The spatial distribution of campylobacteriosis in New Zealand, 1997–2005
In New Zealand Campylobacter infection rates have increased steadily since 1980, reaching a peak in 2003 (396/100 000 population). Compared to other nations, disease rates are unfavourably high (e.g. Australia 117/100 000 population, UK 85/100 000 population, USA 13/100 000 population). This ecologi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Epidemiology and infection 2010-10, Vol.138 (10), p.1359-1371 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1371 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1359 |
container_title | Epidemiology and infection |
container_volume | 138 |
creator | RIND, E. PEARCE, J. |
description | In New Zealand Campylobacter infection rates have increased steadily since 1980, reaching a peak in 2003 (396/100 000 population). Compared to other nations, disease rates are unfavourably high (e.g. Australia 117/100 000 population, UK 85/100 000 population, USA 13/100 000 population). This ecological study investigated spatial variations in Campylobacter infection rates across New Zealand's Territorial Local Authorities (TLAs, n=73) for the period 1997–2005. Applying multiple linear regression, we examined whether geographical factors such as socio-demographic characteristics, climate, land use, water and the food environment were associated with local differences in the occurrence of Campylobacter infection rates. The results suggested significant variations in campylobacteriosis across TLAs (average annual rates ranging from 97 to 526/100 000 population), with higher rates in the South Island. Disease rates were associated with lower socio-economic deprivation (P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S095026881000018X |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_815540211</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S095026881000018X</cupid><jstor_id>40801194</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40801194</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-a5bf263d3df3064ca065d28892e0d3ffae87c3018e86e5ff07f86dcf9dc81723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcuKFDEUhoMoTjv6AC6UQhA3luZ-WQ6N014GRWxQ3IRULpq2qtImVejsfAff0CcxTbc9oJhNFt93Dvn_AHAXwScIIvH0HVQMYi4lgvUg-eEaWCDKVUspVNfBYofbHT8Bt0rZVEdhKW6CEwwRRZzKBXi5_uybsjVTNH3jYply7OYpprFJobFm2F72qTN28jmmEksTx-a1_9Z89KY3o3vcIKXErx8_MYTsNrgRTF_8ncN9Ctbnz9bL5-3Fm9WL5dlFaxnhU2tYFzAnjrhAIKfWQM4cllJhDx0JwXgpLKlpvOSehQBFkNzZoJyVSGByCh7t125z-jr7MukhFuv7-h6f5qIlYoxCjFA1H_xlbtKcx_o2LaiinAvIqoT2ks2plOyD3uY4mHypEdS7lvU_LdeZ-4fFczd4d5z4U2sVHh4EU6zpQzajjeXKI7hWQUn17u29TZlSPnIKJURI0crbPa8f478fuclfNBdEMM1Xb_X7VyuuludrLapPDmHM0OXoPvmryP-P8xum3Krv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>749466705</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The spatial distribution of campylobacteriosis in New Zealand, 1997–2005</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>RIND, E. ; PEARCE, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>RIND, E. ; PEARCE, J.</creatorcontrib><description>In New Zealand Campylobacter infection rates have increased steadily since 1980, reaching a peak in 2003 (396/100 000 population). Compared to other nations, disease rates are unfavourably high (e.g. Australia 117/100 000 population, UK 85/100 000 population, USA 13/100 000 population). This ecological study investigated spatial variations in Campylobacter infection rates across New Zealand's Territorial Local Authorities (TLAs, n=73) for the period 1997–2005. Applying multiple linear regression, we examined whether geographical factors such as socio-demographic characteristics, climate, land use, water and the food environment were associated with local differences in the occurrence of Campylobacter infection rates. The results suggested significant variations in campylobacteriosis across TLAs (average annual rates ranging from 97 to 526/100 000 population), with higher rates in the South Island. Disease rates were associated with lower socio-economic deprivation (P<0·01), the proportion of the population aged 25–44 years (P<0·01) and fresh food outlet density (P<0·76). The results underline the role of area-level characteristics in explaining the spatial distribution of campylobacteriosis in New Zealand. In particular, the findings draw attention to the relatively unexplored role of fresh food outlets as a potential risk factor for increased Campylobacter notifications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0950-2688</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-4409</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S095026881000018X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20141648</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EPINEU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Campylobacter ; Campylobacter - isolation & purification ; Campylobacter infection ; Campylobacter infections ; Campylobacter Infections - epidemiology ; Campylobacter Infections - microbiology ; Campylobacteriosis ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Disease ; Drinking water ; ecological study ; Epidemiology ; Ethnicity ; Food Supply ; Foodborne Diseases - epidemiology ; Foodborne Diseases - microbiology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; geographical determinants ; Groundwater ; Humans ; Infections ; Investigations ; Laboratories ; Male ; Microbiology ; New Zealand ; New Zealand - epidemiology ; Notifiable diseases ; Pathogens ; Population ; Potable water ; Prevalence ; Public health ; Rain ; Rural areas ; Socioeconomics ; Trends ; Urban areas ; Vegetables ; Water consumption</subject><ispartof>Epidemiology and infection, 2010-10, Vol.138 (10), p.1359-1371</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010</rights><rights>Cambridge University Press 2010</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-a5bf263d3df3064ca065d28892e0d3ffae87c3018e86e5ff07f86dcf9dc81723</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-a5bf263d3df3064ca065d28892e0d3ffae87c3018e86e5ff07f86dcf9dc81723</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40801194$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40801194$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23253643$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20141648$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>RIND, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PEARCE, J.</creatorcontrib><title>The spatial distribution of campylobacteriosis in New Zealand, 1997–2005</title><title>Epidemiology and infection</title><addtitle>Epidemiol. Infect</addtitle><description>In New Zealand Campylobacter infection rates have increased steadily since 1980, reaching a peak in 2003 (396/100 000 population). Compared to other nations, disease rates are unfavourably high (e.g. Australia 117/100 000 population, UK 85/100 000 population, USA 13/100 000 population). This ecological study investigated spatial variations in Campylobacter infection rates across New Zealand's Territorial Local Authorities (TLAs, n=73) for the period 1997–2005. Applying multiple linear regression, we examined whether geographical factors such as socio-demographic characteristics, climate, land use, water and the food environment were associated with local differences in the occurrence of Campylobacter infection rates. The results suggested significant variations in campylobacteriosis across TLAs (average annual rates ranging from 97 to 526/100 000 population), with higher rates in the South Island. Disease rates were associated with lower socio-economic deprivation (P<0·01), the proportion of the population aged 25–44 years (P<0·01) and fresh food outlet density (P<0·76). The results underline the role of area-level characteristics in explaining the spatial distribution of campylobacteriosis in New Zealand. In particular, the findings draw attention to the relatively unexplored role of fresh food outlets as a potential risk factor for increased Campylobacter notifications.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Campylobacter</subject><subject>Campylobacter - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Campylobacter infection</subject><subject>Campylobacter infections</subject><subject>Campylobacter Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Campylobacter Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Campylobacteriosis</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Drinking water</subject><subject>ecological study</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Food Supply</subject><subject>Foodborne Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Foodborne Diseases - microbiology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>geographical determinants</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>New Zealand</subject><subject>New Zealand - epidemiology</subject><subject>Notifiable diseases</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Potable water</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Socioeconomics</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Vegetables</subject><subject>Water consumption</subject><issn>0950-2688</issn><issn>1469-4409</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcuKFDEUhoMoTjv6AC6UQhA3luZ-WQ6N014GRWxQ3IRULpq2qtImVejsfAff0CcxTbc9oJhNFt93Dvn_AHAXwScIIvH0HVQMYi4lgvUg-eEaWCDKVUspVNfBYofbHT8Bt0rZVEdhKW6CEwwRRZzKBXi5_uybsjVTNH3jYply7OYpprFJobFm2F72qTN28jmmEksTx-a1_9Z89KY3o3vcIKXErx8_MYTsNrgRTF_8ncN9Ctbnz9bL5-3Fm9WL5dlFaxnhU2tYFzAnjrhAIKfWQM4cllJhDx0JwXgpLKlpvOSehQBFkNzZoJyVSGByCh7t125z-jr7MukhFuv7-h6f5qIlYoxCjFA1H_xlbtKcx_o2LaiinAvIqoT2ks2plOyD3uY4mHypEdS7lvU_LdeZ-4fFczd4d5z4U2sVHh4EU6zpQzajjeXKI7hWQUn17u29TZlSPnIKJURI0crbPa8f478fuclfNBdEMM1Xb_X7VyuuludrLapPDmHM0OXoPvmryP-P8xum3Krv</recordid><startdate>20101001</startdate><enddate>20101001</enddate><creator>RIND, E.</creator><creator>PEARCE, J.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101001</creationdate><title>The spatial distribution of campylobacteriosis in New Zealand, 1997–2005</title><author>RIND, E. ; PEARCE, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-a5bf263d3df3064ca065d28892e0d3ffae87c3018e86e5ff07f86dcf9dc81723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Campylobacter</topic><topic>Campylobacter - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Campylobacter infection</topic><topic>Campylobacter infections</topic><topic>Campylobacter Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Campylobacter Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Campylobacteriosis</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Drinking water</topic><topic>ecological study</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Food Supply</topic><topic>Foodborne Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Foodborne Diseases - microbiology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>geographical determinants</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>New Zealand</topic><topic>New Zealand - epidemiology</topic><topic>Notifiable diseases</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Potable water</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Socioeconomics</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Vegetables</topic><topic>Water consumption</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>RIND, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PEARCE, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><jtitle>Epidemiology and infection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>RIND, E.</au><au>PEARCE, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The spatial distribution of campylobacteriosis in New Zealand, 1997–2005</atitle><jtitle>Epidemiology and infection</jtitle><addtitle>Epidemiol. Infect</addtitle><date>2010-10-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>138</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1359</spage><epage>1371</epage><pages>1359-1371</pages><issn>0950-2688</issn><eissn>1469-4409</eissn><coden>EPINEU</coden><abstract>In New Zealand Campylobacter infection rates have increased steadily since 1980, reaching a peak in 2003 (396/100 000 population). Compared to other nations, disease rates are unfavourably high (e.g. Australia 117/100 000 population, UK 85/100 000 population, USA 13/100 000 population). This ecological study investigated spatial variations in Campylobacter infection rates across New Zealand's Territorial Local Authorities (TLAs, n=73) for the period 1997–2005. Applying multiple linear regression, we examined whether geographical factors such as socio-demographic characteristics, climate, land use, water and the food environment were associated with local differences in the occurrence of Campylobacter infection rates. The results suggested significant variations in campylobacteriosis across TLAs (average annual rates ranging from 97 to 526/100 000 population), with higher rates in the South Island. Disease rates were associated with lower socio-economic deprivation (P<0·01), the proportion of the population aged 25–44 years (P<0·01) and fresh food outlet density (P<0·76). The results underline the role of area-level characteristics in explaining the spatial distribution of campylobacteriosis in New Zealand. In particular, the findings draw attention to the relatively unexplored role of fresh food outlets as a potential risk factor for increased Campylobacter notifications.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>20141648</pmid><doi>10.1017/S095026881000018X</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0950-2688 |
ispartof | Epidemiology and infection, 2010-10, Vol.138 (10), p.1359-1371 |
issn | 0950-2688 1469-4409 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_815540211 |
source | MEDLINE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Biological and medical sciences Campylobacter Campylobacter - isolation & purification Campylobacter infection Campylobacter infections Campylobacter Infections - epidemiology Campylobacter Infections - microbiology Campylobacteriosis Child Child, Preschool Disease Drinking water ecological study Epidemiology Ethnicity Food Supply Foodborne Diseases - epidemiology Foodborne Diseases - microbiology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology geographical determinants Groundwater Humans Infections Investigations Laboratories Male Microbiology New Zealand New Zealand - epidemiology Notifiable diseases Pathogens Population Potable water Prevalence Public health Rain Rural areas Socioeconomics Trends Urban areas Vegetables Water consumption |
title | The spatial distribution of campylobacteriosis in New Zealand, 1997–2005 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T16%3A57%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20spatial%20distribution%20of%20campylobacteriosis%20in%20New%20Zealand,%201997%E2%80%932005&rft.jtitle=Epidemiology%20and%20infection&rft.au=RIND,%20E.&rft.date=2010-10-01&rft.volume=138&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1359&rft.epage=1371&rft.pages=1359-1371&rft.issn=0950-2688&rft.eissn=1469-4409&rft.coden=EPINEU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S095026881000018X&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40801194%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=749466705&rft_id=info:pmid/20141648&rft_cupid=10_1017_S095026881000018X&rft_jstor_id=40801194&rfr_iscdi=true |