The published literature on handoffs in hospitals: deficiencies identified in an extensive review

BackgroundIn hospitals, handoffs are episodes in which control of, or responsibility for, a patient passes from one health professional to another, and in which important information about the patient is also exchanged. In view of the growing interest in improving handoff processes, and the need for...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMJ quality & safety 2010-12, Vol.19 (6), p.493-497
Hauptverfasser: Cohen, Michael D, Hilligoss, P Brian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 497
container_issue 6
container_start_page 493
container_title BMJ quality & safety
container_volume 19
creator Cohen, Michael D
Hilligoss, P Brian
description BackgroundIn hospitals, handoffs are episodes in which control of, or responsibility for, a patient passes from one health professional to another, and in which important information about the patient is also exchanged. In view of the growing interest in improving handoff processes, and the need for guidance in arriving at standardised handoff procedures in response to regulatory requirements, an extensive review of the research on handoffs was conducted.MethodsThe authors have collected all research treatments of hospital handoffs involving medical personnel published in English through July 2008.ResultsA review of this literature yields four significant conclusions: (1) the definition of the handoff concept in the literature is poorly delimited; (2) the meaning of ‘to standardise’ has not been developed with adequate clarity; (3) the literature shows that handoffs perform important functions beyond patient safety, but the trade-offs of these functions against safety considerations are not analysed; (4) studies so far do not fully establish that attempts at handoff standardisation have produced marked gains in measured patient outcomes.ConclusionThe existing literature on patient handoffs does not yet adequately support either definitive research conclusions on best handoff practices or the standardisation of handoffs that has been mandated by some regulators.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/qshc.2009.033480
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_815967110</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>815967110</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b400t-31491e46af2846dd616e3b4d04655e9fd720ba11bc58d79501a75f24e765e62c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtv1DAURi0EoqWwZ4UisWCBMvjGb3ZoRAui4iENiJ3lxNcaD5lkaiel_Hs8StsFGxaWr3TP99k6hDwHugJg8s1V3narhlKzooxxTR-QU-BK1MxQeHg3a6NPyJOcd5SCaQw8JicNZUrLRp8St9lidZjbPuYt-qqPEyY3zQmrcai2bvBjCLmKZR7zIU6uz28rjyF2EYdyysrjMMUQS7hQbqjwZsIhx2usEl5H_P2UPAolhs9u7zPy_fz9Zv2hvvxy8XH97rJuOaVTzYAbQC5daDSX3kuQyFruKZdCoAleNbR1AG0ntFdGUHBKhIajkgJl07Ez8mrpPaTxasY82X3MHfa9G3Ccs9UgjFQAtJAv_yF345yG8jkLSmnNuaC8UHShujTmnDDYQ4p7l_5YoPZo3x7t26N9u9gvkRe3xXO7R38fuNNdgHoBYp7w5n7v0i8rFVPCfv6xtuc_Lzafvupv9lj4euHb_e7_z_8FM1edKg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1778844504</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The published literature on handoffs in hospitals: deficiencies identified in an extensive review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Cohen, Michael D ; Hilligoss, P Brian</creator><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Michael D ; Hilligoss, P Brian</creatorcontrib><description>BackgroundIn hospitals, handoffs are episodes in which control of, or responsibility for, a patient passes from one health professional to another, and in which important information about the patient is also exchanged. In view of the growing interest in improving handoff processes, and the need for guidance in arriving at standardised handoff procedures in response to regulatory requirements, an extensive review of the research on handoffs was conducted.MethodsThe authors have collected all research treatments of hospital handoffs involving medical personnel published in English through July 2008.ResultsA review of this literature yields four significant conclusions: (1) the definition of the handoff concept in the literature is poorly delimited; (2) the meaning of ‘to standardise’ has not been developed with adequate clarity; (3) the literature shows that handoffs perform important functions beyond patient safety, but the trade-offs of these functions against safety considerations are not analysed; (4) studies so far do not fully establish that attempts at handoff standardisation have produced marked gains in measured patient outcomes.ConclusionThe existing literature on patient handoffs does not yet adequately support either definitive research conclusions on best handoff practices or the standardisation of handoffs that has been mandated by some regulators.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1475-3898</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2044-5415</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-3901</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-5423</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2009.033480</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20378628</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><subject>Accreditation ; Communication ; continuity of patient care ; Continuity of Patient Care - standards ; Emergency medical care ; handoff ; Health administration ; Health care ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Intensive care ; Internet resources ; Medical personnel ; Nursing ; Patient safety ; quality of care ; Quality of Health Care ; Researchers ; safety ; standardisation</subject><ispartof>BMJ quality &amp; safety, 2010-12, Vol.19 (6), p.493-497</ispartof><rights>2010, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><rights>2010 2010, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b400t-31491e46af2846dd616e3b4d04655e9fd720ba11bc58d79501a75f24e765e62c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b400t-31491e46af2846dd616e3b4d04655e9fd720ba11bc58d79501a75f24e765e62c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://qualitysafety.bmj.com/content/19/6/493.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://qualitysafety.bmj.com/content/19/6/493.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,776,780,3183,23550,27901,27902,77569,77600</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20378628$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Michael D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hilligoss, P Brian</creatorcontrib><title>The published literature on handoffs in hospitals: deficiencies identified in an extensive review</title><title>BMJ quality &amp; safety</title><addtitle>Qual Saf Health Care</addtitle><description>BackgroundIn hospitals, handoffs are episodes in which control of, or responsibility for, a patient passes from one health professional to another, and in which important information about the patient is also exchanged. In view of the growing interest in improving handoff processes, and the need for guidance in arriving at standardised handoff procedures in response to regulatory requirements, an extensive review of the research on handoffs was conducted.MethodsThe authors have collected all research treatments of hospital handoffs involving medical personnel published in English through July 2008.ResultsA review of this literature yields four significant conclusions: (1) the definition of the handoff concept in the literature is poorly delimited; (2) the meaning of ‘to standardise’ has not been developed with adequate clarity; (3) the literature shows that handoffs perform important functions beyond patient safety, but the trade-offs of these functions against safety considerations are not analysed; (4) studies so far do not fully establish that attempts at handoff standardisation have produced marked gains in measured patient outcomes.ConclusionThe existing literature on patient handoffs does not yet adequately support either definitive research conclusions on best handoff practices or the standardisation of handoffs that has been mandated by some regulators.</description><subject>Accreditation</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>continuity of patient care</subject><subject>Continuity of Patient Care - standards</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>handoff</subject><subject>Health administration</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Internet resources</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Patient safety</subject><subject>quality of care</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>safety</subject><subject>standardisation</subject><issn>1475-3898</issn><issn>2044-5415</issn><issn>1475-3901</issn><issn>2044-5423</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtv1DAURi0EoqWwZ4UisWCBMvjGb3ZoRAui4iENiJ3lxNcaD5lkaiel_Hs8StsFGxaWr3TP99k6hDwHugJg8s1V3narhlKzooxxTR-QU-BK1MxQeHg3a6NPyJOcd5SCaQw8JicNZUrLRp8St9lidZjbPuYt-qqPEyY3zQmrcai2bvBjCLmKZR7zIU6uz28rjyF2EYdyysrjMMUQS7hQbqjwZsIhx2usEl5H_P2UPAolhs9u7zPy_fz9Zv2hvvxy8XH97rJuOaVTzYAbQC5daDSX3kuQyFruKZdCoAleNbR1AG0ntFdGUHBKhIajkgJl07Ez8mrpPaTxasY82X3MHfa9G3Ccs9UgjFQAtJAv_yF345yG8jkLSmnNuaC8UHShujTmnDDYQ4p7l_5YoPZo3x7t26N9u9gvkRe3xXO7R38fuNNdgHoBYp7w5n7v0i8rFVPCfv6xtuc_Lzafvupv9lj4euHb_e7_z_8FM1edKg</recordid><startdate>201012</startdate><enddate>201012</enddate><creator>Cohen, Michael D</creator><creator>Hilligoss, P Brian</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201012</creationdate><title>The published literature on handoffs in hospitals: deficiencies identified in an extensive review</title><author>Cohen, Michael D ; Hilligoss, P Brian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b400t-31491e46af2846dd616e3b4d04655e9fd720ba11bc58d79501a75f24e765e62c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Accreditation</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>continuity of patient care</topic><topic>Continuity of Patient Care - standards</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>handoff</topic><topic>Health administration</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Internet resources</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Patient safety</topic><topic>quality of care</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>safety</topic><topic>standardisation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Michael D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hilligoss, P Brian</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>BMJ quality &amp; safety</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cohen, Michael D</au><au>Hilligoss, P Brian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The published literature on handoffs in hospitals: deficiencies identified in an extensive review</atitle><jtitle>BMJ quality &amp; safety</jtitle><addtitle>Qual Saf Health Care</addtitle><date>2010-12</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>493</spage><epage>497</epage><pages>493-497</pages><issn>1475-3898</issn><issn>2044-5415</issn><eissn>1475-3901</eissn><eissn>2044-5423</eissn><abstract>BackgroundIn hospitals, handoffs are episodes in which control of, or responsibility for, a patient passes from one health professional to another, and in which important information about the patient is also exchanged. In view of the growing interest in improving handoff processes, and the need for guidance in arriving at standardised handoff procedures in response to regulatory requirements, an extensive review of the research on handoffs was conducted.MethodsThe authors have collected all research treatments of hospital handoffs involving medical personnel published in English through July 2008.ResultsA review of this literature yields four significant conclusions: (1) the definition of the handoff concept in the literature is poorly delimited; (2) the meaning of ‘to standardise’ has not been developed with adequate clarity; (3) the literature shows that handoffs perform important functions beyond patient safety, but the trade-offs of these functions against safety considerations are not analysed; (4) studies so far do not fully establish that attempts at handoff standardisation have produced marked gains in measured patient outcomes.ConclusionThe existing literature on patient handoffs does not yet adequately support either definitive research conclusions on best handoff practices or the standardisation of handoffs that has been mandated by some regulators.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</pub><pmid>20378628</pmid><doi>10.1136/qshc.2009.033480</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1475-3898
ispartof BMJ quality & safety, 2010-12, Vol.19 (6), p.493-497
issn 1475-3898
2044-5415
1475-3901
2044-5423
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_815967110
source MEDLINE; BMJ Journals - NESLi2
subjects Accreditation
Communication
continuity of patient care
Continuity of Patient Care - standards
Emergency medical care
handoff
Health administration
Health care
Hospitals
Humans
Intensive care
Internet resources
Medical personnel
Nursing
Patient safety
quality of care
Quality of Health Care
Researchers
safety
standardisation
title The published literature on handoffs in hospitals: deficiencies identified in an extensive review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T04%3A42%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20published%20literature%20on%20handoffs%20in%20hospitals:%20deficiencies%20identified%20in%20an%20extensive%20review&rft.jtitle=BMJ%20quality%20&%20safety&rft.au=Cohen,%20Michael%20D&rft.date=2010-12&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=493&rft.epage=497&rft.pages=493-497&rft.issn=1475-3898&rft.eissn=1475-3901&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/qshc.2009.033480&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E815967110%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1778844504&rft_id=info:pmid/20378628&rfr_iscdi=true