Piecing together numerical language: children's use of default units in early counting and quantification

When asked to ‘find three forks’, adult speakers of English use the noun ‘fork’ to identify units for counting. However, when number words (e.g. three) and quantifiers (e.g. more, every) are used with unfamiliar words (‘Give me three blickets’) noun‐specific conceptual criteria are unavailable for p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Developmental science 2011-01, Vol.14 (1), p.44-57
Hauptverfasser: Brooks, Neon, Pogue, Amanda, Barner, David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 57
container_issue 1
container_start_page 44
container_title Developmental science
container_volume 14
creator Brooks, Neon
Pogue, Amanda
Barner, David
description When asked to ‘find three forks’, adult speakers of English use the noun ‘fork’ to identify units for counting. However, when number words (e.g. three) and quantifiers (e.g. more, every) are used with unfamiliar words (‘Give me three blickets’) noun‐specific conceptual criteria are unavailable for picking out units. This poses a problem for young children learning language, who begin to use quantifiers and number words by age 2, despite knowing a relatively small number of nouns. Without knowing how individual nouns pick out units of quantification – e.g. what counts as a blicket– how could children decide whether there are three blickets or four? Three experiments suggest that children might solve this problem by assigning ‘default units’ of quantification to number words, quantifiers, and number morphology. When shown objects that are broken into arbitrary pieces, 4‐year‐olds in Experiment 1 treated pieces as units when counting, interpreting quantifiers, and when using singular–plural morphology. Experiment 2 found that although children treat object‐hood as sufficient for quantification, it is not necessary. Also sufficient for individuation are the criteria provided by known nouns. When two nameable things were glued together (e.g. two cups), children counted the glued things as two. However, when two arbitrary pieces of an object were put together (e.g. two parts of a ball), children counted them as one, even if they had previously counted the pieces as two. Experiment 3 found that when the pieces of broken things were nameable (e.g. wheels of a bicycle), 4‐year‐olds did not include them in counts of whole objects (e.g. bicycles). We discuss the role of default units in early language acquisition, their origin in acquisition, and how children eventually acquire an adult semantics identifying units of quantification.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00954.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_818640768</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ929029</ericid><sourcerecordid>818640768</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4554-56cf36bcf5f91bb55eed6d5a2489dd095c0a02cd917ca7d75ee16a509fd0390e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1vEzEQhi0EoqXwDxCyuPS0wV6v7TUSBwhpAVWAxEd7sxx7NnXYeFt7rSb_vl5ScsAXz_h9ZuSZFyFMyYyW82Y9o42QlRStnNWkvBKieDPbPkLHB-FxiZlgleT86gg9S2lNCGkYoU_RUU0pV6SVx8h_92B9WOFxWMF4DRGHvIHorelxb8IqmxW8xfba9y5COE04J8BDhx10JvcjzsGPCfuAwcR-h-2Qwzi1M8Hh22xK0pVeox_Cc_SkM32CFw_3Cfp1tvg5_1RdfDv_PH9_UdmG86biwnZMLG3HO0WXS84BnHDc1E2rnCtjWmJIbZ2i0hrpZNGpMJyozhGmCLATdLrvexOH2wxp1BufLPRlGhhy0i1tRUPKhgr5-j9yPeQYyucKJGvV8kYW6NUDlJcbcPom-o2JO_1vhQV4uQemrR3kxRdVK1KrIr_by3e-h91Bp0RPTuq1ngzTk2F6clL_dVJv9cfFj3mJSn21r_dphO2h3sQ_Wkgmub78eq6vLj8I-VucacbuAX-eoKc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>817298547</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Piecing together numerical language: children's use of default units in early counting and quantification</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Brooks, Neon ; Pogue, Amanda ; Barner, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Brooks, Neon ; Pogue, Amanda ; Barner, David</creatorcontrib><description>When asked to ‘find three forks’, adult speakers of English use the noun ‘fork’ to identify units for counting. However, when number words (e.g. three) and quantifiers (e.g. more, every) are used with unfamiliar words (‘Give me three blickets’) noun‐specific conceptual criteria are unavailable for picking out units. This poses a problem for young children learning language, who begin to use quantifiers and number words by age 2, despite knowing a relatively small number of nouns. Without knowing how individual nouns pick out units of quantification – e.g. what counts as a blicket– how could children decide whether there are three blickets or four? Three experiments suggest that children might solve this problem by assigning ‘default units’ of quantification to number words, quantifiers, and number morphology. When shown objects that are broken into arbitrary pieces, 4‐year‐olds in Experiment 1 treated pieces as units when counting, interpreting quantifiers, and when using singular–plural morphology. Experiment 2 found that although children treat object‐hood as sufficient for quantification, it is not necessary. Also sufficient for individuation are the criteria provided by known nouns. When two nameable things were glued together (e.g. two cups), children counted the glued things as two. However, when two arbitrary pieces of an object were put together (e.g. two parts of a ball), children counted them as one, even if they had previously counted the pieces as two. Experiment 3 found that when the pieces of broken things were nameable (e.g. wheels of a bicycle), 4‐year‐olds did not include them in counts of whole objects (e.g. bicycles). We discuss the role of default units in early language acquisition, their origin in acquisition, and how children eventually acquire an adult semantics identifying units of quantification.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1363-755X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-7687</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00954.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21159087</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Age Factors ; Auditory Perception ; Child development ; Child, Preschool ; Children ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Developmental psychology ; Discrimination (Psychology) ; Female ; Grammar ; Humans ; Identification ; Language ; Language Acquisition ; Language Development ; Male ; Mathematical Concepts ; Morphology (Languages) ; Nouns ; Number Concepts ; Numbers ; Numeracy ; Problem Solving ; Psycholinguistics ; Semantics ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Developmental science, 2011-01, Vol.14 (1), p.44-57</ispartof><rights>2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4554-56cf36bcf5f91bb55eed6d5a2489dd095c0a02cd917ca7d75ee16a509fd0390e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1467-7687.2010.00954.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1467-7687.2010.00954.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ929029$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21159087$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brooks, Neon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pogue, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barner, David</creatorcontrib><title>Piecing together numerical language: children's use of default units in early counting and quantification</title><title>Developmental science</title><addtitle>Dev Sci</addtitle><description>When asked to ‘find three forks’, adult speakers of English use the noun ‘fork’ to identify units for counting. However, when number words (e.g. three) and quantifiers (e.g. more, every) are used with unfamiliar words (‘Give me three blickets’) noun‐specific conceptual criteria are unavailable for picking out units. This poses a problem for young children learning language, who begin to use quantifiers and number words by age 2, despite knowing a relatively small number of nouns. Without knowing how individual nouns pick out units of quantification – e.g. what counts as a blicket– how could children decide whether there are three blickets or four? Three experiments suggest that children might solve this problem by assigning ‘default units’ of quantification to number words, quantifiers, and number morphology. When shown objects that are broken into arbitrary pieces, 4‐year‐olds in Experiment 1 treated pieces as units when counting, interpreting quantifiers, and when using singular–plural morphology. Experiment 2 found that although children treat object‐hood as sufficient for quantification, it is not necessary. Also sufficient for individuation are the criteria provided by known nouns. When two nameable things were glued together (e.g. two cups), children counted the glued things as two. However, when two arbitrary pieces of an object were put together (e.g. two parts of a ball), children counted them as one, even if they had previously counted the pieces as two. Experiment 3 found that when the pieces of broken things were nameable (e.g. wheels of a bicycle), 4‐year‐olds did not include them in counts of whole objects (e.g. bicycles). We discuss the role of default units in early language acquisition, their origin in acquisition, and how children eventually acquire an adult semantics identifying units of quantification.</description><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Auditory Perception</subject><subject>Child development</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Developmental psychology</subject><subject>Discrimination (Psychology)</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Grammar</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Language Acquisition</subject><subject>Language Development</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mathematical Concepts</subject><subject>Morphology (Languages)</subject><subject>Nouns</subject><subject>Number Concepts</subject><subject>Numbers</subject><subject>Numeracy</subject><subject>Problem Solving</subject><subject>Psycholinguistics</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1363-755X</issn><issn>1467-7687</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1vEzEQhi0EoqXwDxCyuPS0wV6v7TUSBwhpAVWAxEd7sxx7NnXYeFt7rSb_vl5ScsAXz_h9ZuSZFyFMyYyW82Y9o42QlRStnNWkvBKieDPbPkLHB-FxiZlgleT86gg9S2lNCGkYoU_RUU0pV6SVx8h_92B9WOFxWMF4DRGHvIHorelxb8IqmxW8xfba9y5COE04J8BDhx10JvcjzsGPCfuAwcR-h-2Qwzi1M8Hh22xK0pVeox_Cc_SkM32CFw_3Cfp1tvg5_1RdfDv_PH9_UdmG86biwnZMLG3HO0WXS84BnHDc1E2rnCtjWmJIbZ2i0hrpZNGpMJyozhGmCLATdLrvexOH2wxp1BufLPRlGhhy0i1tRUPKhgr5-j9yPeQYyucKJGvV8kYW6NUDlJcbcPom-o2JO_1vhQV4uQemrR3kxRdVK1KrIr_by3e-h91Bp0RPTuq1ngzTk2F6clL_dVJv9cfFj3mJSn21r_dphO2h3sQ_Wkgmub78eq6vLj8I-VucacbuAX-eoKc</recordid><startdate>201101</startdate><enddate>201101</enddate><creator>Brooks, Neon</creator><creator>Pogue, Amanda</creator><creator>Barner, David</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201101</creationdate><title>Piecing together numerical language: children's use of default units in early counting and quantification</title><author>Brooks, Neon ; Pogue, Amanda ; Barner, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4554-56cf36bcf5f91bb55eed6d5a2489dd095c0a02cd917ca7d75ee16a509fd0390e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Auditory Perception</topic><topic>Child development</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Developmental psychology</topic><topic>Discrimination (Psychology)</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Grammar</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Language Acquisition</topic><topic>Language Development</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mathematical Concepts</topic><topic>Morphology (Languages)</topic><topic>Nouns</topic><topic>Number Concepts</topic><topic>Numbers</topic><topic>Numeracy</topic><topic>Problem Solving</topic><topic>Psycholinguistics</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brooks, Neon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pogue, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barner, David</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Developmental science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brooks, Neon</au><au>Pogue, Amanda</au><au>Barner, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ929029</ericid><atitle>Piecing together numerical language: children's use of default units in early counting and quantification</atitle><jtitle>Developmental science</jtitle><addtitle>Dev Sci</addtitle><date>2011-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>44</spage><epage>57</epage><pages>44-57</pages><issn>1363-755X</issn><eissn>1467-7687</eissn><abstract>When asked to ‘find three forks’, adult speakers of English use the noun ‘fork’ to identify units for counting. However, when number words (e.g. three) and quantifiers (e.g. more, every) are used with unfamiliar words (‘Give me three blickets’) noun‐specific conceptual criteria are unavailable for picking out units. This poses a problem for young children learning language, who begin to use quantifiers and number words by age 2, despite knowing a relatively small number of nouns. Without knowing how individual nouns pick out units of quantification – e.g. what counts as a blicket– how could children decide whether there are three blickets or four? Three experiments suggest that children might solve this problem by assigning ‘default units’ of quantification to number words, quantifiers, and number morphology. When shown objects that are broken into arbitrary pieces, 4‐year‐olds in Experiment 1 treated pieces as units when counting, interpreting quantifiers, and when using singular–plural morphology. Experiment 2 found that although children treat object‐hood as sufficient for quantification, it is not necessary. Also sufficient for individuation are the criteria provided by known nouns. When two nameable things were glued together (e.g. two cups), children counted the glued things as two. However, when two arbitrary pieces of an object were put together (e.g. two parts of a ball), children counted them as one, even if they had previously counted the pieces as two. Experiment 3 found that when the pieces of broken things were nameable (e.g. wheels of a bicycle), 4‐year‐olds did not include them in counts of whole objects (e.g. bicycles). We discuss the role of default units in early language acquisition, their origin in acquisition, and how children eventually acquire an adult semantics identifying units of quantification.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>21159087</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00954.x</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1363-755X
ispartof Developmental science, 2011-01, Vol.14 (1), p.44-57
issn 1363-755X
1467-7687
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_818640768
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Age Factors
Auditory Perception
Child development
Child, Preschool
Children
Cognition & reasoning
Developmental psychology
Discrimination (Psychology)
Female
Grammar
Humans
Identification
Language
Language Acquisition
Language Development
Male
Mathematical Concepts
Morphology (Languages)
Nouns
Number Concepts
Numbers
Numeracy
Problem Solving
Psycholinguistics
Semantics
Young Adult
title Piecing together numerical language: children's use of default units in early counting and quantification
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T01%3A52%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Piecing%20together%20numerical%20language:%20children's%20use%20of%20default%20units%20in%20early%20counting%20and%20quantification&rft.jtitle=Developmental%20science&rft.au=Brooks,%20Neon&rft.date=2011-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=44&rft.epage=57&rft.pages=44-57&rft.issn=1363-755X&rft.eissn=1467-7687&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00954.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E818640768%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=817298547&rft_id=info:pmid/21159087&rft_ericid=EJ929029&rfr_iscdi=true