Sequelae of Prospective versus Retrospective Reports of Adverse Childhood Experiences

Retrospective assessment of adverse childhood experiences is widely used in research, although there are concerns about its validity. In particular, recall bias is assumed to produce significant artifacts. Data from a longitudinal cohort (the British National Child Development Study; N = 7,710) and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychological reports 2010-10, Vol.107 (2), p.425-440
Hauptverfasser: Hardt, J., Vellaisamy, P., Schoon, I.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 440
container_issue 2
container_start_page 425
container_title Psychological reports
container_volume 107
creator Hardt, J.
Vellaisamy, P.
Schoon, I.
description Retrospective assessment of adverse childhood experiences is widely used in research, although there are concerns about its validity. In particular, recall bias is assumed to produce significant artifacts. Data from a longitudinal cohort (the British National Child Development Study; N = 7,710) and the retrospective Mainz Adverse Childhood Experiences Study (N = 1,062, Germany) were compared on 10 adverse childhood experiences and psychological adjustment at age 42 yr. Between the two methods, no significant differences in risk effects were detected. Results held for bivariate analyses on all 10 childhood adversities and a multivariate model; the later comprises the childhood adversities which show significant long-term sequelae (not always with natural parent, chronically ill parent, financial hardship, and being firstborn) and three covariates. In conclusion, the present data did not show any bias in the retrospective assessment.
doi_str_mv 10.2466/02.04.09.10.16.21.PR0.107.5.425-440
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_815554308</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.2466_02.04.09.10.16.21.PR0.107.5.425-440</sage_id><sourcerecordid>815554308</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-7779ab6953ce890b514022a136e084a8c4e3ec265bbbba99dec6a5013da666743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkEtLw0AUhQdRtD7-gmTnQhLvPJPZWYovKFiqBXfDdHJrI2kTZxLRf--UVnHrbO7cw-FczkfIJYWMCaWugGUgMtBZFKjKGM0m0_iDPJOZYDIVAvbIgEpZpErTl30yAOA8ZVrQI3IcwltcKfD8kBwxSmkuVDEgsyd877G2mDSLZOKb0KLrqg9MPtCHPiRT7P6IU2wb34WNd1huHJiMllVdLpumTG4-W_QVrh2GU3KwsHXAs908IbPbm-fRfTp-vHsYDcep45p3aZ7n2s6VltxhoWEuqQDGLOUKoRC2cAI5OqbkPD6rdYlOWQmUl1YplQt-Qi62ua1vYo3QmVUVHNa1XWPTB1NEGlJwKKJztHW6WCd4XJjWVyvrvwwFs8FrgBkQBvRGoMowaiLeuORGmojXRLwx5Xx3r5-vsPzN-OEZDddbQ7CvaN6a3q9j_3_d-AbxzYte</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>815554308</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sequelae of Prospective versus Retrospective Reports of Adverse Childhood Experiences</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Hardt, J. ; Vellaisamy, P. ; Schoon, I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hardt, J. ; Vellaisamy, P. ; Schoon, I.</creatorcontrib><description>Retrospective assessment of adverse childhood experiences is widely used in research, although there are concerns about its validity. In particular, recall bias is assumed to produce significant artifacts. Data from a longitudinal cohort (the British National Child Development Study; N = 7,710) and the retrospective Mainz Adverse Childhood Experiences Study (N = 1,062, Germany) were compared on 10 adverse childhood experiences and psychological adjustment at age 42 yr. Between the two methods, no significant differences in risk effects were detected. Results held for bivariate analyses on all 10 childhood adversities and a multivariate model; the later comprises the childhood adversities which show significant long-term sequelae (not always with natural parent, chronically ill parent, financial hardship, and being firstborn) and three covariates. In conclusion, the present data did not show any bias in the retrospective assessment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-2941</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-691X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2466/02.04.09.10.16.21.PR0.107.5.425-440</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21117468</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adaptation, Psychological ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Bias ; Child ; Female ; Germany ; Health Surveys ; Humans ; Life Change Events ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Mental Recall ; Personality Development ; Prospective Studies ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Somatoform Disorders - psychology ; United Kingdom ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Psychological reports, 2010-10, Vol.107 (2), p.425-440</ispartof><rights>2010 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-7779ab6953ce890b514022a136e084a8c4e3ec265bbbba99dec6a5013da666743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-7779ab6953ce890b514022a136e084a8c4e3ec265bbbba99dec6a5013da666743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.2466/02.04.09.10.16.21.PR0.107.5.425-440$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.2466/02.04.09.10.16.21.PR0.107.5.425-440$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21799,27903,27904,43600,43601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21117468$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hardt, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vellaisamy, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoon, I.</creatorcontrib><title>Sequelae of Prospective versus Retrospective Reports of Adverse Childhood Experiences</title><title>Psychological reports</title><addtitle>Psychol Rep</addtitle><description>Retrospective assessment of adverse childhood experiences is widely used in research, although there are concerns about its validity. In particular, recall bias is assumed to produce significant artifacts. Data from a longitudinal cohort (the British National Child Development Study; N = 7,710) and the retrospective Mainz Adverse Childhood Experiences Study (N = 1,062, Germany) were compared on 10 adverse childhood experiences and psychological adjustment at age 42 yr. Between the two methods, no significant differences in risk effects were detected. Results held for bivariate analyses on all 10 childhood adversities and a multivariate model; the later comprises the childhood adversities which show significant long-term sequelae (not always with natural parent, chronically ill parent, financial hardship, and being firstborn) and three covariates. In conclusion, the present data did not show any bias in the retrospective assessment.</description><subject>Adaptation, Psychological</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Health Surveys</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life Change Events</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mental Recall</subject><subject>Personality Development</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Somatoform Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0033-2941</issn><issn>1558-691X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkEtLw0AUhQdRtD7-gmTnQhLvPJPZWYovKFiqBXfDdHJrI2kTZxLRf--UVnHrbO7cw-FczkfIJYWMCaWugGUgMtBZFKjKGM0m0_iDPJOZYDIVAvbIgEpZpErTl30yAOA8ZVrQI3IcwltcKfD8kBwxSmkuVDEgsyd877G2mDSLZOKb0KLrqg9MPtCHPiRT7P6IU2wb34WNd1huHJiMllVdLpumTG4-W_QVrh2GU3KwsHXAs908IbPbm-fRfTp-vHsYDcep45p3aZ7n2s6VltxhoWEuqQDGLOUKoRC2cAI5OqbkPD6rdYlOWQmUl1YplQt-Qi62ua1vYo3QmVUVHNa1XWPTB1NEGlJwKKJztHW6WCd4XJjWVyvrvwwFs8FrgBkQBvRGoMowaiLeuORGmojXRLwx5Xx3r5-vsPzN-OEZDddbQ7CvaN6a3q9j_3_d-AbxzYte</recordid><startdate>201010</startdate><enddate>201010</enddate><creator>Hardt, J.</creator><creator>Vellaisamy, P.</creator><creator>Schoon, I.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201010</creationdate><title>Sequelae of Prospective versus Retrospective Reports of Adverse Childhood Experiences</title><author>Hardt, J. ; Vellaisamy, P. ; Schoon, I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-7779ab6953ce890b514022a136e084a8c4e3ec265bbbba99dec6a5013da666743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adaptation, Psychological</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Health Surveys</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life Change Events</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mental Recall</topic><topic>Personality Development</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Somatoform Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hardt, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vellaisamy, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoon, I.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychological reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hardt, J.</au><au>Vellaisamy, P.</au><au>Schoon, I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sequelae of Prospective versus Retrospective Reports of Adverse Childhood Experiences</atitle><jtitle>Psychological reports</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Rep</addtitle><date>2010-10</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>107</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>425</spage><epage>440</epage><pages>425-440</pages><issn>0033-2941</issn><eissn>1558-691X</eissn><abstract>Retrospective assessment of adverse childhood experiences is widely used in research, although there are concerns about its validity. In particular, recall bias is assumed to produce significant artifacts. Data from a longitudinal cohort (the British National Child Development Study; N = 7,710) and the retrospective Mainz Adverse Childhood Experiences Study (N = 1,062, Germany) were compared on 10 adverse childhood experiences and psychological adjustment at age 42 yr. Between the two methods, no significant differences in risk effects were detected. Results held for bivariate analyses on all 10 childhood adversities and a multivariate model; the later comprises the childhood adversities which show significant long-term sequelae (not always with natural parent, chronically ill parent, financial hardship, and being firstborn) and three covariates. In conclusion, the present data did not show any bias in the retrospective assessment.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>21117468</pmid><doi>10.2466/02.04.09.10.16.21.PR0.107.5.425-440</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-2941
ispartof Psychological reports, 2010-10, Vol.107 (2), p.425-440
issn 0033-2941
1558-691X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_815554308
source MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Adaptation, Psychological
Adolescent
Adult
Bias
Child
Female
Germany
Health Surveys
Humans
Life Change Events
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Mental Recall
Personality Development
Prospective Studies
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Somatoform Disorders - psychology
United Kingdom
Young Adult
title Sequelae of Prospective versus Retrospective Reports of Adverse Childhood Experiences
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T09%3A28%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sequelae%20of%20Prospective%20versus%20Retrospective%20Reports%20of%20Adverse%20Childhood%20Experiences&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20reports&rft.au=Hardt,%20J.&rft.date=2010-10&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=425&rft.epage=440&rft.pages=425-440&rft.issn=0033-2941&rft.eissn=1558-691X&rft_id=info:doi/10.2466/02.04.09.10.16.21.PR0.107.5.425-440&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E815554308%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=815554308&rft_id=info:pmid/21117468&rft_sage_id=10.2466_02.04.09.10.16.21.PR0.107.5.425-440&rfr_iscdi=true