Antimicrobial resistance in Haemophilus isolates: a Minnesota experience and literature review

Annual ampicillin susceptibility rates for Haemophilus influenzae isolates at the St. Paul-Ramsey Medical Center gradually decreased from 100% in 1974 to 83.3% in 1980 and then remained stable at 88.90%. Penicillin susceptibility rates were similar to those for ampicillin. Ampicillin rates were sour...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of clinical pathology 1984-09, Vol.82 (3), p.311-318
Hauptverfasser: WOOLFREY, B. F, LALLY, R. T, IRELAND, G. K, QUALL, C. O, EDERER, M. N
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 318
container_issue 3
container_start_page 311
container_title American journal of clinical pathology
container_volume 82
creator WOOLFREY, B. F
LALLY, R. T
IRELAND, G. K
QUALL, C. O
EDERER, M. N
description Annual ampicillin susceptibility rates for Haemophilus influenzae isolates at the St. Paul-Ramsey Medical Center gradually decreased from 100% in 1974 to 83.3% in 1980 and then remained stable at 88.90%. Penicillin susceptibility rates were similar to those for ampicillin. Ampicillin rates were source dependent: eye 95%, respiratory 90%, miscellaneous sources 82%, and blood and CSF 80%. Rates for Haemophilus parainfluenzae varied and showed no trend. H. parainfluenzae isolates were distinctly less susceptible to penicillin (70%) than to ampicillin (96%). H. influenzae isolates were highly susceptible to chloramphenicol (99.6%) and tetracycline (97.5%), with the latter also showing source dependency. Characterization of isolates for colony morphology and hemolysis showed no clinical relevancy. Ampicillin and penicillin MICs were determined for 128 clinical isolates saved in stock culture during 1978-1983. All 19 resistant isolates (MIC greater than or equal to 4 micrograms/mL) were resistant to both penicillin and ampicillin and produced beta-lactamase. Eight had penicillin MICs of 1 or 2 micrograms/mL and three had ampicillin MICs of 1 or 2 micrograms/mL. The significance of isolates with MICs of 1-2 micrograms/mL is discussed in relation to our findings and a review of the literature.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ajcp/82.3.311
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_81188357</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>14000079</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-e3dc71455789b504ce937fac145fc5bd07b7309434003b37d9b5ca67ca4520063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMoun4cPQo9iLeuk6RtWm8i6gorXvRqmKZTzNIvk9aPf2-WXfbqaWDeh3eYh7FzDnMOhbzGlRmuczGXc8n5HpvxIpGxUkLssxkAiLjgSh6xY-9XAFzkkByyw0zmIBTM2PttN9rWGteXFpvIkbd-xM5QZLtogdT2w4dtJh9Z3zc4kr-JMHq2XUe-HzGin4GcpTWPXRU1diSH4-QoNH1Z-j5lBzU2ns6284S9Pdy_3i3i5cvj093tMjYik2NMsjKKJ2mq8qJMITFUSFWjCavapGUFqlQSwmMJgCylqgJlMFMGk1QAZPKEXW16B9d_TuRH3VpvqGmwo37yOuc8z2Wq_gV5uACgigDGGzCo8d5RrQdnW3S_moNei9dr8ToXWuogPvAX2-KpbKna0VvTIb_c5ugNNrULkq3fYQVkCYSaPzOWi_M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14000079</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Antimicrobial resistance in Haemophilus isolates: a Minnesota experience and literature review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive Legacy</source><creator>WOOLFREY, B. F ; LALLY, R. T ; IRELAND, G. K ; QUALL, C. O ; EDERER, M. N</creator><creatorcontrib>WOOLFREY, B. F ; LALLY, R. T ; IRELAND, G. K ; QUALL, C. O ; EDERER, M. N</creatorcontrib><description>Annual ampicillin susceptibility rates for Haemophilus influenzae isolates at the St. Paul-Ramsey Medical Center gradually decreased from 100% in 1974 to 83.3% in 1980 and then remained stable at 88.90%. Penicillin susceptibility rates were similar to those for ampicillin. Ampicillin rates were source dependent: eye 95%, respiratory 90%, miscellaneous sources 82%, and blood and CSF 80%. Rates for Haemophilus parainfluenzae varied and showed no trend. H. parainfluenzae isolates were distinctly less susceptible to penicillin (70%) than to ampicillin (96%). H. influenzae isolates were highly susceptible to chloramphenicol (99.6%) and tetracycline (97.5%), with the latter also showing source dependency. Characterization of isolates for colony morphology and hemolysis showed no clinical relevancy. Ampicillin and penicillin MICs were determined for 128 clinical isolates saved in stock culture during 1978-1983. All 19 resistant isolates (MIC greater than or equal to 4 micrograms/mL) were resistant to both penicillin and ampicillin and produced beta-lactamase. Eight had penicillin MICs of 1 or 2 micrograms/mL and three had ampicillin MICs of 1 or 2 micrograms/mL. The significance of isolates with MICs of 1-2 micrograms/mL is discussed in relation to our findings and a review of the literature.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9173</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-7722</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/82.3.311</identifier><identifier>PMID: 6380270</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJCPAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago, IL: American Society of Clinical Pathologists</publisher><subject>Ampicillin - pharmacology ; Ampicillin - therapeutic use ; Antibacterial agents ; Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents ; Bacteriological Techniques ; beta-Lactamases - metabolism ; Biological and medical sciences ; Haemophilus - drug effects ; Haemophilus Infections - drug therapy ; Haemophilus influenzae ; Haemophilus parainfluenzae ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests ; Penicillin Resistance ; Penicillins - pharmacology ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Tetracycline - pharmacology</subject><ispartof>American journal of clinical pathology, 1984-09, Vol.82 (3), p.311-318</ispartof><rights>1985 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-e3dc71455789b504ce937fac145fc5bd07b7309434003b37d9b5ca67ca4520063</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=9064011$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6380270$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>WOOLFREY, B. F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LALLY, R. T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IRELAND, G. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>QUALL, C. O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EDERER, M. N</creatorcontrib><title>Antimicrobial resistance in Haemophilus isolates: a Minnesota experience and literature review</title><title>American journal of clinical pathology</title><addtitle>Am J Clin Pathol</addtitle><description>Annual ampicillin susceptibility rates for Haemophilus influenzae isolates at the St. Paul-Ramsey Medical Center gradually decreased from 100% in 1974 to 83.3% in 1980 and then remained stable at 88.90%. Penicillin susceptibility rates were similar to those for ampicillin. Ampicillin rates were source dependent: eye 95%, respiratory 90%, miscellaneous sources 82%, and blood and CSF 80%. Rates for Haemophilus parainfluenzae varied and showed no trend. H. parainfluenzae isolates were distinctly less susceptible to penicillin (70%) than to ampicillin (96%). H. influenzae isolates were highly susceptible to chloramphenicol (99.6%) and tetracycline (97.5%), with the latter also showing source dependency. Characterization of isolates for colony morphology and hemolysis showed no clinical relevancy. Ampicillin and penicillin MICs were determined for 128 clinical isolates saved in stock culture during 1978-1983. All 19 resistant isolates (MIC greater than or equal to 4 micrograms/mL) were resistant to both penicillin and ampicillin and produced beta-lactamase. Eight had penicillin MICs of 1 or 2 micrograms/mL and three had ampicillin MICs of 1 or 2 micrograms/mL. The significance of isolates with MICs of 1-2 micrograms/mL is discussed in relation to our findings and a review of the literature.</description><subject>Ampicillin - pharmacology</subject><subject>Ampicillin - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antibacterial agents</subject><subject>Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents</subject><subject>Bacteriological Techniques</subject><subject>beta-Lactamases - metabolism</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Haemophilus - drug effects</subject><subject>Haemophilus Infections - drug therapy</subject><subject>Haemophilus influenzae</subject><subject>Haemophilus parainfluenzae</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</subject><subject>Penicillin Resistance</subject><subject>Penicillins - pharmacology</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Tetracycline - pharmacology</subject><issn>0002-9173</issn><issn>1943-7722</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1984</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMoun4cPQo9iLeuk6RtWm8i6gorXvRqmKZTzNIvk9aPf2-WXfbqaWDeh3eYh7FzDnMOhbzGlRmuczGXc8n5HpvxIpGxUkLssxkAiLjgSh6xY-9XAFzkkByyw0zmIBTM2PttN9rWGteXFpvIkbd-xM5QZLtogdT2w4dtJh9Z3zc4kr-JMHq2XUe-HzGin4GcpTWPXRU1diSH4-QoNH1Z-j5lBzU2ns6284S9Pdy_3i3i5cvj093tMjYik2NMsjKKJ2mq8qJMITFUSFWjCavapGUFqlQSwmMJgCylqgJlMFMGk1QAZPKEXW16B9d_TuRH3VpvqGmwo37yOuc8z2Wq_gV5uACgigDGGzCo8d5RrQdnW3S_moNei9dr8ToXWuogPvAX2-KpbKna0VvTIb_c5ugNNrULkq3fYQVkCYSaPzOWi_M</recordid><startdate>198409</startdate><enddate>198409</enddate><creator>WOOLFREY, B. F</creator><creator>LALLY, R. T</creator><creator>IRELAND, G. K</creator><creator>QUALL, C. O</creator><creator>EDERER, M. N</creator><general>American Society of Clinical Pathologists</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198409</creationdate><title>Antimicrobial resistance in Haemophilus isolates: a Minnesota experience and literature review</title><author>WOOLFREY, B. F ; LALLY, R. T ; IRELAND, G. K ; QUALL, C. O ; EDERER, M. N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-e3dc71455789b504ce937fac145fc5bd07b7309434003b37d9b5ca67ca4520063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1984</creationdate><topic>Ampicillin - pharmacology</topic><topic>Ampicillin - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antibacterial agents</topic><topic>Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents</topic><topic>Bacteriological Techniques</topic><topic>beta-Lactamases - metabolism</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Haemophilus - drug effects</topic><topic>Haemophilus Infections - drug therapy</topic><topic>Haemophilus influenzae</topic><topic>Haemophilus parainfluenzae</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</topic><topic>Penicillin Resistance</topic><topic>Penicillins - pharmacology</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Tetracycline - pharmacology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>WOOLFREY, B. F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LALLY, R. T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IRELAND, G. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>QUALL, C. O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EDERER, M. N</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of clinical pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>WOOLFREY, B. F</au><au>LALLY, R. T</au><au>IRELAND, G. K</au><au>QUALL, C. O</au><au>EDERER, M. N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Antimicrobial resistance in Haemophilus isolates: a Minnesota experience and literature review</atitle><jtitle>American journal of clinical pathology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Clin Pathol</addtitle><date>1984-09</date><risdate>1984</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>311</spage><epage>318</epage><pages>311-318</pages><issn>0002-9173</issn><eissn>1943-7722</eissn><coden>AJCPAI</coden><abstract>Annual ampicillin susceptibility rates for Haemophilus influenzae isolates at the St. Paul-Ramsey Medical Center gradually decreased from 100% in 1974 to 83.3% in 1980 and then remained stable at 88.90%. Penicillin susceptibility rates were similar to those for ampicillin. Ampicillin rates were source dependent: eye 95%, respiratory 90%, miscellaneous sources 82%, and blood and CSF 80%. Rates for Haemophilus parainfluenzae varied and showed no trend. H. parainfluenzae isolates were distinctly less susceptible to penicillin (70%) than to ampicillin (96%). H. influenzae isolates were highly susceptible to chloramphenicol (99.6%) and tetracycline (97.5%), with the latter also showing source dependency. Characterization of isolates for colony morphology and hemolysis showed no clinical relevancy. Ampicillin and penicillin MICs were determined for 128 clinical isolates saved in stock culture during 1978-1983. All 19 resistant isolates (MIC greater than or equal to 4 micrograms/mL) were resistant to both penicillin and ampicillin and produced beta-lactamase. Eight had penicillin MICs of 1 or 2 micrograms/mL and three had ampicillin MICs of 1 or 2 micrograms/mL. The significance of isolates with MICs of 1-2 micrograms/mL is discussed in relation to our findings and a review of the literature.</abstract><cop>Chicago, IL</cop><pub>American Society of Clinical Pathologists</pub><pmid>6380270</pmid><doi>10.1093/ajcp/82.3.311</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9173
ispartof American journal of clinical pathology, 1984-09, Vol.82 (3), p.311-318
issn 0002-9173
1943-7722
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_81188357
source MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive Legacy
subjects Ampicillin - pharmacology
Ampicillin - therapeutic use
Antibacterial agents
Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents
Bacteriological Techniques
beta-Lactamases - metabolism
Biological and medical sciences
Haemophilus - drug effects
Haemophilus Infections - drug therapy
Haemophilus influenzae
Haemophilus parainfluenzae
Humans
Medical sciences
Microbial Sensitivity Tests
Penicillin Resistance
Penicillins - pharmacology
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Tetracycline - pharmacology
title Antimicrobial resistance in Haemophilus isolates: a Minnesota experience and literature review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T23%3A50%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Antimicrobial%20resistance%20in%20Haemophilus%20isolates:%20a%20Minnesota%20experience%20and%20literature%20review&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20clinical%20pathology&rft.au=WOOLFREY,%20B.%20F&rft.date=1984-09&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=311&rft.epage=318&rft.pages=311-318&rft.issn=0002-9173&rft.eissn=1943-7722&rft.coden=AJCPAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ajcp/82.3.311&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E14000079%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14000079&rft_id=info:pmid/6380270&rfr_iscdi=true