An evaluation of the Digit Symbol component of the Russell, Neuringer, and Goldstein Average Impairment Rating
Used WAIS subtest scores of 65 brain-damaged (mean age 39.57 yrs) and 50 control (mean age 38.6 yrs) Ss to assess the validity of the Digit Symbol component of the Average Impairment Rating as an indicator of cerebral impairment. The mean impairment rating obtained by the brain-damaged Ss was signif...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of consulting and clinical psychology 1984-04, Vol.52 (2), p.317-318 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 318 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 317 |
| container_title | Journal of consulting and clinical psychology |
| container_volume | 52 |
| creator | Bauer, Chris A Schlottmann, Robert S Kane, Robert L Johnson, David E |
| description | Used WAIS subtest scores of 65 brain-damaged (mean age 39.57 yrs) and 50 control (mean age 38.6 yrs) Ss to assess the validity of the Digit Symbol component of the Average Impairment Rating as an indicator of cerebral impairment. The mean impairment rating obtained by the brain-damaged Ss was significantly higher than that of the control Ss, and examination of individual scores showed that the component correctly identified 72% of all Ss. The component, however, misclassified 40% of the control Ss as impaired. (5 ref) |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1037/0022-006X.52.2.317 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_81033574</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>614280505</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a411t-456bce9b2bba78522626ac51c19fb7bf5b3074be3d960fd5c5ed226148adbf2b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kVFrFDEUhYModVv9A4IQVHzqrLmZyWTmcam1FopCVfAt3GQya8pMMiYzhf33Zum6BcGn-3C-c-7lHkJeAVsDK-UHxjgvGKt_rgVf83UJ8glZQVu2BQeQT8nqCDwnpyndMcagZuKEnNQSRF2zFfEbT-09DgvOLngaejr_svSj27qZftuNOgzUhHEK3vr5r3q7pGSH4Zx-sUt0fmvjOUXf0aswdGm2ztPNvY24tfR6nNDFce-9zQv89gV51uOQ7MvDPCM_Pl1-v_hc3Hy9ur7Y3BRYAcxFJWptbKu51igbwXnNazQCDLS9lroXumSy0rbs2pr1nTDCdhmCqsFO91yXZ-T9Q-4Uw-_FplmNLpl8NHoblqSa_L9SyCqDb_4B78ISfb5N5TjeMMFEht7-DwLeZgSqUmaKP1AmhpSi7dUU3Yhxp4CpfV9qX4fa16EEV1zlvrLp9SF60aPtjpZDQVl_d9AxGRz6iN64dMSaloPk8IjhhGpKO4NxdmawSRkzPW77AzbIqNQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614280505</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An evaluation of the Digit Symbol component of the Russell, Neuringer, and Goldstein Average Impairment Rating</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Bauer, Chris A ; Schlottmann, Robert S ; Kane, Robert L ; Johnson, David E</creator><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Chris A ; Schlottmann, Robert S ; Kane, Robert L ; Johnson, David E</creatorcontrib><description>Used WAIS subtest scores of 65 brain-damaged (mean age 39.57 yrs) and 50 control (mean age 38.6 yrs) Ss to assess the validity of the Digit Symbol component of the Average Impairment Rating as an indicator of cerebral impairment. The mean impairment rating obtained by the brain-damaged Ss was significantly higher than that of the control Ss, and examination of individual scores showed that the component correctly identified 72% of all Ss. The component, however, misclassified 40% of the control Ss as impaired. (5 ref)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-006X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-2117</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.52.2.317</identifier><identifier>PMID: 6715660</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCLPBC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Brain Damage ; Brain Damage, Chronic - diagnosis ; Human ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Neuropsychological Assessment ; Nosology. Terminology. Diagnostic criteria ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Techniques and methods ; Test Validity ; Wechsler Scales</subject><ispartof>Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 1984-04, Vol.52 (2), p.317-318</ispartof><rights>1984 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1985 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>1984, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a411t-456bce9b2bba78522626ac51c19fb7bf5b3074be3d960fd5c5ed226148adbf2b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27867,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=8921721$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6715660$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Chris A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlottmann, Robert S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kane, Robert L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, David E</creatorcontrib><title>An evaluation of the Digit Symbol component of the Russell, Neuringer, and Goldstein Average Impairment Rating</title><title>Journal of consulting and clinical psychology</title><addtitle>J Consult Clin Psychol</addtitle><description>Used WAIS subtest scores of 65 brain-damaged (mean age 39.57 yrs) and 50 control (mean age 38.6 yrs) Ss to assess the validity of the Digit Symbol component of the Average Impairment Rating as an indicator of cerebral impairment. The mean impairment rating obtained by the brain-damaged Ss was significantly higher than that of the control Ss, and examination of individual scores showed that the component correctly identified 72% of all Ss. The component, however, misclassified 40% of the control Ss as impaired. (5 ref)</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brain Damage</subject><subject>Brain Damage, Chronic - diagnosis</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Assessment</subject><subject>Nosology. Terminology. Diagnostic criteria</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Techniques and methods</subject><subject>Test Validity</subject><subject>Wechsler Scales</subject><issn>0022-006X</issn><issn>1939-2117</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1984</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kVFrFDEUhYModVv9A4IQVHzqrLmZyWTmcam1FopCVfAt3GQya8pMMiYzhf33Zum6BcGn-3C-c-7lHkJeAVsDK-UHxjgvGKt_rgVf83UJ8glZQVu2BQeQT8nqCDwnpyndMcagZuKEnNQSRF2zFfEbT-09DgvOLngaejr_svSj27qZftuNOgzUhHEK3vr5r3q7pGSH4Zx-sUt0fmvjOUXf0aswdGm2ztPNvY24tfR6nNDFce-9zQv89gV51uOQ7MvDPCM_Pl1-v_hc3Hy9ur7Y3BRYAcxFJWptbKu51igbwXnNazQCDLS9lroXumSy0rbs2pr1nTDCdhmCqsFO91yXZ-T9Q-4Uw-_FplmNLpl8NHoblqSa_L9SyCqDb_4B78ISfb5N5TjeMMFEht7-DwLeZgSqUmaKP1AmhpSi7dUU3Yhxp4CpfV9qX4fa16EEV1zlvrLp9SF60aPtjpZDQVl_d9AxGRz6iN64dMSaloPk8IjhhGpKO4NxdmawSRkzPW77AzbIqNQ</recordid><startdate>198404</startdate><enddate>198404</enddate><creator>Bauer, Chris A</creator><creator>Schlottmann, Robert S</creator><creator>Kane, Robert L</creator><creator>Johnson, David E</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198404</creationdate><title>An evaluation of the Digit Symbol component of the Russell, Neuringer, and Goldstein Average Impairment Rating</title><author>Bauer, Chris A ; Schlottmann, Robert S ; Kane, Robert L ; Johnson, David E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a411t-456bce9b2bba78522626ac51c19fb7bf5b3074be3d960fd5c5ed226148adbf2b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1984</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brain Damage</topic><topic>Brain Damage, Chronic - diagnosis</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Assessment</topic><topic>Nosology. Terminology. Diagnostic criteria</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Techniques and methods</topic><topic>Test Validity</topic><topic>Wechsler Scales</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Chris A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlottmann, Robert S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kane, Robert L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, David E</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of consulting and clinical psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bauer, Chris A</au><au>Schlottmann, Robert S</au><au>Kane, Robert L</au><au>Johnson, David E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An evaluation of the Digit Symbol component of the Russell, Neuringer, and Goldstein Average Impairment Rating</atitle><jtitle>Journal of consulting and clinical psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Consult Clin Psychol</addtitle><date>1984-04</date><risdate>1984</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>317</spage><epage>318</epage><pages>317-318</pages><issn>0022-006X</issn><eissn>1939-2117</eissn><coden>JCLPBC</coden><abstract>Used WAIS subtest scores of 65 brain-damaged (mean age 39.57 yrs) and 50 control (mean age 38.6 yrs) Ss to assess the validity of the Digit Symbol component of the Average Impairment Rating as an indicator of cerebral impairment. The mean impairment rating obtained by the brain-damaged Ss was significantly higher than that of the control Ss, and examination of individual scores showed that the component correctly identified 72% of all Ss. The component, however, misclassified 40% of the control Ss as impaired. (5 ref)</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>6715660</pmid><doi>10.1037/0022-006X.52.2.317</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-006X |
| ispartof | Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 1984-04, Vol.52 (2), p.317-318 |
| issn | 0022-006X 1939-2117 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_81033574 |
| source | MEDLINE; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES; Periodicals Index Online |
| subjects | Biological and medical sciences Brain Damage Brain Damage, Chronic - diagnosis Human Humans Medical sciences Neuropsychological Assessment Nosology. Terminology. Diagnostic criteria Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychopathology. Psychiatry Techniques and methods Test Validity Wechsler Scales |
| title | An evaluation of the Digit Symbol component of the Russell, Neuringer, and Goldstein Average Impairment Rating |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T08%3A32%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20evaluation%20of%20the%20Digit%20Symbol%20component%20of%20the%20Russell,%20Neuringer,%20and%20Goldstein%20Average%20Impairment%20Rating&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20consulting%20and%20clinical%20psychology&rft.au=Bauer,%20Chris%20A&rft.date=1984-04&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=317&rft.epage=318&rft.pages=317-318&rft.issn=0022-006X&rft.eissn=1939-2117&rft.coden=JCLPBC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0022-006X.52.2.317&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614280505%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614280505&rft_id=info:pmid/6715660&rfr_iscdi=true |