Sequelae of Prospective versus Retrospective Reports of Adverse Childhood Experiences
Retrospective assessment of adverse childhood experiences is widely used in research, although there are concerns about its validity. In particular, recall bias is assumed to produce significant artifacts. Data from a longitudinal cohort (the British National Child Development Study; N = 7,710) and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychological reports 2010-10, Vol.107 (2), p.425-440 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 440 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 425 |
container_title | Psychological reports |
container_volume | 107 |
creator | Hardt, J. Vellaisamy, P. Schoon, I. |
description | Retrospective assessment of adverse childhood experiences is widely used in research, although there are concerns about its validity. In particular, recall bias is assumed to produce significant artifacts. Data from a longitudinal cohort (the British National Child Development Study; N = 7,710) and the retrospective Mainz Adverse Childhood Experiences Study (N = 1,062, Germany) were compared on 10 adverse childhood experiences and psychological adjustment at age 42 yr. Between the two methods, no significant differences in risk effects were detected. Results held for bivariate analyses on all 10 childhood adversities and a multivariate model; the later comprises the childhood adversities which show significant long-term sequelae (not always with natural parent, chronically ill parent, financial hardship, and being firstborn) and three covariates. In conclusion, the present data did not show any bias in the retrospective assessment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2466/02.04.09.10.16.21.PR0.107.5.425-440 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_815554308</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.2466_02.04.09.10.16.21.PR0.107.5.425-440</sage_id><sourcerecordid>815554308</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-7779ab6953ce890b514022a136e084a8c4e3ec265bbbba99dec6a5013da666743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkEtLw0AUhQdRtD7-gmTnQhLvPJPZWYovKFiqBXfDdHJrI2kTZxLRf--UVnHrbO7cw-FczkfIJYWMCaWugGUgMtBZFKjKGM0m0_iDPJOZYDIVAvbIgEpZpErTl30yAOA8ZVrQI3IcwltcKfD8kBwxSmkuVDEgsyd877G2mDSLZOKb0KLrqg9MPtCHPiRT7P6IU2wb34WNd1huHJiMllVdLpumTG4-W_QVrh2GU3KwsHXAs908IbPbm-fRfTp-vHsYDcep45p3aZ7n2s6VltxhoWEuqQDGLOUKoRC2cAI5OqbkPD6rdYlOWQmUl1YplQt-Qi62ua1vYo3QmVUVHNa1XWPTB1NEGlJwKKJztHW6WCd4XJjWVyvrvwwFs8FrgBkQBvRGoMowaiLeuORGmojXRLwx5Xx3r5-vsPzN-OEZDddbQ7CvaN6a3q9j_3_d-AbxzYte</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>815554308</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sequelae of Prospective versus Retrospective Reports of Adverse Childhood Experiences</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Hardt, J. ; Vellaisamy, P. ; Schoon, I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hardt, J. ; Vellaisamy, P. ; Schoon, I.</creatorcontrib><description>Retrospective assessment of adverse childhood experiences is widely used in research, although there are concerns about its validity. In particular, recall bias is assumed to produce significant artifacts. Data from a longitudinal cohort (the British National Child Development Study; N = 7,710) and the retrospective Mainz Adverse Childhood Experiences Study (N = 1,062, Germany) were compared on 10 adverse childhood experiences and psychological adjustment at age 42 yr. Between the two methods, no significant differences in risk effects were detected. Results held for bivariate analyses on all 10 childhood adversities and a multivariate model; the later comprises the childhood adversities which show significant long-term sequelae (not always with natural parent, chronically ill parent, financial hardship, and being firstborn) and three covariates. In conclusion, the present data did not show any bias in the retrospective assessment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-2941</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-691X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2466/02.04.09.10.16.21.PR0.107.5.425-440</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21117468</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adaptation, Psychological ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Bias ; Child ; Female ; Germany ; Health Surveys ; Humans ; Life Change Events ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Mental Recall ; Personality Development ; Prospective Studies ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Somatoform Disorders - psychology ; United Kingdom ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Psychological reports, 2010-10, Vol.107 (2), p.425-440</ispartof><rights>2010 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-7779ab6953ce890b514022a136e084a8c4e3ec265bbbba99dec6a5013da666743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-7779ab6953ce890b514022a136e084a8c4e3ec265bbbba99dec6a5013da666743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.2466/02.04.09.10.16.21.PR0.107.5.425-440$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.2466/02.04.09.10.16.21.PR0.107.5.425-440$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21799,27903,27904,43600,43601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21117468$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hardt, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vellaisamy, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoon, I.</creatorcontrib><title>Sequelae of Prospective versus Retrospective Reports of Adverse Childhood Experiences</title><title>Psychological reports</title><addtitle>Psychol Rep</addtitle><description>Retrospective assessment of adverse childhood experiences is widely used in research, although there are concerns about its validity. In particular, recall bias is assumed to produce significant artifacts. Data from a longitudinal cohort (the British National Child Development Study; N = 7,710) and the retrospective Mainz Adverse Childhood Experiences Study (N = 1,062, Germany) were compared on 10 adverse childhood experiences and psychological adjustment at age 42 yr. Between the two methods, no significant differences in risk effects were detected. Results held for bivariate analyses on all 10 childhood adversities and a multivariate model; the later comprises the childhood adversities which show significant long-term sequelae (not always with natural parent, chronically ill parent, financial hardship, and being firstborn) and three covariates. In conclusion, the present data did not show any bias in the retrospective assessment.</description><subject>Adaptation, Psychological</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Health Surveys</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life Change Events</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mental Recall</subject><subject>Personality Development</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Somatoform Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0033-2941</issn><issn>1558-691X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkEtLw0AUhQdRtD7-gmTnQhLvPJPZWYovKFiqBXfDdHJrI2kTZxLRf--UVnHrbO7cw-FczkfIJYWMCaWugGUgMtBZFKjKGM0m0_iDPJOZYDIVAvbIgEpZpErTl30yAOA8ZVrQI3IcwltcKfD8kBwxSmkuVDEgsyd877G2mDSLZOKb0KLrqg9MPtCHPiRT7P6IU2wb34WNd1huHJiMllVdLpumTG4-W_QVrh2GU3KwsHXAs908IbPbm-fRfTp-vHsYDcep45p3aZ7n2s6VltxhoWEuqQDGLOUKoRC2cAI5OqbkPD6rdYlOWQmUl1YplQt-Qi62ua1vYo3QmVUVHNa1XWPTB1NEGlJwKKJztHW6WCd4XJjWVyvrvwwFs8FrgBkQBvRGoMowaiLeuORGmojXRLwx5Xx3r5-vsPzN-OEZDddbQ7CvaN6a3q9j_3_d-AbxzYte</recordid><startdate>201010</startdate><enddate>201010</enddate><creator>Hardt, J.</creator><creator>Vellaisamy, P.</creator><creator>Schoon, I.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201010</creationdate><title>Sequelae of Prospective versus Retrospective Reports of Adverse Childhood Experiences</title><author>Hardt, J. ; Vellaisamy, P. ; Schoon, I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-7779ab6953ce890b514022a136e084a8c4e3ec265bbbba99dec6a5013da666743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adaptation, Psychological</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Health Surveys</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life Change Events</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mental Recall</topic><topic>Personality Development</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Somatoform Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hardt, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vellaisamy, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoon, I.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychological reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hardt, J.</au><au>Vellaisamy, P.</au><au>Schoon, I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sequelae of Prospective versus Retrospective Reports of Adverse Childhood Experiences</atitle><jtitle>Psychological reports</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Rep</addtitle><date>2010-10</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>107</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>425</spage><epage>440</epage><pages>425-440</pages><issn>0033-2941</issn><eissn>1558-691X</eissn><abstract>Retrospective assessment of adverse childhood experiences is widely used in research, although there are concerns about its validity. In particular, recall bias is assumed to produce significant artifacts. Data from a longitudinal cohort (the British National Child Development Study; N = 7,710) and the retrospective Mainz Adverse Childhood Experiences Study (N = 1,062, Germany) were compared on 10 adverse childhood experiences and psychological adjustment at age 42 yr. Between the two methods, no significant differences in risk effects were detected. Results held for bivariate analyses on all 10 childhood adversities and a multivariate model; the later comprises the childhood adversities which show significant long-term sequelae (not always with natural parent, chronically ill parent, financial hardship, and being firstborn) and three covariates. In conclusion, the present data did not show any bias in the retrospective assessment.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>21117468</pmid><doi>10.2466/02.04.09.10.16.21.PR0.107.5.425-440</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-2941 |
ispartof | Psychological reports, 2010-10, Vol.107 (2), p.425-440 |
issn | 0033-2941 1558-691X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_815554308 |
source | MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | Adaptation, Psychological Adolescent Adult Bias Child Female Germany Health Surveys Humans Life Change Events Longitudinal Studies Male Mental Recall Personality Development Prospective Studies Retrospective Studies Risk Factors Somatoform Disorders - psychology United Kingdom Young Adult |
title | Sequelae of Prospective versus Retrospective Reports of Adverse Childhood Experiences |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T09%3A28%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sequelae%20of%20Prospective%20versus%20Retrospective%20Reports%20of%20Adverse%20Childhood%20Experiences&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20reports&rft.au=Hardt,%20J.&rft.date=2010-10&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=425&rft.epage=440&rft.pages=425-440&rft.issn=0033-2941&rft.eissn=1558-691X&rft_id=info:doi/10.2466/02.04.09.10.16.21.PR0.107.5.425-440&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E815554308%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=815554308&rft_id=info:pmid/21117468&rft_sage_id=10.2466_02.04.09.10.16.21.PR0.107.5.425-440&rfr_iscdi=true |