Colonoscopy yields fewer polyps as the day progresses despite using social influence theory to reverse the trend
Background We previously reported that fewer polyps are detected by colonoscopy as the day progresses, a phenomenon that could be modified with “social influence theory” by using auditing and feedback. Objective To measure the impact of a social influence informational poster on the relationship bet...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2010-12, Vol.72 (6), p.1233-1240 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1240 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1233 |
container_title | Gastrointestinal endoscopy |
container_volume | 72 |
creator | Kaneshiro, Marc, MD Ho, Andrew, MD Chan, Michael, MD, MPH Cohen, Hartley, MD Spiegel, Brennan M.R., MD, MSHS |
description | Background We previously reported that fewer polyps are detected by colonoscopy as the day progresses, a phenomenon that could be modified with “social influence theory” by using auditing and feedback. Objective To measure the impact of a social influence informational poster on the relationship between time of day and colonoscopy yield. Design Controlled before-and-after study comparing the polyp yield and time of day relationship in a historical cohort versus a 3-month intervention period. Setting University-based Veterans Affairs medical center. Patients Patients undergoing outpatient screening, surveillance, or diagnostic colonoscopies. Intervention Placement of informational posters in endoscopy rooms within view of operators and nurses. The poster depicted a bar graph of the previously documented hour-by-hour decreases in polyp yield coupled with prominent text: “What Time Is It Now?” Main Outcome Measurement Polyp yield, including secondary end point limited to adenoma detection. We performed regression to measure the effect of start time on polyp yield. Results There were 477 and 301 patients in the control and intervention periods, respectively. There was a negative relationship between start time and polyp yield, including adenoma detection, for both periods ( P = .001). Start time remained negatively predictive of polyp and adenoma yield after adjusting for poster exposure and confounders ( P = .01). Limitations Nonrandomized study design. Conclusion An informational poster did not alter the relationship between colonoscopy start time and polyp yield. This strengthens the previous finding that start time may affect polyp yield and suggests that passive use of social influence theory is inadequate to modify this effect. Shortening endoscopy shifts and active auditing with feedback may be necessary. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.034 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_815546672</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016510710020584</els_id><sourcerecordid>815546672</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-b50fcf48d3dbeabbdeeb233aa8af2417dd26e182440121e8a0fd4eb8bc163c233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk2LFDEQhhtR3HH1B3iRXMRTj5WkPzIIwjL4BQse1HNIJ9VjxkynTXWv9L837YwKHswlJDxvVfFQRfGUw5YDb14etwePWwH5DWoLsrpXbDjs2rJp2939YgMZKmsO7VXxiOgIAEpI_rC4Ejwf1cpNMe5jiEMkG8eFLR6DI9bjD0xsjGEZiRli01dkzixsTPGQkAiJOaTRT8hm8sOBUbTeBOaHPsw4WFwTMS1siizhHSb69cOmhIN7XDzoTSB8crmviy9v33zevy9vP777sL-5LW0l26nsauhtXyknXYem6xxiJ6Q0RpleVLx1TjTIlagq4IKjMtC7CjvVWd5Im8nr4sW5bp76-4w06ZMniyGYAeNMWvG6rpqmFZnkZ9KmSJSw12PyJ5MWzUGvnvVRZ8969axB6ew5Z55dqs_dCd2fxG-xGXh-AQxZE_pkBuvpLycb1YodZO7VmcPs4s5j0mT96tD5hHbSLvr_jvH6n7QNfvC54TdckI5xTkOWrLkmoUF_Whdi3QcOIKBWlfwJ4fKyTA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>815546672</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Colonoscopy yields fewer polyps as the day progresses despite using social influence theory to reverse the trend</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Kaneshiro, Marc, MD ; Ho, Andrew, MD ; Chan, Michael, MD, MPH ; Cohen, Hartley, MD ; Spiegel, Brennan M.R., MD, MSHS</creator><creatorcontrib>Kaneshiro, Marc, MD ; Ho, Andrew, MD ; Chan, Michael, MD, MPH ; Cohen, Hartley, MD ; Spiegel, Brennan M.R., MD, MSHS</creatorcontrib><description>Background We previously reported that fewer polyps are detected by colonoscopy as the day progresses, a phenomenon that could be modified with “social influence theory” by using auditing and feedback. Objective To measure the impact of a social influence informational poster on the relationship between time of day and colonoscopy yield. Design Controlled before-and-after study comparing the polyp yield and time of day relationship in a historical cohort versus a 3-month intervention period. Setting University-based Veterans Affairs medical center. Patients Patients undergoing outpatient screening, surveillance, or diagnostic colonoscopies. Intervention Placement of informational posters in endoscopy rooms within view of operators and nurses. The poster depicted a bar graph of the previously documented hour-by-hour decreases in polyp yield coupled with prominent text: “What Time Is It Now?” Main Outcome Measurement Polyp yield, including secondary end point limited to adenoma detection. We performed regression to measure the effect of start time on polyp yield. Results There were 477 and 301 patients in the control and intervention periods, respectively. There was a negative relationship between start time and polyp yield, including adenoma detection, for both periods ( P = .001). Start time remained negatively predictive of polyp and adenoma yield after adjusting for poster exposure and confounders ( P = .01). Limitations Nonrandomized study design. Conclusion An informational poster did not alter the relationship between colonoscopy start time and polyp yield. This strengthens the previous finding that start time may affect polyp yield and suggests that passive use of social influence theory is inadequate to modify this effect. Shortening endoscopy shifts and active auditing with feedback may be necessary.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-5107</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6779</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.034</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21111873</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GAENBQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Maryland heights, MO: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Adenoma - diagnosis ; Adenoma - epidemiology ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Circadian Rhythm ; Colonic Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Colonic Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Colonic Polyps - diagnosis ; Colonic Polyps - epidemiology ; Colonoscopy - education ; Colonoscopy - statistics & numerical data ; Digestive system. Abdomen ; Efficiency, Organizational - statistics & numerical data ; Endoscopy ; Feedback ; Female ; Gastroenterology and Hepatology ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; Hospitals, Veterans ; Humans ; Internship and Residency ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Los Angeles ; Male ; Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data ; Medical Audit ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Posters as Topic ; Work Schedule Tolerance</subject><ispartof>Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2010-12, Vol.72 (6), p.1233-1240</ispartof><rights>American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy</rights><rights>2010 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2010 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-b50fcf48d3dbeabbdeeb233aa8af2417dd26e182440121e8a0fd4eb8bc163c233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-b50fcf48d3dbeabbdeeb233aa8af2417dd26e182440121e8a0fd4eb8bc163c233</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.034$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,3554,27933,27934,46004</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23687290$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21111873$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kaneshiro, Marc, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Andrew, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Michael, MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Hartley, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spiegel, Brennan M.R., MD, MSHS</creatorcontrib><title>Colonoscopy yields fewer polyps as the day progresses despite using social influence theory to reverse the trend</title><title>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</title><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><description>Background We previously reported that fewer polyps are detected by colonoscopy as the day progresses, a phenomenon that could be modified with “social influence theory” by using auditing and feedback. Objective To measure the impact of a social influence informational poster on the relationship between time of day and colonoscopy yield. Design Controlled before-and-after study comparing the polyp yield and time of day relationship in a historical cohort versus a 3-month intervention period. Setting University-based Veterans Affairs medical center. Patients Patients undergoing outpatient screening, surveillance, or diagnostic colonoscopies. Intervention Placement of informational posters in endoscopy rooms within view of operators and nurses. The poster depicted a bar graph of the previously documented hour-by-hour decreases in polyp yield coupled with prominent text: “What Time Is It Now?” Main Outcome Measurement Polyp yield, including secondary end point limited to adenoma detection. We performed regression to measure the effect of start time on polyp yield. Results There were 477 and 301 patients in the control and intervention periods, respectively. There was a negative relationship between start time and polyp yield, including adenoma detection, for both periods ( P = .001). Start time remained negatively predictive of polyp and adenoma yield after adjusting for poster exposure and confounders ( P = .01). Limitations Nonrandomized study design. Conclusion An informational poster did not alter the relationship between colonoscopy start time and polyp yield. This strengthens the previous finding that start time may affect polyp yield and suggests that passive use of social influence theory is inadequate to modify this effect. Shortening endoscopy shifts and active auditing with feedback may be necessary.</description><subject>Adenoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Adenoma - epidemiology</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Circadian Rhythm</subject><subject>Colonic Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Colonic Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Colonic Polyps - diagnosis</subject><subject>Colonic Polyps - epidemiology</subject><subject>Colonoscopy - education</subject><subject>Colonoscopy - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Digestive system. Abdomen</subject><subject>Efficiency, Organizational - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>Hospitals, Veterans</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internship and Residency</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Los Angeles</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Medical Audit</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Posters as Topic</subject><subject>Work Schedule Tolerance</subject><issn>0016-5107</issn><issn>1097-6779</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk2LFDEQhhtR3HH1B3iRXMRTj5WkPzIIwjL4BQse1HNIJ9VjxkynTXWv9L837YwKHswlJDxvVfFQRfGUw5YDb14etwePWwH5DWoLsrpXbDjs2rJp2939YgMZKmsO7VXxiOgIAEpI_rC4Ejwf1cpNMe5jiEMkG8eFLR6DI9bjD0xsjGEZiRli01dkzixsTPGQkAiJOaTRT8hm8sOBUbTeBOaHPsw4WFwTMS1siizhHSb69cOmhIN7XDzoTSB8crmviy9v33zevy9vP777sL-5LW0l26nsauhtXyknXYem6xxiJ6Q0RpleVLx1TjTIlagq4IKjMtC7CjvVWd5Im8nr4sW5bp76-4w06ZMniyGYAeNMWvG6rpqmFZnkZ9KmSJSw12PyJ5MWzUGvnvVRZ8969axB6ew5Z55dqs_dCd2fxG-xGXh-AQxZE_pkBuvpLycb1YodZO7VmcPs4s5j0mT96tD5hHbSLvr_jvH6n7QNfvC54TdckI5xTkOWrLkmoUF_Whdi3QcOIKBWlfwJ4fKyTA</recordid><startdate>20101201</startdate><enddate>20101201</enddate><creator>Kaneshiro, Marc, MD</creator><creator>Ho, Andrew, MD</creator><creator>Chan, Michael, MD, MPH</creator><creator>Cohen, Hartley, MD</creator><creator>Spiegel, Brennan M.R., MD, MSHS</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101201</creationdate><title>Colonoscopy yields fewer polyps as the day progresses despite using social influence theory to reverse the trend</title><author>Kaneshiro, Marc, MD ; Ho, Andrew, MD ; Chan, Michael, MD, MPH ; Cohen, Hartley, MD ; Spiegel, Brennan M.R., MD, MSHS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-b50fcf48d3dbeabbdeeb233aa8af2417dd26e182440121e8a0fd4eb8bc163c233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adenoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Adenoma - epidemiology</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Circadian Rhythm</topic><topic>Colonic Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Colonic Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Colonic Polyps - diagnosis</topic><topic>Colonic Polyps - epidemiology</topic><topic>Colonoscopy - education</topic><topic>Colonoscopy - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Digestive system. Abdomen</topic><topic>Efficiency, Organizational - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>Hospitals, Veterans</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internship and Residency</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Los Angeles</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Medical Audit</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Posters as Topic</topic><topic>Work Schedule Tolerance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kaneshiro, Marc, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Andrew, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Michael, MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Hartley, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spiegel, Brennan M.R., MD, MSHS</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kaneshiro, Marc, MD</au><au>Ho, Andrew, MD</au><au>Chan, Michael, MD, MPH</au><au>Cohen, Hartley, MD</au><au>Spiegel, Brennan M.R., MD, MSHS</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Colonoscopy yields fewer polyps as the day progresses despite using social influence theory to reverse the trend</atitle><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><date>2010-12-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1233</spage><epage>1240</epage><pages>1233-1240</pages><issn>0016-5107</issn><eissn>1097-6779</eissn><coden>GAENBQ</coden><abstract>Background We previously reported that fewer polyps are detected by colonoscopy as the day progresses, a phenomenon that could be modified with “social influence theory” by using auditing and feedback. Objective To measure the impact of a social influence informational poster on the relationship between time of day and colonoscopy yield. Design Controlled before-and-after study comparing the polyp yield and time of day relationship in a historical cohort versus a 3-month intervention period. Setting University-based Veterans Affairs medical center. Patients Patients undergoing outpatient screening, surveillance, or diagnostic colonoscopies. Intervention Placement of informational posters in endoscopy rooms within view of operators and nurses. The poster depicted a bar graph of the previously documented hour-by-hour decreases in polyp yield coupled with prominent text: “What Time Is It Now?” Main Outcome Measurement Polyp yield, including secondary end point limited to adenoma detection. We performed regression to measure the effect of start time on polyp yield. Results There were 477 and 301 patients in the control and intervention periods, respectively. There was a negative relationship between start time and polyp yield, including adenoma detection, for both periods ( P = .001). Start time remained negatively predictive of polyp and adenoma yield after adjusting for poster exposure and confounders ( P = .01). Limitations Nonrandomized study design. Conclusion An informational poster did not alter the relationship between colonoscopy start time and polyp yield. This strengthens the previous finding that start time may affect polyp yield and suggests that passive use of social influence theory is inadequate to modify this effect. Shortening endoscopy shifts and active auditing with feedback may be necessary.</abstract><cop>Maryland heights, MO</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>21111873</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.034</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0016-5107 |
ispartof | Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2010-12, Vol.72 (6), p.1233-1240 |
issn | 0016-5107 1097-6779 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_815546672 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Adenoma - diagnosis Adenoma - epidemiology Aged Biological and medical sciences Circadian Rhythm Colonic Neoplasms - diagnosis Colonic Neoplasms - epidemiology Colonic Polyps - diagnosis Colonic Polyps - epidemiology Colonoscopy - education Colonoscopy - statistics & numerical data Digestive system. Abdomen Efficiency, Organizational - statistics & numerical data Endoscopy Feedback Female Gastroenterology and Hepatology Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen Hospitals, Veterans Humans Internship and Residency Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Los Angeles Male Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data Medical Audit Medical sciences Middle Aged Posters as Topic Work Schedule Tolerance |
title | Colonoscopy yields fewer polyps as the day progresses despite using social influence theory to reverse the trend |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-01T23%3A48%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Colonoscopy%20yields%20fewer%20polyps%20as%20the%20day%20progresses%20despite%20using%20social%20influence%20theory%20to%20reverse%20the%20trend&rft.jtitle=Gastrointestinal%20endoscopy&rft.au=Kaneshiro,%20Marc,%20MD&rft.date=2010-12-01&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1233&rft.epage=1240&rft.pages=1233-1240&rft.issn=0016-5107&rft.eissn=1097-6779&rft.coden=GAENBQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.034&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E815546672%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=815546672&rft_id=info:pmid/21111873&rft_els_id=S0016510710020584&rfr_iscdi=true |