Resolution of a Paradox with After Images
Two weeks ago I described the results of flash bleaching the retina with a bright uniform field seen through a set of neutral filters as shown in Fig. 1 b . Ten minutes later cones had quite recovered and only rods contributed to the after image. This was observed by briefly opening the eyes from ti...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nature (London) 1971-12, Vol.234 (5331), p.546-547 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 547 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5331 |
container_start_page | 546 |
container_title | Nature (London) |
container_volume | 234 |
creator | RUSHTON, W. A. H |
description | Two weeks ago I described the results of flash bleaching the retina with a bright uniform field seen through a set of neutral filters as shown in Fig. 1
b
. Ten minutes later cones had quite recovered and only rods contributed to the after image. This was observed by briefly opening the eyes from time to time and looking at a faintly illuminated white wall. After 20 min the negative after image looked as shown in Fig. 1
e
, and at later times it gradually faded in its black contrast to the white wall. But at earlier times the image did not get continually more intense; it exhibited a ceiling of intensity and no segment could exceed the intensity of sector C at 20 min. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/234546a0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_81262382</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>81262382</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-eaaa28ef6644b02ef386fb829e493c97f781576f118fcbbadd6246e109edd7c83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkEtLw0AURgdRaq2Cf0DJSuwiOq_MTJal-CgUFNH1MEnu1JQkU2cS1H9vJLErV3dxDgfuh9A5wTcEM3VLGU-4MPgATQmXIuZCyUM0xZiqGCsmjtFJCFuMcUIkn6AJT7kgWE3R_AWCq7q2dE3kbGSiZ-NN4b6iz7J9jxa2BR-tarOBcIqOrKkCnI13ht7u716Xj_H66WG1XKzjnLGkjcEYQxVYITjPMAXLlLCZoinwlOWptFKRRApLiLJ5lpmiEJQLIDiFopC5YjN0NXR33n10EFpdlyGHqjINuC5oRaigTNFevB7E3LsQPFi982Vt_LcmWP-uov9W6dWLsdllNRR7cZyh5_OBh540G_B66zrf9G_-17oc3Ma0nYd9ay_8AC1Tcgg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>81262382</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Resolution of a Paradox with After Images</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Nature</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>RUSHTON, W. A. H</creator><creatorcontrib>RUSHTON, W. A. H</creatorcontrib><description>Two weeks ago I described the results of flash bleaching the retina with a bright uniform field seen through a set of neutral filters as shown in Fig. 1
b
. Ten minutes later cones had quite recovered and only rods contributed to the after image. This was observed by briefly opening the eyes from time to time and looking at a faintly illuminated white wall. After 20 min the negative after image looked as shown in Fig. 1
e
, and at later times it gradually faded in its black contrast to the white wall. But at earlier times the image did not get continually more intense; it exhibited a ceiling of intensity and no segment could exceed the intensity of sector C at 20 min.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-0836</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-4687</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/234546a0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 4946108</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>Afterimage ; Dark Adaptation ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Humans ; letter ; Light ; multidisciplinary ; Photoreceptor Cells - physiology ; Science ; Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><ispartof>Nature (London), 1971-12, Vol.234 (5331), p.546-547</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Limited 1971</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-eaaa28ef6644b02ef386fb829e493c97f781576f118fcbbadd6246e109edd7c83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2727,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4946108$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>RUSHTON, W. A. H</creatorcontrib><title>Resolution of a Paradox with After Images</title><title>Nature (London)</title><addtitle>Nature</addtitle><addtitle>Nature</addtitle><description>Two weeks ago I described the results of flash bleaching the retina with a bright uniform field seen through a set of neutral filters as shown in Fig. 1
b
. Ten minutes later cones had quite recovered and only rods contributed to the after image. This was observed by briefly opening the eyes from time to time and looking at a faintly illuminated white wall. After 20 min the negative after image looked as shown in Fig. 1
e
, and at later times it gradually faded in its black contrast to the white wall. But at earlier times the image did not get continually more intense; it exhibited a ceiling of intensity and no segment could exceed the intensity of sector C at 20 min.</description><subject>Afterimage</subject><subject>Dark Adaptation</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>letter</subject><subject>Light</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Photoreceptor Cells - physiology</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><issn>0028-0836</issn><issn>1476-4687</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1971</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkEtLw0AURgdRaq2Cf0DJSuwiOq_MTJal-CgUFNH1MEnu1JQkU2cS1H9vJLErV3dxDgfuh9A5wTcEM3VLGU-4MPgATQmXIuZCyUM0xZiqGCsmjtFJCFuMcUIkn6AJT7kgWE3R_AWCq7q2dE3kbGSiZ-NN4b6iz7J9jxa2BR-tarOBcIqOrKkCnI13ht7u716Xj_H66WG1XKzjnLGkjcEYQxVYITjPMAXLlLCZoinwlOWptFKRRApLiLJ5lpmiEJQLIDiFopC5YjN0NXR33n10EFpdlyGHqjINuC5oRaigTNFevB7E3LsQPFi982Vt_LcmWP-uov9W6dWLsdllNRR7cZyh5_OBh540G_B66zrf9G_-17oc3Ma0nYd9ay_8AC1Tcgg</recordid><startdate>19711231</startdate><enddate>19711231</enddate><creator>RUSHTON, W. A. H</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19711231</creationdate><title>Resolution of a Paradox with After Images</title><author>RUSHTON, W. A. H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-eaaa28ef6644b02ef386fb829e493c97f781576f118fcbbadd6246e109edd7c83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1971</creationdate><topic>Afterimage</topic><topic>Dark Adaptation</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>letter</topic><topic>Light</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Photoreceptor Cells - physiology</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science (multidisciplinary)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>RUSHTON, W. A. H</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nature (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>RUSHTON, W. A. H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Resolution of a Paradox with After Images</atitle><jtitle>Nature (London)</jtitle><stitle>Nature</stitle><addtitle>Nature</addtitle><date>1971-12-31</date><risdate>1971</risdate><volume>234</volume><issue>5331</issue><spage>546</spage><epage>547</epage><pages>546-547</pages><issn>0028-0836</issn><eissn>1476-4687</eissn><abstract>Two weeks ago I described the results of flash bleaching the retina with a bright uniform field seen through a set of neutral filters as shown in Fig. 1
b
. Ten minutes later cones had quite recovered and only rods contributed to the after image. This was observed by briefly opening the eyes from time to time and looking at a faintly illuminated white wall. After 20 min the negative after image looked as shown in Fig. 1
e
, and at later times it gradually faded in its black contrast to the white wall. But at earlier times the image did not get continually more intense; it exhibited a ceiling of intensity and no segment could exceed the intensity of sector C at 20 min.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>4946108</pmid><doi>10.1038/234546a0</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0028-0836 |
ispartof | Nature (London), 1971-12, Vol.234 (5331), p.546-547 |
issn | 0028-0836 1476-4687 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_81262382 |
source | MEDLINE; Nature; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Afterimage Dark Adaptation Humanities and Social Sciences Humans letter Light multidisciplinary Photoreceptor Cells - physiology Science Science (multidisciplinary) |
title | Resolution of a Paradox with After Images |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T18%3A47%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Resolution%20of%20a%20Paradox%20with%20After%20Images&rft.jtitle=Nature%20(London)&rft.au=RUSHTON,%20W.%20A.%20H&rft.date=1971-12-31&rft.volume=234&rft.issue=5331&rft.spage=546&rft.epage=547&rft.pages=546-547&rft.issn=0028-0836&rft.eissn=1476-4687&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/234546a0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E81262382%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=81262382&rft_id=info:pmid/4946108&rfr_iscdi=true |