The subrenal capsule tumor implant assay as a predictor of clinical response to chemotherapy: 3 Years of experience
The clinical response to chemotherapy of a series of female patients with advanced pelvic malignancies was compared to the response of their tumors to the same agents in the murine subrenal capsule implant assay. A total of 194 different patients were studied in 242 different assays; 89.3% of the as...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Gynecologic oncology 1984-11, Vol.19 (3), p.336-347 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 347 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 336 |
| container_title | Gynecologic oncology |
| container_volume | 19 |
| creator | Stratton, Joan A. Kucera, Paul R. Micha, John P. Rettenmaier, Mark A. Braly, Patricia S. Berman, Michael L. DiSaia, Philip J. |
| description | The clinical response to chemotherapy of a series of female patients with advanced pelvic malignancies was compared to the response of their tumors to the same agents in the murine subrenal capsule implant assay. A total of 194 different patients were studied in 242 different assays; 89.3% of the assays were evaluable. There were 83 prospective assays (assays performed before the patient received the chemotherapy) of 66 different patients for which clinical correlations were available. In these assays the sensitivity (frequency of positive test results in responding patients) was 85.0%, the specificity (frequency of negative test results in nonresponding patients) was 57.1%, and the efficiency (percentage correctly classified) was 63.9%. There were 100 retrospective assays (assays performed after the patient had been treated with the chemotherapy) of 69 different patients for which clinical correlations were available. In these assays the sensitivity was 66.7%, the specificity 70.7%, and the efficiency 70.0%. Thirty-one of the patients had both prospective and retrospective assays. There were 59 patients for whom the clinical response to chemotherapy could not be determined. It is believed that the clinical utility of the SRC assay has been validated by the good prospective sensitivity of the assay. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0090-8258(84)90201-4 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_81337759</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0090825884902014</els_id><sourcerecordid>81337759</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-d8b57941aef74b79f8efcffd90aab2eecf182ef22f7d79867f5a86893621439c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE2L1TAUhoM4jNfRf6CQhYguqkna5sOFIIM6AwNuxoWrkKYn3Ejb1JxW5v5707mXu3STBN7nPZw8hLzi7ANnXH5kzLBKi1a_0817wwTjVfOE7DgzbSV1a56S3Rl5Rp4j_maM1YyLS3Ip2_JUckfwfg8U1y7D5Abq3YzrAHRZx5RpHOfBTQt1iO5QTuronKGPfilhCtQPcYq-1DLgnCYsvUT9Hsa07CG7-fCJ1vQXuIwbDQ8z5AiThxfkIrgB4eXpviI_v329v76p7n58v73-clf5Wsul6nXXKtNwB0E1nTJBQ_Ah9IY51wkAH7gWEIQIqldGSxVap6U2tRS8qY2vr8jb49w5pz8r4GLHiB6G8ilIK1rN61qp1hSwOYI-J8QMwc45ji4fLGd2c203kXYTaXVjH13bptRen-av3Qj9uXSSW_I3p9xh0RSym3zEM2aEYFpuYz4fMSgu_kbIFv2jpz5m8IvtU_z_Hv8AyLycLQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>81337759</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The subrenal capsule tumor implant assay as a predictor of clinical response to chemotherapy: 3 Years of experience</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Stratton, Joan A. ; Kucera, Paul R. ; Micha, John P. ; Rettenmaier, Mark A. ; Braly, Patricia S. ; Berman, Michael L. ; DiSaia, Philip J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stratton, Joan A. ; Kucera, Paul R. ; Micha, John P. ; Rettenmaier, Mark A. ; Braly, Patricia S. ; Berman, Michael L. ; DiSaia, Philip J.</creatorcontrib><description>The clinical response to chemotherapy of a series of female patients with advanced pelvic malignancies was compared to the response of their tumors to the same agents in the murine subrenal capsule implant assay. A total of 194 different patients were studied in 242 different assays; 89.3% of the assays were evaluable. There were 83 prospective assays (assays performed before the patient received the chemotherapy) of 66 different patients for which clinical correlations were available. In these assays the sensitivity (frequency of positive test results in responding patients) was 85.0%, the specificity (frequency of negative test results in nonresponding patients) was 57.1%, and the efficiency (percentage correctly classified) was 63.9%. There were 100 retrospective assays (assays performed after the patient had been treated with the chemotherapy) of 69 different patients for which clinical correlations were available. In these assays the sensitivity was 66.7%, the specificity 70.7%, and the efficiency 70.0%. Thirty-one of the patients had both prospective and retrospective assays. There were 59 patients for whom the clinical response to chemotherapy could not be determined. It is believed that the clinical utility of the SRC assay has been validated by the good prospective sensitivity of the assay.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-8258</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-6859</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0090-8258(84)90201-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 6500376</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GYNOA3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Diego, CA: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Antineoplastic agents ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use ; Biological and medical sciences ; Colony-Forming Units Assay - methods ; Female ; General aspects ; Genital Neoplasms, Female - drug therapy ; Humans ; Kidney ; Medical sciences ; Mice ; Mice, Inbred Strains ; Neoplasm Transplantation ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Time Factors ; Tumor Stem Cell Assay - methods</subject><ispartof>Gynecologic oncology, 1984-11, Vol.19 (3), p.336-347</ispartof><rights>1984</rights><rights>1985 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-d8b57941aef74b79f8efcffd90aab2eecf182ef22f7d79867f5a86893621439c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-d8b57941aef74b79f8efcffd90aab2eecf182ef22f7d79867f5a86893621439c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0090-8258(84)90201-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=9220864$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6500376$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stratton, Joan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kucera, Paul R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Micha, John P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rettenmaier, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braly, Patricia S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berman, Michael L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DiSaia, Philip J.</creatorcontrib><title>The subrenal capsule tumor implant assay as a predictor of clinical response to chemotherapy: 3 Years of experience</title><title>Gynecologic oncology</title><addtitle>Gynecol Oncol</addtitle><description>The clinical response to chemotherapy of a series of female patients with advanced pelvic malignancies was compared to the response of their tumors to the same agents in the murine subrenal capsule implant assay. A total of 194 different patients were studied in 242 different assays; 89.3% of the assays were evaluable. There were 83 prospective assays (assays performed before the patient received the chemotherapy) of 66 different patients for which clinical correlations were available. In these assays the sensitivity (frequency of positive test results in responding patients) was 85.0%, the specificity (frequency of negative test results in nonresponding patients) was 57.1%, and the efficiency (percentage correctly classified) was 63.9%. There were 100 retrospective assays (assays performed after the patient had been treated with the chemotherapy) of 69 different patients for which clinical correlations were available. In these assays the sensitivity was 66.7%, the specificity 70.7%, and the efficiency 70.0%. Thirty-one of the patients had both prospective and retrospective assays. There were 59 patients for whom the clinical response to chemotherapy could not be determined. It is believed that the clinical utility of the SRC assay has been validated by the good prospective sensitivity of the assay.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antineoplastic agents</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Colony-Forming Units Assay - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Genital Neoplasms, Female - drug therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Mice, Inbred Strains</subject><subject>Neoplasm Transplantation</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Tumor Stem Cell Assay - methods</subject><issn>0090-8258</issn><issn>1095-6859</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1984</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE2L1TAUhoM4jNfRf6CQhYguqkna5sOFIIM6AwNuxoWrkKYn3Ejb1JxW5v5707mXu3STBN7nPZw8hLzi7ANnXH5kzLBKi1a_0817wwTjVfOE7DgzbSV1a56S3Rl5Rp4j_maM1YyLS3Ip2_JUckfwfg8U1y7D5Abq3YzrAHRZx5RpHOfBTQt1iO5QTuronKGPfilhCtQPcYq-1DLgnCYsvUT9Hsa07CG7-fCJ1vQXuIwbDQ8z5AiThxfkIrgB4eXpviI_v329v76p7n58v73-clf5Wsul6nXXKtNwB0E1nTJBQ_Ah9IY51wkAH7gWEIQIqldGSxVap6U2tRS8qY2vr8jb49w5pz8r4GLHiB6G8ilIK1rN61qp1hSwOYI-J8QMwc45ji4fLGd2c203kXYTaXVjH13bptRen-av3Qj9uXSSW_I3p9xh0RSym3zEM2aEYFpuYz4fMSgu_kbIFv2jpz5m8IvtU_z_Hv8AyLycLQ</recordid><startdate>198411</startdate><enddate>198411</enddate><creator>Stratton, Joan A.</creator><creator>Kucera, Paul R.</creator><creator>Micha, John P.</creator><creator>Rettenmaier, Mark A.</creator><creator>Braly, Patricia S.</creator><creator>Berman, Michael L.</creator><creator>DiSaia, Philip J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198411</creationdate><title>The subrenal capsule tumor implant assay as a predictor of clinical response to chemotherapy: 3 Years of experience</title><author>Stratton, Joan A. ; Kucera, Paul R. ; Micha, John P. ; Rettenmaier, Mark A. ; Braly, Patricia S. ; Berman, Michael L. ; DiSaia, Philip J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-d8b57941aef74b79f8efcffd90aab2eecf182ef22f7d79867f5a86893621439c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1984</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antineoplastic agents</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Colony-Forming Units Assay - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Genital Neoplasms, Female - drug therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Mice, Inbred Strains</topic><topic>Neoplasm Transplantation</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Tumor Stem Cell Assay - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stratton, Joan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kucera, Paul R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Micha, John P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rettenmaier, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braly, Patricia S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berman, Michael L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DiSaia, Philip J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gynecologic oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stratton, Joan A.</au><au>Kucera, Paul R.</au><au>Micha, John P.</au><au>Rettenmaier, Mark A.</au><au>Braly, Patricia S.</au><au>Berman, Michael L.</au><au>DiSaia, Philip J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The subrenal capsule tumor implant assay as a predictor of clinical response to chemotherapy: 3 Years of experience</atitle><jtitle>Gynecologic oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Gynecol Oncol</addtitle><date>1984-11</date><risdate>1984</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>336</spage><epage>347</epage><pages>336-347</pages><issn>0090-8258</issn><eissn>1095-6859</eissn><coden>GYNOA3</coden><abstract>The clinical response to chemotherapy of a series of female patients with advanced pelvic malignancies was compared to the response of their tumors to the same agents in the murine subrenal capsule implant assay. A total of 194 different patients were studied in 242 different assays; 89.3% of the assays were evaluable. There were 83 prospective assays (assays performed before the patient received the chemotherapy) of 66 different patients for which clinical correlations were available. In these assays the sensitivity (frequency of positive test results in responding patients) was 85.0%, the specificity (frequency of negative test results in nonresponding patients) was 57.1%, and the efficiency (percentage correctly classified) was 63.9%. There were 100 retrospective assays (assays performed after the patient had been treated with the chemotherapy) of 69 different patients for which clinical correlations were available. In these assays the sensitivity was 66.7%, the specificity 70.7%, and the efficiency 70.0%. Thirty-one of the patients had both prospective and retrospective assays. There were 59 patients for whom the clinical response to chemotherapy could not be determined. It is believed that the clinical utility of the SRC assay has been validated by the good prospective sensitivity of the assay.</abstract><cop>San Diego, CA</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>6500376</pmid><doi>10.1016/0090-8258(84)90201-4</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0090-8258 |
| ispartof | Gynecologic oncology, 1984-11, Vol.19 (3), p.336-347 |
| issn | 0090-8258 1095-6859 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_81337759 |
| source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
| subjects | Animals Antineoplastic agents Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use Biological and medical sciences Colony-Forming Units Assay - methods Female General aspects Genital Neoplasms, Female - drug therapy Humans Kidney Medical sciences Mice Mice, Inbred Strains Neoplasm Transplantation Pharmacology. Drug treatments Time Factors Tumor Stem Cell Assay - methods |
| title | The subrenal capsule tumor implant assay as a predictor of clinical response to chemotherapy: 3 Years of experience |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T07%3A16%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20subrenal%20capsule%20tumor%20implant%20assay%20as%20a%20predictor%20of%20clinical%20response%20to%20chemotherapy:%203%20Years%20of%20experience&rft.jtitle=Gynecologic%20oncology&rft.au=Stratton,%20Joan%20A.&rft.date=1984-11&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=336&rft.epage=347&rft.pages=336-347&rft.issn=0090-8258&rft.eissn=1095-6859&rft.coden=GYNOA3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0090-8258(84)90201-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E81337759%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=81337759&rft_id=info:pmid/6500376&rft_els_id=0090825884902014&rfr_iscdi=true |