Problems Encountered in Clinical Anaerobic Bacteriology

Despite the rapid progress made in the technology of anaerobic bacteriology during the last 15 years, substantial variation in the practices and resources of different laboratories still exists. All steps, from the collection of the specimen to final identification, may involve pitfalls. Aspirated p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Reviews of infectious diseases 1984-03, Vol.6, p.S45-S50
Hauptverfasser: Hannele R. Jousimies-Somer, Sydney M. Finegold
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page S50
container_issue
container_start_page S45
container_title Reviews of infectious diseases
container_volume 6
creator Hannele R. Jousimies-Somer
Sydney M. Finegold
description Despite the rapid progress made in the technology of anaerobic bacteriology during the last 15 years, substantial variation in the practices and resources of different laboratories still exists. All steps, from the collection of the specimen to final identification, may involve pitfalls. Aspirated pus and tissue samples that are anaerobically transported are always preferable to swabs. Failure to examine gram-stained preparations and wet mounts and to inoculate the specimen promptly onto fresh supplemented media, including selective media, is still common. Generating and maintaining anaerobiosis requires careful monitoring. Plates often are discarded prematurely. The results of final identification with PRAS (prereduced, anaerobically sterilized) biochemicals and gas-liquid chromatography usually arrive too late to guide the clinician to proper therapy. Preliminary tests, along with growth on selective and differential media, are essential for prompt identification of clinically significant anaerobes. Future efforts should be directed toward diminishing the heavy work load of anaerobe laboratories by developing simpler and more rapid procedures.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_81043733</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4453299</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4453299</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j227t-91af8b10edb478d2bcd975f28cda9eee49a79c8daa762add5d0fad2501228d0c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9z0tLxDAUhuEslHEc_QcKXbkr5NI2yXIs4wUGdKHrcpqcSkrajEm7mH9vYYqrs3hePjhXZEtZxXOqVHVDblPqKS2FLKoN2VScMq3ZlsjPGFqPQ8oOownzOGFEm7kxq70bnQGf7UfApXEmewazsAs-_JzvyHUHPuH9enfk--XwVb_lx4_X93p_zHvO5ZRrBp1qGUXbFlJZ3hqrZdlxZSxoRCw0SG2UBZAVB2tLSzuwvKSMc2WpETvydNk9xfA7Y5qawSWD3sOIYU6NYrQQUoglfFzDuR3QNqfoBojnZv108YeL92kK8Z-LohRca_EHaDpYZQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>81043733</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Problems Encountered in Clinical Anaerobic Bacteriology</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Hannele R. Jousimies-Somer ; Sydney M. Finegold</creator><creatorcontrib>Hannele R. Jousimies-Somer ; Sydney M. Finegold</creatorcontrib><description>Despite the rapid progress made in the technology of anaerobic bacteriology during the last 15 years, substantial variation in the practices and resources of different laboratories still exists. All steps, from the collection of the specimen to final identification, may involve pitfalls. Aspirated pus and tissue samples that are anaerobically transported are always preferable to swabs. Failure to examine gram-stained preparations and wet mounts and to inoculate the specimen promptly onto fresh supplemented media, including selective media, is still common. Generating and maintaining anaerobiosis requires careful monitoring. Plates often are discarded prematurely. The results of final identification with PRAS (prereduced, anaerobically sterilized) biochemicals and gas-liquid chromatography usually arrive too late to guide the clinician to proper therapy. Preliminary tests, along with growth on selective and differential media, are essential for prompt identification of clinically significant anaerobes. Future efforts should be directed toward diminishing the heavy work load of anaerobe laboratories by developing simpler and more rapid procedures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0162-0886</identifier><identifier>PMID: 6201991</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Actinomyces ; Anaerobic bacteria ; Antimicrobials ; Application programming interfaces ; Bacteria, Anaerobic - classification ; Bacteria, Anaerobic - isolation &amp; purification ; Bacteriological Techniques - instrumentation ; Bacteriology ; Bacteroides - classification ; Bacteroides - isolation &amp; purification ; Biochemistry ; Chromatography, Gas ; Clinical Anaerobic Bacteriology ; Clostridium - classification ; Clostridium - isolation &amp; purification ; Culture Media ; Fatty Acids, Volatile - analysis ; Gentian Violet ; Inoculation ; Microbiology ; Phenazines ; Public health ; Reagent Kits, Diagnostic ; Specimen Handling ; Specimens ; Staining and Labeling</subject><ispartof>Reviews of infectious diseases, 1984-03, Vol.6, p.S45-S50</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1984 The University of Chicago</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4453299$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4453299$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,57995,58228</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6201991$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hannele R. Jousimies-Somer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sydney M. Finegold</creatorcontrib><title>Problems Encountered in Clinical Anaerobic Bacteriology</title><title>Reviews of infectious diseases</title><addtitle>Rev Infect Dis</addtitle><description>Despite the rapid progress made in the technology of anaerobic bacteriology during the last 15 years, substantial variation in the practices and resources of different laboratories still exists. All steps, from the collection of the specimen to final identification, may involve pitfalls. Aspirated pus and tissue samples that are anaerobically transported are always preferable to swabs. Failure to examine gram-stained preparations and wet mounts and to inoculate the specimen promptly onto fresh supplemented media, including selective media, is still common. Generating and maintaining anaerobiosis requires careful monitoring. Plates often are discarded prematurely. The results of final identification with PRAS (prereduced, anaerobically sterilized) biochemicals and gas-liquid chromatography usually arrive too late to guide the clinician to proper therapy. Preliminary tests, along with growth on selective and differential media, are essential for prompt identification of clinically significant anaerobes. Future efforts should be directed toward diminishing the heavy work load of anaerobe laboratories by developing simpler and more rapid procedures.</description><subject>Actinomyces</subject><subject>Anaerobic bacteria</subject><subject>Antimicrobials</subject><subject>Application programming interfaces</subject><subject>Bacteria, Anaerobic - classification</subject><subject>Bacteria, Anaerobic - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Bacteriological Techniques - instrumentation</subject><subject>Bacteriology</subject><subject>Bacteroides - classification</subject><subject>Bacteroides - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Chromatography, Gas</subject><subject>Clinical Anaerobic Bacteriology</subject><subject>Clostridium - classification</subject><subject>Clostridium - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Culture Media</subject><subject>Fatty Acids, Volatile - analysis</subject><subject>Gentian Violet</subject><subject>Inoculation</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Phenazines</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Reagent Kits, Diagnostic</subject><subject>Specimen Handling</subject><subject>Specimens</subject><subject>Staining and Labeling</subject><issn>0162-0886</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1984</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9z0tLxDAUhuEslHEc_QcKXbkr5NI2yXIs4wUGdKHrcpqcSkrajEm7mH9vYYqrs3hePjhXZEtZxXOqVHVDblPqKS2FLKoN2VScMq3ZlsjPGFqPQ8oOownzOGFEm7kxq70bnQGf7UfApXEmewazsAs-_JzvyHUHPuH9enfk--XwVb_lx4_X93p_zHvO5ZRrBp1qGUXbFlJZ3hqrZdlxZSxoRCw0SG2UBZAVB2tLSzuwvKSMc2WpETvydNk9xfA7Y5qawSWD3sOIYU6NYrQQUoglfFzDuR3QNqfoBojnZv108YeL92kK8Z-LohRca_EHaDpYZQ</recordid><startdate>198403</startdate><enddate>198403</enddate><creator>Hannele R. Jousimies-Somer</creator><creator>Sydney M. Finegold</creator><general>University of Chicago Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198403</creationdate><title>Problems Encountered in Clinical Anaerobic Bacteriology</title><author>Hannele R. Jousimies-Somer ; Sydney M. Finegold</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j227t-91af8b10edb478d2bcd975f28cda9eee49a79c8daa762add5d0fad2501228d0c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1984</creationdate><topic>Actinomyces</topic><topic>Anaerobic bacteria</topic><topic>Antimicrobials</topic><topic>Application programming interfaces</topic><topic>Bacteria, Anaerobic - classification</topic><topic>Bacteria, Anaerobic - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Bacteriological Techniques - instrumentation</topic><topic>Bacteriology</topic><topic>Bacteroides - classification</topic><topic>Bacteroides - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Chromatography, Gas</topic><topic>Clinical Anaerobic Bacteriology</topic><topic>Clostridium - classification</topic><topic>Clostridium - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Culture Media</topic><topic>Fatty Acids, Volatile - analysis</topic><topic>Gentian Violet</topic><topic>Inoculation</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Phenazines</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Reagent Kits, Diagnostic</topic><topic>Specimen Handling</topic><topic>Specimens</topic><topic>Staining and Labeling</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hannele R. Jousimies-Somer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sydney M. Finegold</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Reviews of infectious diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hannele R. Jousimies-Somer</au><au>Sydney M. Finegold</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Problems Encountered in Clinical Anaerobic Bacteriology</atitle><jtitle>Reviews of infectious diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Rev Infect Dis</addtitle><date>1984-03</date><risdate>1984</risdate><volume>6</volume><spage>S45</spage><epage>S50</epage><pages>S45-S50</pages><issn>0162-0886</issn><abstract>Despite the rapid progress made in the technology of anaerobic bacteriology during the last 15 years, substantial variation in the practices and resources of different laboratories still exists. All steps, from the collection of the specimen to final identification, may involve pitfalls. Aspirated pus and tissue samples that are anaerobically transported are always preferable to swabs. Failure to examine gram-stained preparations and wet mounts and to inoculate the specimen promptly onto fresh supplemented media, including selective media, is still common. Generating and maintaining anaerobiosis requires careful monitoring. Plates often are discarded prematurely. The results of final identification with PRAS (prereduced, anaerobically sterilized) biochemicals and gas-liquid chromatography usually arrive too late to guide the clinician to proper therapy. Preliminary tests, along with growth on selective and differential media, are essential for prompt identification of clinically significant anaerobes. Future efforts should be directed toward diminishing the heavy work load of anaerobe laboratories by developing simpler and more rapid procedures.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>University of Chicago Press</pub><pmid>6201991</pmid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0162-0886
ispartof Reviews of infectious diseases, 1984-03, Vol.6, p.S45-S50
issn 0162-0886
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_81043733
source MEDLINE; Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Actinomyces
Anaerobic bacteria
Antimicrobials
Application programming interfaces
Bacteria, Anaerobic - classification
Bacteria, Anaerobic - isolation & purification
Bacteriological Techniques - instrumentation
Bacteriology
Bacteroides - classification
Bacteroides - isolation & purification
Biochemistry
Chromatography, Gas
Clinical Anaerobic Bacteriology
Clostridium - classification
Clostridium - isolation & purification
Culture Media
Fatty Acids, Volatile - analysis
Gentian Violet
Inoculation
Microbiology
Phenazines
Public health
Reagent Kits, Diagnostic
Specimen Handling
Specimens
Staining and Labeling
title Problems Encountered in Clinical Anaerobic Bacteriology
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T23%3A35%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Problems%20Encountered%20in%20Clinical%20Anaerobic%20Bacteriology&rft.jtitle=Reviews%20of%20infectious%20diseases&rft.au=Hannele%20R.%20Jousimies-Somer&rft.date=1984-03&rft.volume=6&rft.spage=S45&rft.epage=S50&rft.pages=S45-S50&rft.issn=0162-0886&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4453299%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=81043733&rft_id=info:pmid/6201991&rft_jstor_id=4453299&rfr_iscdi=true