Inequivalence of substitution pairs in hydroxynaphthaldehyde: A theoretical measurement by intramolecular hydrogen bond strength, aromaticity, and excited‐state intramolecular proton transfer reaction
The inequivalence of substitution pair positions of naphthalene ring has been investigated by a theoretical measurement of hydrogen bond strength, aromaticity, and excited state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT) reaction as the tools in three substituted naphthalene compounds viz 1‐hydroxy‐2‐na...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of computational chemistry 2011-01, Vol.32 (1), p.1-14 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 14 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Journal of computational chemistry |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Mahanta, Subrata Paul, Bijan Kumar Balia Singh, Rupashree Guchhait, Nikhil |
description | The inequivalence of substitution pair positions of naphthalene ring has been investigated by a theoretical measurement of hydrogen bond strength, aromaticity, and excited state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT) reaction as the tools in three substituted naphthalene compounds viz 1‐hydroxy‐2‐naphthaldehyde (HN12), 2‐hydroxy‐1‐naphthaldehyde (HN21), and 2‐hydroxy‐3‐naphthaldehyde (HN23). The difference in intramolecular hydrogen bond (IMHB) strength clearly reflects the inequivalence of substitution pairs where the calculated IMHB strength is found to be greater for HN12 and HN21 than HN23. The H‐bonding interactions have been explored by calculation of electron density ρ(r) and Laplacian ∇²ρ(r) at the bond critical point using atoms in molecule method and by calculation of interaction between σ* of OH with lone pair of carbonyl oxygen atom using NBO analysis. The ground and excited state potential energy surfaces (PESs) for the proton transfer reaction at HF (6‐31G**) and DFT (B3LYP/6‐31G**) levels are similar for HN12, HN21 and different for HN23. The computed aromaticity of the two rings of naphthalene moiety at B3LYP/6‐31G** method also predicts similarity between HN12 and HN21, but different for HN23. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jcc.21592 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_808461635</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>808461635</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4482-a93990c5d24cd854cefebc2fb7979395f2910c6ec1433a4cd794f228635659883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kk9u1DAUhyMEokNhwQXAYoOQSGs7_-zuqgGGogILpmJ2luO8zHhI7KntwGTHETgXx-AkuKTtohIr28_f-_Tkn5PkKcFHBGN6vFXqiJKC03vJjGBeppxVq_vJDBNOU1YW5CB55P0WY5wVZf4wOaC4pFmZs1ny-8zA5aC_yw6MAmRb5IfaBx2GoK1BO6mdR9qgzdg4ux-N3G3CRnYNxAKcoFMUNmAdBK1kh3qQfnDQgwmoHmNbcLK3Haihk25SrMGg2poG-eDArMPmNZLO9jIKdBjjIV7BPu6h-fPzlw8ywF3PztkQR4s141twyIFUV8M-Th60svPw5Ho9TC7evV3O36fnnxdn89PzVOU5o6nkGedYFQ3NVcOKXEELtaJtXfEqXhUt5QSrEhTJs0xGpuJ5Sykr49sVnLHsMHk5eeMglwP4IHrtFXSdNGAHLxhmeUkiHskXd8itHZyJwwkW7SXPsjxCryZIOeu9g1bsnO6lGwXB4ipeEeMV_-KN7LNr4VD30NySN3lG4HgCfugOxv-bxIf5_EaZTh3aB9jfdkj3TZRVVhXi66eFWK0Wb8rlshAfI_984ltphVw77cXFF4pJFj8byQvMsr-ZSM5u</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>814369334</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inequivalence of substitution pairs in hydroxynaphthaldehyde: A theoretical measurement by intramolecular hydrogen bond strength, aromaticity, and excited‐state intramolecular proton transfer reaction</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Mahanta, Subrata ; Paul, Bijan Kumar ; Balia Singh, Rupashree ; Guchhait, Nikhil</creator><creatorcontrib>Mahanta, Subrata ; Paul, Bijan Kumar ; Balia Singh, Rupashree ; Guchhait, Nikhil</creatorcontrib><description>The inequivalence of substitution pair positions of naphthalene ring has been investigated by a theoretical measurement of hydrogen bond strength, aromaticity, and excited state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT) reaction as the tools in three substituted naphthalene compounds viz 1‐hydroxy‐2‐naphthaldehyde (HN12), 2‐hydroxy‐1‐naphthaldehyde (HN21), and 2‐hydroxy‐3‐naphthaldehyde (HN23). The difference in intramolecular hydrogen bond (IMHB) strength clearly reflects the inequivalence of substitution pairs where the calculated IMHB strength is found to be greater for HN12 and HN21 than HN23. The H‐bonding interactions have been explored by calculation of electron density ρ(r) and Laplacian ∇²ρ(r) at the bond critical point using atoms in molecule method and by calculation of interaction between σ* of OH with lone pair of carbonyl oxygen atom using NBO analysis. The ground and excited state potential energy surfaces (PESs) for the proton transfer reaction at HF (6‐31G**) and DFT (B3LYP/6‐31G**) levels are similar for HN12, HN21 and different for HN23. The computed aromaticity of the two rings of naphthalene moiety at B3LYP/6‐31G** method also predicts similarity between HN12 and HN21, but different for HN23.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0192-8651</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-987X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jcc.21592</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20623648</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCCHDD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>aromaticity ; Chemical compounds ; Chemical reactions ; Computer Simulation ; ESIPT ; Hydrogen Bonding ; Hydrogen bonds ; inequivalence of substitution pair positions in hydroxynaphthaldehydes ; intramolecular hydrogen bond ; Models, Theoretical ; Molecular chemistry ; Molecular Structure ; Naphthalenes - chemistry ; Protons ; Thermodynamics</subject><ispartof>Journal of computational chemistry, 2011-01, Vol.32 (1), p.1-14</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright John Wiley and Sons, Limited Jan 15, 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4482-a93990c5d24cd854cefebc2fb7979395f2910c6ec1433a4cd794f228635659883</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4482-a93990c5d24cd854cefebc2fb7979395f2910c6ec1433a4cd794f228635659883</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjcc.21592$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjcc.21592$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20623648$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mahanta, Subrata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paul, Bijan Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balia Singh, Rupashree</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guchhait, Nikhil</creatorcontrib><title>Inequivalence of substitution pairs in hydroxynaphthaldehyde: A theoretical measurement by intramolecular hydrogen bond strength, aromaticity, and excited‐state intramolecular proton transfer reaction</title><title>Journal of computational chemistry</title><addtitle>J. Comput. Chem</addtitle><description>The inequivalence of substitution pair positions of naphthalene ring has been investigated by a theoretical measurement of hydrogen bond strength, aromaticity, and excited state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT) reaction as the tools in three substituted naphthalene compounds viz 1‐hydroxy‐2‐naphthaldehyde (HN12), 2‐hydroxy‐1‐naphthaldehyde (HN21), and 2‐hydroxy‐3‐naphthaldehyde (HN23). The difference in intramolecular hydrogen bond (IMHB) strength clearly reflects the inequivalence of substitution pairs where the calculated IMHB strength is found to be greater for HN12 and HN21 than HN23. The H‐bonding interactions have been explored by calculation of electron density ρ(r) and Laplacian ∇²ρ(r) at the bond critical point using atoms in molecule method and by calculation of interaction between σ* of OH with lone pair of carbonyl oxygen atom using NBO analysis. The ground and excited state potential energy surfaces (PESs) for the proton transfer reaction at HF (6‐31G**) and DFT (B3LYP/6‐31G**) levels are similar for HN12, HN21 and different for HN23. The computed aromaticity of the two rings of naphthalene moiety at B3LYP/6‐31G** method also predicts similarity between HN12 and HN21, but different for HN23.</description><subject>aromaticity</subject><subject>Chemical compounds</subject><subject>Chemical reactions</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>ESIPT</subject><subject>Hydrogen Bonding</subject><subject>Hydrogen bonds</subject><subject>inequivalence of substitution pair positions in hydroxynaphthaldehydes</subject><subject>intramolecular hydrogen bond</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Molecular chemistry</subject><subject>Molecular Structure</subject><subject>Naphthalenes - chemistry</subject><subject>Protons</subject><subject>Thermodynamics</subject><issn>0192-8651</issn><issn>1096-987X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kk9u1DAUhyMEokNhwQXAYoOQSGs7_-zuqgGGogILpmJ2luO8zHhI7KntwGTHETgXx-AkuKTtohIr28_f-_Tkn5PkKcFHBGN6vFXqiJKC03vJjGBeppxVq_vJDBNOU1YW5CB55P0WY5wVZf4wOaC4pFmZs1ny-8zA5aC_yw6MAmRb5IfaBx2GoK1BO6mdR9qgzdg4ux-N3G3CRnYNxAKcoFMUNmAdBK1kh3qQfnDQgwmoHmNbcLK3Haihk25SrMGg2poG-eDArMPmNZLO9jIKdBjjIV7BPu6h-fPzlw8ywF3PztkQR4s141twyIFUV8M-Th60svPw5Ho9TC7evV3O36fnnxdn89PzVOU5o6nkGedYFQ3NVcOKXEELtaJtXfEqXhUt5QSrEhTJs0xGpuJ5Sykr49sVnLHsMHk5eeMglwP4IHrtFXSdNGAHLxhmeUkiHskXd8itHZyJwwkW7SXPsjxCryZIOeu9g1bsnO6lGwXB4ipeEeMV_-KN7LNr4VD30NySN3lG4HgCfugOxv-bxIf5_EaZTh3aB9jfdkj3TZRVVhXi66eFWK0Wb8rlshAfI_984ltphVw77cXFF4pJFj8byQvMsr-ZSM5u</recordid><startdate>20110115</startdate><enddate>20110115</enddate><creator>Mahanta, Subrata</creator><creator>Paul, Bijan Kumar</creator><creator>Balia Singh, Rupashree</creator><creator>Guchhait, Nikhil</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110115</creationdate><title>Inequivalence of substitution pairs in hydroxynaphthaldehyde: A theoretical measurement by intramolecular hydrogen bond strength, aromaticity, and excited‐state intramolecular proton transfer reaction</title><author>Mahanta, Subrata ; Paul, Bijan Kumar ; Balia Singh, Rupashree ; Guchhait, Nikhil</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4482-a93990c5d24cd854cefebc2fb7979395f2910c6ec1433a4cd794f228635659883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>aromaticity</topic><topic>Chemical compounds</topic><topic>Chemical reactions</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>ESIPT</topic><topic>Hydrogen Bonding</topic><topic>Hydrogen bonds</topic><topic>inequivalence of substitution pair positions in hydroxynaphthaldehydes</topic><topic>intramolecular hydrogen bond</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Molecular chemistry</topic><topic>Molecular Structure</topic><topic>Naphthalenes - chemistry</topic><topic>Protons</topic><topic>Thermodynamics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mahanta, Subrata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paul, Bijan Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balia Singh, Rupashree</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guchhait, Nikhil</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of computational chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mahanta, Subrata</au><au>Paul, Bijan Kumar</au><au>Balia Singh, Rupashree</au><au>Guchhait, Nikhil</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inequivalence of substitution pairs in hydroxynaphthaldehyde: A theoretical measurement by intramolecular hydrogen bond strength, aromaticity, and excited‐state intramolecular proton transfer reaction</atitle><jtitle>Journal of computational chemistry</jtitle><addtitle>J. Comput. Chem</addtitle><date>2011-01-15</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>14</epage><pages>1-14</pages><issn>0192-8651</issn><eissn>1096-987X</eissn><coden>JCCHDD</coden><abstract>The inequivalence of substitution pair positions of naphthalene ring has been investigated by a theoretical measurement of hydrogen bond strength, aromaticity, and excited state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT) reaction as the tools in three substituted naphthalene compounds viz 1‐hydroxy‐2‐naphthaldehyde (HN12), 2‐hydroxy‐1‐naphthaldehyde (HN21), and 2‐hydroxy‐3‐naphthaldehyde (HN23). The difference in intramolecular hydrogen bond (IMHB) strength clearly reflects the inequivalence of substitution pairs where the calculated IMHB strength is found to be greater for HN12 and HN21 than HN23. The H‐bonding interactions have been explored by calculation of electron density ρ(r) and Laplacian ∇²ρ(r) at the bond critical point using atoms in molecule method and by calculation of interaction between σ* of OH with lone pair of carbonyl oxygen atom using NBO analysis. The ground and excited state potential energy surfaces (PESs) for the proton transfer reaction at HF (6‐31G**) and DFT (B3LYP/6‐31G**) levels are similar for HN12, HN21 and different for HN23. The computed aromaticity of the two rings of naphthalene moiety at B3LYP/6‐31G** method also predicts similarity between HN12 and HN21, but different for HN23.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>20623648</pmid><doi>10.1002/jcc.21592</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0192-8651 |
ispartof | Journal of computational chemistry, 2011-01, Vol.32 (1), p.1-14 |
issn | 0192-8651 1096-987X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_808461635 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | aromaticity Chemical compounds Chemical reactions Computer Simulation ESIPT Hydrogen Bonding Hydrogen bonds inequivalence of substitution pair positions in hydroxynaphthaldehydes intramolecular hydrogen bond Models, Theoretical Molecular chemistry Molecular Structure Naphthalenes - chemistry Protons Thermodynamics |
title | Inequivalence of substitution pairs in hydroxynaphthaldehyde: A theoretical measurement by intramolecular hydrogen bond strength, aromaticity, and excited‐state intramolecular proton transfer reaction |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T02%3A11%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inequivalence%20of%20substitution%20pairs%20in%20hydroxynaphthaldehyde:%20A%20theoretical%20measurement%20by%20intramolecular%20hydrogen%20bond%20strength,%20aromaticity,%20and%20excited%E2%80%90state%20intramolecular%20proton%20transfer%20reaction&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20computational%20chemistry&rft.au=Mahanta,%20Subrata&rft.date=2011-01-15&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=14&rft.pages=1-14&rft.issn=0192-8651&rft.eissn=1096-987X&rft.coden=JCCHDD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jcc.21592&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E808461635%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=814369334&rft_id=info:pmid/20623648&rfr_iscdi=true |