Inequivalence of substitution pairs in hydroxynaphthaldehyde: A theoretical measurement by intramolecular hydrogen bond strength, aromaticity, and excited‐state intramolecular proton transfer reaction

The inequivalence of substitution pair positions of naphthalene ring has been investigated by a theoretical measurement of hydrogen bond strength, aromaticity, and excited state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT) reaction as the tools in three substituted naphthalene compounds viz 1‐hydroxy‐2‐na...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of computational chemistry 2011-01, Vol.32 (1), p.1-14
Hauptverfasser: Mahanta, Subrata, Paul, Bijan Kumar, Balia Singh, Rupashree, Guchhait, Nikhil
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 14
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Journal of computational chemistry
container_volume 32
creator Mahanta, Subrata
Paul, Bijan Kumar
Balia Singh, Rupashree
Guchhait, Nikhil
description The inequivalence of substitution pair positions of naphthalene ring has been investigated by a theoretical measurement of hydrogen bond strength, aromaticity, and excited state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT) reaction as the tools in three substituted naphthalene compounds viz 1‐hydroxy‐2‐naphthaldehyde (HN12), 2‐hydroxy‐1‐naphthaldehyde (HN21), and 2‐hydroxy‐3‐naphthaldehyde (HN23). The difference in intramolecular hydrogen bond (IMHB) strength clearly reflects the inequivalence of substitution pairs where the calculated IMHB strength is found to be greater for HN12 and HN21 than HN23. The H‐bonding interactions have been explored by calculation of electron density ρ(r) and Laplacian ∇²ρ(r) at the bond critical point using atoms in molecule method and by calculation of interaction between σ* of OH with lone pair of carbonyl oxygen atom using NBO analysis. The ground and excited state potential energy surfaces (PESs) for the proton transfer reaction at HF (6‐31G**) and DFT (B3LYP/6‐31G**) levels are similar for HN12, HN21 and different for HN23. The computed aromaticity of the two rings of naphthalene moiety at B3LYP/6‐31G** method also predicts similarity between HN12 and HN21, but different for HN23.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jcc.21592
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_808461635</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>808461635</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4482-a93990c5d24cd854cefebc2fb7979395f2910c6ec1433a4cd794f228635659883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kk9u1DAUhyMEokNhwQXAYoOQSGs7_-zuqgGGogILpmJ2luO8zHhI7KntwGTHETgXx-AkuKTtohIr28_f-_Tkn5PkKcFHBGN6vFXqiJKC03vJjGBeppxVq_vJDBNOU1YW5CB55P0WY5wVZf4wOaC4pFmZs1ny-8zA5aC_yw6MAmRb5IfaBx2GoK1BO6mdR9qgzdg4ux-N3G3CRnYNxAKcoFMUNmAdBK1kh3qQfnDQgwmoHmNbcLK3Haihk25SrMGg2poG-eDArMPmNZLO9jIKdBjjIV7BPu6h-fPzlw8ywF3PztkQR4s141twyIFUV8M-Th60svPw5Ho9TC7evV3O36fnnxdn89PzVOU5o6nkGedYFQ3NVcOKXEELtaJtXfEqXhUt5QSrEhTJs0xGpuJ5Sykr49sVnLHsMHk5eeMglwP4IHrtFXSdNGAHLxhmeUkiHskXd8itHZyJwwkW7SXPsjxCryZIOeu9g1bsnO6lGwXB4ipeEeMV_-KN7LNr4VD30NySN3lG4HgCfugOxv-bxIf5_EaZTh3aB9jfdkj3TZRVVhXi66eFWK0Wb8rlshAfI_984ltphVw77cXFF4pJFj8byQvMsr-ZSM5u</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>814369334</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inequivalence of substitution pairs in hydroxynaphthaldehyde: A theoretical measurement by intramolecular hydrogen bond strength, aromaticity, and excited‐state intramolecular proton transfer reaction</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Mahanta, Subrata ; Paul, Bijan Kumar ; Balia Singh, Rupashree ; Guchhait, Nikhil</creator><creatorcontrib>Mahanta, Subrata ; Paul, Bijan Kumar ; Balia Singh, Rupashree ; Guchhait, Nikhil</creatorcontrib><description>The inequivalence of substitution pair positions of naphthalene ring has been investigated by a theoretical measurement of hydrogen bond strength, aromaticity, and excited state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT) reaction as the tools in three substituted naphthalene compounds viz 1‐hydroxy‐2‐naphthaldehyde (HN12), 2‐hydroxy‐1‐naphthaldehyde (HN21), and 2‐hydroxy‐3‐naphthaldehyde (HN23). The difference in intramolecular hydrogen bond (IMHB) strength clearly reflects the inequivalence of substitution pairs where the calculated IMHB strength is found to be greater for HN12 and HN21 than HN23. The H‐bonding interactions have been explored by calculation of electron density ρ(r) and Laplacian ∇²ρ(r) at the bond critical point using atoms in molecule method and by calculation of interaction between σ* of OH with lone pair of carbonyl oxygen atom using NBO analysis. The ground and excited state potential energy surfaces (PESs) for the proton transfer reaction at HF (6‐31G**) and DFT (B3LYP/6‐31G**) levels are similar for HN12, HN21 and different for HN23. The computed aromaticity of the two rings of naphthalene moiety at B3LYP/6‐31G** method also predicts similarity between HN12 and HN21, but different for HN23.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0192-8651</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-987X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jcc.21592</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20623648</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCCHDD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>aromaticity ; Chemical compounds ; Chemical reactions ; Computer Simulation ; ESIPT ; Hydrogen Bonding ; Hydrogen bonds ; inequivalence of substitution pair positions in hydroxynaphthaldehydes ; intramolecular hydrogen bond ; Models, Theoretical ; Molecular chemistry ; Molecular Structure ; Naphthalenes - chemistry ; Protons ; Thermodynamics</subject><ispartof>Journal of computational chemistry, 2011-01, Vol.32 (1), p.1-14</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright John Wiley and Sons, Limited Jan 15, 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4482-a93990c5d24cd854cefebc2fb7979395f2910c6ec1433a4cd794f228635659883</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4482-a93990c5d24cd854cefebc2fb7979395f2910c6ec1433a4cd794f228635659883</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjcc.21592$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjcc.21592$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20623648$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mahanta, Subrata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paul, Bijan Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balia Singh, Rupashree</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guchhait, Nikhil</creatorcontrib><title>Inequivalence of substitution pairs in hydroxynaphthaldehyde: A theoretical measurement by intramolecular hydrogen bond strength, aromaticity, and excited‐state intramolecular proton transfer reaction</title><title>Journal of computational chemistry</title><addtitle>J. Comput. Chem</addtitle><description>The inequivalence of substitution pair positions of naphthalene ring has been investigated by a theoretical measurement of hydrogen bond strength, aromaticity, and excited state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT) reaction as the tools in three substituted naphthalene compounds viz 1‐hydroxy‐2‐naphthaldehyde (HN12), 2‐hydroxy‐1‐naphthaldehyde (HN21), and 2‐hydroxy‐3‐naphthaldehyde (HN23). The difference in intramolecular hydrogen bond (IMHB) strength clearly reflects the inequivalence of substitution pairs where the calculated IMHB strength is found to be greater for HN12 and HN21 than HN23. The H‐bonding interactions have been explored by calculation of electron density ρ(r) and Laplacian ∇²ρ(r) at the bond critical point using atoms in molecule method and by calculation of interaction between σ* of OH with lone pair of carbonyl oxygen atom using NBO analysis. The ground and excited state potential energy surfaces (PESs) for the proton transfer reaction at HF (6‐31G**) and DFT (B3LYP/6‐31G**) levels are similar for HN12, HN21 and different for HN23. The computed aromaticity of the two rings of naphthalene moiety at B3LYP/6‐31G** method also predicts similarity between HN12 and HN21, but different for HN23.</description><subject>aromaticity</subject><subject>Chemical compounds</subject><subject>Chemical reactions</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>ESIPT</subject><subject>Hydrogen Bonding</subject><subject>Hydrogen bonds</subject><subject>inequivalence of substitution pair positions in hydroxynaphthaldehydes</subject><subject>intramolecular hydrogen bond</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Molecular chemistry</subject><subject>Molecular Structure</subject><subject>Naphthalenes - chemistry</subject><subject>Protons</subject><subject>Thermodynamics</subject><issn>0192-8651</issn><issn>1096-987X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kk9u1DAUhyMEokNhwQXAYoOQSGs7_-zuqgGGogILpmJ2luO8zHhI7KntwGTHETgXx-AkuKTtohIr28_f-_Tkn5PkKcFHBGN6vFXqiJKC03vJjGBeppxVq_vJDBNOU1YW5CB55P0WY5wVZf4wOaC4pFmZs1ny-8zA5aC_yw6MAmRb5IfaBx2GoK1BO6mdR9qgzdg4ux-N3G3CRnYNxAKcoFMUNmAdBK1kh3qQfnDQgwmoHmNbcLK3Haihk25SrMGg2poG-eDArMPmNZLO9jIKdBjjIV7BPu6h-fPzlw8ywF3PztkQR4s141twyIFUV8M-Th60svPw5Ho9TC7evV3O36fnnxdn89PzVOU5o6nkGedYFQ3NVcOKXEELtaJtXfEqXhUt5QSrEhTJs0xGpuJ5Sykr49sVnLHsMHk5eeMglwP4IHrtFXSdNGAHLxhmeUkiHskXd8itHZyJwwkW7SXPsjxCryZIOeu9g1bsnO6lGwXB4ipeEeMV_-KN7LNr4VD30NySN3lG4HgCfugOxv-bxIf5_EaZTh3aB9jfdkj3TZRVVhXi66eFWK0Wb8rlshAfI_984ltphVw77cXFF4pJFj8byQvMsr-ZSM5u</recordid><startdate>20110115</startdate><enddate>20110115</enddate><creator>Mahanta, Subrata</creator><creator>Paul, Bijan Kumar</creator><creator>Balia Singh, Rupashree</creator><creator>Guchhait, Nikhil</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110115</creationdate><title>Inequivalence of substitution pairs in hydroxynaphthaldehyde: A theoretical measurement by intramolecular hydrogen bond strength, aromaticity, and excited‐state intramolecular proton transfer reaction</title><author>Mahanta, Subrata ; Paul, Bijan Kumar ; Balia Singh, Rupashree ; Guchhait, Nikhil</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4482-a93990c5d24cd854cefebc2fb7979395f2910c6ec1433a4cd794f228635659883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>aromaticity</topic><topic>Chemical compounds</topic><topic>Chemical reactions</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>ESIPT</topic><topic>Hydrogen Bonding</topic><topic>Hydrogen bonds</topic><topic>inequivalence of substitution pair positions in hydroxynaphthaldehydes</topic><topic>intramolecular hydrogen bond</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Molecular chemistry</topic><topic>Molecular Structure</topic><topic>Naphthalenes - chemistry</topic><topic>Protons</topic><topic>Thermodynamics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mahanta, Subrata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paul, Bijan Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balia Singh, Rupashree</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guchhait, Nikhil</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of computational chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mahanta, Subrata</au><au>Paul, Bijan Kumar</au><au>Balia Singh, Rupashree</au><au>Guchhait, Nikhil</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inequivalence of substitution pairs in hydroxynaphthaldehyde: A theoretical measurement by intramolecular hydrogen bond strength, aromaticity, and excited‐state intramolecular proton transfer reaction</atitle><jtitle>Journal of computational chemistry</jtitle><addtitle>J. Comput. Chem</addtitle><date>2011-01-15</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>14</epage><pages>1-14</pages><issn>0192-8651</issn><eissn>1096-987X</eissn><coden>JCCHDD</coden><abstract>The inequivalence of substitution pair positions of naphthalene ring has been investigated by a theoretical measurement of hydrogen bond strength, aromaticity, and excited state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT) reaction as the tools in three substituted naphthalene compounds viz 1‐hydroxy‐2‐naphthaldehyde (HN12), 2‐hydroxy‐1‐naphthaldehyde (HN21), and 2‐hydroxy‐3‐naphthaldehyde (HN23). The difference in intramolecular hydrogen bond (IMHB) strength clearly reflects the inequivalence of substitution pairs where the calculated IMHB strength is found to be greater for HN12 and HN21 than HN23. The H‐bonding interactions have been explored by calculation of electron density ρ(r) and Laplacian ∇²ρ(r) at the bond critical point using atoms in molecule method and by calculation of interaction between σ* of OH with lone pair of carbonyl oxygen atom using NBO analysis. The ground and excited state potential energy surfaces (PESs) for the proton transfer reaction at HF (6‐31G**) and DFT (B3LYP/6‐31G**) levels are similar for HN12, HN21 and different for HN23. The computed aromaticity of the two rings of naphthalene moiety at B3LYP/6‐31G** method also predicts similarity between HN12 and HN21, but different for HN23.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>20623648</pmid><doi>10.1002/jcc.21592</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0192-8651
ispartof Journal of computational chemistry, 2011-01, Vol.32 (1), p.1-14
issn 0192-8651
1096-987X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_808461635
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects aromaticity
Chemical compounds
Chemical reactions
Computer Simulation
ESIPT
Hydrogen Bonding
Hydrogen bonds
inequivalence of substitution pair positions in hydroxynaphthaldehydes
intramolecular hydrogen bond
Models, Theoretical
Molecular chemistry
Molecular Structure
Naphthalenes - chemistry
Protons
Thermodynamics
title Inequivalence of substitution pairs in hydroxynaphthaldehyde: A theoretical measurement by intramolecular hydrogen bond strength, aromaticity, and excited‐state intramolecular proton transfer reaction
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T02%3A11%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inequivalence%20of%20substitution%20pairs%20in%20hydroxynaphthaldehyde:%20A%20theoretical%20measurement%20by%20intramolecular%20hydrogen%20bond%20strength,%20aromaticity,%20and%20excited%E2%80%90state%20intramolecular%20proton%20transfer%20reaction&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20computational%20chemistry&rft.au=Mahanta,%20Subrata&rft.date=2011-01-15&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=14&rft.pages=1-14&rft.issn=0192-8651&rft.eissn=1096-987X&rft.coden=JCCHDD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jcc.21592&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E808461635%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=814369334&rft_id=info:pmid/20623648&rfr_iscdi=true