Breast volume measurement of 248 women using biostereometric analysis

A study of volumes of the right and left breasts of 248 subjects was undertaken using biostereometric analysis. This measurement technique uses close-range stereophotogrammetry to characterize the shape of the breast and is noncontact, noninvasive, accurate, and rapid with respect to the subject inv...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) 1987-10, Vol.80 (4), p.553-558
Hauptverfasser: Loughry, C W, Sheffer, D B, Price, Jr, T E, Lackney, M J, Bartfai, R G, Morek, W M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 558
container_issue 4
container_start_page 553
container_title Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)
container_volume 80
creator Loughry, C W
Sheffer, D B
Price, Jr, T E
Lackney, M J
Bartfai, R G
Morek, W M
description A study of volumes of the right and left breasts of 248 subjects was undertaken using biostereometric analysis. This measurement technique uses close-range stereophotogrammetry to characterize the shape of the breast and is noncontact, noninvasive, accurate, and rapid with respect to the subject involvement time. Volumes and volumetric differences between breast pairs were compared, using chi-square tests, with handedness, perception of breast size by each subject, age, and menstrual status. No significant relationship was found between the handedness of the subject and the larger breast volume. Several groups of subjects based on age and menstrual status were accurate in their perception of breast size difference. Analysis did not confirm the generally accepted clinical impression of left breast volume dominance. Although a size difference in breast pairs was documented, neither breast predominated.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00006534-198710000-00013
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_81039010</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>81039010</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-2690b3150cf015e1f3286bed90020539a7767c46a9ba9c4e658543b761e7a24b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1PwzAMhnMAjTH4CUg5cSs4SZM0R5jGhzSJC5yjpHNRUduMpAXx78nYmCXbei2_tvQQQhncMDD6FnIoKcqCmUqznSpyMnFC5gCCFwwkPyPnKX3kqRZKzsgsV8OUnJPVfUSXRvoVuqlH2mcxRexxGGloKC8r-h2yolNqh3fq25BGjJhHY2xr6gbX_aQ2XZDTxnUJLw99Qd4eVq_Lp2L98vi8vFsXtRBmLLgy4AWTUDfAJLJG8Ep53BgADlIYp7XSdamc8c7UJSpZyVJ4rRhqx0svFuR6f3cbw-eEabR9m2rsOjdgmJKtGAgDuSxItV-sY0gpYmO3se1d_LEM7I6a_admj9TsH7VsvTr8mHyPm6PxgEz8Aj1kaKY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>81039010</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Breast volume measurement of 248 women using biostereometric analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Loughry, C W ; Sheffer, D B ; Price, Jr, T E ; Lackney, M J ; Bartfai, R G ; Morek, W M</creator><creatorcontrib>Loughry, C W ; Sheffer, D B ; Price, Jr, T E ; Lackney, M J ; Bartfai, R G ; Morek, W M</creatorcontrib><description>A study of volumes of the right and left breasts of 248 subjects was undertaken using biostereometric analysis. This measurement technique uses close-range stereophotogrammetry to characterize the shape of the breast and is noncontact, noninvasive, accurate, and rapid with respect to the subject involvement time. Volumes and volumetric differences between breast pairs were compared, using chi-square tests, with handedness, perception of breast size by each subject, age, and menstrual status. No significant relationship was found between the handedness of the subject and the larger breast volume. Several groups of subjects based on age and menstrual status were accurate in their perception of breast size difference. Analysis did not confirm the generally accepted clinical impression of left breast volume dominance. Although a size difference in breast pairs was documented, neither breast predominated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-1052</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00006534-198710000-00013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3659165</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Breast - anatomy &amp; histology ; Female ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Photogrammetry - instrumentation ; Photogrammetry - methods</subject><ispartof>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 1987-10, Vol.80 (4), p.553-558</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-2690b3150cf015e1f3286bed90020539a7767c46a9ba9c4e658543b761e7a24b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3659165$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Loughry, C W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheffer, D B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Jr, T E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lackney, M J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartfai, R G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morek, W M</creatorcontrib><title>Breast volume measurement of 248 women using biostereometric analysis</title><title>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</title><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><description>A study of volumes of the right and left breasts of 248 subjects was undertaken using biostereometric analysis. This measurement technique uses close-range stereophotogrammetry to characterize the shape of the breast and is noncontact, noninvasive, accurate, and rapid with respect to the subject involvement time. Volumes and volumetric differences between breast pairs were compared, using chi-square tests, with handedness, perception of breast size by each subject, age, and menstrual status. No significant relationship was found between the handedness of the subject and the larger breast volume. Several groups of subjects based on age and menstrual status were accurate in their perception of breast size difference. Analysis did not confirm the generally accepted clinical impression of left breast volume dominance. Although a size difference in breast pairs was documented, neither breast predominated.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Breast - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Photogrammetry - instrumentation</subject><subject>Photogrammetry - methods</subject><issn>0032-1052</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1987</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE1PwzAMhnMAjTH4CUg5cSs4SZM0R5jGhzSJC5yjpHNRUduMpAXx78nYmCXbei2_tvQQQhncMDD6FnIoKcqCmUqznSpyMnFC5gCCFwwkPyPnKX3kqRZKzsgsV8OUnJPVfUSXRvoVuqlH2mcxRexxGGloKC8r-h2yolNqh3fq25BGjJhHY2xr6gbX_aQ2XZDTxnUJLw99Qd4eVq_Lp2L98vi8vFsXtRBmLLgy4AWTUDfAJLJG8Ep53BgADlIYp7XSdamc8c7UJSpZyVJ4rRhqx0svFuR6f3cbw-eEabR9m2rsOjdgmJKtGAgDuSxItV-sY0gpYmO3se1d_LEM7I6a_admj9TsH7VsvTr8mHyPm6PxgEz8Aj1kaKY</recordid><startdate>19871001</startdate><enddate>19871001</enddate><creator>Loughry, C W</creator><creator>Sheffer, D B</creator><creator>Price, Jr, T E</creator><creator>Lackney, M J</creator><creator>Bartfai, R G</creator><creator>Morek, W M</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19871001</creationdate><title>Breast volume measurement of 248 women using biostereometric analysis</title><author>Loughry, C W ; Sheffer, D B ; Price, Jr, T E ; Lackney, M J ; Bartfai, R G ; Morek, W M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-2690b3150cf015e1f3286bed90020539a7767c46a9ba9c4e658543b761e7a24b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1987</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Breast - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Photogrammetry - instrumentation</topic><topic>Photogrammetry - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Loughry, C W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheffer, D B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Jr, T E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lackney, M J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartfai, R G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morek, W M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Loughry, C W</au><au>Sheffer, D B</au><au>Price, Jr, T E</au><au>Lackney, M J</au><au>Bartfai, R G</au><au>Morek, W M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Breast volume measurement of 248 women using biostereometric analysis</atitle><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><date>1987-10-01</date><risdate>1987</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>553</spage><epage>558</epage><pages>553-558</pages><issn>0032-1052</issn><abstract>A study of volumes of the right and left breasts of 248 subjects was undertaken using biostereometric analysis. This measurement technique uses close-range stereophotogrammetry to characterize the shape of the breast and is noncontact, noninvasive, accurate, and rapid with respect to the subject involvement time. Volumes and volumetric differences between breast pairs were compared, using chi-square tests, with handedness, perception of breast size by each subject, age, and menstrual status. No significant relationship was found between the handedness of the subject and the larger breast volume. Several groups of subjects based on age and menstrual status were accurate in their perception of breast size difference. Analysis did not confirm the generally accepted clinical impression of left breast volume dominance. Although a size difference in breast pairs was documented, neither breast predominated.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>3659165</pmid><doi>10.1097/00006534-198710000-00013</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-1052
ispartof Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 1987-10, Vol.80 (4), p.553-558
issn 0032-1052
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_81039010
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adult
Aged
Breast - anatomy & histology
Female
Humans
Middle Aged
Photogrammetry - instrumentation
Photogrammetry - methods
title Breast volume measurement of 248 women using biostereometric analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T18%3A55%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Breast%20volume%20measurement%20of%20248%20women%20using%20biostereometric%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Plastic%20and%20reconstructive%20surgery%20(1963)&rft.au=Loughry,%20C%20W&rft.date=1987-10-01&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=553&rft.epage=558&rft.pages=553-558&rft.issn=0032-1052&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00006534-198710000-00013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E81039010%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=81039010&rft_id=info:pmid/3659165&rfr_iscdi=true