A functional analysis of shoulder fusions

Seventeen shoulder fusions with relatively normal musculature were analyzed with particular interest to the ability of the fused extremity to perform activities of daily living. Joints fused for paralysis were excluded. No patient was able to work overhead or with arms abducted as required for activ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical orthopaedics and related research 1987-10, Vol.223 (223), p.65-76
Hauptverfasser: Hawkins, R J, Neer, 2nd, C S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 76
container_issue 223
container_start_page 65
container_title Clinical orthopaedics and related research
container_volume 223
creator Hawkins, R J
Neer, 2nd, C S
description Seventeen shoulder fusions with relatively normal musculature were analyzed with particular interest to the ability of the fused extremity to perform activities of daily living. Joints fused for paralysis were excluded. No patient was able to work overhead or with arms abducted as required for activities such as hammering, house painting, or climbing a ladder. Many patients had difficulty functioning at head level for hygienic purposes. Many were unable to perform functions behind the back, although waist-level function approached normal. The position of rotation was the most critical factor in approaching optimum function. Fusions in positions of internal rotation reduced the ability to comb hair, wash the face, or to otherwise use the hand at head level. Fusion in a position of excessive external rotation made it impossible for the patient to reach the opposite axilla or belt buckle. There was a range of acceptability of abduction of forward flexion that did not appear to compromise the eventual functional result. The recommended position is 25 degrees to 40 degrees abduction, 20 degrees to 30 degrees flexion, and 25 degrees to 30 degrees of internal rotation. Even at the ideal position, shoulder fusion produces significant limitations in function. For patients with painful, nonfunctional shoulders who need arthrodesis, these limitations should be clearly discussed, along with the pros and cons of surgical treatment in general.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00003086-198710000-00009
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_81007953</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>81007953</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-791cf0b63972ec4e3aeb2d1d849b34cc59dd060f27a704a546a9143697595e8a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UE1PwzAMzQE0xuAnIPWExKGQNEkTH6eJL2kSF5C4RWk-RFG7jro97N-TsjIf_GS_Z1t-hGSM3jMK6oGm4FSXOQOt2FTlU4Izspwgh4J9XpBLxO9JKGSxIAteykKCWJK7dRbHnRvqbmebzKZ0wBqzLmb41Y2ND33iMbF4Rc6jbTBcz7giH0-P75uXfPv2_LpZb3PHGR1yBcxFWpUcVBGcCNyGqvDMawEVF85J8J6WNBbKKiqsFKUFJngJSoIM2vIVuT3u3ffdzxhwMG2NLjSN3YVuRKPTiwokT0J9FLq-Q-xDNPu-bm1_MIyayRnz74w5OfPXgjR6M98Yqzb40-BsC_8FoctfAg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>81007953</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A functional analysis of shoulder fusions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Hawkins, R J ; Neer, 2nd, C S</creator><creatorcontrib>Hawkins, R J ; Neer, 2nd, C S</creatorcontrib><description>Seventeen shoulder fusions with relatively normal musculature were analyzed with particular interest to the ability of the fused extremity to perform activities of daily living. Joints fused for paralysis were excluded. No patient was able to work overhead or with arms abducted as required for activities such as hammering, house painting, or climbing a ladder. Many patients had difficulty functioning at head level for hygienic purposes. Many were unable to perform functions behind the back, although waist-level function approached normal. The position of rotation was the most critical factor in approaching optimum function. Fusions in positions of internal rotation reduced the ability to comb hair, wash the face, or to otherwise use the hand at head level. Fusion in a position of excessive external rotation made it impossible for the patient to reach the opposite axilla or belt buckle. There was a range of acceptability of abduction of forward flexion that did not appear to compromise the eventual functional result. The recommended position is 25 degrees to 40 degrees abduction, 20 degrees to 30 degrees flexion, and 25 degrees to 30 degrees of internal rotation. Even at the ideal position, shoulder fusion produces significant limitations in function. For patients with painful, nonfunctional shoulders who need arthrodesis, these limitations should be clearly discussed, along with the pros and cons of surgical treatment in general.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-921X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00003086-198710000-00009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3652594</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Activities of Daily Living ; Adult ; Aged ; Arthrodesis ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Osteoarthritis - physiopathology ; Osteoarthritis - surgery ; Shoulder Joint - physiopathology ; Shoulder Joint - surgery ; Space life sciences ; Sports ; Work Capacity Evaluation</subject><ispartof>Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 1987-10, Vol.223 (223), p.65-76</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-791cf0b63972ec4e3aeb2d1d849b34cc59dd060f27a704a546a9143697595e8a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3652594$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hawkins, R J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neer, 2nd, C S</creatorcontrib><title>A functional analysis of shoulder fusions</title><title>Clinical orthopaedics and related research</title><addtitle>Clin Orthop Relat Res</addtitle><description>Seventeen shoulder fusions with relatively normal musculature were analyzed with particular interest to the ability of the fused extremity to perform activities of daily living. Joints fused for paralysis were excluded. No patient was able to work overhead or with arms abducted as required for activities such as hammering, house painting, or climbing a ladder. Many patients had difficulty functioning at head level for hygienic purposes. Many were unable to perform functions behind the back, although waist-level function approached normal. The position of rotation was the most critical factor in approaching optimum function. Fusions in positions of internal rotation reduced the ability to comb hair, wash the face, or to otherwise use the hand at head level. Fusion in a position of excessive external rotation made it impossible for the patient to reach the opposite axilla or belt buckle. There was a range of acceptability of abduction of forward flexion that did not appear to compromise the eventual functional result. The recommended position is 25 degrees to 40 degrees abduction, 20 degrees to 30 degrees flexion, and 25 degrees to 30 degrees of internal rotation. Even at the ideal position, shoulder fusion produces significant limitations in function. For patients with painful, nonfunctional shoulders who need arthrodesis, these limitations should be clearly discussed, along with the pros and cons of surgical treatment in general.</description><subject>Activities of Daily Living</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Arthrodesis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis - surgery</subject><subject>Shoulder Joint - physiopathology</subject><subject>Shoulder Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Space life sciences</subject><subject>Sports</subject><subject>Work Capacity Evaluation</subject><issn>0009-921X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1987</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9UE1PwzAMzQE0xuAnIPWExKGQNEkTH6eJL2kSF5C4RWk-RFG7jro97N-TsjIf_GS_Z1t-hGSM3jMK6oGm4FSXOQOt2FTlU4Izspwgh4J9XpBLxO9JKGSxIAteykKCWJK7dRbHnRvqbmebzKZ0wBqzLmb41Y2ND33iMbF4Rc6jbTBcz7giH0-P75uXfPv2_LpZb3PHGR1yBcxFWpUcVBGcCNyGqvDMawEVF85J8J6WNBbKKiqsFKUFJngJSoIM2vIVuT3u3ffdzxhwMG2NLjSN3YVuRKPTiwokT0J9FLq-Q-xDNPu-bm1_MIyayRnz74w5OfPXgjR6M98Yqzb40-BsC_8FoctfAg</recordid><startdate>19871001</startdate><enddate>19871001</enddate><creator>Hawkins, R J</creator><creator>Neer, 2nd, C S</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19871001</creationdate><title>A functional analysis of shoulder fusions</title><author>Hawkins, R J ; Neer, 2nd, C S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-791cf0b63972ec4e3aeb2d1d849b34cc59dd060f27a704a546a9143697595e8a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1987</creationdate><topic>Activities of Daily Living</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Arthrodesis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis - surgery</topic><topic>Shoulder Joint - physiopathology</topic><topic>Shoulder Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Space life sciences</topic><topic>Sports</topic><topic>Work Capacity Evaluation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hawkins, R J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neer, 2nd, C S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical orthopaedics and related research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hawkins, R J</au><au>Neer, 2nd, C S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A functional analysis of shoulder fusions</atitle><jtitle>Clinical orthopaedics and related research</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Orthop Relat Res</addtitle><date>1987-10-01</date><risdate>1987</risdate><volume>223</volume><issue>223</issue><spage>65</spage><epage>76</epage><pages>65-76</pages><issn>0009-921X</issn><abstract>Seventeen shoulder fusions with relatively normal musculature were analyzed with particular interest to the ability of the fused extremity to perform activities of daily living. Joints fused for paralysis were excluded. No patient was able to work overhead or with arms abducted as required for activities such as hammering, house painting, or climbing a ladder. Many patients had difficulty functioning at head level for hygienic purposes. Many were unable to perform functions behind the back, although waist-level function approached normal. The position of rotation was the most critical factor in approaching optimum function. Fusions in positions of internal rotation reduced the ability to comb hair, wash the face, or to otherwise use the hand at head level. Fusion in a position of excessive external rotation made it impossible for the patient to reach the opposite axilla or belt buckle. There was a range of acceptability of abduction of forward flexion that did not appear to compromise the eventual functional result. The recommended position is 25 degrees to 40 degrees abduction, 20 degrees to 30 degrees flexion, and 25 degrees to 30 degrees of internal rotation. Even at the ideal position, shoulder fusion produces significant limitations in function. For patients with painful, nonfunctional shoulders who need arthrodesis, these limitations should be clearly discussed, along with the pros and cons of surgical treatment in general.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>3652594</pmid><doi>10.1097/00003086-198710000-00009</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0009-921X
ispartof Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 1987-10, Vol.223 (223), p.65-76
issn 0009-921X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_81007953
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Activities of Daily Living
Adult
Aged
Arthrodesis
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Osteoarthritis - physiopathology
Osteoarthritis - surgery
Shoulder Joint - physiopathology
Shoulder Joint - surgery
Space life sciences
Sports
Work Capacity Evaluation
title A functional analysis of shoulder fusions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T05%3A56%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20functional%20analysis%20of%20shoulder%20fusions&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20orthopaedics%20and%20related%20research&rft.au=Hawkins,%20R%20J&rft.date=1987-10-01&rft.volume=223&rft.issue=223&rft.spage=65&rft.epage=76&rft.pages=65-76&rft.issn=0009-921X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00003086-198710000-00009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E81007953%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=81007953&rft_id=info:pmid/3652594&rfr_iscdi=true