Sugarcane Response to Phosphorus Fertilizer on Everglades Histosols
Determining sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) yield response to P fertilizer supports the development of agricultural best management practices consistent with Everglades restoration efforts. Field studies were conducted on organic soils to determine sugarcane yield responses to P fertilizer. Four test sit...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Agronomy journal 2010-09, Vol.102 (5), p.1468-1477 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1477 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1468 |
container_title | Agronomy journal |
container_volume | 102 |
creator | McCray, J. Mabry Rice, Ronald W Luo, Yigang Ji, Shangning |
description | Determining sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) yield response to P fertilizer supports the development of agricultural best management practices consistent with Everglades restoration efforts. Field studies were conducted on organic soils to determine sugarcane yield responses to P fertilizer. Four test sites were established on Florida Histosols (water-extractable P = 1.3, 1.7, 2.1, and 9.0 g P m−3) with annual banded rates of 0, 9, 18, 36, 72, and 144 kg P ha−1 There were a total of 13 crop years with duration of each test ranging from 2 to 4 yr. Linear and quadratic regression and single degree of freedom contrasts were used to determine P fertilizer requirements. There were responses in t cane ha−1 (TCH) and t sucrose ha−1 (TSH) to P fertilizer application at four and three sites, respectively. Annual fertilizer P requirement at the four sites ranged from 18 to 33 kg P ha−1, with no consistent change in P requirement across crop years. Based on measured response (95% of maximum yield) in TCH and TSH up to 33 kg P ha−1, the maximum P recommendation for sugarcane grown on Florida Histosols should be maintained at 36 kg P ha−1 Minimal reductions in sucrose concentration (kg sucrose t−1 cane) were measured at P rates ≤36 kg P ha−1 Water-extractable P did not predict the measured yield response at all sites, demonstrating the need for an updated soil test calibration that should be applicable over a wide pH range and include both quickly available and reserve soil P. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2134/agronj2010.0046 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_817605916</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>817605916</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4106-5b952df6e4b89d23d99b02768999cf84b3301f7b4785d30c091313d9acc5abde3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1r20AQxZeSQpyPc44VhZKTktlPaU_FGMeJCU2J4_OyWq1sGUXr7lgt6V_fNTYt5NLTMDO_eW94hFxRuGGUi1u7iqHfMEg9gFAfyIgKLnNQQp6QEQCwnGrFTskZ4gaAUi3oiEwWw8pGZ3ufPXvchh59tgvZ93XA7TrEAbM7H3dt1_72MQt9Nv3p46qztcfsvsVdwNDhBfnY2A795bGek-Xd9GVynz8-zR4m48fcCQoql5WWrG6UF1Wpa8ZrrStghSq11q4pRcU50KaoRFHKmoMDTTlNlHVO2qr2_JxcH3S3MfwYPO7Ma4vOd136PgxoSlookJqqRH5-R27CEPv0nCkkSFUwCQm6PUAuBsToG7ON7auNb4aC2Udq_kVq9pGmiy9HWYvOdk20vWvx7xnjjPNCscR9PXC_2s6__U_WjGdzNp49P32b72dHp08HhcaGPZ9clou0TQlpJkAD_wOQQ5LS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>750567250</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sugarcane Response to Phosphorus Fertilizer on Everglades Histosols</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>McCray, J. Mabry ; Rice, Ronald W ; Luo, Yigang ; Ji, Shangning</creator><creatorcontrib>McCray, J. Mabry ; Rice, Ronald W ; Luo, Yigang ; Ji, Shangning</creatorcontrib><description>Determining sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) yield response to P fertilizer supports the development of agricultural best management practices consistent with Everglades restoration efforts. Field studies were conducted on organic soils to determine sugarcane yield responses to P fertilizer. Four test sites were established on Florida Histosols (water-extractable P = 1.3, 1.7, 2.1, and 9.0 g P m−3) with annual banded rates of 0, 9, 18, 36, 72, and 144 kg P ha−1 There were a total of 13 crop years with duration of each test ranging from 2 to 4 yr. Linear and quadratic regression and single degree of freedom contrasts were used to determine P fertilizer requirements. There were responses in t cane ha−1 (TCH) and t sucrose ha−1 (TSH) to P fertilizer application at four and three sites, respectively. Annual fertilizer P requirement at the four sites ranged from 18 to 33 kg P ha−1, with no consistent change in P requirement across crop years. Based on measured response (95% of maximum yield) in TCH and TSH up to 33 kg P ha−1, the maximum P recommendation for sugarcane grown on Florida Histosols should be maintained at 36 kg P ha−1 Minimal reductions in sucrose concentration (kg sucrose t−1 cane) were measured at P rates ≤36 kg P ha−1 Water-extractable P did not predict the measured yield response at all sites, demonstrating the need for an updated soil test calibration that should be applicable over a wide pH range and include both quickly available and reserve soil P.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-1962</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1435-0645</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0645</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2134/agronj2010.0046</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AGJOAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: American Society of Agronomy</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; application methods ; Biological and medical sciences ; calibration ; crop yield ; dry matter accumulation ; Everglades histosols ; fertilizer rates ; fertilizer requirements ; fertilizer response ; field experimentation ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agronomy. Plant production ; good agricultural practices ; Histosols ; Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium fertilizations ; Phosphorus fertilization ; phosphorus fertilizers ; Saccharum ; soil pH ; soil test values ; Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments ; sucrose ; Sugarcane ; yield components</subject><ispartof>Agronomy journal, 2010-09, Vol.102 (5), p.1468-1477</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 by the American Society of Agronomy</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Sep 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4106-5b952df6e4b89d23d99b02768999cf84b3301f7b4785d30c091313d9acc5abde3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4106-5b952df6e4b89d23d99b02768999cf84b3301f7b4785d30c091313d9acc5abde3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2134%2Fagronj2010.0046$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2134%2Fagronj2010.0046$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23233762$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McCray, J. Mabry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rice, Ronald W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Yigang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ji, Shangning</creatorcontrib><title>Sugarcane Response to Phosphorus Fertilizer on Everglades Histosols</title><title>Agronomy journal</title><description>Determining sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) yield response to P fertilizer supports the development of agricultural best management practices consistent with Everglades restoration efforts. Field studies were conducted on organic soils to determine sugarcane yield responses to P fertilizer. Four test sites were established on Florida Histosols (water-extractable P = 1.3, 1.7, 2.1, and 9.0 g P m−3) with annual banded rates of 0, 9, 18, 36, 72, and 144 kg P ha−1 There were a total of 13 crop years with duration of each test ranging from 2 to 4 yr. Linear and quadratic regression and single degree of freedom contrasts were used to determine P fertilizer requirements. There were responses in t cane ha−1 (TCH) and t sucrose ha−1 (TSH) to P fertilizer application at four and three sites, respectively. Annual fertilizer P requirement at the four sites ranged from 18 to 33 kg P ha−1, with no consistent change in P requirement across crop years. Based on measured response (95% of maximum yield) in TCH and TSH up to 33 kg P ha−1, the maximum P recommendation for sugarcane grown on Florida Histosols should be maintained at 36 kg P ha−1 Minimal reductions in sucrose concentration (kg sucrose t−1 cane) were measured at P rates ≤36 kg P ha−1 Water-extractable P did not predict the measured yield response at all sites, demonstrating the need for an updated soil test calibration that should be applicable over a wide pH range and include both quickly available and reserve soil P.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>application methods</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>calibration</subject><subject>crop yield</subject><subject>dry matter accumulation</subject><subject>Everglades histosols</subject><subject>fertilizer rates</subject><subject>fertilizer requirements</subject><subject>fertilizer response</subject><subject>field experimentation</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>good agricultural practices</subject><subject>Histosols</subject><subject>Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium fertilizations</subject><subject>Phosphorus fertilization</subject><subject>phosphorus fertilizers</subject><subject>Saccharum</subject><subject>soil pH</subject><subject>soil test values</subject><subject>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments</subject><subject>sucrose</subject><subject>Sugarcane</subject><subject>yield components</subject><issn>0002-1962</issn><issn>1435-0645</issn><issn>1435-0645</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1r20AQxZeSQpyPc44VhZKTktlPaU_FGMeJCU2J4_OyWq1sGUXr7lgt6V_fNTYt5NLTMDO_eW94hFxRuGGUi1u7iqHfMEg9gFAfyIgKLnNQQp6QEQCwnGrFTskZ4gaAUi3oiEwWw8pGZ3ufPXvchh59tgvZ93XA7TrEAbM7H3dt1_72MQt9Nv3p46qztcfsvsVdwNDhBfnY2A795bGek-Xd9GVynz8-zR4m48fcCQoql5WWrG6UF1Wpa8ZrrStghSq11q4pRcU50KaoRFHKmoMDTTlNlHVO2qr2_JxcH3S3MfwYPO7Ma4vOd136PgxoSlookJqqRH5-R27CEPv0nCkkSFUwCQm6PUAuBsToG7ON7auNb4aC2Udq_kVq9pGmiy9HWYvOdk20vWvx7xnjjPNCscR9PXC_2s6__U_WjGdzNp49P32b72dHp08HhcaGPZ9clou0TQlpJkAD_wOQQ5LS</recordid><startdate>201009</startdate><enddate>201009</enddate><creator>McCray, J. Mabry</creator><creator>Rice, Ronald W</creator><creator>Luo, Yigang</creator><creator>Ji, Shangning</creator><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201009</creationdate><title>Sugarcane Response to Phosphorus Fertilizer on Everglades Histosols</title><author>McCray, J. Mabry ; Rice, Ronald W ; Luo, Yigang ; Ji, Shangning</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4106-5b952df6e4b89d23d99b02768999cf84b3301f7b4785d30c091313d9acc5abde3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>application methods</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>calibration</topic><topic>crop yield</topic><topic>dry matter accumulation</topic><topic>Everglades histosols</topic><topic>fertilizer rates</topic><topic>fertilizer requirements</topic><topic>fertilizer response</topic><topic>field experimentation</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>good agricultural practices</topic><topic>Histosols</topic><topic>Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium fertilizations</topic><topic>Phosphorus fertilization</topic><topic>phosphorus fertilizers</topic><topic>Saccharum</topic><topic>soil pH</topic><topic>soil test values</topic><topic>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments</topic><topic>sucrose</topic><topic>Sugarcane</topic><topic>yield components</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McCray, J. Mabry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rice, Ronald W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Yigang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ji, Shangning</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McCray, J. Mabry</au><au>Rice, Ronald W</au><au>Luo, Yigang</au><au>Ji, Shangning</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sugarcane Response to Phosphorus Fertilizer on Everglades Histosols</atitle><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle><date>2010-09</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>102</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1468</spage><epage>1477</epage><pages>1468-1477</pages><issn>0002-1962</issn><issn>1435-0645</issn><eissn>1435-0645</eissn><coden>AGJOAT</coden><abstract>Determining sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) yield response to P fertilizer supports the development of agricultural best management practices consistent with Everglades restoration efforts. Field studies were conducted on organic soils to determine sugarcane yield responses to P fertilizer. Four test sites were established on Florida Histosols (water-extractable P = 1.3, 1.7, 2.1, and 9.0 g P m−3) with annual banded rates of 0, 9, 18, 36, 72, and 144 kg P ha−1 There were a total of 13 crop years with duration of each test ranging from 2 to 4 yr. Linear and quadratic regression and single degree of freedom contrasts were used to determine P fertilizer requirements. There were responses in t cane ha−1 (TCH) and t sucrose ha−1 (TSH) to P fertilizer application at four and three sites, respectively. Annual fertilizer P requirement at the four sites ranged from 18 to 33 kg P ha−1, with no consistent change in P requirement across crop years. Based on measured response (95% of maximum yield) in TCH and TSH up to 33 kg P ha−1, the maximum P recommendation for sugarcane grown on Florida Histosols should be maintained at 36 kg P ha−1 Minimal reductions in sucrose concentration (kg sucrose t−1 cane) were measured at P rates ≤36 kg P ha−1 Water-extractable P did not predict the measured yield response at all sites, demonstrating the need for an updated soil test calibration that should be applicable over a wide pH range and include both quickly available and reserve soil P.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>American Society of Agronomy</pub><doi>10.2134/agronj2010.0046</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-1962 |
ispartof | Agronomy journal, 2010-09, Vol.102 (5), p.1468-1477 |
issn | 0002-1962 1435-0645 1435-0645 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_817605916 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions application methods Biological and medical sciences calibration crop yield dry matter accumulation Everglades histosols fertilizer rates fertilizer requirements fertilizer response field experimentation Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General agronomy. Plant production good agricultural practices Histosols Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium fertilizations Phosphorus fertilization phosphorus fertilizers Saccharum soil pH soil test values Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments sucrose Sugarcane yield components |
title | Sugarcane Response to Phosphorus Fertilizer on Everglades Histosols |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T06%3A44%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sugarcane%20Response%20to%20Phosphorus%20Fertilizer%20on%20Everglades%20Histosols&rft.jtitle=Agronomy%20journal&rft.au=McCray,%20J.%20Mabry&rft.date=2010-09&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1468&rft.epage=1477&rft.pages=1468-1477&rft.issn=0002-1962&rft.eissn=1435-0645&rft.coden=AGJOAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134/agronj2010.0046&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E817605916%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=750567250&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |