The scintillation camera with diverging collimator: Physical parameters and a clinical evaluation
The Pho/Gamma III with diverging collimator was compared to two dual-headed scanners. Both physical parameters and clinical scans were studied. Diverging collimator resolution was measured by the modulation transfer function (MIT) computed from a line-spread function obtained with a 1600-channel ana...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Seminars in nuclear medicine 1971-04, Vol.1 (2), p.206-215 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 215 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 206 |
container_title | Seminars in nuclear medicine |
container_volume | 1 |
creator | Gottschalk, Alexander Usher, Michael S. Turner, David A. Polcyn, Robert E. Quinn, James L. |
description | The Pho/Gamma III with diverging collimator was compared to two dual-headed scanners. Both physical parameters and clinical scans were studied. Diverging collimator resolution was measured by the modulation transfer function (MIT) computed from a line-spread function obtained with a 1600-channel analyzer. Analysis of MTF data showed that there is no significant septal penetration at 390 IceV, and that the resolution is quite comparable to the MTF of a 3-inch rectilinear scanner with 19-hole 3-inch focused collimator. Thirty patients had lung scans with 113min on both a scintillation camera with diverging collimator, and a dual 3-inch Picker rectilinear scanner with 19-hole collimator (2107). On the average, the examination time with this nuclide (patient positioning plus exposure) was about the same with each technique. In no instance was a lesion detected with one system and not detected with the other. The studies were identical in 23 cases. In four instances the scanner was better, in three instances the camera was better. A second series of eight patients was compared using a dual 5-inch Ohio-Nuclear (84D) with 38H-collimators, and the Pho/Gamma III with diverging collimator. The nuclide in this series was SSmTc-labeled1 albumin microspheres. An appreciable resolution loss was noted on the “up” side view with the scanner especially with the patient supine. This is believed due to increased respiratory motion and inability to place the detector near the chest wall especially over the apices. The images from the two systems were otherwise comparable. The total examination time was much shorter with the camera and this nuclide, taking one-third to one-half the time necessary with the dual 5-inch scanner. The diverging collimator is a valuable accessory to the gamma camera. It provides an increase in the useful field of view (13 inches in diameter, at a distance of 4 inches from the collimator face) with satisfactory resolution and adequate sensitivity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0001-2998(71)81018-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_81125245</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0001299871810188</els_id><sourcerecordid>81125245</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-deda58da6b42b40bd1afd0c54994ca216b2a3d483382349696736e0517ec28783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkN1LwzAUxYMoc378CYM8iT5Uk7RpE19Ehl8wUHA-hzS52yJdO5N0sv_erht79enCPefew_khNKLklhKa330SQmjCpBTXBb0R3U4k4ggNKeciyXKWHqPhwXKKzkL4JoRxLvkADTiRRSHEEOnpAnAwro6uqnR0TY2NXoLX-NfFBbZuDX7u6jk2TVW5pY6Nv8cfi01wRld4pX1njuAD1rXFGpvK1b0Ca121_b8LdDLTVYDL_TxHX89P0_FrMnl_eRs_ThLDCh4TC1ZzYXVeZqzMSGmpnllieCZlZjSjecl0ajORpoKlmcxlXqQ5EE4LMEwUIj1HV7u_K9_8tBCiWrpgoGtVQ9MGJShlnGW8M_Kd0fgmBA8ztfJdM79RlKgtWtWjVVtuqqCqR6u2AaN9QFsuwR6u9iw7_WGnQ9dy7cCrjivUBqzzYKKyjfsn4Q8HmImp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>81125245</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The scintillation camera with diverging collimator: Physical parameters and a clinical evaluation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Gottschalk, Alexander ; Usher, Michael S. ; Turner, David A. ; Polcyn, Robert E. ; Quinn, James L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gottschalk, Alexander ; Usher, Michael S. ; Turner, David A. ; Polcyn, Robert E. ; Quinn, James L.</creatorcontrib><description>The Pho/Gamma III with diverging collimator was compared to two dual-headed scanners. Both physical parameters and clinical scans were studied. Diverging collimator resolution was measured by the modulation transfer function (MIT) computed from a line-spread function obtained with a 1600-channel analyzer. Analysis of MTF data showed that there is no significant septal penetration at 390 IceV, and that the resolution is quite comparable to the MTF of a 3-inch rectilinear scanner with 19-hole 3-inch focused collimator. Thirty patients had lung scans with 113min on both a scintillation camera with diverging collimator, and a dual 3-inch Picker rectilinear scanner with 19-hole collimator (2107). On the average, the examination time with this nuclide (patient positioning plus exposure) was about the same with each technique. In no instance was a lesion detected with one system and not detected with the other. The studies were identical in 23 cases. In four instances the scanner was better, in three instances the camera was better. A second series of eight patients was compared using a dual 5-inch Ohio-Nuclear (84D) with 38H-collimators, and the Pho/Gamma III with diverging collimator. The nuclide in this series was SSmTc-labeled1 albumin microspheres. An appreciable resolution loss was noted on the “up” side view with the scanner especially with the patient supine. This is believed due to increased respiratory motion and inability to place the detector near the chest wall especially over the apices. The images from the two systems were otherwise comparable. The total examination time was much shorter with the camera and this nuclide, taking one-third to one-half the time necessary with the dual 5-inch scanner. The diverging collimator is a valuable accessory to the gamma camera. It provides an increase in the useful field of view (13 inches in diameter, at a distance of 4 inches from the collimator face) with satisfactory resolution and adequate sensitivity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-2998</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-4623</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0001-2998(71)81018-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 5097788</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Humans ; Indium ; Lung Diseases - diagnosis ; Methods ; Photomicrography ; Radioisotopes ; Radionuclide Imaging - instrumentation ; Technetium ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Seminars in nuclear medicine, 1971-04, Vol.1 (2), p.206-215</ispartof><rights>1971 Henry M. Stratton, Inc., Publishers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-deda58da6b42b40bd1afd0c54994ca216b2a3d483382349696736e0517ec28783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-deda58da6b42b40bd1afd0c54994ca216b2a3d483382349696736e0517ec28783</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0001-2998(71)81018-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5097788$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gottschalk, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Usher, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polcyn, Robert E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quinn, James L.</creatorcontrib><title>The scintillation camera with diverging collimator: Physical parameters and a clinical evaluation</title><title>Seminars in nuclear medicine</title><addtitle>Semin Nucl Med</addtitle><description>The Pho/Gamma III with diverging collimator was compared to two dual-headed scanners. Both physical parameters and clinical scans were studied. Diverging collimator resolution was measured by the modulation transfer function (MIT) computed from a line-spread function obtained with a 1600-channel analyzer. Analysis of MTF data showed that there is no significant septal penetration at 390 IceV, and that the resolution is quite comparable to the MTF of a 3-inch rectilinear scanner with 19-hole 3-inch focused collimator. Thirty patients had lung scans with 113min on both a scintillation camera with diverging collimator, and a dual 3-inch Picker rectilinear scanner with 19-hole collimator (2107). On the average, the examination time with this nuclide (patient positioning plus exposure) was about the same with each technique. In no instance was a lesion detected with one system and not detected with the other. The studies were identical in 23 cases. In four instances the scanner was better, in three instances the camera was better. A second series of eight patients was compared using a dual 5-inch Ohio-Nuclear (84D) with 38H-collimators, and the Pho/Gamma III with diverging collimator. The nuclide in this series was SSmTc-labeled1 albumin microspheres. An appreciable resolution loss was noted on the “up” side view with the scanner especially with the patient supine. This is believed due to increased respiratory motion and inability to place the detector near the chest wall especially over the apices. The images from the two systems were otherwise comparable. The total examination time was much shorter with the camera and this nuclide, taking one-third to one-half the time necessary with the dual 5-inch scanner. The diverging collimator is a valuable accessory to the gamma camera. It provides an increase in the useful field of view (13 inches in diameter, at a distance of 4 inches from the collimator face) with satisfactory resolution and adequate sensitivity.</description><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Indium</subject><subject>Lung Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Photomicrography</subject><subject>Radioisotopes</subject><subject>Radionuclide Imaging - instrumentation</subject><subject>Technetium</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0001-2998</issn><issn>1558-4623</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1971</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkN1LwzAUxYMoc378CYM8iT5Uk7RpE19Ehl8wUHA-hzS52yJdO5N0sv_erht79enCPefew_khNKLklhKa330SQmjCpBTXBb0R3U4k4ggNKeciyXKWHqPhwXKKzkL4JoRxLvkADTiRRSHEEOnpAnAwro6uqnR0TY2NXoLX-NfFBbZuDX7u6jk2TVW5pY6Nv8cfi01wRld4pX1njuAD1rXFGpvK1b0Ca121_b8LdDLTVYDL_TxHX89P0_FrMnl_eRs_ThLDCh4TC1ZzYXVeZqzMSGmpnllieCZlZjSjecl0ajORpoKlmcxlXqQ5EE4LMEwUIj1HV7u_K9_8tBCiWrpgoGtVQ9MGJShlnGW8M_Kd0fgmBA8ztfJdM79RlKgtWtWjVVtuqqCqR6u2AaN9QFsuwR6u9iw7_WGnQ9dy7cCrjivUBqzzYKKyjfsn4Q8HmImp</recordid><startdate>197104</startdate><enddate>197104</enddate><creator>Gottschalk, Alexander</creator><creator>Usher, Michael S.</creator><creator>Turner, David A.</creator><creator>Polcyn, Robert E.</creator><creator>Quinn, James L.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197104</creationdate><title>The scintillation camera with diverging collimator: Physical parameters and a clinical evaluation</title><author>Gottschalk, Alexander ; Usher, Michael S. ; Turner, David A. ; Polcyn, Robert E. ; Quinn, James L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-deda58da6b42b40bd1afd0c54994ca216b2a3d483382349696736e0517ec28783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1971</creationdate><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Indium</topic><topic>Lung Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Photomicrography</topic><topic>Radioisotopes</topic><topic>Radionuclide Imaging - instrumentation</topic><topic>Technetium</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gottschalk, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Usher, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polcyn, Robert E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quinn, James L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Seminars in nuclear medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gottschalk, Alexander</au><au>Usher, Michael S.</au><au>Turner, David A.</au><au>Polcyn, Robert E.</au><au>Quinn, James L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The scintillation camera with diverging collimator: Physical parameters and a clinical evaluation</atitle><jtitle>Seminars in nuclear medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Semin Nucl Med</addtitle><date>1971-04</date><risdate>1971</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>206</spage><epage>215</epage><pages>206-215</pages><issn>0001-2998</issn><eissn>1558-4623</eissn><abstract>The Pho/Gamma III with diverging collimator was compared to two dual-headed scanners. Both physical parameters and clinical scans were studied. Diverging collimator resolution was measured by the modulation transfer function (MIT) computed from a line-spread function obtained with a 1600-channel analyzer. Analysis of MTF data showed that there is no significant septal penetration at 390 IceV, and that the resolution is quite comparable to the MTF of a 3-inch rectilinear scanner with 19-hole 3-inch focused collimator. Thirty patients had lung scans with 113min on both a scintillation camera with diverging collimator, and a dual 3-inch Picker rectilinear scanner with 19-hole collimator (2107). On the average, the examination time with this nuclide (patient positioning plus exposure) was about the same with each technique. In no instance was a lesion detected with one system and not detected with the other. The studies were identical in 23 cases. In four instances the scanner was better, in three instances the camera was better. A second series of eight patients was compared using a dual 5-inch Ohio-Nuclear (84D) with 38H-collimators, and the Pho/Gamma III with diverging collimator. The nuclide in this series was SSmTc-labeled1 albumin microspheres. An appreciable resolution loss was noted on the “up” side view with the scanner especially with the patient supine. This is believed due to increased respiratory motion and inability to place the detector near the chest wall especially over the apices. The images from the two systems were otherwise comparable. The total examination time was much shorter with the camera and this nuclide, taking one-third to one-half the time necessary with the dual 5-inch scanner. The diverging collimator is a valuable accessory to the gamma camera. It provides an increase in the useful field of view (13 inches in diameter, at a distance of 4 inches from the collimator face) with satisfactory resolution and adequate sensitivity.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>5097788</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0001-2998(71)81018-8</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0001-2998 |
ispartof | Seminars in nuclear medicine, 1971-04, Vol.1 (2), p.206-215 |
issn | 0001-2998 1558-4623 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_81125245 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Humans Indium Lung Diseases - diagnosis Methods Photomicrography Radioisotopes Radionuclide Imaging - instrumentation Technetium Time Factors |
title | The scintillation camera with diverging collimator: Physical parameters and a clinical evaluation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T14%3A03%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20scintillation%20camera%20with%20diverging%20collimator:%20Physical%20parameters%20and%20a%20clinical%20evaluation&rft.jtitle=Seminars%20in%20nuclear%20medicine&rft.au=Gottschalk,%20Alexander&rft.date=1971-04&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=206&rft.epage=215&rft.pages=206-215&rft.issn=0001-2998&rft.eissn=1558-4623&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0001-2998(71)81018-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E81125245%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=81125245&rft_id=info:pmid/5097788&rft_els_id=S0001299871810188&rfr_iscdi=true |