Reconstruction of the Posterior Canal Wall with Proplast

Many ears with prior radical or modified radical mastoidectomy operations can be rehabilitated by reconstruction of the posterior canal wall with the porous biocompatible implant material Proplast. Many techniques have been advanced for reconstruction of the posterior canal wall and/or obliteration...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery 1984-06, Vol.92 (3), p.329-333
Hauptverfasser: Shea, John J., Malenbaum, Bruce T., Moretz, William H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 333
container_issue 3
container_start_page 329
container_title Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery
container_volume 92
creator Shea, John J.
Malenbaum, Bruce T.
Moretz, William H.
description Many ears with prior radical or modified radical mastoidectomy operations can be rehabilitated by reconstruction of the posterior canal wall with the porous biocompatible implant material Proplast. Many techniques have been advanced for reconstruction of the posterior canal wall and/or obliteration of the mastoid bowl. We prefer reconstruction of the posterior canal wall to obliteration of the mastoid bowl on the theoretical grounds that with obliteration you lose the pneumatic buffer of the mastoid air cell system and you might be burying infection and/or cholesteatoma in the depths of the mastoid. In this article we shall present our results with elimination of the open mastoid bowl by reconstruction of the posterior canal wall with Proplast. A retrospective study of 83 consecutive patients who underwent reconstruction of the posterior canal wall with Proplast during the 5-year period 1974 to 1978 was undertaken. The surgical technique consisted of rebuilding the tympanic membrane, when necessary, repairing the ossicular chain, when necessary, and reconstructing the posterior canal wall. The overall success rate for the posterior canal wall reconstructions was 46% (38 of 83). However, after modifications were made in the technique, especially in the use of thicker fascia and/or perichondria and periosteum over the Proplast, the success rate increased dramatically to 68% (19 of 28).
doi_str_mv 10.1177/019459988409200316
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_81175202</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_019459988409200316</sage_id><sourcerecordid>81175202</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3891-c712ae6bfa07497223a110c17e1c3ca86be8ef5207b3fa8d577c4274327ee0a73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEFLw0AQhRdRaq3-AUHIyVvszm6a2XjTYq0gtojiMWy2E5uSZutuQum_NyXFiyCe5vDe9xg-xi6B3wAgDjkk0ShJlIp4IjiXEB-xPvAEw1gBHrP-vhDuG6fszPsV5zyOEXusF0cSJEZ9pl7J2MrXrjF1YavA5kG9pGBufU2usC4Y60qXwYcuy2Bb1Mtg7uym1L4-Zye5Lj1dHO6AvU8e3sbT8Hn2-DS-ew6NVAmEBkFoirNcc4wSFEJqAG4ACYw0WsUZKcpHgmMmc60WI0QTCYykQCKuUQ7Ydbe7cfarIV-n68IbKktdkW18qloTLS7aouiKxlnvHeXpxhVr7XYp8HSvK_2tq4WuDutNtqbFD3Lw0-a3Xb4tStr9YzGdTV_uJxykgBYedrDXn5SubONalf6vd74BabKBpA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>81175202</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reconstruction of the Posterior Canal Wall with Proplast</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Shea, John J. ; Malenbaum, Bruce T. ; Moretz, William H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shea, John J. ; Malenbaum, Bruce T. ; Moretz, William H.</creatorcontrib><description>Many ears with prior radical or modified radical mastoidectomy operations can be rehabilitated by reconstruction of the posterior canal wall with the porous biocompatible implant material Proplast. Many techniques have been advanced for reconstruction of the posterior canal wall and/or obliteration of the mastoid bowl. We prefer reconstruction of the posterior canal wall to obliteration of the mastoid bowl on the theoretical grounds that with obliteration you lose the pneumatic buffer of the mastoid air cell system and you might be burying infection and/or cholesteatoma in the depths of the mastoid. In this article we shall present our results with elimination of the open mastoid bowl by reconstruction of the posterior canal wall with Proplast. A retrospective study of 83 consecutive patients who underwent reconstruction of the posterior canal wall with Proplast during the 5-year period 1974 to 1978 was undertaken. The surgical technique consisted of rebuilding the tympanic membrane, when necessary, repairing the ossicular chain, when necessary, and reconstructing the posterior canal wall. The overall success rate for the posterior canal wall reconstructions was 46% (38 of 83). However, after modifications were made in the technique, especially in the use of thicker fascia and/or perichondria and periosteum over the Proplast, the success rate increased dramatically to 68% (19 of 28).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0194-5998</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/019459988409200316</identifier><identifier>PMID: 6431374</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Ear Canal - surgery ; Ear Ossicles - surgery ; Humans ; Mastoid - surgery ; Polytetrafluoroethylene ; Proplast ; Prostheses and Implants ; Retrospective Studies ; Tympanoplasty</subject><ispartof>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery, 1984-06, Vol.92 (3), p.329-333</ispartof><rights>1984 SAGE Publications</rights><rights>1984 American Association of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery Foundation (AAO‐HNSF)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3891-c712ae6bfa07497223a110c17e1c3ca86be8ef5207b3fa8d577c4274327ee0a73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3891-c712ae6bfa07497223a110c17e1c3ca86be8ef5207b3fa8d577c4274327ee0a73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1177%2F019459988409200316$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1177%2F019459988409200316$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6431374$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shea, John J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malenbaum, Bruce T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moretz, William H.</creatorcontrib><title>Reconstruction of the Posterior Canal Wall with Proplast</title><title>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery</title><addtitle>Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg</addtitle><description>Many ears with prior radical or modified radical mastoidectomy operations can be rehabilitated by reconstruction of the posterior canal wall with the porous biocompatible implant material Proplast. Many techniques have been advanced for reconstruction of the posterior canal wall and/or obliteration of the mastoid bowl. We prefer reconstruction of the posterior canal wall to obliteration of the mastoid bowl on the theoretical grounds that with obliteration you lose the pneumatic buffer of the mastoid air cell system and you might be burying infection and/or cholesteatoma in the depths of the mastoid. In this article we shall present our results with elimination of the open mastoid bowl by reconstruction of the posterior canal wall with Proplast. A retrospective study of 83 consecutive patients who underwent reconstruction of the posterior canal wall with Proplast during the 5-year period 1974 to 1978 was undertaken. The surgical technique consisted of rebuilding the tympanic membrane, when necessary, repairing the ossicular chain, when necessary, and reconstructing the posterior canal wall. The overall success rate for the posterior canal wall reconstructions was 46% (38 of 83). However, after modifications were made in the technique, especially in the use of thicker fascia and/or perichondria and periosteum over the Proplast, the success rate increased dramatically to 68% (19 of 28).</description><subject>Ear Canal - surgery</subject><subject>Ear Ossicles - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mastoid - surgery</subject><subject>Polytetrafluoroethylene</subject><subject>Proplast</subject><subject>Prostheses and Implants</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Tympanoplasty</subject><issn>0194-5998</issn><issn>1097-6817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1984</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEFLw0AQhRdRaq3-AUHIyVvszm6a2XjTYq0gtojiMWy2E5uSZutuQum_NyXFiyCe5vDe9xg-xi6B3wAgDjkk0ShJlIp4IjiXEB-xPvAEw1gBHrP-vhDuG6fszPsV5zyOEXusF0cSJEZ9pl7J2MrXrjF1YavA5kG9pGBufU2usC4Y60qXwYcuy2Bb1Mtg7uym1L4-Zye5Lj1dHO6AvU8e3sbT8Hn2-DS-ew6NVAmEBkFoirNcc4wSFEJqAG4ACYw0WsUZKcpHgmMmc60WI0QTCYykQCKuUQ7Ydbe7cfarIV-n68IbKktdkW18qloTLS7aouiKxlnvHeXpxhVr7XYp8HSvK_2tq4WuDutNtqbFD3Lw0-a3Xb4tStr9YzGdTV_uJxykgBYedrDXn5SubONalf6vd74BabKBpA</recordid><startdate>198406</startdate><enddate>198406</enddate><creator>Shea, John J.</creator><creator>Malenbaum, Bruce T.</creator><creator>Moretz, William H.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198406</creationdate><title>Reconstruction of the Posterior Canal Wall with Proplast</title><author>Shea, John J. ; Malenbaum, Bruce T. ; Moretz, William H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3891-c712ae6bfa07497223a110c17e1c3ca86be8ef5207b3fa8d577c4274327ee0a73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1984</creationdate><topic>Ear Canal - surgery</topic><topic>Ear Ossicles - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mastoid - surgery</topic><topic>Polytetrafluoroethylene</topic><topic>Proplast</topic><topic>Prostheses and Implants</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Tympanoplasty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shea, John J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malenbaum, Bruce T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moretz, William H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shea, John J.</au><au>Malenbaum, Bruce T.</au><au>Moretz, William H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reconstruction of the Posterior Canal Wall with Proplast</atitle><jtitle>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg</addtitle><date>1984-06</date><risdate>1984</risdate><volume>92</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>329</spage><epage>333</epage><pages>329-333</pages><issn>0194-5998</issn><eissn>1097-6817</eissn><abstract>Many ears with prior radical or modified radical mastoidectomy operations can be rehabilitated by reconstruction of the posterior canal wall with the porous biocompatible implant material Proplast. Many techniques have been advanced for reconstruction of the posterior canal wall and/or obliteration of the mastoid bowl. We prefer reconstruction of the posterior canal wall to obliteration of the mastoid bowl on the theoretical grounds that with obliteration you lose the pneumatic buffer of the mastoid air cell system and you might be burying infection and/or cholesteatoma in the depths of the mastoid. In this article we shall present our results with elimination of the open mastoid bowl by reconstruction of the posterior canal wall with Proplast. A retrospective study of 83 consecutive patients who underwent reconstruction of the posterior canal wall with Proplast during the 5-year period 1974 to 1978 was undertaken. The surgical technique consisted of rebuilding the tympanic membrane, when necessary, repairing the ossicular chain, when necessary, and reconstructing the posterior canal wall. The overall success rate for the posterior canal wall reconstructions was 46% (38 of 83). However, after modifications were made in the technique, especially in the use of thicker fascia and/or perichondria and periosteum over the Proplast, the success rate increased dramatically to 68% (19 of 28).</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>6431374</pmid><doi>10.1177/019459988409200316</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0194-5998
ispartof Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery, 1984-06, Vol.92 (3), p.329-333
issn 0194-5998
1097-6817
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_81175202
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Ear Canal - surgery
Ear Ossicles - surgery
Humans
Mastoid - surgery
Polytetrafluoroethylene
Proplast
Prostheses and Implants
Retrospective Studies
Tympanoplasty
title Reconstruction of the Posterior Canal Wall with Proplast
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T12%3A01%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reconstruction%20of%20the%20Posterior%20Canal%20Wall%20with%20Proplast&rft.jtitle=Otolaryngology-head%20and%20neck%20surgery&rft.au=Shea,%20John%20J.&rft.date=1984-06&rft.volume=92&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=329&rft.epage=333&rft.pages=329-333&rft.issn=0194-5998&rft.eissn=1097-6817&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/019459988409200316&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E81175202%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=81175202&rft_id=info:pmid/6431374&rft_sage_id=10.1177_019459988409200316&rfr_iscdi=true