Orthodontic appliance preferences of children and adolescents
Introduction Although attractiveness and acceptability of orthodontic appliances have been rated by adults for themselves and for adolescents, children and adolescents have not provided any substantial data. The objective of this study was to evaluate preferences and acceptability of orthodontic app...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics 2010-12, Vol.138 (6), p.698.e1-698.e12 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 698.e12 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 698.e1 |
container_title | American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics |
container_volume | 138 |
creator | Walton, Daniel K Fields, Henry W Johnston, William M Rosenstiel, Stephen F Firestone, Allen R Christensen, James C |
description | Introduction Although attractiveness and acceptability of orthodontic appliances have been rated by adults for themselves and for adolescents, children and adolescents have not provided any substantial data. The objective of this study was to evaluate preferences and acceptability of orthodontic appliances in children and adolescents. Methods Images of orthodontic appliances previously captured and standardized were selected and incorporated into a computer-based survey. Additional images of shaped brackets and colored elastomeric ties, as well as discolored clear elastomeric ties, were captured and incorporated onto existing survey images with Photoshop (Adobe, San Jose, Calif). The survey displayed 12 orthodontic appliance variations to 139 children in 3 age groups: 9 to 11 years (n = 45), 12 to 14 years (n = 49), and 15 to 17 years (n = 45). The subjects rated each image for attractiveness and acceptability. All images were displayed and rated twice to assess rater reliability. Results Overall reliability ratings were r = 0.74 for attractiveness and k = 0.66 for acceptability. There were significant differences in bracket attractiveness and acceptability in each age group. The highest-rated appliances were clear aligners, twin brackets with colored ties, and shaped brackets with and without colored ties. Colored elastomeric ties improved attractiveness significantly over brackets without colored ties for children in the 12-to-14 year group. There was a tendency for older subjects to rate clear orthodontic appliances higher than did younger subjects. Ceramic brackets with discolored ties tended to be rated lower than ceramic brackets with new ties and scored lowest in acceptability and attractiveness in all age groups. Girls rated shaped brackets significantly higher than did boys. Conclusions Children’s preferences for orthodontic appliances differ by age and sex. Child and adolescent preferences differ from adult preferences. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.06.012 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_816385584</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0889540610006670</els_id><sourcerecordid>816385584</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-42321b9f99083dcaae8fad15c1b1ff21423588ec5b4fc29d9f30dcdfd83dcb23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9P3DAQxa2qqGyBT1Cpyq2nLDN2knUOVKpW0CIh7QHulmOPhdNsnNpZJL49Thc49NKT_7154_k9xr4grBGwuezXug82rDnkG2jWgPwDWyG0m7LZ1PwjW4GUbVlX0Jyyzyn1ANBWHD6xU44oQGC1Yle7OD9ml3H2ptDTNHg9GiqmSI4i5W0qgivMox9sPhZ6tIW2YaBkaJzTOTtxekh08bqesYeb64ftr_Ju9_N2--OuNFUt57LigmPXurYFKazRmqTTFmuDHTrHMb_XUpKpu8oZ3trWCbDGOruoOy7O2Lej7RTDnwOlWe19_sAw6JHCISmJjZB1LausFEeliSGlPISaot_r-KwQ1EJN9eovNbVQU9CoTC1XfX31P3R7su81b5iy4OoooDzkk6eokvELHesjmVnZ4P_T4Ps_9Wbwozd6-E3PlPpwiGPmp1AlrkDdL8EtuWGOrGk2IF4ApWeUTQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>816385584</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Orthodontic appliance preferences of children and adolescents</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Walton, Daniel K ; Fields, Henry W ; Johnston, William M ; Rosenstiel, Stephen F ; Firestone, Allen R ; Christensen, James C</creator><creatorcontrib>Walton, Daniel K ; Fields, Henry W ; Johnston, William M ; Rosenstiel, Stephen F ; Firestone, Allen R ; Christensen, James C</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Although attractiveness and acceptability of orthodontic appliances have been rated by adults for themselves and for adolescents, children and adolescents have not provided any substantial data. The objective of this study was to evaluate preferences and acceptability of orthodontic appliances in children and adolescents. Methods Images of orthodontic appliances previously captured and standardized were selected and incorporated into a computer-based survey. Additional images of shaped brackets and colored elastomeric ties, as well as discolored clear elastomeric ties, were captured and incorporated onto existing survey images with Photoshop (Adobe, San Jose, Calif). The survey displayed 12 orthodontic appliance variations to 139 children in 3 age groups: 9 to 11 years (n = 45), 12 to 14 years (n = 49), and 15 to 17 years (n = 45). The subjects rated each image for attractiveness and acceptability. All images were displayed and rated twice to assess rater reliability. Results Overall reliability ratings were r = 0.74 for attractiveness and k = 0.66 for acceptability. There were significant differences in bracket attractiveness and acceptability in each age group. The highest-rated appliances were clear aligners, twin brackets with colored ties, and shaped brackets with and without colored ties. Colored elastomeric ties improved attractiveness significantly over brackets without colored ties for children in the 12-to-14 year group. There was a tendency for older subjects to rate clear orthodontic appliances higher than did younger subjects. Ceramic brackets with discolored ties tended to be rated lower than ceramic brackets with new ties and scored lowest in acceptability and attractiveness in all age groups. Girls rated shaped brackets significantly higher than did boys. Conclusions Children’s preferences for orthodontic appliances differ by age and sex. Child and adolescent preferences differ from adult preferences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0889-5406</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6752</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.06.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21130314</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Age Factors ; Ceramics ; Child ; Color ; Computer Graphics ; Dental Alloys ; Dental Materials ; Dentistry ; Elastomers ; Esthetics, Dental ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Orthodontic Appliance Design ; Orthodontic Appliances ; Orthodontic Brackets ; Orthodontic Wires ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care ; Patient Preference ; Patient Satisfaction ; Photography, Dental ; Stainless Steel</subject><ispartof>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 2010-12, Vol.138 (6), p.698.e1-698.e12</ispartof><rights>American Association of Orthodontists</rights><rights>2010 American Association of Orthodontists</rights><rights>Copyright © 2010 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-42321b9f99083dcaae8fad15c1b1ff21423588ec5b4fc29d9f30dcdfd83dcb23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-42321b9f99083dcaae8fad15c1b1ff21423588ec5b4fc29d9f30dcdfd83dcb23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889540610006670$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21130314$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Walton, Daniel K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fields, Henry W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, William M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenstiel, Stephen F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Firestone, Allen R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, James C</creatorcontrib><title>Orthodontic appliance preferences of children and adolescents</title><title>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics</title><addtitle>Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop</addtitle><description>Introduction Although attractiveness and acceptability of orthodontic appliances have been rated by adults for themselves and for adolescents, children and adolescents have not provided any substantial data. The objective of this study was to evaluate preferences and acceptability of orthodontic appliances in children and adolescents. Methods Images of orthodontic appliances previously captured and standardized were selected and incorporated into a computer-based survey. Additional images of shaped brackets and colored elastomeric ties, as well as discolored clear elastomeric ties, were captured and incorporated onto existing survey images with Photoshop (Adobe, San Jose, Calif). The survey displayed 12 orthodontic appliance variations to 139 children in 3 age groups: 9 to 11 years (n = 45), 12 to 14 years (n = 49), and 15 to 17 years (n = 45). The subjects rated each image for attractiveness and acceptability. All images were displayed and rated twice to assess rater reliability. Results Overall reliability ratings were r = 0.74 for attractiveness and k = 0.66 for acceptability. There were significant differences in bracket attractiveness and acceptability in each age group. The highest-rated appliances were clear aligners, twin brackets with colored ties, and shaped brackets with and without colored ties. Colored elastomeric ties improved attractiveness significantly over brackets without colored ties for children in the 12-to-14 year group. There was a tendency for older subjects to rate clear orthodontic appliances higher than did younger subjects. Ceramic brackets with discolored ties tended to be rated lower than ceramic brackets with new ties and scored lowest in acceptability and attractiveness in all age groups. Girls rated shaped brackets significantly higher than did boys. Conclusions Children’s preferences for orthodontic appliances differ by age and sex. Child and adolescent preferences differ from adult preferences.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Ceramics</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Color</subject><subject>Computer Graphics</subject><subject>Dental Alloys</subject><subject>Dental Materials</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Elastomers</subject><subject>Esthetics, Dental</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Orthodontic Appliance Design</subject><subject>Orthodontic Appliances</subject><subject>Orthodontic Brackets</subject><subject>Orthodontic Wires</subject><subject>Patient Acceptance of Health Care</subject><subject>Patient Preference</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Photography, Dental</subject><subject>Stainless Steel</subject><issn>0889-5406</issn><issn>1097-6752</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9P3DAQxa2qqGyBT1Cpyq2nLDN2knUOVKpW0CIh7QHulmOPhdNsnNpZJL49Thc49NKT_7154_k9xr4grBGwuezXug82rDnkG2jWgPwDWyG0m7LZ1PwjW4GUbVlX0Jyyzyn1ANBWHD6xU44oQGC1Yle7OD9ml3H2ptDTNHg9GiqmSI4i5W0qgivMox9sPhZ6tIW2YaBkaJzTOTtxekh08bqesYeb64ftr_Ju9_N2--OuNFUt57LigmPXurYFKazRmqTTFmuDHTrHMb_XUpKpu8oZ3trWCbDGOruoOy7O2Lej7RTDnwOlWe19_sAw6JHCISmJjZB1LausFEeliSGlPISaot_r-KwQ1EJN9eovNbVQU9CoTC1XfX31P3R7su81b5iy4OoooDzkk6eokvELHesjmVnZ4P_T4Ps_9Wbwozd6-E3PlPpwiGPmp1AlrkDdL8EtuWGOrGk2IF4ApWeUTQ</recordid><startdate>20101201</startdate><enddate>20101201</enddate><creator>Walton, Daniel K</creator><creator>Fields, Henry W</creator><creator>Johnston, William M</creator><creator>Rosenstiel, Stephen F</creator><creator>Firestone, Allen R</creator><creator>Christensen, James C</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101201</creationdate><title>Orthodontic appliance preferences of children and adolescents</title><author>Walton, Daniel K ; Fields, Henry W ; Johnston, William M ; Rosenstiel, Stephen F ; Firestone, Allen R ; Christensen, James C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-42321b9f99083dcaae8fad15c1b1ff21423588ec5b4fc29d9f30dcdfd83dcb23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Ceramics</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Color</topic><topic>Computer Graphics</topic><topic>Dental Alloys</topic><topic>Dental Materials</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Elastomers</topic><topic>Esthetics, Dental</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Orthodontic Appliance Design</topic><topic>Orthodontic Appliances</topic><topic>Orthodontic Brackets</topic><topic>Orthodontic Wires</topic><topic>Patient Acceptance of Health Care</topic><topic>Patient Preference</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Photography, Dental</topic><topic>Stainless Steel</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Walton, Daniel K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fields, Henry W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, William M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenstiel, Stephen F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Firestone, Allen R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, James C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Walton, Daniel K</au><au>Fields, Henry W</au><au>Johnston, William M</au><au>Rosenstiel, Stephen F</au><au>Firestone, Allen R</au><au>Christensen, James C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Orthodontic appliance preferences of children and adolescents</atitle><jtitle>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop</addtitle><date>2010-12-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>138</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>698.e1</spage><epage>698.e12</epage><pages>698.e1-698.e12</pages><issn>0889-5406</issn><eissn>1097-6752</eissn><abstract>Introduction Although attractiveness and acceptability of orthodontic appliances have been rated by adults for themselves and for adolescents, children and adolescents have not provided any substantial data. The objective of this study was to evaluate preferences and acceptability of orthodontic appliances in children and adolescents. Methods Images of orthodontic appliances previously captured and standardized were selected and incorporated into a computer-based survey. Additional images of shaped brackets and colored elastomeric ties, as well as discolored clear elastomeric ties, were captured and incorporated onto existing survey images with Photoshop (Adobe, San Jose, Calif). The survey displayed 12 orthodontic appliance variations to 139 children in 3 age groups: 9 to 11 years (n = 45), 12 to 14 years (n = 49), and 15 to 17 years (n = 45). The subjects rated each image for attractiveness and acceptability. All images were displayed and rated twice to assess rater reliability. Results Overall reliability ratings were r = 0.74 for attractiveness and k = 0.66 for acceptability. There were significant differences in bracket attractiveness and acceptability in each age group. The highest-rated appliances were clear aligners, twin brackets with colored ties, and shaped brackets with and without colored ties. Colored elastomeric ties improved attractiveness significantly over brackets without colored ties for children in the 12-to-14 year group. There was a tendency for older subjects to rate clear orthodontic appliances higher than did younger subjects. Ceramic brackets with discolored ties tended to be rated lower than ceramic brackets with new ties and scored lowest in acceptability and attractiveness in all age groups. Girls rated shaped brackets significantly higher than did boys. Conclusions Children’s preferences for orthodontic appliances differ by age and sex. Child and adolescent preferences differ from adult preferences.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>21130314</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.06.012</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0889-5406 |
ispartof | American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 2010-12, Vol.138 (6), p.698.e1-698.e12 |
issn | 0889-5406 1097-6752 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_816385584 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adolescent Age Factors Ceramics Child Color Computer Graphics Dental Alloys Dental Materials Dentistry Elastomers Esthetics, Dental Female Humans Male Orthodontic Appliance Design Orthodontic Appliances Orthodontic Brackets Orthodontic Wires Patient Acceptance of Health Care Patient Preference Patient Satisfaction Photography, Dental Stainless Steel |
title | Orthodontic appliance preferences of children and adolescents |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T08%3A40%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Orthodontic%20appliance%20preferences%20of%20children%20and%20adolescents&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20orthodontics%20and%20dentofacial%20orthopedics&rft.au=Walton,%20Daniel%20K&rft.date=2010-12-01&rft.volume=138&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=698.e1&rft.epage=698.e12&rft.pages=698.e1-698.e12&rft.issn=0889-5406&rft.eissn=1097-6752&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.06.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E816385584%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=816385584&rft_id=info:pmid/21130314&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0889540610006670&rfr_iscdi=true |