The safety and effectiveness of endoscopic and non-endoscopic approaches to the management of early esophageal cancer: A systematic review

Summary Introduction Traditionally, management of early cancer (stages 0–IIA) has comprised esophagectomy, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Recent efforts to improve outcomes and minimize side-effects have focussed on minimally invasive, endoscopic treatments tha...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer treatment reviews 2011-02, Vol.37 (1), p.11-62
Hauptverfasser: McCann, Paul, Stafinski, Tania, Wong, Clarence, Menon, Devidas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 62
container_issue 1
container_start_page 11
container_title Cancer treatment reviews
container_volume 37
creator McCann, Paul
Stafinski, Tania
Wong, Clarence
Menon, Devidas
description Summary Introduction Traditionally, management of early cancer (stages 0–IIA) has comprised esophagectomy, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Recent efforts to improve outcomes and minimize side-effects have focussed on minimally invasive, endoscopic treatments that remove lesions while sparing healthy tissue. This review assesses their safety and efficacy/effectiveness relative to traditional, non-endoscopic treatments for early esophageal cancer. Methods A systematic review of peer-reviewed studies was performed using Cochrane guidelines. Bibliographic databases searched to identify relevant English language studies published in the last 3 years included: PubMed (i.e., MEDLINE and additional sources), EMBASE, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, the UK Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (NHS EED, DARE and HTA) databases, EconLit and Web of Science. Web sites of professional associations, relevant cancer organizations, clinical practice guidelines, and clinical trials were also searched. Two independent reviewers selected, critically appraised, and extracted information from studies. Results The review included 75 studies spanning 3124 patients and 10 forms of treatment. Most studies were of short term duration and non-comparative. Adverse events reported across studies of endoscopic techniques were similar and less significant compared to those in the studies of non-endoscopic techniques. Complete response rates were slightly lower for photodynamic therapy (PDT) relative to the other endoscopic techniques, possibly due to differences in patient populations across studies. No studies compared overall or cause-specific survival in patients who received endoscopic treatments vs. those who received non-endoscopic treatments. Discussion Based on findings from this review, there is no single “best practice” approach to the treatment of early esophageal cancer.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ctrv.2010.04.006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_816386132</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0305737210000848</els_id><sourcerecordid>816386132</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-c74611cd0f8cfa0819cf835f24fcc3eda87ac7ea3f75b5edd0623105c34ac2993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UstuFDEQtBCILIEf4IB84zRL254nQkhRxEuKxIFwtpyeNutlxh7s2Y3mF_hqPNmAEAdOlspVpe6qZuy5gK0AUb_ab3GOx62EDEC5BagfsI2olCxEVzcP2QYUVEWjGnnGnqS0B4BO1d1jdiahaqAs5Yb9vN4RT8bSvHDje07WEs7uSJ5S4sFy8n1IGCaHd_8--OJvaJpiMLijxOfA5-w1Gm--0Uh-vlObOCycUph2GTUDR-OR4mt-wdOSZhrNnF0iHR3dPmWPrBkSPbt_z9nX9--uLz8WV58_fLq8uCqwFDAX2JS1ENiDbdEaaEWHtlWVlaVFVNSbtjHYkFG2qW4q6nuopRJQoSoNyq5T5-zlyTeP_uNAadajS0jDYDyFQ9KtqFVbCyUzU56YGENKkayeohtNXLQAvVag93qtQK8VaCh1riCLXtzbH25G6v9IfmeeCW9OBMpL5sWjTugox9K7mLPXfXD_93_7jxwH5x2a4TstlPbhEH2OTwudpAb9ZT2C9QZErh_aslW_ANWXr7g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>816386132</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The safety and effectiveness of endoscopic and non-endoscopic approaches to the management of early esophageal cancer: A systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>McCann, Paul ; Stafinski, Tania ; Wong, Clarence ; Menon, Devidas</creator><creatorcontrib>McCann, Paul ; Stafinski, Tania ; Wong, Clarence ; Menon, Devidas</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Introduction Traditionally, management of early cancer (stages 0–IIA) has comprised esophagectomy, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Recent efforts to improve outcomes and minimize side-effects have focussed on minimally invasive, endoscopic treatments that remove lesions while sparing healthy tissue. This review assesses their safety and efficacy/effectiveness relative to traditional, non-endoscopic treatments for early esophageal cancer. Methods A systematic review of peer-reviewed studies was performed using Cochrane guidelines. Bibliographic databases searched to identify relevant English language studies published in the last 3 years included: PubMed (i.e., MEDLINE and additional sources), EMBASE, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, the UK Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (NHS EED, DARE and HTA) databases, EconLit and Web of Science. Web sites of professional associations, relevant cancer organizations, clinical practice guidelines, and clinical trials were also searched. Two independent reviewers selected, critically appraised, and extracted information from studies. Results The review included 75 studies spanning 3124 patients and 10 forms of treatment. Most studies were of short term duration and non-comparative. Adverse events reported across studies of endoscopic techniques were similar and less significant compared to those in the studies of non-endoscopic techniques. Complete response rates were slightly lower for photodynamic therapy (PDT) relative to the other endoscopic techniques, possibly due to differences in patient populations across studies. No studies compared overall or cause-specific survival in patients who received endoscopic treatments vs. those who received non-endoscopic treatments. Discussion Based on findings from this review, there is no single “best practice” approach to the treatment of early esophageal cancer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-7372</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-1967</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2010.04.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20570442</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Argon plasma coagulation ; Chemotherapy ; Combined Modality Therapy - methods ; Cryoablation ; Early esophageal cancer ; Effectiveness ; Endoscopic mucosal resection ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal - methods ; Esophageal Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Esophageal Neoplasms - therapy ; Esophagectomy ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Humans ; Neoplasm Staging - methods ; Photodynamic therapy ; Radio frequency ablation ; Radiotherapy ; Safety ; Systematic review ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Cancer treatment reviews, 2011-02, Vol.37 (1), p.11-62</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2010 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-c74611cd0f8cfa0819cf835f24fcc3eda87ac7ea3f75b5edd0623105c34ac2993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-c74611cd0f8cfa0819cf835f24fcc3eda87ac7ea3f75b5edd0623105c34ac2993</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305737210000848$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20570442$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McCann, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stafinski, Tania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Clarence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menon, Devidas</creatorcontrib><title>The safety and effectiveness of endoscopic and non-endoscopic approaches to the management of early esophageal cancer: A systematic review</title><title>Cancer treatment reviews</title><addtitle>Cancer Treat Rev</addtitle><description>Summary Introduction Traditionally, management of early cancer (stages 0–IIA) has comprised esophagectomy, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Recent efforts to improve outcomes and minimize side-effects have focussed on minimally invasive, endoscopic treatments that remove lesions while sparing healthy tissue. This review assesses their safety and efficacy/effectiveness relative to traditional, non-endoscopic treatments for early esophageal cancer. Methods A systematic review of peer-reviewed studies was performed using Cochrane guidelines. Bibliographic databases searched to identify relevant English language studies published in the last 3 years included: PubMed (i.e., MEDLINE and additional sources), EMBASE, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, the UK Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (NHS EED, DARE and HTA) databases, EconLit and Web of Science. Web sites of professional associations, relevant cancer organizations, clinical practice guidelines, and clinical trials were also searched. Two independent reviewers selected, critically appraised, and extracted information from studies. Results The review included 75 studies spanning 3124 patients and 10 forms of treatment. Most studies were of short term duration and non-comparative. Adverse events reported across studies of endoscopic techniques were similar and less significant compared to those in the studies of non-endoscopic techniques. Complete response rates were slightly lower for photodynamic therapy (PDT) relative to the other endoscopic techniques, possibly due to differences in patient populations across studies. No studies compared overall or cause-specific survival in patients who received endoscopic treatments vs. those who received non-endoscopic treatments. Discussion Based on findings from this review, there is no single “best practice” approach to the treatment of early esophageal cancer.</description><subject>Argon plasma coagulation</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Combined Modality Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Cryoablation</subject><subject>Early esophageal cancer</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Endoscopic mucosal resection</subject><subject>Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal - methods</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Esophagectomy</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging - methods</subject><subject>Photodynamic therapy</subject><subject>Radio frequency ablation</subject><subject>Radiotherapy</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0305-7372</issn><issn>1532-1967</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UstuFDEQtBCILIEf4IB84zRL254nQkhRxEuKxIFwtpyeNutlxh7s2Y3mF_hqPNmAEAdOlspVpe6qZuy5gK0AUb_ab3GOx62EDEC5BagfsI2olCxEVzcP2QYUVEWjGnnGnqS0B4BO1d1jdiahaqAs5Yb9vN4RT8bSvHDje07WEs7uSJ5S4sFy8n1IGCaHd_8--OJvaJpiMLijxOfA5-w1Gm--0Uh-vlObOCycUph2GTUDR-OR4mt-wdOSZhrNnF0iHR3dPmWPrBkSPbt_z9nX9--uLz8WV58_fLq8uCqwFDAX2JS1ENiDbdEaaEWHtlWVlaVFVNSbtjHYkFG2qW4q6nuopRJQoSoNyq5T5-zlyTeP_uNAadajS0jDYDyFQ9KtqFVbCyUzU56YGENKkayeohtNXLQAvVag93qtQK8VaCh1riCLXtzbH25G6v9IfmeeCW9OBMpL5sWjTugox9K7mLPXfXD_93_7jxwH5x2a4TstlPbhEH2OTwudpAb9ZT2C9QZErh_aslW_ANWXr7g</recordid><startdate>20110201</startdate><enddate>20110201</enddate><creator>McCann, Paul</creator><creator>Stafinski, Tania</creator><creator>Wong, Clarence</creator><creator>Menon, Devidas</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110201</creationdate><title>The safety and effectiveness of endoscopic and non-endoscopic approaches to the management of early esophageal cancer: A systematic review</title><author>McCann, Paul ; Stafinski, Tania ; Wong, Clarence ; Menon, Devidas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-c74611cd0f8cfa0819cf835f24fcc3eda87ac7ea3f75b5edd0623105c34ac2993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Argon plasma coagulation</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Combined Modality Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Cryoablation</topic><topic>Early esophageal cancer</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Endoscopic mucosal resection</topic><topic>Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal - methods</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Esophagectomy</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging - methods</topic><topic>Photodynamic therapy</topic><topic>Radio frequency ablation</topic><topic>Radiotherapy</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McCann, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stafinski, Tania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Clarence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menon, Devidas</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer treatment reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McCann, Paul</au><au>Stafinski, Tania</au><au>Wong, Clarence</au><au>Menon, Devidas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The safety and effectiveness of endoscopic and non-endoscopic approaches to the management of early esophageal cancer: A systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Cancer treatment reviews</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer Treat Rev</addtitle><date>2011-02-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>11</spage><epage>62</epage><pages>11-62</pages><issn>0305-7372</issn><eissn>1532-1967</eissn><abstract>Summary Introduction Traditionally, management of early cancer (stages 0–IIA) has comprised esophagectomy, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Recent efforts to improve outcomes and minimize side-effects have focussed on minimally invasive, endoscopic treatments that remove lesions while sparing healthy tissue. This review assesses their safety and efficacy/effectiveness relative to traditional, non-endoscopic treatments for early esophageal cancer. Methods A systematic review of peer-reviewed studies was performed using Cochrane guidelines. Bibliographic databases searched to identify relevant English language studies published in the last 3 years included: PubMed (i.e., MEDLINE and additional sources), EMBASE, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, the UK Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (NHS EED, DARE and HTA) databases, EconLit and Web of Science. Web sites of professional associations, relevant cancer organizations, clinical practice guidelines, and clinical trials were also searched. Two independent reviewers selected, critically appraised, and extracted information from studies. Results The review included 75 studies spanning 3124 patients and 10 forms of treatment. Most studies were of short term duration and non-comparative. Adverse events reported across studies of endoscopic techniques were similar and less significant compared to those in the studies of non-endoscopic techniques. Complete response rates were slightly lower for photodynamic therapy (PDT) relative to the other endoscopic techniques, possibly due to differences in patient populations across studies. No studies compared overall or cause-specific survival in patients who received endoscopic treatments vs. those who received non-endoscopic treatments. Discussion Based on findings from this review, there is no single “best practice” approach to the treatment of early esophageal cancer.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>20570442</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ctrv.2010.04.006</doi><tpages>52</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0305-7372
ispartof Cancer treatment reviews, 2011-02, Vol.37 (1), p.11-62
issn 0305-7372
1532-1967
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_816386132
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Argon plasma coagulation
Chemotherapy
Combined Modality Therapy - methods
Cryoablation
Early esophageal cancer
Effectiveness
Endoscopic mucosal resection
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal - methods
Esophageal Neoplasms - diagnosis
Esophageal Neoplasms - therapy
Esophagectomy
Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine
Humans
Neoplasm Staging - methods
Photodynamic therapy
Radio frequency ablation
Radiotherapy
Safety
Systematic review
Treatment Outcome
title The safety and effectiveness of endoscopic and non-endoscopic approaches to the management of early esophageal cancer: A systematic review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T13%3A01%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20safety%20and%20effectiveness%20of%20endoscopic%20and%20non-endoscopic%20approaches%20to%20the%20management%20of%20early%20esophageal%20cancer:%20A%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Cancer%20treatment%20reviews&rft.au=McCann,%20Paul&rft.date=2011-02-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=11&rft.epage=62&rft.pages=11-62&rft.issn=0305-7372&rft.eissn=1532-1967&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ctrv.2010.04.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E816386132%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=816386132&rft_id=info:pmid/20570442&rft_els_id=S0305737210000848&rfr_iscdi=true