi, Jane S, Rivadulla-Serrano, Isabel, Salvador-Sanchís, José Luis, Ruiz Del Castillo, Juan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:spa
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 389
container_issue 6
container_start_page 383
container_title Cirugia Española
container_volume 88
creator Martínez-Ramos, David
Escrig-Sos, Javier
Hoashi, Jane S
Rivadulla-Serrano, Isabel
Salvador-Sanchís, José Luis
Ruiz Del Castillo, Juan
description In cancer of the colon, the number of lymph nodes that should be analysed before a patient is classified as free of lymph node involvement has been widely discussed. A mathematical model is proposed which is based on the Bayes Theorem for calculating the probability of error (PE) similar to that normally used to evaluate a diagnostic test, but adapted to a quantitative variable, the lymph node count. The clinical histories of 480 patients routinely operated on in attempt to cure cancer of the colon were reviewed. Cases with any kind of metastasis were excluded. The proposed formula based on the Bayes Theorem was applied with the aim of calculating the PEs for the complete series and for different patient sub-groups (T2, T3, and T4 tumours). For the probabilities of error of classifying a patient as N negative, which varied between 5% and 1% (near or practically 0), the minimum number of negative lymph nodes required for analysis fluctuated between 7 and 17, respectively, for the complete series. This minimum figure was also variable for the different sub-groups (T2, T3, and T4 tumours) studied. These numbers mainly depended on the case characteristics of a specific study group as regards the prevalence of the N+ cases that they dealt with, and of its historically demonstrated ability to collect and identify positive lymph nodes in those patients that had them. From a mathematical point of view, the minimum number of lymph nodes that have to be analysed in cancer of the colon in order to classify a patient as N negative is not a constant. This depends on the error that is prepared to be assumed for that diagnosis, possibly depending on certain tumour traits, and also may be adapted to the cases of each study group.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ciresp.2010.09.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_818646427</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>818646427</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p140t-518de6291fb4e2bb78ea1dd3af627aedb270848b1f763c6c6f8b799bd0dfa5e53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kE1LwzAcxoMgbk6_gUhunlqTtE3S4xi-geBFwVvJyz9bZtvUpBvs29vpPD3wvPwOD0I3lOSUUH6_zY2PkIackckidU4IO0NzWgmZ0VJ8ztBlStvJrArKLtCMUVKSmsg52i5xB-MmWOxCxL63fu_tTrU--X6Nxw3g6NMXDg4r3MNajX4PuD10wwb3wQI2rUrJO2-mJPQYYvzFYKN6A_G4OzJMaEN_hc6dahNcn3SBPh4f3lfP2evb08tq-ZoNtCRjVlFpgbOaOl0C01pIUNTaQjnOhAKrmSCylJo6wQvDDXdSi7rWllinKqiKBbr74w4xfO8gjU3nk4G2VT2EXWoklbzkJRNT8_bU3OkObDNE36l4aP7vKX4AqmhpGg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>818646427</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A method for individualising the risk of a negative lymph node classification error in cancer of the colon</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Martínez-Ramos, David ; Escrig-Sos, Javier ; Hoashi, Jane S ; Rivadulla-Serrano, Isabel ; Salvador-Sanchís, José Luis ; Ruiz Del Castillo, Juan</creator><creatorcontrib>Martínez-Ramos, David ; Escrig-Sos, Javier ; Hoashi, Jane S ; Rivadulla-Serrano, Isabel ; Salvador-Sanchís, José Luis ; Ruiz Del Castillo, Juan</creatorcontrib><description>In cancer of the colon, the number of lymph nodes that should be analysed before a patient is classified as free of lymph node involvement has been widely discussed. A mathematical model is proposed which is based on the Bayes Theorem for calculating the probability of error (PE) similar to that normally used to evaluate a diagnostic test, but adapted to a quantitative variable, the lymph node count. The clinical histories of 480 patients routinely operated on in attempt to cure cancer of the colon were reviewed. Cases with any kind of metastasis were excluded. The proposed formula based on the Bayes Theorem was applied with the aim of calculating the PEs for the complete series and for different patient sub-groups (T2, T3, and T4 tumours). For the probabilities of error of classifying a patient as N negative, which varied between 5% and 1% (near or practically 0), the minimum number of negative lymph nodes required for analysis fluctuated between 7 and 17, respectively, for the complete series. This minimum figure was also variable for the different sub-groups (T2, T3, and T4 tumours) studied. These numbers mainly depended on the case characteristics of a specific study group as regards the prevalence of the N+ cases that they dealt with, and of its historically demonstrated ability to collect and identify positive lymph nodes in those patients that had them. From a mathematical point of view, the minimum number of lymph nodes that have to be analysed in cancer of the colon in order to classify a patient as N negative is not a constant. This depends on the error that is prepared to be assumed for that diagnosis, possibly depending on certain tumour traits, and also may be adapted to the cases of each study group.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1578-147X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2010.09.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21040908</identifier><language>spa</language><publisher>Spain</publisher><subject>Aged ; Bayes Theorem ; Colonic Neoplasms - classification ; Colonic Neoplasms - pathology ; Diagnostic Errors ; False Negative Reactions ; Female ; Humans ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Male ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment</subject><ispartof>Cirugia Española, 2010-12, Vol.88 (6), p.383-389</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 AEC. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21040908$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martínez-Ramos, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Escrig-Sos, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoashi, Jane S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivadulla-Serrano, Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salvador-Sanchís, José Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruiz Del Castillo, Juan</creatorcontrib><title>A method for individualising the risk of a negative lymph node classification error in cancer of the colon</title><title>Cirugia Española</title><addtitle>Cir Esp</addtitle><description>In cancer of the colon, the number of lymph nodes that should be analysed before a patient is classified as free of lymph node involvement has been widely discussed. A mathematical model is proposed which is based on the Bayes Theorem for calculating the probability of error (PE) similar to that normally used to evaluate a diagnostic test, but adapted to a quantitative variable, the lymph node count. The clinical histories of 480 patients routinely operated on in attempt to cure cancer of the colon were reviewed. Cases with any kind of metastasis were excluded. The proposed formula based on the Bayes Theorem was applied with the aim of calculating the PEs for the complete series and for different patient sub-groups (T2, T3, and T4 tumours). For the probabilities of error of classifying a patient as N negative, which varied between 5% and 1% (near or practically 0), the minimum number of negative lymph nodes required for analysis fluctuated between 7 and 17, respectively, for the complete series. This minimum figure was also variable for the different sub-groups (T2, T3, and T4 tumours) studied. These numbers mainly depended on the case characteristics of a specific study group as regards the prevalence of the N+ cases that they dealt with, and of its historically demonstrated ability to collect and identify positive lymph nodes in those patients that had them. From a mathematical point of view, the minimum number of lymph nodes that have to be analysed in cancer of the colon in order to classify a patient as N negative is not a constant. This depends on the error that is prepared to be assumed for that diagnosis, possibly depending on certain tumour traits, and also may be adapted to the cases of each study group.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Bayes Theorem</subject><subject>Colonic Neoplasms - classification</subject><subject>Colonic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Diagnostic Errors</subject><subject>False Negative Reactions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><issn>1578-147X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kE1LwzAcxoMgbk6_gUhunlqTtE3S4xi-geBFwVvJyz9bZtvUpBvs29vpPD3wvPwOD0I3lOSUUH6_zY2PkIackckidU4IO0NzWgmZ0VJ8ztBlStvJrArKLtCMUVKSmsg52i5xB-MmWOxCxL63fu_tTrU--X6Nxw3g6NMXDg4r3MNajX4PuD10wwb3wQI2rUrJO2-mJPQYYvzFYKN6A_G4OzJMaEN_hc6dahNcn3SBPh4f3lfP2evb08tq-ZoNtCRjVlFpgbOaOl0C01pIUNTaQjnOhAKrmSCylJo6wQvDDXdSi7rWllinKqiKBbr74w4xfO8gjU3nk4G2VT2EXWoklbzkJRNT8_bU3OkObDNE36l4aP7vKX4AqmhpGg</recordid><startdate>201012</startdate><enddate>201012</enddate><creator>Martínez-Ramos, David</creator><creator>Escrig-Sos, Javier</creator><creator>Hoashi, Jane S</creator><creator>Rivadulla-Serrano, Isabel</creator><creator>Salvador-Sanchís, José Luis</creator><creator>Ruiz Del Castillo, Juan</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201012</creationdate><title>A method for individualising the risk of a negative lymph node classification error in cancer of the colon</title><author>Martínez-Ramos, David ; Escrig-Sos, Javier ; Hoashi, Jane S ; Rivadulla-Serrano, Isabel ; Salvador-Sanchís, José Luis ; Ruiz Del Castillo, Juan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p140t-518de6291fb4e2bb78ea1dd3af627aedb270848b1f763c6c6f8b799bd0dfa5e53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>spa</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Bayes Theorem</topic><topic>Colonic Neoplasms - classification</topic><topic>Colonic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Diagnostic Errors</topic><topic>False Negative Reactions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martínez-Ramos, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Escrig-Sos, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoashi, Jane S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivadulla-Serrano, Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salvador-Sanchís, José Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruiz Del Castillo, Juan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cirugia Española</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martínez-Ramos, David</au><au>Escrig-Sos, Javier</au><au>Hoashi, Jane S</au><au>Rivadulla-Serrano, Isabel</au><au>Salvador-Sanchís, José Luis</au><au>Ruiz Del Castillo, Juan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A method for individualising the risk of a negative lymph node classification error in cancer of the colon</atitle><jtitle>Cirugia Española</jtitle><addtitle>Cir Esp</addtitle><date>2010-12</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>383</spage><epage>389</epage><pages>383-389</pages><eissn>1578-147X</eissn><abstract>In cancer of the colon, the number of lymph nodes that should be analysed before a patient is classified as free of lymph node involvement has been widely discussed. A mathematical model is proposed which is based on the Bayes Theorem for calculating the probability of error (PE) similar to that normally used to evaluate a diagnostic test, but adapted to a quantitative variable, the lymph node count. The clinical histories of 480 patients routinely operated on in attempt to cure cancer of the colon were reviewed. Cases with any kind of metastasis were excluded. The proposed formula based on the Bayes Theorem was applied with the aim of calculating the PEs for the complete series and for different patient sub-groups (T2, T3, and T4 tumours). For the probabilities of error of classifying a patient as N negative, which varied between 5% and 1% (near or practically 0), the minimum number of negative lymph nodes required for analysis fluctuated between 7 and 17, respectively, for the complete series. This minimum figure was also variable for the different sub-groups (T2, T3, and T4 tumours) studied. These numbers mainly depended on the case characteristics of a specific study group as regards the prevalence of the N+ cases that they dealt with, and of its historically demonstrated ability to collect and identify positive lymph nodes in those patients that had them. From a mathematical point of view, the minimum number of lymph nodes that have to be analysed in cancer of the colon in order to classify a patient as N negative is not a constant. This depends on the error that is prepared to be assumed for that diagnosis, possibly depending on certain tumour traits, and also may be adapted to the cases of each study group.</abstract><cop>Spain</cop><pmid>21040908</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ciresp.2010.09.002</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1578-147X
ispartof Cirugia Española, 2010-12, Vol.88 (6), p.383-389
issn 1578-147X
language spa
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_818646427
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Aged
Bayes Theorem
Colonic Neoplasms - classification
Colonic Neoplasms - pathology
Diagnostic Errors
False Negative Reactions
Female
Humans
Lymphatic Metastasis
Male
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
title A method for individualising the risk of a negative lymph node classification error in cancer of the colon
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T00%3A15%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20method%20for%20individualising%20the%20risk%20of%20a%20negative%20lymph%20node%20classification%20error%20in%20cancer%20of%20the%20colon&rft.jtitle=Cirugia%20Espa%C3%B1ola&rft.au=Mart%C3%ADnez-Ramos,%20David&rft.date=2010-12&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=383&rft.epage=389&rft.pages=383-389&rft.eissn=1578-147X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ciresp.2010.09.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E818646427%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=818646427&rft_id=info:pmid/21040908&rfr_iscdi=true