A framework for assessing ecological quality based on ecosystem services

Existing environmental legislation and ecological quality definitions such as ecosystem integrity tend to rely on measures that, either implicitly or explicitly, utilize naturalness as a key criterion. There are marked practical difficulties with employing the concept of naturalness in human dominat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecological complexity 2010-09, Vol.7 (3), p.273-281
Hauptverfasser: Paetzold, Achim, Warren, Philip H., Maltby, Lorraine L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 281
container_issue 3
container_start_page 273
container_title Ecological complexity
container_volume 7
creator Paetzold, Achim
Warren, Philip H.
Maltby, Lorraine L.
description Existing environmental legislation and ecological quality definitions such as ecosystem integrity tend to rely on measures that, either implicitly or explicitly, utilize naturalness as a key criterion. There are marked practical difficulties with employing the concept of naturalness in human dominated landscapes, and the management of such ecosystems is inevitably going to need to take account of human needs and expectations. We propose that ecological quality could be assessed by its ecosystem service profile (ESP): the overlap between societal expectations for, and the sustainable provision of, suites of ecosystem services. The status for each individual ecosystem service is defined by the ratio of its sustained provision to the expected level of provision for the service. The ESP measure is a multi-criterion, context-specific assessment of the match between expectation for and sustainable supply of ecosystem services. It provides a flexible measure of quality which takes into account that the “ideal” ecosystem state is largely dependent on the specific management context. The implementation of ESPs challenges us to develop indicators for the sustained provision of individual ecosystem services, much better understanding of the trade-offs among services, and practical tools for gauging societal demands. All of which are challenging problems. The proposed framework can help to strategically address research needs and monitoring requirements and foster a more integrative approach to ecosystem assessment and management in the future. The need for this follows from the fact that the undisturbed reference state represents only one aspect of an ecosystem and that ecological quality in human dominated landscapes will, ultimately, be determined by the value society places on the sustainable provision of multiple ecosystem services.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.11.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_815534807</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1476945X09001135</els_id><sourcerecordid>815534807</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-a1f1e7628a472d239d72c8fe0ea75d366a5a9fb1825a417ae8a63da9c03dea7c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhj2ARPn4BwzemBLsOImdBamqgCJVYgGJzbo6l8oliVtfWtR_T6owM51097yvdA9j91KkUsjycZuiCy50aSZElUqZCqEu2EzmukyqvPi6YtdE23FppM5nbDnnTYQOf0L85k2IHIiQyPcbPva0YeMdtHx_gNYPJ74GwpqH_nyjEw3YccJ49A7pll020BLe_c0b9vny_LFYJqv317fFfJU4pcyQgGwk6jIzkOuszlRV68yZBgWCLmpVllBA1aylyQrIpQY0UKoaKidUPSJO3bCHqXcXw_6ANNjOk8O2hR7DgayRRaFyI_RI5hPpYiCK2Nhd9B3Ek5XCnl3ZrZ1c2bMrK6UdtYyxpymG4xdHj9GS89g7rH1EN9g6-P8LfgHrN3e5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>815534807</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A framework for assessing ecological quality based on ecosystem services</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Paetzold, Achim ; Warren, Philip H. ; Maltby, Lorraine L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Paetzold, Achim ; Warren, Philip H. ; Maltby, Lorraine L.</creatorcontrib><description>Existing environmental legislation and ecological quality definitions such as ecosystem integrity tend to rely on measures that, either implicitly or explicitly, utilize naturalness as a key criterion. There are marked practical difficulties with employing the concept of naturalness in human dominated landscapes, and the management of such ecosystems is inevitably going to need to take account of human needs and expectations. We propose that ecological quality could be assessed by its ecosystem service profile (ESP): the overlap between societal expectations for, and the sustainable provision of, suites of ecosystem services. The status for each individual ecosystem service is defined by the ratio of its sustained provision to the expected level of provision for the service. The ESP measure is a multi-criterion, context-specific assessment of the match between expectation for and sustainable supply of ecosystem services. It provides a flexible measure of quality which takes into account that the “ideal” ecosystem state is largely dependent on the specific management context. The implementation of ESPs challenges us to develop indicators for the sustained provision of individual ecosystem services, much better understanding of the trade-offs among services, and practical tools for gauging societal demands. All of which are challenging problems. The proposed framework can help to strategically address research needs and monitoring requirements and foster a more integrative approach to ecosystem assessment and management in the future. The need for this follows from the fact that the undisturbed reference state represents only one aspect of an ecosystem and that ecological quality in human dominated landscapes will, ultimately, be determined by the value society places on the sustainable provision of multiple ecosystem services.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1476-945X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.11.003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adaptive management ; Biological integrity ; Ecological status ; Ecosystem health ; Societal demand ; Trade-offs</subject><ispartof>Ecological complexity, 2010-09, Vol.7 (3), p.273-281</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-a1f1e7628a472d239d72c8fe0ea75d366a5a9fb1825a417ae8a63da9c03dea7c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-a1f1e7628a472d239d72c8fe0ea75d366a5a9fb1825a417ae8a63da9c03dea7c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1476945X09001135$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Paetzold, Achim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warren, Philip H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maltby, Lorraine L.</creatorcontrib><title>A framework for assessing ecological quality based on ecosystem services</title><title>Ecological complexity</title><description>Existing environmental legislation and ecological quality definitions such as ecosystem integrity tend to rely on measures that, either implicitly or explicitly, utilize naturalness as a key criterion. There are marked practical difficulties with employing the concept of naturalness in human dominated landscapes, and the management of such ecosystems is inevitably going to need to take account of human needs and expectations. We propose that ecological quality could be assessed by its ecosystem service profile (ESP): the overlap between societal expectations for, and the sustainable provision of, suites of ecosystem services. The status for each individual ecosystem service is defined by the ratio of its sustained provision to the expected level of provision for the service. The ESP measure is a multi-criterion, context-specific assessment of the match between expectation for and sustainable supply of ecosystem services. It provides a flexible measure of quality which takes into account that the “ideal” ecosystem state is largely dependent on the specific management context. The implementation of ESPs challenges us to develop indicators for the sustained provision of individual ecosystem services, much better understanding of the trade-offs among services, and practical tools for gauging societal demands. All of which are challenging problems. The proposed framework can help to strategically address research needs and monitoring requirements and foster a more integrative approach to ecosystem assessment and management in the future. The need for this follows from the fact that the undisturbed reference state represents only one aspect of an ecosystem and that ecological quality in human dominated landscapes will, ultimately, be determined by the value society places on the sustainable provision of multiple ecosystem services.</description><subject>Adaptive management</subject><subject>Biological integrity</subject><subject>Ecological status</subject><subject>Ecosystem health</subject><subject>Societal demand</subject><subject>Trade-offs</subject><issn>1476-945X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhj2ARPn4BwzemBLsOImdBamqgCJVYgGJzbo6l8oliVtfWtR_T6owM51097yvdA9j91KkUsjycZuiCy50aSZElUqZCqEu2EzmukyqvPi6YtdE23FppM5nbDnnTYQOf0L85k2IHIiQyPcbPva0YeMdtHx_gNYPJ74GwpqH_nyjEw3YccJ49A7pll020BLe_c0b9vny_LFYJqv317fFfJU4pcyQgGwk6jIzkOuszlRV68yZBgWCLmpVllBA1aylyQrIpQY0UKoaKidUPSJO3bCHqXcXw_6ANNjOk8O2hR7DgayRRaFyI_RI5hPpYiCK2Nhd9B3Ek5XCnl3ZrZ1c2bMrK6UdtYyxpymG4xdHj9GS89g7rH1EN9g6-P8LfgHrN3e5</recordid><startdate>20100901</startdate><enddate>20100901</enddate><creator>Paetzold, Achim</creator><creator>Warren, Philip H.</creator><creator>Maltby, Lorraine L.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100901</creationdate><title>A framework for assessing ecological quality based on ecosystem services</title><author>Paetzold, Achim ; Warren, Philip H. ; Maltby, Lorraine L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-a1f1e7628a472d239d72c8fe0ea75d366a5a9fb1825a417ae8a63da9c03dea7c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adaptive management</topic><topic>Biological integrity</topic><topic>Ecological status</topic><topic>Ecosystem health</topic><topic>Societal demand</topic><topic>Trade-offs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Paetzold, Achim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warren, Philip H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maltby, Lorraine L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Ecological complexity</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Paetzold, Achim</au><au>Warren, Philip H.</au><au>Maltby, Lorraine L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A framework for assessing ecological quality based on ecosystem services</atitle><jtitle>Ecological complexity</jtitle><date>2010-09-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>273</spage><epage>281</epage><pages>273-281</pages><issn>1476-945X</issn><abstract>Existing environmental legislation and ecological quality definitions such as ecosystem integrity tend to rely on measures that, either implicitly or explicitly, utilize naturalness as a key criterion. There are marked practical difficulties with employing the concept of naturalness in human dominated landscapes, and the management of such ecosystems is inevitably going to need to take account of human needs and expectations. We propose that ecological quality could be assessed by its ecosystem service profile (ESP): the overlap between societal expectations for, and the sustainable provision of, suites of ecosystem services. The status for each individual ecosystem service is defined by the ratio of its sustained provision to the expected level of provision for the service. The ESP measure is a multi-criterion, context-specific assessment of the match between expectation for and sustainable supply of ecosystem services. It provides a flexible measure of quality which takes into account that the “ideal” ecosystem state is largely dependent on the specific management context. The implementation of ESPs challenges us to develop indicators for the sustained provision of individual ecosystem services, much better understanding of the trade-offs among services, and practical tools for gauging societal demands. All of which are challenging problems. The proposed framework can help to strategically address research needs and monitoring requirements and foster a more integrative approach to ecosystem assessment and management in the future. The need for this follows from the fact that the undisturbed reference state represents only one aspect of an ecosystem and that ecological quality in human dominated landscapes will, ultimately, be determined by the value society places on the sustainable provision of multiple ecosystem services.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.11.003</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1476-945X
ispartof Ecological complexity, 2010-09, Vol.7 (3), p.273-281
issn 1476-945X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_815534807
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adaptive management
Biological integrity
Ecological status
Ecosystem health
Societal demand
Trade-offs
title A framework for assessing ecological quality based on ecosystem services
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T12%3A31%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20framework%20for%20assessing%20ecological%20quality%20based%20on%20ecosystem%20services&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20complexity&rft.au=Paetzold,%20Achim&rft.date=2010-09-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=273&rft.epage=281&rft.pages=273-281&rft.issn=1476-945X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.11.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E815534807%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=815534807&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1476945X09001135&rfr_iscdi=true