Conventional and Rapid Methods for Yeast Identification
Identification of yeasts depends on data obtained from morphological features and physiological characteristics. This article reviews the commonly used conventional methods for the identification of yeast to set the stage for a critical review of rapid systems for yeast identification. Comparative a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | CRC critical reviews in microbiology 1987, Vol.14 (4), p.273-289 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 289 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 273 |
container_title | CRC critical reviews in microbiology |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Sheree Lin, C. C. Fung, Daniel Y. C. |
description | Identification of yeasts depends on data obtained from morphological features and physiological characteristics. This article reviews the commonly used conventional methods for the identification of yeast to set the stage for a critical review of rapid systems for yeast identification. Comparative analyses of percentage agreement of API 20C, Uni-Yeast Tek, Minitek, Mycotube, Micro-Drop, Auxodisk, Iatron, Autobac 1, AMS, Abbott MS-2, and Abbott Quantum 11 against the conventional method and, in some cases, against each other are tabulated. Gas liquid chromatography method, enzyme method, MUG, and the Fung's mini-system are also mentioned as possible rapid methods for yeast identification. The purpose of this review is to update the rapidly expanding information concerning diagnostic kits and systems for yeast identification and analyze some of the advantages, disadvantages and potential uses of rapid systems of yeast identification. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3109/10408418709104441 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_81017097</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>81017097</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-d342f373d8fe8fa6754c93f942a6a1362ab443ee49b94826743916c396c6fd3f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kVtLAzEQhYMoWi8_wAdhH8S31WQzzSboixRvUBFEQZ-WaS50ZbupyVbpvzeltSBCn2bgfGeYOUPIMaPnnFF1wShQCUyWVKUWgG2RHuuDyktZyO3UJz1PwNse2Y_xg1IqCujvkl3OqeRM9Eg58O2Xbbvat9hk2JrsGae1yR5tN_YmZs6H7N1i7LIHs8BcrXEBH5Idh020R6t6QF5vb14G9_nw6e5hcD3MNXDa5YZD4XjJjXRWOhRlH7TiTkGBAhkXBY4AuLWgRgpkIUrgignNldDCGe74ATlbzp0G_zmzsasmddS2abC1fhYryShL15cJZEtQBx9jsK6ahnqCYV4xWi3Cqv6FlTwnq-Gz0cSatWOVTtJPVzpGjY0L2Oo6rrESQAroJ-xqidVtimuC3z40pupw3vjw6-Gbtrj8Yx9bbLqxxmCrDz8L6S9xww0_zI-UqQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>81017097</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Conventional and Rapid Methods for Yeast Identification</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Taylor & Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Sheree Lin, C. C. ; Fung, Daniel Y. C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sheree Lin, C. C. ; Fung, Daniel Y. C.</creatorcontrib><description>Identification of yeasts depends on data obtained from morphological features and physiological characteristics. This article reviews the commonly used conventional methods for the identification of yeast to set the stage for a critical review of rapid systems for yeast identification. Comparative analyses of percentage agreement of API 20C, Uni-Yeast Tek, Minitek, Mycotube, Micro-Drop, Auxodisk, Iatron, Autobac 1, AMS, Abbott MS-2, and Abbott Quantum 11 against the conventional method and, in some cases, against each other are tabulated. Gas liquid chromatography method, enzyme method, MUG, and the Fung's mini-system are also mentioned as possible rapid methods for yeast identification. The purpose of this review is to update the rapidly expanding information concerning diagnostic kits and systems for yeast identification and analyze some of the advantages, disadvantages and potential uses of rapid systems of yeast identification.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1040-841X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0045-6454</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1549-7828</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3109/10408418709104441</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3308316</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cleveland, OH: Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Biology of microorganisms of confirmed or potential industrial interest ; Biotechnology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Isolation and description ; Microbiology ; Mission oriented research ; Mycology ; Mycology - methods ; Reagent Kits, Diagnostic ; Systematics ; Yeasts - classification ; Yeasts - isolation & purification</subject><ispartof>CRC critical reviews in microbiology, 1987, Vol.14 (4), p.273-289</ispartof><rights>1987 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 1987</rights><rights>1988 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-d342f373d8fe8fa6754c93f942a6a1362ab443ee49b94826743916c396c6fd3f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-d342f373d8fe8fa6754c93f942a6a1362ab443ee49b94826743916c396c6fd3f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.3109/10408418709104441$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformahealthcare$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/10408418709104441$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformahealthcare$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4022,27922,27923,27924,61220,61401</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=7448645$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3308316$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sheree Lin, C. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fung, Daniel Y. C.</creatorcontrib><title>Conventional and Rapid Methods for Yeast Identification</title><title>CRC critical reviews in microbiology</title><addtitle>Crit Rev Microbiol</addtitle><description>Identification of yeasts depends on data obtained from morphological features and physiological characteristics. This article reviews the commonly used conventional methods for the identification of yeast to set the stage for a critical review of rapid systems for yeast identification. Comparative analyses of percentage agreement of API 20C, Uni-Yeast Tek, Minitek, Mycotube, Micro-Drop, Auxodisk, Iatron, Autobac 1, AMS, Abbott MS-2, and Abbott Quantum 11 against the conventional method and, in some cases, against each other are tabulated. Gas liquid chromatography method, enzyme method, MUG, and the Fung's mini-system are also mentioned as possible rapid methods for yeast identification. The purpose of this review is to update the rapidly expanding information concerning diagnostic kits and systems for yeast identification and analyze some of the advantages, disadvantages and potential uses of rapid systems of yeast identification.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biology of microorganisms of confirmed or potential industrial interest</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Isolation and description</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Mission oriented research</subject><subject>Mycology</subject><subject>Mycology - methods</subject><subject>Reagent Kits, Diagnostic</subject><subject>Systematics</subject><subject>Yeasts - classification</subject><subject>Yeasts - isolation & purification</subject><issn>1040-841X</issn><issn>0045-6454</issn><issn>1549-7828</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1987</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kVtLAzEQhYMoWi8_wAdhH8S31WQzzSboixRvUBFEQZ-WaS50ZbupyVbpvzeltSBCn2bgfGeYOUPIMaPnnFF1wShQCUyWVKUWgG2RHuuDyktZyO3UJz1PwNse2Y_xg1IqCujvkl3OqeRM9Eg58O2Xbbvat9hk2JrsGae1yR5tN_YmZs6H7N1i7LIHs8BcrXEBH5Idh020R6t6QF5vb14G9_nw6e5hcD3MNXDa5YZD4XjJjXRWOhRlH7TiTkGBAhkXBY4AuLWgRgpkIUrgignNldDCGe74ATlbzp0G_zmzsasmddS2abC1fhYryShL15cJZEtQBx9jsK6ahnqCYV4xWi3Cqv6FlTwnq-Gz0cSatWOVTtJPVzpGjY0L2Oo6rrESQAroJ-xqidVtimuC3z40pupw3vjw6-Gbtrj8Yx9bbLqxxmCrDz8L6S9xww0_zI-UqQ</recordid><startdate>1987</startdate><enddate>1987</enddate><creator>Sheree Lin, C. C.</creator><creator>Fung, Daniel Y. C.</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Chemical Rubber Co</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1987</creationdate><title>Conventional and Rapid Methods for Yeast Identification</title><author>Sheree Lin, C. C. ; Fung, Daniel Y. C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-d342f373d8fe8fa6754c93f942a6a1362ab443ee49b94826743916c396c6fd3f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1987</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biology of microorganisms of confirmed or potential industrial interest</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Isolation and description</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Mission oriented research</topic><topic>Mycology</topic><topic>Mycology - methods</topic><topic>Reagent Kits, Diagnostic</topic><topic>Systematics</topic><topic>Yeasts - classification</topic><topic>Yeasts - isolation & purification</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sheree Lin, C. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fung, Daniel Y. C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>CRC critical reviews in microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sheree Lin, C. C.</au><au>Fung, Daniel Y. C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Conventional and Rapid Methods for Yeast Identification</atitle><jtitle>CRC critical reviews in microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>Crit Rev Microbiol</addtitle><date>1987</date><risdate>1987</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>273</spage><epage>289</epage><pages>273-289</pages><issn>1040-841X</issn><issn>0045-6454</issn><eissn>1549-7828</eissn><abstract>Identification of yeasts depends on data obtained from morphological features and physiological characteristics. This article reviews the commonly used conventional methods for the identification of yeast to set the stage for a critical review of rapid systems for yeast identification. Comparative analyses of percentage agreement of API 20C, Uni-Yeast Tek, Minitek, Mycotube, Micro-Drop, Auxodisk, Iatron, Autobac 1, AMS, Abbott MS-2, and Abbott Quantum 11 against the conventional method and, in some cases, against each other are tabulated. Gas liquid chromatography method, enzyme method, MUG, and the Fung's mini-system are also mentioned as possible rapid methods for yeast identification. The purpose of this review is to update the rapidly expanding information concerning diagnostic kits and systems for yeast identification and analyze some of the advantages, disadvantages and potential uses of rapid systems of yeast identification.</abstract><cop>Cleveland, OH</cop><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><pmid>3308316</pmid><doi>10.3109/10408418709104441</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1040-841X |
ispartof | CRC critical reviews in microbiology, 1987, Vol.14 (4), p.273-289 |
issn | 1040-841X 0045-6454 1549-7828 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_81017097 |
source | MEDLINE; Taylor & Francis Journals Complete |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Biology of microorganisms of confirmed or potential industrial interest Biotechnology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Isolation and description Microbiology Mission oriented research Mycology Mycology - methods Reagent Kits, Diagnostic Systematics Yeasts - classification Yeasts - isolation & purification |
title | Conventional and Rapid Methods for Yeast Identification |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T00%3A14%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Conventional%20and%20Rapid%20Methods%20for%20Yeast%20Identification&rft.jtitle=CRC%20critical%20reviews%20in%20microbiology&rft.au=Sheree%20Lin,%20C.%20C.&rft.date=1987&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=273&rft.epage=289&rft.pages=273-289&rft.issn=1040-841X&rft.eissn=1549-7828&rft_id=info:doi/10.3109/10408418709104441&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E81017097%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=81017097&rft_id=info:pmid/3308316&rfr_iscdi=true |