Bone Mineral Content of Female Athletes
To the Editor: In the article by Drinkwater et al. (Aug. 2 issue) 1 concerning the implications of amenorrhea on bone density, the amenorrheic women fit the profile of a generally more competitive group (their 10-km times were approximately one minute per mile faster) and a statistically higher week...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The New England journal of medicine 1984-11, Vol.311 (20), p.1320-1321 |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1321 |
---|---|
container_issue | 20 |
container_start_page | 1320 |
container_title | The New England journal of medicine |
container_volume | 311 |
description | To the Editor:
In the article by Drinkwater et al. (Aug. 2 issue)
1
concerning the implications of amenorrhea on bone density, the amenorrheic women fit the profile of a generally more competitive group (their 10-km times were approximately one minute per mile faster) and a statistically higher weekly running mileage.
2
Moreover, the authors may have promulgated nutrition as a factor in the development of athletic amenorrhea.
Caloric intake did not differ statistically between the two groups. However, if one combines the mileage data in Table 1 with the calorie consumption shown in Table 4, it is apparent that after calories . . .
No extract is available for articles shorter than 400 words. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1056/NEJM198411153112015 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_81325064</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>81325064</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-dd14806d6fb9272b5c32e05306b44c937265ec10a6c588fb4a21f8447d7d04be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kLtOw0AQRVcIFELgCxCSKyiQYWZfXpcQJTyUQAP1ar0ei0ReO3idgr_HKBEVYpo70n0Uh7FzhBsEpW9fZs9LzI1ERCUQOaA6YOPhF6mUoA_ZGICbVGa5OGYnMa5hOJT5iI20zAU3Zsyu7tuGkuWqoc7VybRtemr6pK2SOQVXU3LXf9TUUzxlR5WrI53tdcLe57O36WO6eH14mt4tUs-N7tOyRGlAl7oqcp7xQnnBCZQAXUjpc5FxrcgjOO2VMVUhHcfKSJmVWQmyIDFhl7vdTdd-bin2Nqyip7p2DbXbaA0KrkDLISh2Qd-1MXZU2U23Cq77sgj2B4_9A8_QutjPb4tA5W9nz2Pwr3d-CNE2tA7_rn0DnQtpWA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>81325064</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bone Mineral Content of Female Athletes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><description>To the Editor:
In the article by Drinkwater et al. (Aug. 2 issue)
1
concerning the implications of amenorrhea on bone density, the amenorrheic women fit the profile of a generally more competitive group (their 10-km times were approximately one minute per mile faster) and a statistically higher weekly running mileage.
2
Moreover, the authors may have promulgated nutrition as a factor in the development of athletic amenorrhea.
Caloric intake did not differ statistically between the two groups. However, if one combines the mileage data in Table 1 with the calorie consumption shown in Table 4, it is apparent that after calories . . .
No extract is available for articles shorter than 400 words.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-4793</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198411153112015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 6493288</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Massachusetts Medical Society</publisher><subject>Bone and Bones - analysis ; Female ; Humans ; Minerals - analysis ; Running ; Sports</subject><ispartof>The New England journal of medicine, 1984-11, Vol.311 (20), p.1320-1321</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-dd14806d6fb9272b5c32e05306b44c937265ec10a6c588fb4a21f8447d7d04be3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,64387</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6493288$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><title>Bone Mineral Content of Female Athletes</title><title>The New England journal of medicine</title><addtitle>N Engl J Med</addtitle><description>To the Editor:
In the article by Drinkwater et al. (Aug. 2 issue)
1
concerning the implications of amenorrhea on bone density, the amenorrheic women fit the profile of a generally more competitive group (their 10-km times were approximately one minute per mile faster) and a statistically higher weekly running mileage.
2
Moreover, the authors may have promulgated nutrition as a factor in the development of athletic amenorrhea.
Caloric intake did not differ statistically between the two groups. However, if one combines the mileage data in Table 1 with the calorie consumption shown in Table 4, it is apparent that after calories . . .
No extract is available for articles shorter than 400 words.</description><subject>Bone and Bones - analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Minerals - analysis</subject><subject>Running</subject><subject>Sports</subject><issn>0028-4793</issn><issn>1533-4406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1984</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kLtOw0AQRVcIFELgCxCSKyiQYWZfXpcQJTyUQAP1ar0ei0ReO3idgr_HKBEVYpo70n0Uh7FzhBsEpW9fZs9LzI1ERCUQOaA6YOPhF6mUoA_ZGICbVGa5OGYnMa5hOJT5iI20zAU3Zsyu7tuGkuWqoc7VybRtemr6pK2SOQVXU3LXf9TUUzxlR5WrI53tdcLe57O36WO6eH14mt4tUs-N7tOyRGlAl7oqcp7xQnnBCZQAXUjpc5FxrcgjOO2VMVUhHcfKSJmVWQmyIDFhl7vdTdd-bin2Nqyip7p2DbXbaA0KrkDLISh2Qd-1MXZU2U23Cq77sgj2B4_9A8_QutjPb4tA5W9nz2Pwr3d-CNE2tA7_rn0DnQtpWA</recordid><startdate>19841115</startdate><enddate>19841115</enddate><general>Massachusetts Medical Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19841115</creationdate><title>Bone Mineral Content of Female Athletes</title></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-dd14806d6fb9272b5c32e05306b44c937265ec10a6c588fb4a21f8447d7d04be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1984</creationdate><topic>Bone and Bones - analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Minerals - analysis</topic><topic>Running</topic><topic>Sports</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The New England journal of medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bone Mineral Content of Female Athletes</atitle><jtitle>The New England journal of medicine</jtitle><addtitle>N Engl J Med</addtitle><date>1984-11-15</date><risdate>1984</risdate><volume>311</volume><issue>20</issue><spage>1320</spage><epage>1321</epage><pages>1320-1321</pages><issn>0028-4793</issn><eissn>1533-4406</eissn><abstract>To the Editor:
In the article by Drinkwater et al. (Aug. 2 issue)
1
concerning the implications of amenorrhea on bone density, the amenorrheic women fit the profile of a generally more competitive group (their 10-km times were approximately one minute per mile faster) and a statistically higher weekly running mileage.
2
Moreover, the authors may have promulgated nutrition as a factor in the development of athletic amenorrhea.
Caloric intake did not differ statistically between the two groups. However, if one combines the mileage data in Table 1 with the calorie consumption shown in Table 4, it is apparent that after calories . . .
No extract is available for articles shorter than 400 words.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Massachusetts Medical Society</pub><pmid>6493288</pmid><doi>10.1056/NEJM198411153112015</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0028-4793 |
ispartof | The New England journal of medicine, 1984-11, Vol.311 (20), p.1320-1321 |
issn | 0028-4793 1533-4406 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_81325064 |
source | MEDLINE; ProQuest Central |
subjects | Bone and Bones - analysis Female Humans Minerals - analysis Running Sports |
title | Bone Mineral Content of Female Athletes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T06%3A42%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bone%20Mineral%20Content%20of%20Female%20Athletes&rft.jtitle=The%20New%20England%20journal%20of%20medicine&rft.date=1984-11-15&rft.volume=311&rft.issue=20&rft.spage=1320&rft.epage=1321&rft.pages=1320-1321&rft.issn=0028-4793&rft.eissn=1533-4406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1056/NEJM198411153112015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E81325064%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=81325064&rft_id=info:pmid/6493288&rfr_iscdi=true |