Comparison between square-ended distraction rods and standard round-ended distraction rods in the treatment of thoracolumbar spinal injuries: a statistical analysis
This is a retrospective clinical and roentgenographic study of two different types of instrumentation used in the treatment of thoracic and lumbar spinal fractures. Dual square-ended distraction rods contoured into lordosis produced improved results when compared with round-ended distraction rods in...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical orthopaedics and related research 1984-10, Vol.189 (189), p.162-167 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 167 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 189 |
| container_start_page | 162 |
| container_title | Clinical orthopaedics and related research |
| container_volume | 189 |
| creator | DENIS, F RUIZ, H SEARLS, K |
| description | This is a retrospective clinical and roentgenographic study of two different types of instrumentation used in the treatment of thoracic and lumbar spinal fractures. Dual square-ended distraction rods contoured into lordosis produced improved results when compared with round-ended distraction rods in terms of both the degree of reduction obtained on the operating table and preventing recollapse of the fracture in the ensuing month. The importance of restoring lordosis was more apparent in the thoracolumbar junction and lumbar spine than in the thoracic region. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1097/00003086-198410000-00017 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_81237159</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>81237159</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-80045c75c654ba449f22cf6a45a490c658efb1272ccc9c39dc8533e95695bdbb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc-KFDEQxoO4rOPqIwg5iLfWzr_uxJsMuisseFHw1lQn1ZilOz2bSiP7PvugZtxxbgaSIl_9vgrkY4yL9r1oXf-hrUu1tmuEs1ocb03don_GdsJI2wih5HO2q5prnBQ_X7CXRHdHkzbykl12uredUzv2uF-XA-RIa-Ijlt-IidP9BhkbTAEDD5FKBl9iBfIaiEMKnEo9IYeqbCn8j4yJl1_IS0YoC6bC16kKa2XWeVtGyJwOMcFcwbstR6SPHI6jSx0UfdWhNh8o0it2McFM-PpUr9iPL5-_72-a22_XX_efbhuvlCuNbVttfG98Z_QIWrtJSj91oA1o11bV4jQK2UvvvfPKBW-NUuhM58wYxlFdsXdPcw95vd-QyrBE8jjPkHDdaLBCql4YV0H7BPq8EmWchkOOC-SHQbTDMaDhX0DDOaDhb0DV-ub0xjYuGM7GUyK1__bUB6p_MGVIPtIZs67rpbXqDxdDnRs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>81237159</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison between square-ended distraction rods and standard round-ended distraction rods in the treatment of thoracolumbar spinal injuries: a statistical analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>DENIS, F ; RUIZ, H ; SEARLS, K</creator><creatorcontrib>DENIS, F ; RUIZ, H ; SEARLS, K</creatorcontrib><description>This is a retrospective clinical and roentgenographic study of two different types of instrumentation used in the treatment of thoracic and lumbar spinal fractures. Dual square-ended distraction rods contoured into lordosis produced improved results when compared with round-ended distraction rods in terms of both the degree of reduction obtained on the operating table and preventing recollapse of the fracture in the ensuing month. The importance of restoring lordosis was more apparent in the thoracolumbar junction and lumbar spine than in the thoracic region.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-921X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1132</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00003086-198410000-00017</identifier><identifier>PMID: 6478693</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CORTBR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Female ; Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation ; Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods ; Humans ; Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine ; Lumbar Vertebrae - injuries ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Orthopedic Fixation Devices ; Thoracic Vertebrae - injuries ; Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</subject><ispartof>Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 1984-10, Vol.189 (189), p.162-167</ispartof><rights>1985 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-80045c75c654ba449f22cf6a45a490c658efb1272ccc9c39dc8533e95695bdbb3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=8967288$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6478693$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DENIS, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RUIZ, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SEARLS, K</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison between square-ended distraction rods and standard round-ended distraction rods in the treatment of thoracolumbar spinal injuries: a statistical analysis</title><title>Clinical orthopaedics and related research</title><addtitle>Clin Orthop Relat Res</addtitle><description>This is a retrospective clinical and roentgenographic study of two different types of instrumentation used in the treatment of thoracic and lumbar spinal fractures. Dual square-ended distraction rods contoured into lordosis produced improved results when compared with round-ended distraction rods in terms of both the degree of reduction obtained on the operating table and preventing recollapse of the fracture in the ensuing month. The importance of restoring lordosis was more apparent in the thoracolumbar junction and lumbar spine than in the thoracic region.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - injuries</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orthopedic Fixation Devices</subject><subject>Thoracic Vertebrae - injuries</subject><subject>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</subject><issn>0009-921X</issn><issn>1528-1132</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1984</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc-KFDEQxoO4rOPqIwg5iLfWzr_uxJsMuisseFHw1lQn1ZilOz2bSiP7PvugZtxxbgaSIl_9vgrkY4yL9r1oXf-hrUu1tmuEs1ocb03don_GdsJI2wih5HO2q5prnBQ_X7CXRHdHkzbykl12uredUzv2uF-XA-RIa-Ijlt-IidP9BhkbTAEDD5FKBl9iBfIaiEMKnEo9IYeqbCn8j4yJl1_IS0YoC6bC16kKa2XWeVtGyJwOMcFcwbstR6SPHI6jSx0UfdWhNh8o0it2McFM-PpUr9iPL5-_72-a22_XX_efbhuvlCuNbVttfG98Z_QIWrtJSj91oA1o11bV4jQK2UvvvfPKBW-NUuhM58wYxlFdsXdPcw95vd-QyrBE8jjPkHDdaLBCql4YV0H7BPq8EmWchkOOC-SHQbTDMaDhX0DDOaDhb0DV-ub0xjYuGM7GUyK1__bUB6p_MGVIPtIZs67rpbXqDxdDnRs</recordid><startdate>198410</startdate><enddate>198410</enddate><creator>DENIS, F</creator><creator>RUIZ, H</creator><creator>SEARLS, K</creator><general>Springer</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198410</creationdate><title>Comparison between square-ended distraction rods and standard round-ended distraction rods in the treatment of thoracolumbar spinal injuries: a statistical analysis</title><author>DENIS, F ; RUIZ, H ; SEARLS, K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-80045c75c654ba449f22cf6a45a490c658efb1272ccc9c39dc8533e95695bdbb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1984</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - injuries</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orthopedic Fixation Devices</topic><topic>Thoracic Vertebrae - injuries</topic><topic>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DENIS, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RUIZ, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SEARLS, K</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical orthopaedics and related research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DENIS, F</au><au>RUIZ, H</au><au>SEARLS, K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison between square-ended distraction rods and standard round-ended distraction rods in the treatment of thoracolumbar spinal injuries: a statistical analysis</atitle><jtitle>Clinical orthopaedics and related research</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Orthop Relat Res</addtitle><date>1984-10</date><risdate>1984</risdate><volume>189</volume><issue>189</issue><spage>162</spage><epage>167</epage><pages>162-167</pages><issn>0009-921X</issn><eissn>1528-1132</eissn><coden>CORTBR</coden><abstract>This is a retrospective clinical and roentgenographic study of two different types of instrumentation used in the treatment of thoracic and lumbar spinal fractures. Dual square-ended distraction rods contoured into lordosis produced improved results when compared with round-ended distraction rods in terms of both the degree of reduction obtained on the operating table and preventing recollapse of the fracture in the ensuing month. The importance of restoring lordosis was more apparent in the thoracolumbar junction and lumbar spine than in the thoracic region.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>6478693</pmid><doi>10.1097/00003086-198410000-00017</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0009-921X |
| ispartof | Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 1984-10, Vol.189 (189), p.162-167 |
| issn | 0009-921X 1528-1132 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_81237159 |
| source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
| subjects | Adolescent Adult Biological and medical sciences Female Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods Humans Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine Lumbar Vertebrae - injuries Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Orthopedic Fixation Devices Thoracic Vertebrae - injuries Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents |
| title | Comparison between square-ended distraction rods and standard round-ended distraction rods in the treatment of thoracolumbar spinal injuries: a statistical analysis |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T22%3A08%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20between%20square-ended%20distraction%20rods%20and%20standard%20round-ended%20distraction%20rods%20in%20the%20treatment%20of%20thoracolumbar%20spinal%20injuries:%20a%20statistical%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20orthopaedics%20and%20related%20research&rft.au=DENIS,%20F&rft.date=1984-10&rft.volume=189&rft.issue=189&rft.spage=162&rft.epage=167&rft.pages=162-167&rft.issn=0009-921X&rft.eissn=1528-1132&rft.coden=CORTBR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00003086-198410000-00017&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E81237159%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=81237159&rft_id=info:pmid/6478693&rfr_iscdi=true |