Patterns of Obstetric Procedures Use in Maternity Care
The use of seven obstetric procedures was studied in two institutions that use different approaches to maternity care. The study population included 796 women delivering at Booth Maternity Center and 804 women with similar sociodemographic characteristics delivering at Thomas Jefferson University Ho...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953) 1984-10, Vol.64 (4), p.493-498 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 498 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 493 |
| container_title | Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953) |
| container_volume | 64 |
| creator | BARUFFI, GIGLIOLA DELLINGER, WOODROW S STROBINO, DONNA M RUDOLPH, ALICE TIMMONS, REBECCA GIBSON ROSS, ALAN |
| description | The use of seven obstetric procedures was studied in two institutions that use different approaches to maternity care. The study population included 796 women delivering at Booth Maternity Center and 804 women with similar sociodemographic characteristics delivering at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital during 1977 and 1978. Several differences were found between the two institutions. The majority of selected procedures were used more often at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital than at Booth Maternity Center. The greatest differences were found for women at low intrapartum risk, while differences were smallest for women at high prenatal and intrapartum risk. The two institutions differed in their use of procedures for women at various levels of prenatal and intrapartum risk. The findings suggested that most of the differences did not reflect different levels of risk in the populations served, but were due to other unidentified factors. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_81278481</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>81278481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p2809-f75261c3d73b75eb997af12891037f5aa825c67aacd2e6a4db586dfee097eb643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1Lw0AQhhdRaqz-BCEH8RbYr-zHUYpfUGkPFryFyWZCo2lSdzeU_ntTGrzMMLwPA897QRJmtMi4EF-XJKGU20wbKa_JTQjflFKmrJiRmZJGcKsTotYQI_oupH2drsoQMfrGpWvfO6wGjyHdBEybLv2AE9bEY7oAj7fkqoY24N2052Tz8vy5eMuWq9f3xdMy23NDbVbrnCvmRKVFqXMsrdVQM24so0LXOYDhuVMawFUcFciqzI2qakRqNZZKijl5PP_d-_53wBCLXRMcti102A-hMIyPeoaN4P0EDuUOq2Lvmx34YzGJjvnDlENw0NYeOteEf8wyLnPLR0yesUPfjr7hpx0O6IstQhu3xdgfVTynGbNGstOVnYYVf-1ma3M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>81278481</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patterns of Obstetric Procedures Use in Maternity Care</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>BARUFFI, GIGLIOLA ; DELLINGER, WOODROW S ; STROBINO, DONNA M ; RUDOLPH, ALICE ; TIMMONS, REBECCA GIBSON ; ROSS, ALAN</creator><creatorcontrib>BARUFFI, GIGLIOLA ; DELLINGER, WOODROW S ; STROBINO, DONNA M ; RUDOLPH, ALICE ; TIMMONS, REBECCA GIBSON ; ROSS, ALAN</creatorcontrib><description>The use of seven obstetric procedures was studied in two institutions that use different approaches to maternity care. The study population included 796 women delivering at Booth Maternity Center and 804 women with similar sociodemographic characteristics delivering at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital during 1977 and 1978. Several differences were found between the two institutions. The majority of selected procedures were used more often at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital than at Booth Maternity Center. The greatest differences were found for women at low intrapartum risk, while differences were smallest for women at high prenatal and intrapartum risk. The two institutions differed in their use of procedures for women at various levels of prenatal and intrapartum risk. The findings suggested that most of the differences did not reflect different levels of risk in the populations served, but were due to other unidentified factors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-7844</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-233X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 6483297</identifier><identifier>CODEN: OBGNAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anesthesia, Obstetrical ; Biological and medical sciences ; Breech Presentation ; Cesarean Section ; Delivery, Obstetric ; Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation ; Education ; Episiotomy ; Female ; Fetal Monitoring ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Labor, Induced ; Maternal Age ; Maternal Health Services - trends ; Medical sciences ; Obstetrical Forceps ; Obstetrical techniques ; Obstetrics ; Parity ; Pennsylvania ; Pregnancy ; Prenatal Diagnosis</subject><ispartof>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953), 1984-10, Vol.64 (4), p.493-498</ispartof><rights>1984 The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists</rights><rights>1985 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=9124592$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6483297$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BARUFFI, GIGLIOLA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DELLINGER, WOODROW S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STROBINO, DONNA M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RUDOLPH, ALICE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TIMMONS, REBECCA GIBSON</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROSS, ALAN</creatorcontrib><title>Patterns of Obstetric Procedures Use in Maternity Care</title><title>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953)</title><addtitle>Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>The use of seven obstetric procedures was studied in two institutions that use different approaches to maternity care. The study population included 796 women delivering at Booth Maternity Center and 804 women with similar sociodemographic characteristics delivering at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital during 1977 and 1978. Several differences were found between the two institutions. The majority of selected procedures were used more often at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital than at Booth Maternity Center. The greatest differences were found for women at low intrapartum risk, while differences were smallest for women at high prenatal and intrapartum risk. The two institutions differed in their use of procedures for women at various levels of prenatal and intrapartum risk. The findings suggested that most of the differences did not reflect different levels of risk in the populations served, but were due to other unidentified factors.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anesthesia, Obstetrical</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Breech Presentation</subject><subject>Cesarean Section</subject><subject>Delivery, Obstetric</subject><subject>Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Episiotomy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fetal Monitoring</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Labor, Induced</subject><subject>Maternal Age</subject><subject>Maternal Health Services - trends</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Obstetrical Forceps</subject><subject>Obstetrical techniques</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Parity</subject><subject>Pennsylvania</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prenatal Diagnosis</subject><issn>0029-7844</issn><issn>1873-233X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1984</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE1Lw0AQhhdRaqz-BCEH8RbYr-zHUYpfUGkPFryFyWZCo2lSdzeU_ntTGrzMMLwPA897QRJmtMi4EF-XJKGU20wbKa_JTQjflFKmrJiRmZJGcKsTotYQI_oupH2drsoQMfrGpWvfO6wGjyHdBEybLv2AE9bEY7oAj7fkqoY24N2052Tz8vy5eMuWq9f3xdMy23NDbVbrnCvmRKVFqXMsrdVQM24so0LXOYDhuVMawFUcFciqzI2qakRqNZZKijl5PP_d-_53wBCLXRMcti102A-hMIyPeoaN4P0EDuUOq2Lvmx34YzGJjvnDlENw0NYeOteEf8wyLnPLR0yesUPfjr7hpx0O6IstQhu3xdgfVTynGbNGstOVnYYVf-1ma3M</recordid><startdate>198410</startdate><enddate>198410</enddate><creator>BARUFFI, GIGLIOLA</creator><creator>DELLINGER, WOODROW S</creator><creator>STROBINO, DONNA M</creator><creator>RUDOLPH, ALICE</creator><creator>TIMMONS, REBECCA GIBSON</creator><creator>ROSS, ALAN</creator><general>The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198410</creationdate><title>Patterns of Obstetric Procedures Use in Maternity Care</title><author>BARUFFI, GIGLIOLA ; DELLINGER, WOODROW S ; STROBINO, DONNA M ; RUDOLPH, ALICE ; TIMMONS, REBECCA GIBSON ; ROSS, ALAN</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p2809-f75261c3d73b75eb997af12891037f5aa825c67aacd2e6a4db586dfee097eb643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1984</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anesthesia, Obstetrical</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Breech Presentation</topic><topic>Cesarean Section</topic><topic>Delivery, Obstetric</topic><topic>Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Episiotomy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fetal Monitoring</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Labor, Induced</topic><topic>Maternal Age</topic><topic>Maternal Health Services - trends</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Obstetrical Forceps</topic><topic>Obstetrical techniques</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Parity</topic><topic>Pennsylvania</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prenatal Diagnosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BARUFFI, GIGLIOLA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DELLINGER, WOODROW S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STROBINO, DONNA M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RUDOLPH, ALICE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TIMMONS, REBECCA GIBSON</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROSS, ALAN</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BARUFFI, GIGLIOLA</au><au>DELLINGER, WOODROW S</au><au>STROBINO, DONNA M</au><au>RUDOLPH, ALICE</au><au>TIMMONS, REBECCA GIBSON</au><au>ROSS, ALAN</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patterns of Obstetric Procedures Use in Maternity Care</atitle><jtitle>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953)</jtitle><addtitle>Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>1984-10</date><risdate>1984</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>493</spage><epage>498</epage><pages>493-498</pages><issn>0029-7844</issn><eissn>1873-233X</eissn><coden>OBGNAS</coden><abstract>The use of seven obstetric procedures was studied in two institutions that use different approaches to maternity care. The study population included 796 women delivering at Booth Maternity Center and 804 women with similar sociodemographic characteristics delivering at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital during 1977 and 1978. Several differences were found between the two institutions. The majority of selected procedures were used more often at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital than at Booth Maternity Center. The greatest differences were found for women at low intrapartum risk, while differences were smallest for women at high prenatal and intrapartum risk. The two institutions differed in their use of procedures for women at various levels of prenatal and intrapartum risk. The findings suggested that most of the differences did not reflect different levels of risk in the populations served, but were due to other unidentified factors.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists</pub><pmid>6483297</pmid><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0029-7844 |
| ispartof | Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953), 1984-10, Vol.64 (4), p.493-498 |
| issn | 0029-7844 1873-233X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_81278481 |
| source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
| subjects | Adult Anesthesia, Obstetrical Biological and medical sciences Breech Presentation Cesarean Section Delivery, Obstetric Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation Education Episiotomy Female Fetal Monitoring Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Humans Labor, Induced Maternal Age Maternal Health Services - trends Medical sciences Obstetrical Forceps Obstetrical techniques Obstetrics Parity Pennsylvania Pregnancy Prenatal Diagnosis |
| title | Patterns of Obstetric Procedures Use in Maternity Care |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T18%3A42%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patterns%20of%20Obstetric%20Procedures%20Use%20in%20Maternity%20Care&rft.jtitle=Obstetrics%20and%20gynecology%20(New%20York.%201953)&rft.au=BARUFFI,%20GIGLIOLA&rft.date=1984-10&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=493&rft.epage=498&rft.pages=493-498&rft.issn=0029-7844&rft.eissn=1873-233X&rft.coden=OBGNAS&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E81278481%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=81278481&rft_id=info:pmid/6483297&rfr_iscdi=true |