cytological comparison of inclusions as a basis for distinguishing two filamentous legume Viruses
Agronomy and Plant Pathology Departments, Plant Virus Laboratory, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32601, U.S.A., and Botany Department, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada Light and electron microscopy were used to compare two flexuous-rod viruses: cowpea virus (CV) and bean ye...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of general virology 1972-05, Vol.15 (2), p.113-118 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 118 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 113 |
| container_title | Journal of general virology |
| container_volume | 15 |
| creator | Edwardson, J.R Zettler, F.W Christie, R.G Evans, I.R |
| description | Agronomy and Plant Pathology Departments, Plant Virus Laboratory, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32601, U.S.A., and Botany Department, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
Light and electron microscopy were used to compare two flexuous-rod viruses: cowpea virus (CV) and bean yellow mosaic virus (BYMV). Inclusions induced by CV were consistently different from those induced by BYMV. In the light microscope, BYMV-induced cylindrical inclusions appeared as a group of plates, whereas CV-induced cylindrical inclusions appeared as a group of tubes. Electron microscopy showed that CV induced fibrous nuclear inclusions, while BYMV induced non-fibrous nucleolar inclusions in Crotalaria spectabilis . Thin section studies showed that CV-induced cylindrical inclusions contained circles and tubes, but no laminated aggregates, while BYMV-induced cylindrical inclusions contained laminated aggregates, but no circles or tubes. The shapes of extracted inclusions induced by CV were consistently different from those induced by BYMV. These viruses are cytologically different and are believed to be distinct.
Received 26 October 1971;
accepted 16 December 1971. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1099/0022-1317-15-2-113 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_81493659</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>81493659</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3133-f4a1f22428f08775b92a628c1b4a5e772c2f13fcfe16b5227afd3a7bb00f34673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE9r3DAQxUVJSbabfoFCqE7pya1Gkq31MYT0DwR6aJOrkLWSd4ptbTV2Qr59tewSCgMz4r15Gn6MfQDxGUTbfhFCygoUmArqqkyg3rAV6KY8inzGVq-GC_aO6I8QoHVtztm5Ll4jzYo5_zKnIfXo3cB9GvcuI6WJp8hx8sNCmCbirhTvHCHxmDLfIs049QvSrjQ-PycecXBjmOa0EB9Cv4yBP2JeKNAlexvdQOH9qa_Zw9e737ffq_uf337c3txXXoFSVdQOopRabqLYGFN3rXSN3HjotKuDMdLLCCr6GKDpaimNi1vlTNcJEZVujFqz62PuPqe_S6DZjkg-DIObQrnKbkC3qqnbYpRHo8-JKIdo9xlHl18sCHvgag_Y7AGbhdqWqdy3Zlen9KUbw_Z15QSy6J-O-g773TPmYPswjVi-6DDZJ8z_JX08OqNL1vUFt334JQUoIZXQbS3UP8fsi1E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>81493659</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>cytological comparison of inclusions as a basis for distinguishing two filamentous legume Viruses</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Microbiology Society</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Edwardson, J.R ; Zettler, F.W ; Christie, R.G ; Evans, I.R</creator><creatorcontrib>Edwardson, J.R ; Zettler, F.W ; Christie, R.G ; Evans, I.R</creatorcontrib><description>Agronomy and Plant Pathology Departments, Plant Virus Laboratory, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32601, U.S.A., and Botany Department, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
Light and electron microscopy were used to compare two flexuous-rod viruses: cowpea virus (CV) and bean yellow mosaic virus (BYMV). Inclusions induced by CV were consistently different from those induced by BYMV. In the light microscope, BYMV-induced cylindrical inclusions appeared as a group of plates, whereas CV-induced cylindrical inclusions appeared as a group of tubes. Electron microscopy showed that CV induced fibrous nuclear inclusions, while BYMV induced non-fibrous nucleolar inclusions in Crotalaria spectabilis . Thin section studies showed that CV-induced cylindrical inclusions contained circles and tubes, but no laminated aggregates, while BYMV-induced cylindrical inclusions contained laminated aggregates, but no circles or tubes. The shapes of extracted inclusions induced by CV were consistently different from those induced by BYMV. These viruses are cytologically different and are believed to be distinct.
Received 26 October 1971;
accepted 16 December 1971.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1317</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-2099</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1099/0022-1317-15-2-113</identifier><identifier>PMID: 4113727</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Soc General Microbiol</publisher><subject>Cell Nucleolus - microbiology ; Cell Nucleus - microbiology ; cowpeas ; Inclusion Bodies, Viral ; Microscopy, Electron ; Molybdenum ; Phosphotungstic Acid ; Plant Diseases ; Plant Viruses - classification ; Plants, Edible - cytology ; Staining and Labeling</subject><ispartof>Journal of general virology, 1972-05, Vol.15 (2), p.113-118</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3133-f4a1f22428f08775b92a628c1b4a5e772c2f13fcfe16b5227afd3a7bb00f34673</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3733,3734,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4113727$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Edwardson, J.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zettler, F.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christie, R.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, I.R</creatorcontrib><title>cytological comparison of inclusions as a basis for distinguishing two filamentous legume Viruses</title><title>Journal of general virology</title><addtitle>J Gen Virol</addtitle><description>Agronomy and Plant Pathology Departments, Plant Virus Laboratory, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32601, U.S.A., and Botany Department, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
Light and electron microscopy were used to compare two flexuous-rod viruses: cowpea virus (CV) and bean yellow mosaic virus (BYMV). Inclusions induced by CV were consistently different from those induced by BYMV. In the light microscope, BYMV-induced cylindrical inclusions appeared as a group of plates, whereas CV-induced cylindrical inclusions appeared as a group of tubes. Electron microscopy showed that CV induced fibrous nuclear inclusions, while BYMV induced non-fibrous nucleolar inclusions in Crotalaria spectabilis . Thin section studies showed that CV-induced cylindrical inclusions contained circles and tubes, but no laminated aggregates, while BYMV-induced cylindrical inclusions contained laminated aggregates, but no circles or tubes. The shapes of extracted inclusions induced by CV were consistently different from those induced by BYMV. These viruses are cytologically different and are believed to be distinct.
Received 26 October 1971;
accepted 16 December 1971.</description><subject>Cell Nucleolus - microbiology</subject><subject>Cell Nucleus - microbiology</subject><subject>cowpeas</subject><subject>Inclusion Bodies, Viral</subject><subject>Microscopy, Electron</subject><subject>Molybdenum</subject><subject>Phosphotungstic Acid</subject><subject>Plant Diseases</subject><subject>Plant Viruses - classification</subject><subject>Plants, Edible - cytology</subject><subject>Staining and Labeling</subject><issn>0022-1317</issn><issn>1465-2099</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1972</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkE9r3DAQxUVJSbabfoFCqE7pya1Gkq31MYT0DwR6aJOrkLWSd4ptbTV2Qr59tewSCgMz4r15Gn6MfQDxGUTbfhFCygoUmArqqkyg3rAV6KY8inzGVq-GC_aO6I8QoHVtztm5Ll4jzYo5_zKnIfXo3cB9GvcuI6WJp8hx8sNCmCbirhTvHCHxmDLfIs049QvSrjQ-PycecXBjmOa0EB9Cv4yBP2JeKNAlexvdQOH9qa_Zw9e737ffq_uf337c3txXXoFSVdQOopRabqLYGFN3rXSN3HjotKuDMdLLCCr6GKDpaimNi1vlTNcJEZVujFqz62PuPqe_S6DZjkg-DIObQrnKbkC3qqnbYpRHo8-JKIdo9xlHl18sCHvgag_Y7AGbhdqWqdy3Zlen9KUbw_Z15QSy6J-O-g773TPmYPswjVi-6DDZJ8z_JX08OqNL1vUFt334JQUoIZXQbS3UP8fsi1E</recordid><startdate>197205</startdate><enddate>197205</enddate><creator>Edwardson, J.R</creator><creator>Zettler, F.W</creator><creator>Christie, R.G</creator><creator>Evans, I.R</creator><general>Soc General Microbiol</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197205</creationdate><title>cytological comparison of inclusions as a basis for distinguishing two filamentous legume Viruses</title><author>Edwardson, J.R ; Zettler, F.W ; Christie, R.G ; Evans, I.R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3133-f4a1f22428f08775b92a628c1b4a5e772c2f13fcfe16b5227afd3a7bb00f34673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1972</creationdate><topic>Cell Nucleolus - microbiology</topic><topic>Cell Nucleus - microbiology</topic><topic>cowpeas</topic><topic>Inclusion Bodies, Viral</topic><topic>Microscopy, Electron</topic><topic>Molybdenum</topic><topic>Phosphotungstic Acid</topic><topic>Plant Diseases</topic><topic>Plant Viruses - classification</topic><topic>Plants, Edible - cytology</topic><topic>Staining and Labeling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Edwardson, J.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zettler, F.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christie, R.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, I.R</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of general virology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Edwardson, J.R</au><au>Zettler, F.W</au><au>Christie, R.G</au><au>Evans, I.R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>cytological comparison of inclusions as a basis for distinguishing two filamentous legume Viruses</atitle><jtitle>Journal of general virology</jtitle><addtitle>J Gen Virol</addtitle><date>1972-05</date><risdate>1972</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>113</spage><epage>118</epage><pages>113-118</pages><issn>0022-1317</issn><eissn>1465-2099</eissn><abstract>Agronomy and Plant Pathology Departments, Plant Virus Laboratory, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32601, U.S.A., and Botany Department, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
Light and electron microscopy were used to compare two flexuous-rod viruses: cowpea virus (CV) and bean yellow mosaic virus (BYMV). Inclusions induced by CV were consistently different from those induced by BYMV. In the light microscope, BYMV-induced cylindrical inclusions appeared as a group of plates, whereas CV-induced cylindrical inclusions appeared as a group of tubes. Electron microscopy showed that CV induced fibrous nuclear inclusions, while BYMV induced non-fibrous nucleolar inclusions in Crotalaria spectabilis . Thin section studies showed that CV-induced cylindrical inclusions contained circles and tubes, but no laminated aggregates, while BYMV-induced cylindrical inclusions contained laminated aggregates, but no circles or tubes. The shapes of extracted inclusions induced by CV were consistently different from those induced by BYMV. These viruses are cytologically different and are believed to be distinct.
Received 26 October 1971;
accepted 16 December 1971.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Soc General Microbiol</pub><pmid>4113727</pmid><doi>10.1099/0022-1317-15-2-113</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-1317 |
| ispartof | Journal of general virology, 1972-05, Vol.15 (2), p.113-118 |
| issn | 0022-1317 1465-2099 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_81493659 |
| source | MEDLINE; Microbiology Society; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Cell Nucleolus - microbiology Cell Nucleus - microbiology cowpeas Inclusion Bodies, Viral Microscopy, Electron Molybdenum Phosphotungstic Acid Plant Diseases Plant Viruses - classification Plants, Edible - cytology Staining and Labeling |
| title | cytological comparison of inclusions as a basis for distinguishing two filamentous legume Viruses |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T09%3A24%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=cytological%20comparison%20of%20inclusions%20as%20a%20basis%20for%20distinguishing%20two%20filamentous%20legume%20Viruses&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20general%20virology&rft.au=Edwardson,%20J.R&rft.date=1972-05&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=113&rft.epage=118&rft.pages=113-118&rft.issn=0022-1317&rft.eissn=1465-2099&rft_id=info:doi/10.1099/0022-1317-15-2-113&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E81493659%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=81493659&rft_id=info:pmid/4113727&rfr_iscdi=true |