Comparison of radioreceptor assay and radioimmunoassay for atropine: pharmacokinetic application
A membrane suspension prepared from rat brain was able to bind the potent muscarinic antagonist quinuclidinyl benzilate (QNB). The KD for binding was 0.48 nM and Bmax was 1.42 pmol/mg protein. Atropine competitively inhibited the binding of tritiated QNB to muscarinic receptors. This new radiorecept...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of clinical pharmacology 1984-01, Vol.26 (5), p.613-617 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 617 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 613 |
container_title | European journal of clinical pharmacology |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | AALTONEN, L KANTO, J IISALO, E PIHLAJAMAKI, K |
description | A membrane suspension prepared from rat brain was able to bind the potent muscarinic antagonist quinuclidinyl benzilate (QNB). The KD for binding was 0.48 nM and Bmax was 1.42 pmol/mg protein. Atropine competitively inhibited the binding of tritiated QNB to muscarinic receptors. This new radioreceptor assay (RRA) for atropine has been compared with a radioimmunoassay (RIA) for atropine. The RRA measures only the active component of atropine, 1-hyoscyamine and in this respect it differs from the RIA. As little atropine as 1.25 ng/ml (4.33 nmol/l) in a 25 microliters serum sample could be reliably assayed by the RRA. Using both assay techniques the pharmacokinetics of atropine was studied after a single 0.02 mg/kg i.v. dose given to 8 anaesthetized patients. The half-life calculated by the RRA was 3.7 +/- 2.3 h (m +/- SD) and by the RIA 4.3 +/- 1.7 h. Both the volume of distribution and the total clearance were higher according to the RRA than the RIA: 3.9 +/- 1.5 vs 1.7 +/- 0.71/kg and 15.4 +/- 10.3 vs 5.9 +/- 3.6 ml/min/kg, respectively. The AUC measured by the RRA and RIA was 29.8 +/- 18.9 and 103.9 +/- 110.7 micrograms X h/l, respectively. The differences in the pharmacokinetics according to the 2 methods are presumably due to preferential tissue uptake of the l-form. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/bf00543495 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_81201512</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>81201512</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-3ca35ebf54c4e73745cdae3e38fe0d48abca383b564c6bfb906566125bdcae3e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kL1PwzAUxC0EKqWwsCNlQAxIATv-iMsGFQWkSiwwhxfHFoYkNnYy9L8nJaHT0939dNI7hM4JviEY57elwZgzypb8AM0Jo1lKMCOHaI4xJalY5vgYncT4hTHhS0xnaCaYkCyXc_Sxco2HYKNrE2eSAJV1QSvtOxcSiBG2CbTV6Num6Vs3mmYXd8F52-q7xH9CaEC570F1ViXgfW0VdNa1p-jIQB312XQX6H39-LZ6TjevTy-r-02qaJ53KVVAuS4NZ4rpnOaMqwo01VQajSsmoRwASUsumBKlKZdYcCFIxstK_XELdDX2-uB-eh27orFR6bqGVrs-FpJkw_ckG8DrEVTBxRi0KXywDYRtQXCxm7N4WP_POcAXU2tfNrrao9N-Q3455RAV1CZAq2zcY1JKIVhOfwFYqH8d</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>81201512</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of radioreceptor assay and radioimmunoassay for atropine: pharmacokinetic application</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>AALTONEN, L ; KANTO, J ; IISALO, E ; PIHLAJAMAKI, K</creator><creatorcontrib>AALTONEN, L ; KANTO, J ; IISALO, E ; PIHLAJAMAKI, K</creatorcontrib><description>A membrane suspension prepared from rat brain was able to bind the potent muscarinic antagonist quinuclidinyl benzilate (QNB). The KD for binding was 0.48 nM and Bmax was 1.42 pmol/mg protein. Atropine competitively inhibited the binding of tritiated QNB to muscarinic receptors. This new radioreceptor assay (RRA) for atropine has been compared with a radioimmunoassay (RIA) for atropine. The RRA measures only the active component of atropine, 1-hyoscyamine and in this respect it differs from the RIA. As little atropine as 1.25 ng/ml (4.33 nmol/l) in a 25 microliters serum sample could be reliably assayed by the RRA. Using both assay techniques the pharmacokinetics of atropine was studied after a single 0.02 mg/kg i.v. dose given to 8 anaesthetized patients. The half-life calculated by the RRA was 3.7 +/- 2.3 h (m +/- SD) and by the RIA 4.3 +/- 1.7 h. Both the volume of distribution and the total clearance were higher according to the RRA than the RIA: 3.9 +/- 1.5 vs 1.7 +/- 0.71/kg and 15.4 +/- 10.3 vs 5.9 +/- 3.6 ml/min/kg, respectively. The AUC measured by the RRA and RIA was 29.8 +/- 18.9 and 103.9 +/- 110.7 micrograms X h/l, respectively. The differences in the pharmacokinetics according to the 2 methods are presumably due to preferential tissue uptake of the l-form.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-6970</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1041</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/bf00543495</identifier><identifier>PMID: 6468478</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Analysis ; Animals ; Atropine - blood ; Atropine - metabolism ; Biological and medical sciences ; Female ; General pharmacology ; Humans ; Kinetics ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Rabbits ; Radioimmunoassay - methods ; Radioligand Assay - methods ; Rats</subject><ispartof>European journal of clinical pharmacology, 1984-01, Vol.26 (5), p.613-617</ispartof><rights>1985 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-3ca35ebf54c4e73745cdae3e38fe0d48abca383b564c6bfb906566125bdcae3e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-3ca35ebf54c4e73745cdae3e38fe0d48abca383b564c6bfb906566125bdcae3e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=8886647$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6468478$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>AALTONEN, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KANTO, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IISALO, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PIHLAJAMAKI, K</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of radioreceptor assay and radioimmunoassay for atropine: pharmacokinetic application</title><title>European journal of clinical pharmacology</title><addtitle>Eur J Clin Pharmacol</addtitle><description>A membrane suspension prepared from rat brain was able to bind the potent muscarinic antagonist quinuclidinyl benzilate (QNB). The KD for binding was 0.48 nM and Bmax was 1.42 pmol/mg protein. Atropine competitively inhibited the binding of tritiated QNB to muscarinic receptors. This new radioreceptor assay (RRA) for atropine has been compared with a radioimmunoassay (RIA) for atropine. The RRA measures only the active component of atropine, 1-hyoscyamine and in this respect it differs from the RIA. As little atropine as 1.25 ng/ml (4.33 nmol/l) in a 25 microliters serum sample could be reliably assayed by the RRA. Using both assay techniques the pharmacokinetics of atropine was studied after a single 0.02 mg/kg i.v. dose given to 8 anaesthetized patients. The half-life calculated by the RRA was 3.7 +/- 2.3 h (m +/- SD) and by the RIA 4.3 +/- 1.7 h. Both the volume of distribution and the total clearance were higher according to the RRA than the RIA: 3.9 +/- 1.5 vs 1.7 +/- 0.71/kg and 15.4 +/- 10.3 vs 5.9 +/- 3.6 ml/min/kg, respectively. The AUC measured by the RRA and RIA was 29.8 +/- 18.9 and 103.9 +/- 110.7 micrograms X h/l, respectively. The differences in the pharmacokinetics according to the 2 methods are presumably due to preferential tissue uptake of the l-form.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Atropine - blood</subject><subject>Atropine - metabolism</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General pharmacology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Rabbits</subject><subject>Radioimmunoassay - methods</subject><subject>Radioligand Assay - methods</subject><subject>Rats</subject><issn>0031-6970</issn><issn>1432-1041</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1984</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kL1PwzAUxC0EKqWwsCNlQAxIATv-iMsGFQWkSiwwhxfHFoYkNnYy9L8nJaHT0939dNI7hM4JviEY57elwZgzypb8AM0Jo1lKMCOHaI4xJalY5vgYncT4hTHhS0xnaCaYkCyXc_Sxco2HYKNrE2eSAJV1QSvtOxcSiBG2CbTV6Num6Vs3mmYXd8F52-q7xH9CaEC570F1ViXgfW0VdNa1p-jIQB312XQX6H39-LZ6TjevTy-r-02qaJ53KVVAuS4NZ4rpnOaMqwo01VQajSsmoRwASUsumBKlKZdYcCFIxstK_XELdDX2-uB-eh27orFR6bqGVrs-FpJkw_ckG8DrEVTBxRi0KXywDYRtQXCxm7N4WP_POcAXU2tfNrrao9N-Q3455RAV1CZAq2zcY1JKIVhOfwFYqH8d</recordid><startdate>19840101</startdate><enddate>19840101</enddate><creator>AALTONEN, L</creator><creator>KANTO, J</creator><creator>IISALO, E</creator><creator>PIHLAJAMAKI, K</creator><general>Springer</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19840101</creationdate><title>Comparison of radioreceptor assay and radioimmunoassay for atropine: pharmacokinetic application</title><author>AALTONEN, L ; KANTO, J ; IISALO, E ; PIHLAJAMAKI, K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-3ca35ebf54c4e73745cdae3e38fe0d48abca383b564c6bfb906566125bdcae3e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1984</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Atropine - blood</topic><topic>Atropine - metabolism</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General pharmacology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Rabbits</topic><topic>Radioimmunoassay - methods</topic><topic>Radioligand Assay - methods</topic><topic>Rats</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>AALTONEN, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KANTO, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IISALO, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PIHLAJAMAKI, K</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of clinical pharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>AALTONEN, L</au><au>KANTO, J</au><au>IISALO, E</au><au>PIHLAJAMAKI, K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of radioreceptor assay and radioimmunoassay for atropine: pharmacokinetic application</atitle><jtitle>European journal of clinical pharmacology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Clin Pharmacol</addtitle><date>1984-01-01</date><risdate>1984</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>613</spage><epage>617</epage><pages>613-617</pages><issn>0031-6970</issn><eissn>1432-1041</eissn><abstract>A membrane suspension prepared from rat brain was able to bind the potent muscarinic antagonist quinuclidinyl benzilate (QNB). The KD for binding was 0.48 nM and Bmax was 1.42 pmol/mg protein. Atropine competitively inhibited the binding of tritiated QNB to muscarinic receptors. This new radioreceptor assay (RRA) for atropine has been compared with a radioimmunoassay (RIA) for atropine. The RRA measures only the active component of atropine, 1-hyoscyamine and in this respect it differs from the RIA. As little atropine as 1.25 ng/ml (4.33 nmol/l) in a 25 microliters serum sample could be reliably assayed by the RRA. Using both assay techniques the pharmacokinetics of atropine was studied after a single 0.02 mg/kg i.v. dose given to 8 anaesthetized patients. The half-life calculated by the RRA was 3.7 +/- 2.3 h (m +/- SD) and by the RIA 4.3 +/- 1.7 h. Both the volume of distribution and the total clearance were higher according to the RRA than the RIA: 3.9 +/- 1.5 vs 1.7 +/- 0.71/kg and 15.4 +/- 10.3 vs 5.9 +/- 3.6 ml/min/kg, respectively. The AUC measured by the RRA and RIA was 29.8 +/- 18.9 and 103.9 +/- 110.7 micrograms X h/l, respectively. The differences in the pharmacokinetics according to the 2 methods are presumably due to preferential tissue uptake of the l-form.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>6468478</pmid><doi>10.1007/bf00543495</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0031-6970 |
ispartof | European journal of clinical pharmacology, 1984-01, Vol.26 (5), p.613-617 |
issn | 0031-6970 1432-1041 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_81201512 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Adult Age Factors Aged Analysis Animals Atropine - blood Atropine - metabolism Biological and medical sciences Female General pharmacology Humans Kinetics Medical sciences Middle Aged Pharmacology. Drug treatments Rabbits Radioimmunoassay - methods Radioligand Assay - methods Rats |
title | Comparison of radioreceptor assay and radioimmunoassay for atropine: pharmacokinetic application |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T00%3A54%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20radioreceptor%20assay%20and%20radioimmunoassay%20for%20atropine:%20pharmacokinetic%20application&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20clinical%20pharmacology&rft.au=AALTONEN,%20L&rft.date=1984-01-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=613&rft.epage=617&rft.pages=613-617&rft.issn=0031-6970&rft.eissn=1432-1041&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/bf00543495&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E81201512%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=81201512&rft_id=info:pmid/6468478&rfr_iscdi=true |