Orthodontic appliance preferences of children and adolescents

Introduction Although attractiveness and acceptability of orthodontic appliances have been rated by adults for themselves and for adolescents, children and adolescents have not provided any substantial data. The objective of this study was to evaluate preferences and acceptability of orthodontic app...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics 2010-12, Vol.138 (6), p.698.e1-698.e12
Hauptverfasser: Walton, Daniel K, Fields, Henry W, Johnston, William M, Rosenstiel, Stephen F, Firestone, Allen R, Christensen, James C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 698.e12
container_issue 6
container_start_page 698.e1
container_title American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics
container_volume 138
creator Walton, Daniel K
Fields, Henry W
Johnston, William M
Rosenstiel, Stephen F
Firestone, Allen R
Christensen, James C
description Introduction Although attractiveness and acceptability of orthodontic appliances have been rated by adults for themselves and for adolescents, children and adolescents have not provided any substantial data. The objective of this study was to evaluate preferences and acceptability of orthodontic appliances in children and adolescents. Methods Images of orthodontic appliances previously captured and standardized were selected and incorporated into a computer-based survey. Additional images of shaped brackets and colored elastomeric ties, as well as discolored clear elastomeric ties, were captured and incorporated onto existing survey images with Photoshop (Adobe, San Jose, Calif). The survey displayed 12 orthodontic appliance variations to 139 children in 3 age groups: 9 to 11 years (n = 45), 12 to 14 years (n = 49), and 15 to 17 years (n = 45). The subjects rated each image for attractiveness and acceptability. All images were displayed and rated twice to assess rater reliability. Results Overall reliability ratings were r = 0.74 for attractiveness and k = 0.66 for acceptability. There were significant differences in bracket attractiveness and acceptability in each age group. The highest-rated appliances were clear aligners, twin brackets with colored ties, and shaped brackets with and without colored ties. Colored elastomeric ties improved attractiveness significantly over brackets without colored ties for children in the 12-to-14 year group. There was a tendency for older subjects to rate clear orthodontic appliances higher than did younger subjects. Ceramic brackets with discolored ties tended to be rated lower than ceramic brackets with new ties and scored lowest in acceptability and attractiveness in all age groups. Girls rated shaped brackets significantly higher than did boys. Conclusions Children’s preferences for orthodontic appliances differ by age and sex. Child and adolescent preferences differ from adult preferences.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.06.012
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_816385584</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0889540610006670</els_id><sourcerecordid>816385584</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-42321b9f99083dcaae8fad15c1b1ff21423588ec5b4fc29d9f30dcdfd83dcb23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9P3DAQxa2qqGyBT1Cpyq2nLDN2knUOVKpW0CIh7QHulmOPhdNsnNpZJL49Thc49NKT_7154_k9xr4grBGwuezXug82rDnkG2jWgPwDWyG0m7LZ1PwjW4GUbVlX0Jyyzyn1ANBWHD6xU44oQGC1Yle7OD9ml3H2ptDTNHg9GiqmSI4i5W0qgivMox9sPhZ6tIW2YaBkaJzTOTtxekh08bqesYeb64ftr_Ju9_N2--OuNFUt57LigmPXurYFKazRmqTTFmuDHTrHMb_XUpKpu8oZ3trWCbDGOruoOy7O2Lej7RTDnwOlWe19_sAw6JHCISmJjZB1LausFEeliSGlPISaot_r-KwQ1EJN9eovNbVQU9CoTC1XfX31P3R7su81b5iy4OoooDzkk6eokvELHesjmVnZ4P_T4Ps_9Wbwozd6-E3PlPpwiGPmp1AlrkDdL8EtuWGOrGk2IF4ApWeUTQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>816385584</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Orthodontic appliance preferences of children and adolescents</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Walton, Daniel K ; Fields, Henry W ; Johnston, William M ; Rosenstiel, Stephen F ; Firestone, Allen R ; Christensen, James C</creator><creatorcontrib>Walton, Daniel K ; Fields, Henry W ; Johnston, William M ; Rosenstiel, Stephen F ; Firestone, Allen R ; Christensen, James C</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Although attractiveness and acceptability of orthodontic appliances have been rated by adults for themselves and for adolescents, children and adolescents have not provided any substantial data. The objective of this study was to evaluate preferences and acceptability of orthodontic appliances in children and adolescents. Methods Images of orthodontic appliances previously captured and standardized were selected and incorporated into a computer-based survey. Additional images of shaped brackets and colored elastomeric ties, as well as discolored clear elastomeric ties, were captured and incorporated onto existing survey images with Photoshop (Adobe, San Jose, Calif). The survey displayed 12 orthodontic appliance variations to 139 children in 3 age groups: 9 to 11 years (n = 45), 12 to 14 years (n = 49), and 15 to 17 years (n = 45). The subjects rated each image for attractiveness and acceptability. All images were displayed and rated twice to assess rater reliability. Results Overall reliability ratings were r = 0.74 for attractiveness and k = 0.66 for acceptability. There were significant differences in bracket attractiveness and acceptability in each age group. The highest-rated appliances were clear aligners, twin brackets with colored ties, and shaped brackets with and without colored ties. Colored elastomeric ties improved attractiveness significantly over brackets without colored ties for children in the 12-to-14 year group. There was a tendency for older subjects to rate clear orthodontic appliances higher than did younger subjects. Ceramic brackets with discolored ties tended to be rated lower than ceramic brackets with new ties and scored lowest in acceptability and attractiveness in all age groups. Girls rated shaped brackets significantly higher than did boys. Conclusions Children’s preferences for orthodontic appliances differ by age and sex. Child and adolescent preferences differ from adult preferences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0889-5406</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6752</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.06.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21130314</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Age Factors ; Ceramics ; Child ; Color ; Computer Graphics ; Dental Alloys ; Dental Materials ; Dentistry ; Elastomers ; Esthetics, Dental ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Orthodontic Appliance Design ; Orthodontic Appliances ; Orthodontic Brackets ; Orthodontic Wires ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care ; Patient Preference ; Patient Satisfaction ; Photography, Dental ; Stainless Steel</subject><ispartof>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 2010-12, Vol.138 (6), p.698.e1-698.e12</ispartof><rights>American Association of Orthodontists</rights><rights>2010 American Association of Orthodontists</rights><rights>Copyright © 2010 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-42321b9f99083dcaae8fad15c1b1ff21423588ec5b4fc29d9f30dcdfd83dcb23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-42321b9f99083dcaae8fad15c1b1ff21423588ec5b4fc29d9f30dcdfd83dcb23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889540610006670$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21130314$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Walton, Daniel K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fields, Henry W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, William M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenstiel, Stephen F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Firestone, Allen R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, James C</creatorcontrib><title>Orthodontic appliance preferences of children and adolescents</title><title>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics</title><addtitle>Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop</addtitle><description>Introduction Although attractiveness and acceptability of orthodontic appliances have been rated by adults for themselves and for adolescents, children and adolescents have not provided any substantial data. The objective of this study was to evaluate preferences and acceptability of orthodontic appliances in children and adolescents. Methods Images of orthodontic appliances previously captured and standardized were selected and incorporated into a computer-based survey. Additional images of shaped brackets and colored elastomeric ties, as well as discolored clear elastomeric ties, were captured and incorporated onto existing survey images with Photoshop (Adobe, San Jose, Calif). The survey displayed 12 orthodontic appliance variations to 139 children in 3 age groups: 9 to 11 years (n = 45), 12 to 14 years (n = 49), and 15 to 17 years (n = 45). The subjects rated each image for attractiveness and acceptability. All images were displayed and rated twice to assess rater reliability. Results Overall reliability ratings were r = 0.74 for attractiveness and k = 0.66 for acceptability. There were significant differences in bracket attractiveness and acceptability in each age group. The highest-rated appliances were clear aligners, twin brackets with colored ties, and shaped brackets with and without colored ties. Colored elastomeric ties improved attractiveness significantly over brackets without colored ties for children in the 12-to-14 year group. There was a tendency for older subjects to rate clear orthodontic appliances higher than did younger subjects. Ceramic brackets with discolored ties tended to be rated lower than ceramic brackets with new ties and scored lowest in acceptability and attractiveness in all age groups. Girls rated shaped brackets significantly higher than did boys. Conclusions Children’s preferences for orthodontic appliances differ by age and sex. Child and adolescent preferences differ from adult preferences.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Ceramics</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Color</subject><subject>Computer Graphics</subject><subject>Dental Alloys</subject><subject>Dental Materials</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Elastomers</subject><subject>Esthetics, Dental</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Orthodontic Appliance Design</subject><subject>Orthodontic Appliances</subject><subject>Orthodontic Brackets</subject><subject>Orthodontic Wires</subject><subject>Patient Acceptance of Health Care</subject><subject>Patient Preference</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Photography, Dental</subject><subject>Stainless Steel</subject><issn>0889-5406</issn><issn>1097-6752</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9P3DAQxa2qqGyBT1Cpyq2nLDN2knUOVKpW0CIh7QHulmOPhdNsnNpZJL49Thc49NKT_7154_k9xr4grBGwuezXug82rDnkG2jWgPwDWyG0m7LZ1PwjW4GUbVlX0Jyyzyn1ANBWHD6xU44oQGC1Yle7OD9ml3H2ptDTNHg9GiqmSI4i5W0qgivMox9sPhZ6tIW2YaBkaJzTOTtxekh08bqesYeb64ftr_Ju9_N2--OuNFUt57LigmPXurYFKazRmqTTFmuDHTrHMb_XUpKpu8oZ3trWCbDGOruoOy7O2Lej7RTDnwOlWe19_sAw6JHCISmJjZB1LausFEeliSGlPISaot_r-KwQ1EJN9eovNbVQU9CoTC1XfX31P3R7su81b5iy4OoooDzkk6eokvELHesjmVnZ4P_T4Ps_9Wbwozd6-E3PlPpwiGPmp1AlrkDdL8EtuWGOrGk2IF4ApWeUTQ</recordid><startdate>20101201</startdate><enddate>20101201</enddate><creator>Walton, Daniel K</creator><creator>Fields, Henry W</creator><creator>Johnston, William M</creator><creator>Rosenstiel, Stephen F</creator><creator>Firestone, Allen R</creator><creator>Christensen, James C</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101201</creationdate><title>Orthodontic appliance preferences of children and adolescents</title><author>Walton, Daniel K ; Fields, Henry W ; Johnston, William M ; Rosenstiel, Stephen F ; Firestone, Allen R ; Christensen, James C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-42321b9f99083dcaae8fad15c1b1ff21423588ec5b4fc29d9f30dcdfd83dcb23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Ceramics</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Color</topic><topic>Computer Graphics</topic><topic>Dental Alloys</topic><topic>Dental Materials</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Elastomers</topic><topic>Esthetics, Dental</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Orthodontic Appliance Design</topic><topic>Orthodontic Appliances</topic><topic>Orthodontic Brackets</topic><topic>Orthodontic Wires</topic><topic>Patient Acceptance of Health Care</topic><topic>Patient Preference</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Photography, Dental</topic><topic>Stainless Steel</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Walton, Daniel K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fields, Henry W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, William M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenstiel, Stephen F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Firestone, Allen R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, James C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Walton, Daniel K</au><au>Fields, Henry W</au><au>Johnston, William M</au><au>Rosenstiel, Stephen F</au><au>Firestone, Allen R</au><au>Christensen, James C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Orthodontic appliance preferences of children and adolescents</atitle><jtitle>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop</addtitle><date>2010-12-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>138</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>698.e1</spage><epage>698.e12</epage><pages>698.e1-698.e12</pages><issn>0889-5406</issn><eissn>1097-6752</eissn><abstract>Introduction Although attractiveness and acceptability of orthodontic appliances have been rated by adults for themselves and for adolescents, children and adolescents have not provided any substantial data. The objective of this study was to evaluate preferences and acceptability of orthodontic appliances in children and adolescents. Methods Images of orthodontic appliances previously captured and standardized were selected and incorporated into a computer-based survey. Additional images of shaped brackets and colored elastomeric ties, as well as discolored clear elastomeric ties, were captured and incorporated onto existing survey images with Photoshop (Adobe, San Jose, Calif). The survey displayed 12 orthodontic appliance variations to 139 children in 3 age groups: 9 to 11 years (n = 45), 12 to 14 years (n = 49), and 15 to 17 years (n = 45). The subjects rated each image for attractiveness and acceptability. All images were displayed and rated twice to assess rater reliability. Results Overall reliability ratings were r = 0.74 for attractiveness and k = 0.66 for acceptability. There were significant differences in bracket attractiveness and acceptability in each age group. The highest-rated appliances were clear aligners, twin brackets with colored ties, and shaped brackets with and without colored ties. Colored elastomeric ties improved attractiveness significantly over brackets without colored ties for children in the 12-to-14 year group. There was a tendency for older subjects to rate clear orthodontic appliances higher than did younger subjects. Ceramic brackets with discolored ties tended to be rated lower than ceramic brackets with new ties and scored lowest in acceptability and attractiveness in all age groups. Girls rated shaped brackets significantly higher than did boys. Conclusions Children’s preferences for orthodontic appliances differ by age and sex. Child and adolescent preferences differ from adult preferences.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>21130314</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.06.012</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0889-5406
ispartof American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 2010-12, Vol.138 (6), p.698.e1-698.e12
issn 0889-5406
1097-6752
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_816385584
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adolescent
Age Factors
Ceramics
Child
Color
Computer Graphics
Dental Alloys
Dental Materials
Dentistry
Elastomers
Esthetics, Dental
Female
Humans
Male
Orthodontic Appliance Design
Orthodontic Appliances
Orthodontic Brackets
Orthodontic Wires
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
Patient Preference
Patient Satisfaction
Photography, Dental
Stainless Steel
title Orthodontic appliance preferences of children and adolescents
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T08%3A40%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Orthodontic%20appliance%20preferences%20of%20children%20and%20adolescents&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20orthodontics%20and%20dentofacial%20orthopedics&rft.au=Walton,%20Daniel%20K&rft.date=2010-12-01&rft.volume=138&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=698.e1&rft.epage=698.e12&rft.pages=698.e1-698.e12&rft.issn=0889-5406&rft.eissn=1097-6752&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.06.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E816385584%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=816385584&rft_id=info:pmid/21130314&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0889540610006670&rfr_iscdi=true