Conventional and Rapid Methods for Yeast Identification

Identification of yeasts depends on data obtained from morphological features and physiological characteristics. This article reviews the commonly used conventional methods for the identification of yeast to set the stage for a critical review of rapid systems for yeast identification. Comparative a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:CRC critical reviews in microbiology 1987, Vol.14 (4), p.273-289
Hauptverfasser: Sheree Lin, C. C., Fung, Daniel Y. C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 289
container_issue 4
container_start_page 273
container_title CRC critical reviews in microbiology
container_volume 14
creator Sheree Lin, C. C.
Fung, Daniel Y. C.
description Identification of yeasts depends on data obtained from morphological features and physiological characteristics. This article reviews the commonly used conventional methods for the identification of yeast to set the stage for a critical review of rapid systems for yeast identification. Comparative analyses of percentage agreement of API 20C, Uni-Yeast Tek, Minitek, Mycotube, Micro-Drop, Auxodisk, Iatron, Autobac 1, AMS, Abbott MS-2, and Abbott Quantum 11 against the conventional method and, in some cases, against each other are tabulated. Gas liquid chromatography method, enzyme method, MUG, and the Fung's mini-system are also mentioned as possible rapid methods for yeast identification. The purpose of this review is to update the rapidly expanding information concerning diagnostic kits and systems for yeast identification and analyze some of the advantages, disadvantages and potential uses of rapid systems of yeast identification.
doi_str_mv 10.3109/10408418709104441
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_81017097</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>81017097</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-d342f373d8fe8fa6754c93f942a6a1362ab443ee49b94826743916c396c6fd3f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kVtLAzEQhYMoWi8_wAdhH8S31WQzzSboixRvUBFEQZ-WaS50ZbupyVbpvzeltSBCn2bgfGeYOUPIMaPnnFF1wShQCUyWVKUWgG2RHuuDyktZyO3UJz1PwNse2Y_xg1IqCujvkl3OqeRM9Eg58O2Xbbvat9hk2JrsGae1yR5tN_YmZs6H7N1i7LIHs8BcrXEBH5Idh020R6t6QF5vb14G9_nw6e5hcD3MNXDa5YZD4XjJjXRWOhRlH7TiTkGBAhkXBY4AuLWgRgpkIUrgignNldDCGe74ATlbzp0G_zmzsasmddS2abC1fhYryShL15cJZEtQBx9jsK6ahnqCYV4xWi3Cqv6FlTwnq-Gz0cSatWOVTtJPVzpGjY0L2Oo6rrESQAroJ-xqidVtimuC3z40pupw3vjw6-Gbtrj8Yx9bbLqxxmCrDz8L6S9xww0_zI-UqQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>81017097</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Conventional and Rapid Methods for Yeast Identification</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Sheree Lin, C. C. ; Fung, Daniel Y. C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sheree Lin, C. C. ; Fung, Daniel Y. C.</creatorcontrib><description>Identification of yeasts depends on data obtained from morphological features and physiological characteristics. This article reviews the commonly used conventional methods for the identification of yeast to set the stage for a critical review of rapid systems for yeast identification. Comparative analyses of percentage agreement of API 20C, Uni-Yeast Tek, Minitek, Mycotube, Micro-Drop, Auxodisk, Iatron, Autobac 1, AMS, Abbott MS-2, and Abbott Quantum 11 against the conventional method and, in some cases, against each other are tabulated. Gas liquid chromatography method, enzyme method, MUG, and the Fung's mini-system are also mentioned as possible rapid methods for yeast identification. The purpose of this review is to update the rapidly expanding information concerning diagnostic kits and systems for yeast identification and analyze some of the advantages, disadvantages and potential uses of rapid systems of yeast identification.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1040-841X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0045-6454</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1549-7828</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3109/10408418709104441</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3308316</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cleveland, OH: Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Biology of microorganisms of confirmed or potential industrial interest ; Biotechnology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Isolation and description ; Microbiology ; Mission oriented research ; Mycology ; Mycology - methods ; Reagent Kits, Diagnostic ; Systematics ; Yeasts - classification ; Yeasts - isolation &amp; purification</subject><ispartof>CRC critical reviews in microbiology, 1987, Vol.14 (4), p.273-289</ispartof><rights>1987 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 1987</rights><rights>1988 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-d342f373d8fe8fa6754c93f942a6a1362ab443ee49b94826743916c396c6fd3f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-d342f373d8fe8fa6754c93f942a6a1362ab443ee49b94826743916c396c6fd3f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.3109/10408418709104441$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformahealthcare$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/10408418709104441$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformahealthcare$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4022,27922,27923,27924,61220,61401</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=7448645$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3308316$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sheree Lin, C. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fung, Daniel Y. C.</creatorcontrib><title>Conventional and Rapid Methods for Yeast Identification</title><title>CRC critical reviews in microbiology</title><addtitle>Crit Rev Microbiol</addtitle><description>Identification of yeasts depends on data obtained from morphological features and physiological characteristics. This article reviews the commonly used conventional methods for the identification of yeast to set the stage for a critical review of rapid systems for yeast identification. Comparative analyses of percentage agreement of API 20C, Uni-Yeast Tek, Minitek, Mycotube, Micro-Drop, Auxodisk, Iatron, Autobac 1, AMS, Abbott MS-2, and Abbott Quantum 11 against the conventional method and, in some cases, against each other are tabulated. Gas liquid chromatography method, enzyme method, MUG, and the Fung's mini-system are also mentioned as possible rapid methods for yeast identification. The purpose of this review is to update the rapidly expanding information concerning diagnostic kits and systems for yeast identification and analyze some of the advantages, disadvantages and potential uses of rapid systems of yeast identification.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biology of microorganisms of confirmed or potential industrial interest</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Isolation and description</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Mission oriented research</subject><subject>Mycology</subject><subject>Mycology - methods</subject><subject>Reagent Kits, Diagnostic</subject><subject>Systematics</subject><subject>Yeasts - classification</subject><subject>Yeasts - isolation &amp; purification</subject><issn>1040-841X</issn><issn>0045-6454</issn><issn>1549-7828</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1987</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kVtLAzEQhYMoWi8_wAdhH8S31WQzzSboixRvUBFEQZ-WaS50ZbupyVbpvzeltSBCn2bgfGeYOUPIMaPnnFF1wShQCUyWVKUWgG2RHuuDyktZyO3UJz1PwNse2Y_xg1IqCujvkl3OqeRM9Eg58O2Xbbvat9hk2JrsGae1yR5tN_YmZs6H7N1i7LIHs8BcrXEBH5Idh020R6t6QF5vb14G9_nw6e5hcD3MNXDa5YZD4XjJjXRWOhRlH7TiTkGBAhkXBY4AuLWgRgpkIUrgignNldDCGe74ATlbzp0G_zmzsasmddS2abC1fhYryShL15cJZEtQBx9jsK6ahnqCYV4xWi3Cqv6FlTwnq-Gz0cSatWOVTtJPVzpGjY0L2Oo6rrESQAroJ-xqidVtimuC3z40pupw3vjw6-Gbtrj8Yx9bbLqxxmCrDz8L6S9xww0_zI-UqQ</recordid><startdate>1987</startdate><enddate>1987</enddate><creator>Sheree Lin, C. C.</creator><creator>Fung, Daniel Y. C.</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Chemical Rubber Co</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1987</creationdate><title>Conventional and Rapid Methods for Yeast Identification</title><author>Sheree Lin, C. C. ; Fung, Daniel Y. C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-d342f373d8fe8fa6754c93f942a6a1362ab443ee49b94826743916c396c6fd3f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1987</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biology of microorganisms of confirmed or potential industrial interest</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Isolation and description</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Mission oriented research</topic><topic>Mycology</topic><topic>Mycology - methods</topic><topic>Reagent Kits, Diagnostic</topic><topic>Systematics</topic><topic>Yeasts - classification</topic><topic>Yeasts - isolation &amp; purification</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sheree Lin, C. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fung, Daniel Y. C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>CRC critical reviews in microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sheree Lin, C. C.</au><au>Fung, Daniel Y. C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Conventional and Rapid Methods for Yeast Identification</atitle><jtitle>CRC critical reviews in microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>Crit Rev Microbiol</addtitle><date>1987</date><risdate>1987</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>273</spage><epage>289</epage><pages>273-289</pages><issn>1040-841X</issn><issn>0045-6454</issn><eissn>1549-7828</eissn><abstract>Identification of yeasts depends on data obtained from morphological features and physiological characteristics. This article reviews the commonly used conventional methods for the identification of yeast to set the stage for a critical review of rapid systems for yeast identification. Comparative analyses of percentage agreement of API 20C, Uni-Yeast Tek, Minitek, Mycotube, Micro-Drop, Auxodisk, Iatron, Autobac 1, AMS, Abbott MS-2, and Abbott Quantum 11 against the conventional method and, in some cases, against each other are tabulated. Gas liquid chromatography method, enzyme method, MUG, and the Fung's mini-system are also mentioned as possible rapid methods for yeast identification. The purpose of this review is to update the rapidly expanding information concerning diagnostic kits and systems for yeast identification and analyze some of the advantages, disadvantages and potential uses of rapid systems of yeast identification.</abstract><cop>Cleveland, OH</cop><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><pmid>3308316</pmid><doi>10.3109/10408418709104441</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1040-841X
ispartof CRC critical reviews in microbiology, 1987, Vol.14 (4), p.273-289
issn 1040-841X
0045-6454
1549-7828
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_81017097
source MEDLINE; Taylor & Francis Journals Complete
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Biology of microorganisms of confirmed or potential industrial interest
Biotechnology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Isolation and description
Microbiology
Mission oriented research
Mycology
Mycology - methods
Reagent Kits, Diagnostic
Systematics
Yeasts - classification
Yeasts - isolation & purification
title Conventional and Rapid Methods for Yeast Identification
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T00%3A14%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Conventional%20and%20Rapid%20Methods%20for%20Yeast%20Identification&rft.jtitle=CRC%20critical%20reviews%20in%20microbiology&rft.au=Sheree%20Lin,%20C.%20C.&rft.date=1987&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=273&rft.epage=289&rft.pages=273-289&rft.issn=1040-841X&rft.eissn=1549-7828&rft_id=info:doi/10.3109/10408418709104441&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E81017097%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=81017097&rft_id=info:pmid/3308316&rfr_iscdi=true