Critical aortic stenosis. Survival and management

The factors associated with survival in 40 neonates (age less than 28 days) with critical aortic stenosis undergoing either open (22 patients) or closed (18 patients) transventricular aortic valvotomy were reviewed. Significant adverse correlates with survival included evidence of poor perfusion pre...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 1987-10, Vol.94 (4), p.510-517
Hauptverfasser: Pelech, AN, Dyck, JD, Trusler, GA, Williams, WG, Olley, PM, Rowe, RD, Freedom, RM
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 517
container_issue 4
container_start_page 510
container_title The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery
container_volume 94
creator Pelech, AN
Dyck, JD
Trusler, GA
Williams, WG
Olley, PM
Rowe, RD
Freedom, RM
description The factors associated with survival in 40 neonates (age less than 28 days) with critical aortic stenosis undergoing either open (22 patients) or closed (18 patients) transventricular aortic valvotomy were reviewed. Significant adverse correlates with survival included evidence of poor perfusion preoperatively (low pH, greater than Grade 2/6 soft ejection systolic murmur) and marked congestive heart failure (hepatomegaly, cardiomegaly, elevated left atrial pressure). Congenital mitral stenosis (anulus less than 11 mm), a small aortic anulus (less than 6.5 mm), and failure to achieve an adequate aortic orifice (greater than 6 mm), at operation were identified as factors associated with increased mortality. Initial perioperative survival was better with closed aortic valvotomy. However, there was no significant difference in overall operative survival between closed (9/18, 50%) and open (8/22, 36%) aortic valvotomy (p = 0.26). The incidence of early reoperation (less than 1 year of age) was greater in perioperative survivors undergoing closed valvotomy (7/13, 54%) rather than open valvotomy (1/10, 10%) (p less than 0.05). In conclusion, long-term survival among patients with critical neonatal aortic valve stenosis remains disturbingly low (13/40, 32%) and has not significantly improved over the past 20 years.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/s0022-5223(19)36211-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_81018552</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>81018552</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-h266t-5bf1ca8de6955c408367e6439b5828a0a0d18f58a4312ce5866c93cf796f38783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkMtKAzEUhoMotVYfoTALEV1MzUkmt6UM3qDgQgV3Ic1k2pS51GSm4ts74lBX58D38R_-g9Ac8AIw8NuIMSEpI4Reg7qhnACk4ghNASuRcsk-jtH0oJyisxi3GGOBQU3QhHImCKNTBHnwnbemSkwbhiWJnWva6OMiee3D3u9_SVMktWnM2tWu6c7RSWmq6C7GOUPvD_dv-VO6fHl8zu-W6YZw3qVsVYI1snBcMWYzLCkXjmdUrZgk0mCDC5AlkyajQKxjknOrqC2F4iWVQtIZuvrL3YX2s3ex07WP1lWVaVzbRy2HL0jGyCDOR7Ff1a7Qu-BrE7712HHglyM3cShaBtNYHw-aoJJSAf_3Nn69-fLB6VibqhpCQW87G1WmM80A0x8jbmyx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>81018552</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Critical aortic stenosis. Survival and management</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Pelech, AN ; Dyck, JD ; Trusler, GA ; Williams, WG ; Olley, PM ; Rowe, RD ; Freedom, RM</creator><creatorcontrib>Pelech, AN ; Dyck, JD ; Trusler, GA ; Williams, WG ; Olley, PM ; Rowe, RD ; Freedom, RM</creatorcontrib><description>The factors associated with survival in 40 neonates (age less than 28 days) with critical aortic stenosis undergoing either open (22 patients) or closed (18 patients) transventricular aortic valvotomy were reviewed. Significant adverse correlates with survival included evidence of poor perfusion preoperatively (low pH, greater than Grade 2/6 soft ejection systolic murmur) and marked congestive heart failure (hepatomegaly, cardiomegaly, elevated left atrial pressure). Congenital mitral stenosis (anulus less than 11 mm), a small aortic anulus (less than 6.5 mm), and failure to achieve an adequate aortic orifice (greater than 6 mm), at operation were identified as factors associated with increased mortality. Initial perioperative survival was better with closed aortic valvotomy. However, there was no significant difference in overall operative survival between closed (9/18, 50%) and open (8/22, 36%) aortic valvotomy (p = 0.26). The incidence of early reoperation (less than 1 year of age) was greater in perioperative survivors undergoing closed valvotomy (7/13, 54%) rather than open valvotomy (1/10, 10%) (p less than 0.05). In conclusion, long-term survival among patients with critical neonatal aortic valve stenosis remains disturbingly low (13/40, 32%) and has not significantly improved over the past 20 years.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5223</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-685X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5223(19)36211-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3657253</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JTCSAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: AATS/WTSA</publisher><subject>Aortic Valve - surgery ; Aortic Valve Stenosis - mortality ; Aortic Valve Stenosis - physiopathology ; Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiac Catheterization ; Cardiology. Vascular system ; Congenital heart diseases. Malformations of the aorta, pulmonary vessels and vena cava ; Echocardiography ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Heart ; Hemodynamics ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Methods ; Mitral Valve Insufficiency - complications ; Reoperation ; Retrospective Studies</subject><ispartof>The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 1987-10, Vol.94 (4), p.510-517</ispartof><rights>1988 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=7383371$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3657253$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pelech, AN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dyck, JD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trusler, GA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, WG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olley, PM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowe, RD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freedom, RM</creatorcontrib><title>Critical aortic stenosis. Survival and management</title><title>The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery</title><addtitle>J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg</addtitle><description>The factors associated with survival in 40 neonates (age less than 28 days) with critical aortic stenosis undergoing either open (22 patients) or closed (18 patients) transventricular aortic valvotomy were reviewed. Significant adverse correlates with survival included evidence of poor perfusion preoperatively (low pH, greater than Grade 2/6 soft ejection systolic murmur) and marked congestive heart failure (hepatomegaly, cardiomegaly, elevated left atrial pressure). Congenital mitral stenosis (anulus less than 11 mm), a small aortic anulus (less than 6.5 mm), and failure to achieve an adequate aortic orifice (greater than 6 mm), at operation were identified as factors associated with increased mortality. Initial perioperative survival was better with closed aortic valvotomy. However, there was no significant difference in overall operative survival between closed (9/18, 50%) and open (8/22, 36%) aortic valvotomy (p = 0.26). The incidence of early reoperation (less than 1 year of age) was greater in perioperative survivors undergoing closed valvotomy (7/13, 54%) rather than open valvotomy (1/10, 10%) (p less than 0.05). In conclusion, long-term survival among patients with critical neonatal aortic valve stenosis remains disturbingly low (13/40, 32%) and has not significantly improved over the past 20 years.</description><subject>Aortic Valve - surgery</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Stenosis - mortality</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Stenosis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiac Catheterization</subject><subject>Cardiology. Vascular system</subject><subject>Congenital heart diseases. Malformations of the aorta, pulmonary vessels and vena cava</subject><subject>Echocardiography</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Heart</subject><subject>Hemodynamics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Mitral Valve Insufficiency - complications</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><issn>0022-5223</issn><issn>1097-685X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1987</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkMtKAzEUhoMotVYfoTALEV1MzUkmt6UM3qDgQgV3Ic1k2pS51GSm4ts74lBX58D38R_-g9Ac8AIw8NuIMSEpI4Reg7qhnACk4ghNASuRcsk-jtH0oJyisxi3GGOBQU3QhHImCKNTBHnwnbemSkwbhiWJnWva6OMiee3D3u9_SVMktWnM2tWu6c7RSWmq6C7GOUPvD_dv-VO6fHl8zu-W6YZw3qVsVYI1snBcMWYzLCkXjmdUrZgk0mCDC5AlkyajQKxjknOrqC2F4iWVQtIZuvrL3YX2s3ex07WP1lWVaVzbRy2HL0jGyCDOR7Ff1a7Qu-BrE7712HHglyM3cShaBtNYHw-aoJJSAf_3Nn69-fLB6VibqhpCQW87G1WmM80A0x8jbmyx</recordid><startdate>19871001</startdate><enddate>19871001</enddate><creator>Pelech, AN</creator><creator>Dyck, JD</creator><creator>Trusler, GA</creator><creator>Williams, WG</creator><creator>Olley, PM</creator><creator>Rowe, RD</creator><creator>Freedom, RM</creator><general>AATS/WTSA</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19871001</creationdate><title>Critical aortic stenosis. Survival and management</title><author>Pelech, AN ; Dyck, JD ; Trusler, GA ; Williams, WG ; Olley, PM ; Rowe, RD ; Freedom, RM</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-h266t-5bf1ca8de6955c408367e6439b5828a0a0d18f58a4312ce5866c93cf796f38783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1987</creationdate><topic>Aortic Valve - surgery</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Stenosis - mortality</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Stenosis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiac Catheterization</topic><topic>Cardiology. Vascular system</topic><topic>Congenital heart diseases. Malformations of the aorta, pulmonary vessels and vena cava</topic><topic>Echocardiography</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Heart</topic><topic>Hemodynamics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Mitral Valve Insufficiency - complications</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pelech, AN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dyck, JD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trusler, GA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, WG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olley, PM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowe, RD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freedom, RM</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pelech, AN</au><au>Dyck, JD</au><au>Trusler, GA</au><au>Williams, WG</au><au>Olley, PM</au><au>Rowe, RD</au><au>Freedom, RM</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Critical aortic stenosis. Survival and management</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg</addtitle><date>1987-10-01</date><risdate>1987</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>510</spage><epage>517</epage><pages>510-517</pages><issn>0022-5223</issn><eissn>1097-685X</eissn><coden>JTCSAQ</coden><abstract>The factors associated with survival in 40 neonates (age less than 28 days) with critical aortic stenosis undergoing either open (22 patients) or closed (18 patients) transventricular aortic valvotomy were reviewed. Significant adverse correlates with survival included evidence of poor perfusion preoperatively (low pH, greater than Grade 2/6 soft ejection systolic murmur) and marked congestive heart failure (hepatomegaly, cardiomegaly, elevated left atrial pressure). Congenital mitral stenosis (anulus less than 11 mm), a small aortic anulus (less than 6.5 mm), and failure to achieve an adequate aortic orifice (greater than 6 mm), at operation were identified as factors associated with increased mortality. Initial perioperative survival was better with closed aortic valvotomy. However, there was no significant difference in overall operative survival between closed (9/18, 50%) and open (8/22, 36%) aortic valvotomy (p = 0.26). The incidence of early reoperation (less than 1 year of age) was greater in perioperative survivors undergoing closed valvotomy (7/13, 54%) rather than open valvotomy (1/10, 10%) (p less than 0.05). In conclusion, long-term survival among patients with critical neonatal aortic valve stenosis remains disturbingly low (13/40, 32%) and has not significantly improved over the past 20 years.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><pub>AATS/WTSA</pub><pmid>3657253</pmid><doi>10.1016/s0022-5223(19)36211-7</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-5223
ispartof The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 1987-10, Vol.94 (4), p.510-517
issn 0022-5223
1097-685X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_81018552
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Aortic Valve - surgery
Aortic Valve Stenosis - mortality
Aortic Valve Stenosis - physiopathology
Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery
Biological and medical sciences
Cardiac Catheterization
Cardiology. Vascular system
Congenital heart diseases. Malformations of the aorta, pulmonary vessels and vena cava
Echocardiography
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Heart
Hemodynamics
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Male
Medical sciences
Methods
Mitral Valve Insufficiency - complications
Reoperation
Retrospective Studies
title Critical aortic stenosis. Survival and management
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T17%3A26%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Critical%20aortic%20stenosis.%20Survival%20and%20management&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20thoracic%20and%20cardiovascular%20surgery&rft.au=Pelech,%20AN&rft.date=1987-10-01&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=510&rft.epage=517&rft.pages=510-517&rft.issn=0022-5223&rft.eissn=1097-685X&rft.coden=JTCSAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/s0022-5223(19)36211-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E81018552%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=81018552&rft_id=info:pmid/3657253&rfr_iscdi=true