An exponential formula for heart rate dependence of QT interval during exercise and cardiac pacing in humans: Reevaluation of Bazett's formula

A new exponential formula to characterize the human RR-QT relation was evaluated in comparison with Bazett's formula in 16 subjects: 10 healthy, normal men (ages 18 to 30 years) who exercised on a stationary bicycle, and 6 patients (ages 50 to 80 years; 2 women and 4 men) with rate-programmable...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of cardiology 1984-07, Vol.54 (1), p.103-108
Hauptverfasser: Sarma, Jonnalagedda S.M., Sarma, Radha J., Bilitch, Michael, Katz, Darryl, Song, Susan L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A new exponential formula to characterize the human RR-QT relation was evaluated in comparison with Bazett's formula in 16 subjects: 10 healthy, normal men (ages 18 to 30 years) who exercised on a stationary bicycle, and 6 patients (ages 50 to 80 years; 2 women and 4 men) with rate-programmable VVI pacemakers whose rates were changed by an external programmer. The RR and QT intervals for heart rate in the range of 50 to 180 beats/min were measured from electrocardiographic tracings recorded at a paper speed of 100 mm/s. The data from each subject were fitted separately by 4 formulas by an appropriate regression analysis using a statistical package program: (F1) QT = A1 — B1∗Exp(−k1∗RR); (F2) QT = A2[1-Exp-(−k2∗RR)]; (F3) QT = A3∗√(RR)+B3; and (F4) QT = A4∗√(RR), where all A, B, and k are regression parameters. The relative goodness of fit of data by the 4 formulas was assessed by the mean-squared residual and the Akaike Information Criterion using Wilcoxon signed-ranks tests. This analysis confirmed that F1 is the best model among the formulas tested and F4 (Bazett's formula) is the least acceptable for both exercised and paced groups. The deviations from Bazett's formula were more striking for the paced group than for the exercised group, as reflected by the mean-squared residual values for F4 (715 ± 86 for the paced group vs 384 ± 41 for the exercised group, p < 0.005). Comparison of exercised and paced groups with respect to the parameters of F1 showed that the shortening of the QT interval with increased heart rate is more rapid in the former group than in the latter. The proposed formula may be clinically applied whenever QT intervals can be measured at 3 or more heart rates during exercise or pacing.
ISSN:0002-9149
1879-1913
DOI:10.1016/0002-9149(84)90312-6