An evaluation of impacts of DEM resolution and parameter correlation on TOPMODEL modeling uncertainty

► Uncertainty should be due solely to DEM resolution changes by fixing the parameter values. ► The Copula-based analysis of the correlation structures of the model parameters. ► Evaluation of uncertainty of parameters with more behavioral parameter sets. ► Uncertainty due to parameter correlation ca...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam) 2010-11, Vol.394 (3-4), p.370-383
Hauptverfasser: Lin, Kairong, Zhang, Qiang, Chen, Xiaohong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 383
container_issue 3-4
container_start_page 370
container_title Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)
container_volume 394
creator Lin, Kairong
Zhang, Qiang
Chen, Xiaohong
description ► Uncertainty should be due solely to DEM resolution changes by fixing the parameter values. ► The Copula-based analysis of the correlation structures of the model parameters. ► Evaluation of uncertainty of parameters with more behavioral parameter sets. ► Uncertainty due to parameter correlation can be considerably removed. Hydrological modeling uncertainties are the results of many factors such as input error, calibration accuracy, parameter uncertainty, model structure, and so on. Wherein, input errors and parameter uncertainties are the two of the major factors influencing the uncertainties of hydrological modeling. TOPMODEL is a rainfall–runoff model that bases its distributed predictions on analysis of watershed topography, which is widely used in hydrological modeling practices. In this study, the effects of DEM resolution and parameter correlation on TOPMODEL modeling uncertainties are evaluated by using GLUE technique. The uncertainty evaluation is performed by modeling the rainfall–runoff processes of three tributaries in the Hanjiang River, one of the major tributaries of the Yangtze River, China. The results show no evident effects of the DEM resolution on the uncertainty intervals of the TOPMODEL simulation. This can be attributed to the fact that the modeling uncertainty is due solely to changes of DEM resolution by fixing the parameter values to avoid the artifacts resulted from interactions between ln( a/tan( B)) and the parameters. In addition, the copula functions are used to produce more behavioral parameter sets for the same sample time intervals when the model parameters are in good correlation, and which can benefit thorough evaluation of effects of parameter correlation on the hydrological modeling uncertainty. With the same number of the behavioral parameter sets, after putting the parameter correlation under consideration, the simulated runoff series by the TOPMODEL with the behavioral parameter sets can fit reasonably better the observed runoff series. Thus, the uncertainty due to parameter correlation of the TOPMODEL modeling can be considerably removed. This study is of great theoretical and practical merits in sound understanding of the modeling behaviors of the TOPMODEL under the influences of inputs and parameter correlation.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.09.012
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_817606671</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022169410005925</els_id><sourcerecordid>817606671</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a418t-b7eb12b5cc5253b396b40cbd7c5956f1f55d21b449e979e019fa2ee888a941cc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEGP1CAYhonRxHH1Jxi5GE8dgdJSTmazO6smsxkTd8_kK_26MqEwQrvJ_HsZZ-JVLhB43o83DyHvOVtzxtvP-_X-13FI0a8FK3dMrxkXL8iKd0pXQjH1kqwYE6LirZavyZuc96ysupYrgteB4jP4BWYXA40jddMB7JxPx9vNPU2Yo1_-PkIY6AESTDhjojamhP4SC_Rh9-N-d7vZ0ikO6F14okuwmGZwYT6-Ja9G8BnfXfYr8ni3ebj5Vm13X7_fXG8rkLybq15hz0XfWNuIpu5r3faS2X5QttFNO_KxaQbBeyk1aqWRcT2CQOy6DrTk1tZX5NN57iHF3wvm2UwuW_QeAsYlm46rlrWt4oVszqRNMeeEozkkN0E6Gs7MyarZm4tVc7JqmDbFasl9vPwA2YIfEwTr8r-wqKXQXKjCfThzI0QDT6kwjz_LoLqUZlqKU4MvZwKLkGeHyWTrsDgbXEI7myG6_3T5A5ocmhw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>817606671</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An evaluation of impacts of DEM resolution and parameter correlation on TOPMODEL modeling uncertainty</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Lin, Kairong ; Zhang, Qiang ; Chen, Xiaohong</creator><creatorcontrib>Lin, Kairong ; Zhang, Qiang ; Chen, Xiaohong</creatorcontrib><description>► Uncertainty should be due solely to DEM resolution changes by fixing the parameter values. ► The Copula-based analysis of the correlation structures of the model parameters. ► Evaluation of uncertainty of parameters with more behavioral parameter sets. ► Uncertainty due to parameter correlation can be considerably removed. Hydrological modeling uncertainties are the results of many factors such as input error, calibration accuracy, parameter uncertainty, model structure, and so on. Wherein, input errors and parameter uncertainties are the two of the major factors influencing the uncertainties of hydrological modeling. TOPMODEL is a rainfall–runoff model that bases its distributed predictions on analysis of watershed topography, which is widely used in hydrological modeling practices. In this study, the effects of DEM resolution and parameter correlation on TOPMODEL modeling uncertainties are evaluated by using GLUE technique. The uncertainty evaluation is performed by modeling the rainfall–runoff processes of three tributaries in the Hanjiang River, one of the major tributaries of the Yangtze River, China. The results show no evident effects of the DEM resolution on the uncertainty intervals of the TOPMODEL simulation. This can be attributed to the fact that the modeling uncertainty is due solely to changes of DEM resolution by fixing the parameter values to avoid the artifacts resulted from interactions between ln( a/tan( B)) and the parameters. In addition, the copula functions are used to produce more behavioral parameter sets for the same sample time intervals when the model parameters are in good correlation, and which can benefit thorough evaluation of effects of parameter correlation on the hydrological modeling uncertainty. With the same number of the behavioral parameter sets, after putting the parameter correlation under consideration, the simulated runoff series by the TOPMODEL with the behavioral parameter sets can fit reasonably better the observed runoff series. Thus, the uncertainty due to parameter correlation of the TOPMODEL modeling can be considerably removed. This study is of great theoretical and practical merits in sound understanding of the modeling behaviors of the TOPMODEL under the influences of inputs and parameter correlation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1694</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2707</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.09.012</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JHYDA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Computer simulation ; Correlation ; Correlation analysis ; DEM resolution ; Discrete element method ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; GLUE ; Hydrology ; Hydrology. Hydrogeology ; Intervals ; Mathematical models ; Modeling uncertainty ; Parameter correlation ; TOPMODEL ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam), 2010-11, Vol.394 (3-4), p.370-383</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a418t-b7eb12b5cc5253b396b40cbd7c5956f1f55d21b449e979e019fa2ee888a941cc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a418t-b7eb12b5cc5253b396b40cbd7c5956f1f55d21b449e979e019fa2ee888a941cc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169410005925$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23429127$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lin, Kairong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Qiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xiaohong</creatorcontrib><title>An evaluation of impacts of DEM resolution and parameter correlation on TOPMODEL modeling uncertainty</title><title>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</title><description>► Uncertainty should be due solely to DEM resolution changes by fixing the parameter values. ► The Copula-based analysis of the correlation structures of the model parameters. ► Evaluation of uncertainty of parameters with more behavioral parameter sets. ► Uncertainty due to parameter correlation can be considerably removed. Hydrological modeling uncertainties are the results of many factors such as input error, calibration accuracy, parameter uncertainty, model structure, and so on. Wherein, input errors and parameter uncertainties are the two of the major factors influencing the uncertainties of hydrological modeling. TOPMODEL is a rainfall–runoff model that bases its distributed predictions on analysis of watershed topography, which is widely used in hydrological modeling practices. In this study, the effects of DEM resolution and parameter correlation on TOPMODEL modeling uncertainties are evaluated by using GLUE technique. The uncertainty evaluation is performed by modeling the rainfall–runoff processes of three tributaries in the Hanjiang River, one of the major tributaries of the Yangtze River, China. The results show no evident effects of the DEM resolution on the uncertainty intervals of the TOPMODEL simulation. This can be attributed to the fact that the modeling uncertainty is due solely to changes of DEM resolution by fixing the parameter values to avoid the artifacts resulted from interactions between ln( a/tan( B)) and the parameters. In addition, the copula functions are used to produce more behavioral parameter sets for the same sample time intervals when the model parameters are in good correlation, and which can benefit thorough evaluation of effects of parameter correlation on the hydrological modeling uncertainty. With the same number of the behavioral parameter sets, after putting the parameter correlation under consideration, the simulated runoff series by the TOPMODEL with the behavioral parameter sets can fit reasonably better the observed runoff series. Thus, the uncertainty due to parameter correlation of the TOPMODEL modeling can be considerably removed. This study is of great theoretical and practical merits in sound understanding of the modeling behaviors of the TOPMODEL under the influences of inputs and parameter correlation.</description><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>DEM resolution</subject><subject>Discrete element method</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>GLUE</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Intervals</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Modeling uncertainty</subject><subject>Parameter correlation</subject><subject>TOPMODEL</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>0022-1694</issn><issn>1879-2707</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEGP1CAYhonRxHH1Jxi5GE8dgdJSTmazO6smsxkTd8_kK_26MqEwQrvJ_HsZZ-JVLhB43o83DyHvOVtzxtvP-_X-13FI0a8FK3dMrxkXL8iKd0pXQjH1kqwYE6LirZavyZuc96ysupYrgteB4jP4BWYXA40jddMB7JxPx9vNPU2Yo1_-PkIY6AESTDhjojamhP4SC_Rh9-N-d7vZ0ikO6F14okuwmGZwYT6-Ja9G8BnfXfYr8ni3ebj5Vm13X7_fXG8rkLybq15hz0XfWNuIpu5r3faS2X5QttFNO_KxaQbBeyk1aqWRcT2CQOy6DrTk1tZX5NN57iHF3wvm2UwuW_QeAsYlm46rlrWt4oVszqRNMeeEozkkN0E6Gs7MyarZm4tVc7JqmDbFasl9vPwA2YIfEwTr8r-wqKXQXKjCfThzI0QDT6kwjz_LoLqUZlqKU4MvZwKLkGeHyWTrsDgbXEI7myG6_3T5A5ocmhw</recordid><startdate>20101126</startdate><enddate>20101126</enddate><creator>Lin, Kairong</creator><creator>Zhang, Qiang</creator><creator>Chen, Xiaohong</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>[Amsterdam; New York]: Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101126</creationdate><title>An evaluation of impacts of DEM resolution and parameter correlation on TOPMODEL modeling uncertainty</title><author>Lin, Kairong ; Zhang, Qiang ; Chen, Xiaohong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a418t-b7eb12b5cc5253b396b40cbd7c5956f1f55d21b449e979e019fa2ee888a941cc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>DEM resolution</topic><topic>Discrete element method</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>GLUE</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Intervals</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Modeling uncertainty</topic><topic>Parameter correlation</topic><topic>TOPMODEL</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lin, Kairong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Qiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xiaohong</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lin, Kairong</au><au>Zhang, Qiang</au><au>Chen, Xiaohong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An evaluation of impacts of DEM resolution and parameter correlation on TOPMODEL modeling uncertainty</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</jtitle><date>2010-11-26</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>394</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>370</spage><epage>383</epage><pages>370-383</pages><issn>0022-1694</issn><eissn>1879-2707</eissn><coden>JHYDA7</coden><abstract>► Uncertainty should be due solely to DEM resolution changes by fixing the parameter values. ► The Copula-based analysis of the correlation structures of the model parameters. ► Evaluation of uncertainty of parameters with more behavioral parameter sets. ► Uncertainty due to parameter correlation can be considerably removed. Hydrological modeling uncertainties are the results of many factors such as input error, calibration accuracy, parameter uncertainty, model structure, and so on. Wherein, input errors and parameter uncertainties are the two of the major factors influencing the uncertainties of hydrological modeling. TOPMODEL is a rainfall–runoff model that bases its distributed predictions on analysis of watershed topography, which is widely used in hydrological modeling practices. In this study, the effects of DEM resolution and parameter correlation on TOPMODEL modeling uncertainties are evaluated by using GLUE technique. The uncertainty evaluation is performed by modeling the rainfall–runoff processes of three tributaries in the Hanjiang River, one of the major tributaries of the Yangtze River, China. The results show no evident effects of the DEM resolution on the uncertainty intervals of the TOPMODEL simulation. This can be attributed to the fact that the modeling uncertainty is due solely to changes of DEM resolution by fixing the parameter values to avoid the artifacts resulted from interactions between ln( a/tan( B)) and the parameters. In addition, the copula functions are used to produce more behavioral parameter sets for the same sample time intervals when the model parameters are in good correlation, and which can benefit thorough evaluation of effects of parameter correlation on the hydrological modeling uncertainty. With the same number of the behavioral parameter sets, after putting the parameter correlation under consideration, the simulated runoff series by the TOPMODEL with the behavioral parameter sets can fit reasonably better the observed runoff series. Thus, the uncertainty due to parameter correlation of the TOPMODEL modeling can be considerably removed. This study is of great theoretical and practical merits in sound understanding of the modeling behaviors of the TOPMODEL under the influences of inputs and parameter correlation.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.09.012</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1694
ispartof Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam), 2010-11, Vol.394 (3-4), p.370-383
issn 0022-1694
1879-2707
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_817606671
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Computer simulation
Correlation
Correlation analysis
DEM resolution
Discrete element method
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Exact sciences and technology
GLUE
Hydrology
Hydrology. Hydrogeology
Intervals
Mathematical models
Modeling uncertainty
Parameter correlation
TOPMODEL
Uncertainty
title An evaluation of impacts of DEM resolution and parameter correlation on TOPMODEL modeling uncertainty
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T21%3A25%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20evaluation%20of%20impacts%20of%20DEM%20resolution%20and%20parameter%20correlation%20on%20TOPMODEL%20modeling%20uncertainty&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hydrology%20(Amsterdam)&rft.au=Lin,%20Kairong&rft.date=2010-11-26&rft.volume=394&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=370&rft.epage=383&rft.pages=370-383&rft.issn=0022-1694&rft.eissn=1879-2707&rft.coden=JHYDA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.09.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E817606671%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=817606671&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0022169410005925&rfr_iscdi=true