Sugarcane Response to Phosphorus Fertilizer on Everglades Histosols

Determining sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) yield response to P fertilizer supports the development of agricultural best management practices consistent with Everglades restoration efforts. Field studies were conducted on organic soils to determine sugarcane yield responses to P fertilizer. Four test sit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agronomy journal 2010-09, Vol.102 (5), p.1468-1477
Hauptverfasser: McCray, J. Mabry, Rice, Ronald W, Luo, Yigang, Ji, Shangning
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1477
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1468
container_title Agronomy journal
container_volume 102
creator McCray, J. Mabry
Rice, Ronald W
Luo, Yigang
Ji, Shangning
description Determining sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) yield response to P fertilizer supports the development of agricultural best management practices consistent with Everglades restoration efforts. Field studies were conducted on organic soils to determine sugarcane yield responses to P fertilizer. Four test sites were established on Florida Histosols (water-extractable P = 1.3, 1.7, 2.1, and 9.0 g P m−3) with annual banded rates of 0, 9, 18, 36, 72, and 144 kg P ha−1 There were a total of 13 crop years with duration of each test ranging from 2 to 4 yr. Linear and quadratic regression and single degree of freedom contrasts were used to determine P fertilizer requirements. There were responses in t cane ha−1 (TCH) and t sucrose ha−1 (TSH) to P fertilizer application at four and three sites, respectively. Annual fertilizer P requirement at the four sites ranged from 18 to 33 kg P ha−1, with no consistent change in P requirement across crop years. Based on measured response (95% of maximum yield) in TCH and TSH up to 33 kg P ha−1, the maximum P recommendation for sugarcane grown on Florida Histosols should be maintained at 36 kg P ha−1 Minimal reductions in sucrose concentration (kg sucrose t−1 cane) were measured at P rates ≤36 kg P ha−1 Water-extractable P did not predict the measured yield response at all sites, demonstrating the need for an updated soil test calibration that should be applicable over a wide pH range and include both quickly available and reserve soil P.
doi_str_mv 10.2134/agronj2010.0046
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_817605916</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>817605916</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4106-5b952df6e4b89d23d99b02768999cf84b3301f7b4785d30c091313d9acc5abde3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1r20AQxZeSQpyPc44VhZKTktlPaU_FGMeJCU2J4_OyWq1sGUXr7lgt6V_fNTYt5NLTMDO_eW94hFxRuGGUi1u7iqHfMEg9gFAfyIgKLnNQQp6QEQCwnGrFTskZ4gaAUi3oiEwWw8pGZ3ufPXvchh59tgvZ93XA7TrEAbM7H3dt1_72MQt9Nv3p46qztcfsvsVdwNDhBfnY2A795bGek-Xd9GVynz8-zR4m48fcCQoql5WWrG6UF1Wpa8ZrrStghSq11q4pRcU50KaoRFHKmoMDTTlNlHVO2qr2_JxcH3S3MfwYPO7Ma4vOd136PgxoSlookJqqRH5-R27CEPv0nCkkSFUwCQm6PUAuBsToG7ON7auNb4aC2Udq_kVq9pGmiy9HWYvOdk20vWvx7xnjjPNCscR9PXC_2s6__U_WjGdzNp49P32b72dHp08HhcaGPZ9clou0TQlpJkAD_wOQQ5LS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>750567250</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sugarcane Response to Phosphorus Fertilizer on Everglades Histosols</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>McCray, J. Mabry ; Rice, Ronald W ; Luo, Yigang ; Ji, Shangning</creator><creatorcontrib>McCray, J. Mabry ; Rice, Ronald W ; Luo, Yigang ; Ji, Shangning</creatorcontrib><description>Determining sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) yield response to P fertilizer supports the development of agricultural best management practices consistent with Everglades restoration efforts. Field studies were conducted on organic soils to determine sugarcane yield responses to P fertilizer. Four test sites were established on Florida Histosols (water-extractable P = 1.3, 1.7, 2.1, and 9.0 g P m−3) with annual banded rates of 0, 9, 18, 36, 72, and 144 kg P ha−1 There were a total of 13 crop years with duration of each test ranging from 2 to 4 yr. Linear and quadratic regression and single degree of freedom contrasts were used to determine P fertilizer requirements. There were responses in t cane ha−1 (TCH) and t sucrose ha−1 (TSH) to P fertilizer application at four and three sites, respectively. Annual fertilizer P requirement at the four sites ranged from 18 to 33 kg P ha−1, with no consistent change in P requirement across crop years. Based on measured response (95% of maximum yield) in TCH and TSH up to 33 kg P ha−1, the maximum P recommendation for sugarcane grown on Florida Histosols should be maintained at 36 kg P ha−1 Minimal reductions in sucrose concentration (kg sucrose t−1 cane) were measured at P rates ≤36 kg P ha−1 Water-extractable P did not predict the measured yield response at all sites, demonstrating the need for an updated soil test calibration that should be applicable over a wide pH range and include both quickly available and reserve soil P.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-1962</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1435-0645</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0645</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2134/agronj2010.0046</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AGJOAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: American Society of Agronomy</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; application methods ; Biological and medical sciences ; calibration ; crop yield ; dry matter accumulation ; Everglades histosols ; fertilizer rates ; fertilizer requirements ; fertilizer response ; field experimentation ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agronomy. Plant production ; good agricultural practices ; Histosols ; Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium fertilizations ; Phosphorus fertilization ; phosphorus fertilizers ; Saccharum ; soil pH ; soil test values ; Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments ; sucrose ; Sugarcane ; yield components</subject><ispartof>Agronomy journal, 2010-09, Vol.102 (5), p.1468-1477</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 by the American Society of Agronomy</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Sep 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4106-5b952df6e4b89d23d99b02768999cf84b3301f7b4785d30c091313d9acc5abde3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4106-5b952df6e4b89d23d99b02768999cf84b3301f7b4785d30c091313d9acc5abde3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2134%2Fagronj2010.0046$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2134%2Fagronj2010.0046$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23233762$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McCray, J. Mabry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rice, Ronald W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Yigang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ji, Shangning</creatorcontrib><title>Sugarcane Response to Phosphorus Fertilizer on Everglades Histosols</title><title>Agronomy journal</title><description>Determining sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) yield response to P fertilizer supports the development of agricultural best management practices consistent with Everglades restoration efforts. Field studies were conducted on organic soils to determine sugarcane yield responses to P fertilizer. Four test sites were established on Florida Histosols (water-extractable P = 1.3, 1.7, 2.1, and 9.0 g P m−3) with annual banded rates of 0, 9, 18, 36, 72, and 144 kg P ha−1 There were a total of 13 crop years with duration of each test ranging from 2 to 4 yr. Linear and quadratic regression and single degree of freedom contrasts were used to determine P fertilizer requirements. There were responses in t cane ha−1 (TCH) and t sucrose ha−1 (TSH) to P fertilizer application at four and three sites, respectively. Annual fertilizer P requirement at the four sites ranged from 18 to 33 kg P ha−1, with no consistent change in P requirement across crop years. Based on measured response (95% of maximum yield) in TCH and TSH up to 33 kg P ha−1, the maximum P recommendation for sugarcane grown on Florida Histosols should be maintained at 36 kg P ha−1 Minimal reductions in sucrose concentration (kg sucrose t−1 cane) were measured at P rates ≤36 kg P ha−1 Water-extractable P did not predict the measured yield response at all sites, demonstrating the need for an updated soil test calibration that should be applicable over a wide pH range and include both quickly available and reserve soil P.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>application methods</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>calibration</subject><subject>crop yield</subject><subject>dry matter accumulation</subject><subject>Everglades histosols</subject><subject>fertilizer rates</subject><subject>fertilizer requirements</subject><subject>fertilizer response</subject><subject>field experimentation</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>good agricultural practices</subject><subject>Histosols</subject><subject>Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium fertilizations</subject><subject>Phosphorus fertilization</subject><subject>phosphorus fertilizers</subject><subject>Saccharum</subject><subject>soil pH</subject><subject>soil test values</subject><subject>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments</subject><subject>sucrose</subject><subject>Sugarcane</subject><subject>yield components</subject><issn>0002-1962</issn><issn>1435-0645</issn><issn>1435-0645</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1r20AQxZeSQpyPc44VhZKTktlPaU_FGMeJCU2J4_OyWq1sGUXr7lgt6V_fNTYt5NLTMDO_eW94hFxRuGGUi1u7iqHfMEg9gFAfyIgKLnNQQp6QEQCwnGrFTskZ4gaAUi3oiEwWw8pGZ3ufPXvchh59tgvZ93XA7TrEAbM7H3dt1_72MQt9Nv3p46qztcfsvsVdwNDhBfnY2A795bGek-Xd9GVynz8-zR4m48fcCQoql5WWrG6UF1Wpa8ZrrStghSq11q4pRcU50KaoRFHKmoMDTTlNlHVO2qr2_JxcH3S3MfwYPO7Ma4vOd136PgxoSlookJqqRH5-R27CEPv0nCkkSFUwCQm6PUAuBsToG7ON7auNb4aC2Udq_kVq9pGmiy9HWYvOdk20vWvx7xnjjPNCscR9PXC_2s6__U_WjGdzNp49P32b72dHp08HhcaGPZ9clou0TQlpJkAD_wOQQ5LS</recordid><startdate>201009</startdate><enddate>201009</enddate><creator>McCray, J. Mabry</creator><creator>Rice, Ronald W</creator><creator>Luo, Yigang</creator><creator>Ji, Shangning</creator><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201009</creationdate><title>Sugarcane Response to Phosphorus Fertilizer on Everglades Histosols</title><author>McCray, J. Mabry ; Rice, Ronald W ; Luo, Yigang ; Ji, Shangning</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4106-5b952df6e4b89d23d99b02768999cf84b3301f7b4785d30c091313d9acc5abde3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>application methods</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>calibration</topic><topic>crop yield</topic><topic>dry matter accumulation</topic><topic>Everglades histosols</topic><topic>fertilizer rates</topic><topic>fertilizer requirements</topic><topic>fertilizer response</topic><topic>field experimentation</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>good agricultural practices</topic><topic>Histosols</topic><topic>Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium fertilizations</topic><topic>Phosphorus fertilization</topic><topic>phosphorus fertilizers</topic><topic>Saccharum</topic><topic>soil pH</topic><topic>soil test values</topic><topic>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments</topic><topic>sucrose</topic><topic>Sugarcane</topic><topic>yield components</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McCray, J. Mabry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rice, Ronald W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Yigang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ji, Shangning</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McCray, J. Mabry</au><au>Rice, Ronald W</au><au>Luo, Yigang</au><au>Ji, Shangning</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sugarcane Response to Phosphorus Fertilizer on Everglades Histosols</atitle><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle><date>2010-09</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>102</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1468</spage><epage>1477</epage><pages>1468-1477</pages><issn>0002-1962</issn><issn>1435-0645</issn><eissn>1435-0645</eissn><coden>AGJOAT</coden><abstract>Determining sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) yield response to P fertilizer supports the development of agricultural best management practices consistent with Everglades restoration efforts. Field studies were conducted on organic soils to determine sugarcane yield responses to P fertilizer. Four test sites were established on Florida Histosols (water-extractable P = 1.3, 1.7, 2.1, and 9.0 g P m−3) with annual banded rates of 0, 9, 18, 36, 72, and 144 kg P ha−1 There were a total of 13 crop years with duration of each test ranging from 2 to 4 yr. Linear and quadratic regression and single degree of freedom contrasts were used to determine P fertilizer requirements. There were responses in t cane ha−1 (TCH) and t sucrose ha−1 (TSH) to P fertilizer application at four and three sites, respectively. Annual fertilizer P requirement at the four sites ranged from 18 to 33 kg P ha−1, with no consistent change in P requirement across crop years. Based on measured response (95% of maximum yield) in TCH and TSH up to 33 kg P ha−1, the maximum P recommendation for sugarcane grown on Florida Histosols should be maintained at 36 kg P ha−1 Minimal reductions in sucrose concentration (kg sucrose t−1 cane) were measured at P rates ≤36 kg P ha−1 Water-extractable P did not predict the measured yield response at all sites, demonstrating the need for an updated soil test calibration that should be applicable over a wide pH range and include both quickly available and reserve soil P.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>American Society of Agronomy</pub><doi>10.2134/agronj2010.0046</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-1962
ispartof Agronomy journal, 2010-09, Vol.102 (5), p.1468-1477
issn 0002-1962
1435-0645
1435-0645
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_817605916
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
application methods
Biological and medical sciences
calibration
crop yield
dry matter accumulation
Everglades histosols
fertilizer rates
fertilizer requirements
fertilizer response
field experimentation
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General agronomy. Plant production
good agricultural practices
Histosols
Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium fertilizations
Phosphorus fertilization
phosphorus fertilizers
Saccharum
soil pH
soil test values
Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments
sucrose
Sugarcane
yield components
title Sugarcane Response to Phosphorus Fertilizer on Everglades Histosols
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T06%3A44%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sugarcane%20Response%20to%20Phosphorus%20Fertilizer%20on%20Everglades%20Histosols&rft.jtitle=Agronomy%20journal&rft.au=McCray,%20J.%20Mabry&rft.date=2010-09&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1468&rft.epage=1477&rft.pages=1468-1477&rft.issn=0002-1962&rft.eissn=1435-0645&rft.coden=AGJOAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134/agronj2010.0046&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E817605916%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=750567250&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true