The performance of vasectomy in an urban municipality. Practical considerations for follow-up

To establish an adequate follow-up protocol based on time to azoospermia achievement after vasectomy. Also, to review the rate of complications in our setting. Retrospective analysis of 391 men who underwent vasectomy. Follow-up was performed by means of semen analysis 6 months after surgery, and th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archivos españoles de urología 2010-11, Vol.63 (9), p.797-802
Hauptverfasser: Luján, Marcos, Vigil, Almudena, Turo, Jorge, Pascual, Carlos, Nevado, Manuel, Martín, Carlos, Chiva, Vicente
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 802
container_issue 9
container_start_page 797
container_title Archivos españoles de urología
container_volume 63
creator Luján, Marcos
Vigil, Almudena
Turo, Jorge
Pascual, Carlos
Nevado, Manuel
Martín, Carlos
Chiva, Vicente
description To establish an adequate follow-up protocol based on time to azoospermia achievement after vasectomy. Also, to review the rate of complications in our setting. Retrospective analysis of 391 men who underwent vasectomy. Follow-up was performed by means of semen analysis 6 months after surgery, and then every 3 months until azoospermia was achieved. Data of visits to the emergency unit at our centre were obtained within the first 30 postoperative days. During follow-up 567 semen analysis were performed. From 391 vasectomy interventions, 275 had at least one semen sample available and valid for processing. After the first 6 months from surgery, 41.1%men still presented nonmotile rare sperm in semen analysis, 9.7% after 9 months, and 4.7% after 12 months. If semen analysis was postponed from 6 to 9 months after surgery, a total yearly saving of 6,153.23 Euro would be observed in our setting, but with the drawback of delaying the diagnosis of azoospermia in nearly 60% of men. Overall complication rate was 3.1%(only one man required hospital admittance and reintervention). No statistical difference was observed in operative time with regard to the presence or absence of urological complications. The percentage of men not achieving azoospermia 6 months after surgery is notorious. Vasectomy practice in our setting seems to be reliable and safe, with a limited rate of complications.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_816526884</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>816526884</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p554-7e8aaac6169be618f824c86ee272c5e1f67c76a37af4e6e25bb97407f64766153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kEtLxDAUhYMgzjj6FyQ7V5UmTW7SpQy-YEAXs5Vym7nBSNvUpFXm31twXJzH4uMszhlbC22gsBLKFbvM-bMsKyu0vmArKcra1qVas_f9B_GRko-px8ERj55_YyY3xf7Iw8Bx4HNqF-_nIbgwYhem4x1_S-im4LDjLg45HCjhFJbGl6FFXRd_inm8Yuceu0zXp9yw_ePDfvtc7F6fXrb3u2LUWhWGLCI6EFC3BMJ6K5WzQCSNdJqEB-MMYGXQKwKSum1ro0rjQRkAoasNu_2bHVP8milPTR-yo67DgeKcGytAS7BWLeTNiZzbng7NmEKP6dj8H1L9AoIQXIQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>816526884</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The performance of vasectomy in an urban municipality. Practical considerations for follow-up</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Luján, Marcos ; Vigil, Almudena ; Turo, Jorge ; Pascual, Carlos ; Nevado, Manuel ; Martín, Carlos ; Chiva, Vicente</creator><creatorcontrib>Luján, Marcos ; Vigil, Almudena ; Turo, Jorge ; Pascual, Carlos ; Nevado, Manuel ; Martín, Carlos ; Chiva, Vicente</creatorcontrib><description>To establish an adequate follow-up protocol based on time to azoospermia achievement after vasectomy. Also, to review the rate of complications in our setting. Retrospective analysis of 391 men who underwent vasectomy. Follow-up was performed by means of semen analysis 6 months after surgery, and then every 3 months until azoospermia was achieved. Data of visits to the emergency unit at our centre were obtained within the first 30 postoperative days. During follow-up 567 semen analysis were performed. From 391 vasectomy interventions, 275 had at least one semen sample available and valid for processing. After the first 6 months from surgery, 41.1%men still presented nonmotile rare sperm in semen analysis, 9.7% after 9 months, and 4.7% after 12 months. If semen analysis was postponed from 6 to 9 months after surgery, a total yearly saving of 6,153.23 Euro would be observed in our setting, but with the drawback of delaying the diagnosis of azoospermia in nearly 60% of men. Overall complication rate was 3.1%(only one man required hospital admittance and reintervention). No statistical difference was observed in operative time with regard to the presence or absence of urological complications. The percentage of men not achieving azoospermia 6 months after surgery is notorious. Vasectomy practice in our setting seems to be reliable and safe, with a limited rate of complications.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1576-8260</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21098904</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Spain</publisher><subject>Adult ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Semen Analysis ; Spain ; Treatment Failure ; Urban Health ; Vasectomy - adverse effects</subject><ispartof>Archivos españoles de urología, 2010-11, Vol.63 (9), p.797-802</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21098904$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Luján, Marcos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vigil, Almudena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turo, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pascual, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nevado, Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martín, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiva, Vicente</creatorcontrib><title>The performance of vasectomy in an urban municipality. Practical considerations for follow-up</title><title>Archivos españoles de urología</title><addtitle>Arch Esp Urol</addtitle><description>To establish an adequate follow-up protocol based on time to azoospermia achievement after vasectomy. Also, to review the rate of complications in our setting. Retrospective analysis of 391 men who underwent vasectomy. Follow-up was performed by means of semen analysis 6 months after surgery, and then every 3 months until azoospermia was achieved. Data of visits to the emergency unit at our centre were obtained within the first 30 postoperative days. During follow-up 567 semen analysis were performed. From 391 vasectomy interventions, 275 had at least one semen sample available and valid for processing. After the first 6 months from surgery, 41.1%men still presented nonmotile rare sperm in semen analysis, 9.7% after 9 months, and 4.7% after 12 months. If semen analysis was postponed from 6 to 9 months after surgery, a total yearly saving of 6,153.23 Euro would be observed in our setting, but with the drawback of delaying the diagnosis of azoospermia in nearly 60% of men. Overall complication rate was 3.1%(only one man required hospital admittance and reintervention). No statistical difference was observed in operative time with regard to the presence or absence of urological complications. The percentage of men not achieving azoospermia 6 months after surgery is notorious. Vasectomy practice in our setting seems to be reliable and safe, with a limited rate of complications.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Semen Analysis</subject><subject>Spain</subject><subject>Treatment Failure</subject><subject>Urban Health</subject><subject>Vasectomy - adverse effects</subject><issn>1576-8260</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kEtLxDAUhYMgzjj6FyQ7V5UmTW7SpQy-YEAXs5Vym7nBSNvUpFXm31twXJzH4uMszhlbC22gsBLKFbvM-bMsKyu0vmArKcra1qVas_f9B_GRko-px8ERj55_YyY3xf7Iw8Bx4HNqF-_nIbgwYhem4x1_S-im4LDjLg45HCjhFJbGl6FFXRd_inm8Yuceu0zXp9yw_ePDfvtc7F6fXrb3u2LUWhWGLCI6EFC3BMJ6K5WzQCSNdJqEB-MMYGXQKwKSum1ro0rjQRkAoasNu_2bHVP8milPTR-yo67DgeKcGytAS7BWLeTNiZzbng7NmEKP6dj8H1L9AoIQXIQ</recordid><startdate>201011</startdate><enddate>201011</enddate><creator>Luján, Marcos</creator><creator>Vigil, Almudena</creator><creator>Turo, Jorge</creator><creator>Pascual, Carlos</creator><creator>Nevado, Manuel</creator><creator>Martín, Carlos</creator><creator>Chiva, Vicente</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201011</creationdate><title>The performance of vasectomy in an urban municipality. Practical considerations for follow-up</title><author>Luján, Marcos ; Vigil, Almudena ; Turo, Jorge ; Pascual, Carlos ; Nevado, Manuel ; Martín, Carlos ; Chiva, Vicente</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p554-7e8aaac6169be618f824c86ee272c5e1f67c76a37af4e6e25bb97407f64766153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Semen Analysis</topic><topic>Spain</topic><topic>Treatment Failure</topic><topic>Urban Health</topic><topic>Vasectomy - adverse effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Luján, Marcos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vigil, Almudena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turo, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pascual, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nevado, Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martín, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiva, Vicente</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archivos españoles de urología</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Luján, Marcos</au><au>Vigil, Almudena</au><au>Turo, Jorge</au><au>Pascual, Carlos</au><au>Nevado, Manuel</au><au>Martín, Carlos</au><au>Chiva, Vicente</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The performance of vasectomy in an urban municipality. Practical considerations for follow-up</atitle><jtitle>Archivos españoles de urología</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Esp Urol</addtitle><date>2010-11</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>797</spage><epage>802</epage><pages>797-802</pages><eissn>1576-8260</eissn><abstract>To establish an adequate follow-up protocol based on time to azoospermia achievement after vasectomy. Also, to review the rate of complications in our setting. Retrospective analysis of 391 men who underwent vasectomy. Follow-up was performed by means of semen analysis 6 months after surgery, and then every 3 months until azoospermia was achieved. Data of visits to the emergency unit at our centre were obtained within the first 30 postoperative days. During follow-up 567 semen analysis were performed. From 391 vasectomy interventions, 275 had at least one semen sample available and valid for processing. After the first 6 months from surgery, 41.1%men still presented nonmotile rare sperm in semen analysis, 9.7% after 9 months, and 4.7% after 12 months. If semen analysis was postponed from 6 to 9 months after surgery, a total yearly saving of 6,153.23 Euro would be observed in our setting, but with the drawback of delaying the diagnosis of azoospermia in nearly 60% of men. Overall complication rate was 3.1%(only one man required hospital admittance and reintervention). No statistical difference was observed in operative time with regard to the presence or absence of urological complications. The percentage of men not achieving azoospermia 6 months after surgery is notorious. Vasectomy practice in our setting seems to be reliable and safe, with a limited rate of complications.</abstract><cop>Spain</cop><pmid>21098904</pmid><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1576-8260
ispartof Archivos españoles de urología, 2010-11, Vol.63 (9), p.797-802
issn 1576-8260
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_816526884
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Retrospective Studies
Semen Analysis
Spain
Treatment Failure
Urban Health
Vasectomy - adverse effects
title The performance of vasectomy in an urban municipality. Practical considerations for follow-up
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T10%3A49%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20performance%20of%20vasectomy%20in%20an%20urban%20municipality.%20Practical%20considerations%20for%20follow-up&rft.jtitle=Archivos%20espa%C3%B1oles%20de%20urolog%C3%ADa&rft.au=Luj%C3%A1n,%20Marcos&rft.date=2010-11&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=797&rft.epage=802&rft.pages=797-802&rft.eissn=1576-8260&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E816526884%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=816526884&rft_id=info:pmid/21098904&rfr_iscdi=true