Intravenous contrast-enhanced CT of the postoperative lumbar spine: improved identification of recurrent disk herniation, scar, arachnoiditis, and diskitis

Unsuccessful relief of symptoms after back surgery is usually attributable to hypertrophic extradural scar or recurrent herniated disk. Their clinical and myelographic differentiation is difficult, yet important because reoperation is not always beneficial for scar removal. This article examines the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:AJR, Am. J. Roentgenol.; (United States) Am. J. Roentgenol.; (United States), 1984-10, Vol.143 (4), p.845-855
Hauptverfasser: Teplick, JG, Haskin, ME
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 855
container_issue 4
container_start_page 845
container_title AJR, Am. J. Roentgenol.; (United States)
container_volume 143
creator Teplick, JG
Haskin, ME
description Unsuccessful relief of symptoms after back surgery is usually attributable to hypertrophic extradural scar or recurrent herniated disk. Their clinical and myelographic differentiation is difficult, yet important because reoperation is not always beneficial for scar removal. This article examines the usefulness of intravenous contrast-enhanced computed tomography for this problem. Forty-five postsurgical patients were studied; eight had subsequent surgery. In the four with hypertrophic scars, intravenous contrast enhancement of the scar allowed its recognition in each case; in the four with recurrent disk herniation, nonenhancement of the extruded disk allowed its recognition in three. In the other 37 patients who were not reoperated, 33 were believed to have scar on the basis of contrast enhancement. Continuous contrast infusion during scanning, absolute avoidance of patient movement, and careful consideration of other structures in the spinal canal are important in interpretation. The method seems promising for more accurate evaluation of failed back surgery, including the recognition of diskitis.
doi_str_mv 10.2214/ajr.143.4.845
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_81244857</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>81244857</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-8024314ad11a484e3fa050a1db4a57de3a58b82707a7cadfac4a9a1801c518053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkUFv3CAUhFHVKt2kPfZYCfXQU7wBg222t2qVtJEi5ZJKvaG38FyT2tgFvKv-lv7Z4OyquYAGPgbNG0I-cLYuSy6v4DGsuRRruVayekVWvJJ1Ibjkr8mKiZoXiomfb8l5jI-MsUZtmjNyVgtRyk29Iv9ufQqwRz_OkZpxETEV6DvwBi3dPtCxpalDOo0xjRMGSG6PtJ-HHQQaJ-fxC3XDFMZ9xp1Fn1zrTKZGvzwNaOYQ8im1Lv6mHQbvni8vaTQQLikEMJ0fnXXJxSy9fSYX9Y68aaGP-P60X5AfN9cP2-_F3f232-3Xu8IIVaWcr5Q5L1jOQSqJogVWMeB2J6FqLAqo1E6VDWugMWBbMBI2wBXjpsprJS7Ip6Nvjuh0NC6h6fIsPJqk6wyUmwX6fIRy1D8zxqQHFw32PXjMs9OKl1KqqslgcQRNGGMM2OopuAHCX82ZXhrTuTGdG9NS58Yy__FkPO8GtP_pU0UvH3fuV3dwAXUcoO8zzfXhcHgxegLscqJV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>81244857</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intravenous contrast-enhanced CT of the postoperative lumbar spine: improved identification of recurrent disk herniation, scar, arachnoiditis, and diskitis</title><source>American Roentgen Ray Society</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Teplick, JG ; Haskin, ME</creator><creatorcontrib>Teplick, JG ; Haskin, ME ; Hahnemann Univ. Hospital, Philadelphia, PA</creatorcontrib><description>Unsuccessful relief of symptoms after back surgery is usually attributable to hypertrophic extradural scar or recurrent herniated disk. Their clinical and myelographic differentiation is difficult, yet important because reoperation is not always beneficial for scar removal. This article examines the usefulness of intravenous contrast-enhanced computed tomography for this problem. Forty-five postsurgical patients were studied; eight had subsequent surgery. In the four with hypertrophic scars, intravenous contrast enhancement of the scar allowed its recognition in each case; in the four with recurrent disk herniation, nonenhancement of the extruded disk allowed its recognition in three. In the other 37 patients who were not reoperated, 33 were believed to have scar on the basis of contrast enhancement. Continuous contrast infusion during scanning, absolute avoidance of patient movement, and careful consideration of other structures in the spinal canal are important in interpretation. The method seems promising for more accurate evaluation of failed back surgery, including the recognition of diskitis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-803X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1546-3141</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2214/ajr.143.4.845</identifier><identifier>PMID: 6332496</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Am Roentgen Ray Soc</publisher><subject>550602 - Medicine- External Radiation in Diagnostics- (1980-) ; Arachnoiditis - diagnostic imaging ; BODY ; Cicatrix - diagnostic imaging ; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY ; CONTRAST MEDIA ; DIAGNOSIS ; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES ; DISEASES ; Humans ; Infusions, Parenteral ; Intervertebral Disc - diagnostic imaging ; Intervertebral Disc Displacement - diagnostic imaging ; Lumbosacral Region ; MEDICINE ; ORGANS ; PATIENTS ; Postoperative Period ; RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE ; Recurrence ; SKELETAL DISEASES ; SKELETON ; Spinal Diseases - diagnostic imaging ; SURGERY ; TOMOGRAPHY ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; VERTEBRAE</subject><ispartof>AJR, Am. J. Roentgenol.; (United States), 1984-10, Vol.143 (4), p.845-855</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-8024314ad11a484e3fa050a1db4a57de3a58b82707a7cadfac4a9a1801c518053</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,885,4120,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6332496$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/6053295$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Teplick, JG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haskin, ME</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hahnemann Univ. Hospital, Philadelphia, PA</creatorcontrib><title>Intravenous contrast-enhanced CT of the postoperative lumbar spine: improved identification of recurrent disk herniation, scar, arachnoiditis, and diskitis</title><title>AJR, Am. J. Roentgenol.; (United States)</title><addtitle>AJR Am J Roentgenol</addtitle><description>Unsuccessful relief of symptoms after back surgery is usually attributable to hypertrophic extradural scar or recurrent herniated disk. Their clinical and myelographic differentiation is difficult, yet important because reoperation is not always beneficial for scar removal. This article examines the usefulness of intravenous contrast-enhanced computed tomography for this problem. Forty-five postsurgical patients were studied; eight had subsequent surgery. In the four with hypertrophic scars, intravenous contrast enhancement of the scar allowed its recognition in each case; in the four with recurrent disk herniation, nonenhancement of the extruded disk allowed its recognition in three. In the other 37 patients who were not reoperated, 33 were believed to have scar on the basis of contrast enhancement. Continuous contrast infusion during scanning, absolute avoidance of patient movement, and careful consideration of other structures in the spinal canal are important in interpretation. The method seems promising for more accurate evaluation of failed back surgery, including the recognition of diskitis.</description><subject>550602 - Medicine- External Radiation in Diagnostics- (1980-)</subject><subject>Arachnoiditis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>BODY</subject><subject>Cicatrix - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY</subject><subject>CONTRAST MEDIA</subject><subject>DIAGNOSIS</subject><subject>DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES</subject><subject>DISEASES</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infusions, Parenteral</subject><subject>Intervertebral Disc - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Intervertebral Disc Displacement - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Lumbosacral Region</subject><subject>MEDICINE</subject><subject>ORGANS</subject><subject>PATIENTS</subject><subject>Postoperative Period</subject><subject>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>SKELETAL DISEASES</subject><subject>SKELETON</subject><subject>Spinal Diseases - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>SURGERY</subject><subject>TOMOGRAPHY</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>VERTEBRAE</subject><issn>0361-803X</issn><issn>1546-3141</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1984</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkUFv3CAUhFHVKt2kPfZYCfXQU7wBg222t2qVtJEi5ZJKvaG38FyT2tgFvKv-lv7Z4OyquYAGPgbNG0I-cLYuSy6v4DGsuRRruVayekVWvJJ1Ibjkr8mKiZoXiomfb8l5jI-MsUZtmjNyVgtRyk29Iv9ufQqwRz_OkZpxETEV6DvwBi3dPtCxpalDOo0xjRMGSG6PtJ-HHQQaJ-fxC3XDFMZ9xp1Fn1zrTKZGvzwNaOYQ8im1Lv6mHQbvni8vaTQQLikEMJ0fnXXJxSy9fSYX9Y68aaGP-P60X5AfN9cP2-_F3f232-3Xu8IIVaWcr5Q5L1jOQSqJogVWMeB2J6FqLAqo1E6VDWugMWBbMBI2wBXjpsprJS7Ip6Nvjuh0NC6h6fIsPJqk6wyUmwX6fIRy1D8zxqQHFw32PXjMs9OKl1KqqslgcQRNGGMM2OopuAHCX82ZXhrTuTGdG9NS58Yy__FkPO8GtP_pU0UvH3fuV3dwAXUcoO8zzfXhcHgxegLscqJV</recordid><startdate>198410</startdate><enddate>198410</enddate><creator>Teplick, JG</creator><creator>Haskin, ME</creator><general>Am Roentgen Ray Soc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198410</creationdate><title>Intravenous contrast-enhanced CT of the postoperative lumbar spine: improved identification of recurrent disk herniation, scar, arachnoiditis, and diskitis</title><author>Teplick, JG ; Haskin, ME</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-8024314ad11a484e3fa050a1db4a57de3a58b82707a7cadfac4a9a1801c518053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1984</creationdate><topic>550602 - Medicine- External Radiation in Diagnostics- (1980-)</topic><topic>Arachnoiditis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>BODY</topic><topic>Cicatrix - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY</topic><topic>CONTRAST MEDIA</topic><topic>DIAGNOSIS</topic><topic>DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES</topic><topic>DISEASES</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infusions, Parenteral</topic><topic>Intervertebral Disc - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Intervertebral Disc Displacement - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Lumbosacral Region</topic><topic>MEDICINE</topic><topic>ORGANS</topic><topic>PATIENTS</topic><topic>Postoperative Period</topic><topic>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>SKELETAL DISEASES</topic><topic>SKELETON</topic><topic>Spinal Diseases - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>SURGERY</topic><topic>TOMOGRAPHY</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>VERTEBRAE</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Teplick, JG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haskin, ME</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hahnemann Univ. Hospital, Philadelphia, PA</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>AJR, Am. J. Roentgenol.; (United States)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Teplick, JG</au><au>Haskin, ME</au><aucorp>Hahnemann Univ. Hospital, Philadelphia, PA</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intravenous contrast-enhanced CT of the postoperative lumbar spine: improved identification of recurrent disk herniation, scar, arachnoiditis, and diskitis</atitle><jtitle>AJR, Am. J. Roentgenol.; (United States)</jtitle><addtitle>AJR Am J Roentgenol</addtitle><date>1984-10</date><risdate>1984</risdate><volume>143</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>845</spage><epage>855</epage><pages>845-855</pages><issn>0361-803X</issn><eissn>1546-3141</eissn><abstract>Unsuccessful relief of symptoms after back surgery is usually attributable to hypertrophic extradural scar or recurrent herniated disk. Their clinical and myelographic differentiation is difficult, yet important because reoperation is not always beneficial for scar removal. This article examines the usefulness of intravenous contrast-enhanced computed tomography for this problem. Forty-five postsurgical patients were studied; eight had subsequent surgery. In the four with hypertrophic scars, intravenous contrast enhancement of the scar allowed its recognition in each case; in the four with recurrent disk herniation, nonenhancement of the extruded disk allowed its recognition in three. In the other 37 patients who were not reoperated, 33 were believed to have scar on the basis of contrast enhancement. Continuous contrast infusion during scanning, absolute avoidance of patient movement, and careful consideration of other structures in the spinal canal are important in interpretation. The method seems promising for more accurate evaluation of failed back surgery, including the recognition of diskitis.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Am Roentgen Ray Soc</pub><pmid>6332496</pmid><doi>10.2214/ajr.143.4.845</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0361-803X
ispartof AJR, Am. J. Roentgenol.; (United States), 1984-10, Vol.143 (4), p.845-855
issn 0361-803X
1546-3141
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_81244857
source American Roentgen Ray Society; MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects 550602 - Medicine- External Radiation in Diagnostics- (1980-)
Arachnoiditis - diagnostic imaging
BODY
Cicatrix - diagnostic imaging
COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY
CONTRAST MEDIA
DIAGNOSIS
DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES
DISEASES
Humans
Infusions, Parenteral
Intervertebral Disc - diagnostic imaging
Intervertebral Disc Displacement - diagnostic imaging
Lumbosacral Region
MEDICINE
ORGANS
PATIENTS
Postoperative Period
RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Recurrence
SKELETAL DISEASES
SKELETON
Spinal Diseases - diagnostic imaging
SURGERY
TOMOGRAPHY
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
VERTEBRAE
title Intravenous contrast-enhanced CT of the postoperative lumbar spine: improved identification of recurrent disk herniation, scar, arachnoiditis, and diskitis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T17%3A25%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intravenous%20contrast-enhanced%20CT%20of%20the%20postoperative%20lumbar%20spine:%20improved%20identification%20of%20recurrent%20disk%20herniation,%20scar,%20arachnoiditis,%20and%20diskitis&rft.jtitle=AJR,%20Am.%20J.%20Roentgenol.;%20(United%20States)&rft.au=Teplick,%20JG&rft.aucorp=Hahnemann%20Univ.%20Hospital,%20Philadelphia,%20PA&rft.date=1984-10&rft.volume=143&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=845&rft.epage=855&rft.pages=845-855&rft.issn=0361-803X&rft.eissn=1546-3141&rft_id=info:doi/10.2214/ajr.143.4.845&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E81244857%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=81244857&rft_id=info:pmid/6332496&rfr_iscdi=true