The boundaries of entoptic space and Emmert's law
From each of 34 subjects three measurements were obtained: size of the entoptic after-image, apparent distance of such image and the distance of the screen for the projected after-image of the same size as the entoptic one. From the average size of the entoptic after-images theoretical distances for...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Acta psychologica 1970, Vol.34 (4), p.516-520 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 520 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 516 |
container_title | Acta psychologica |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Fulgosi, Ante Fulgosi, Ljerka |
description | From each of 34 subjects three measurements were obtained: size of the entoptic after-image, apparent distance of such image and the distance of the screen for the projected after-image of the same size as the entoptic one. From the average size of the entoptic after-images theoretical distances for each subject were computed. Statistical analysis showed that the differences between the distances of the screen, from one side, and the theoretical distances and the apparent distances of the entoptic after-images from the other side, were significant. These results were interpreted as a proof that the spaces of the projected and entoptic after-images are not comparable.
The difference between the apparent distances of the entoptic after-images and theoretical distances, predicted on the basis of Emmert's law, was not significant. The latter result was interpreted as a proof that Emmert's law for projected after-images is also valid for the entoptic ones. On the basis of this, it was concluded, that entoptic space can have as many boundaries as different sizes of the entoptic after-images can exist. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0001-6918(70)90046-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80772185</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0001691870900466</els_id><sourcerecordid>32693514</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-788843c0558c32d2c75d693696edbc70f42c5586cdfdf7857da9303f397226b63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLAzEQx4MotVa_gcKC4OOwOkl287gIUuoDCl7qOWyTWdyyL5NdxW_v1pYePOhpGP6_zEx-hJxSuKFAxS0A0Fhoqq4kXGuARMRij4ypkjwWTMt9Mt4hh-QohNXQJlTTERmliZaUszGhizeMlk1fu8wXGKImj7DumrYrbBTazGKU1S6aVRX67jJEZfZ5TA7yrAx4sq0T8vowW0yf4vnL4_P0fh5bpqCLpVIq4RbSVFnOHLMydUJzoQW6pZWQJ8wOmbAud7lUqXSZ5sBzriVjYin4hFxs5ra-ee8xdKYqgsWyzGps-mAUSMmoSv8FORv2pjQZwPNf4KrpfT18wlAOlDGtgQ5UsqGsb0LwmJvWF1XmvwwFsxZv1lbN2qqRYH7Em_W5Z9vh_bJCt3u0NT3kd5scB2cfBXoTbIG1RVd4tJ1xTfH3gm_Mb44x</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1301229901</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The boundaries of entoptic space and Emmert's law</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Fulgosi, Ante ; Fulgosi, Ljerka</creator><creatorcontrib>Fulgosi, Ante ; Fulgosi, Ljerka</creatorcontrib><description>From each of 34 subjects three measurements were obtained: size of the entoptic after-image, apparent distance of such image and the distance of the screen for the projected after-image of the same size as the entoptic one. From the average size of the entoptic after-images theoretical distances for each subject were computed. Statistical analysis showed that the differences between the distances of the screen, from one side, and the theoretical distances and the apparent distances of the entoptic after-images from the other side, were significant. These results were interpreted as a proof that the spaces of the projected and entoptic after-images are not comparable.
The difference between the apparent distances of the entoptic after-images and theoretical distances, predicted on the basis of Emmert's law, was not significant. The latter result was interpreted as a proof that Emmert's law for projected after-images is also valid for the entoptic ones. On the basis of this, it was concluded, that entoptic space can have as many boundaries as different sizes of the entoptic after-images can exist.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-6918</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6297</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0001-6918(70)90046-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 5497132</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Afterimage ; Distance Perception ; Humans</subject><ispartof>Acta psychologica, 1970, Vol.34 (4), p.516-520</ispartof><rights>1970</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-788843c0558c32d2c75d693696edbc70f42c5586cdfdf7857da9303f397226b63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(70)90046-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3541,4014,27860,27914,27915,27916,45986</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5497132$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fulgosi, Ante</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fulgosi, Ljerka</creatorcontrib><title>The boundaries of entoptic space and Emmert's law</title><title>Acta psychologica</title><addtitle>Acta Psychol (Amst)</addtitle><description>From each of 34 subjects three measurements were obtained: size of the entoptic after-image, apparent distance of such image and the distance of the screen for the projected after-image of the same size as the entoptic one. From the average size of the entoptic after-images theoretical distances for each subject were computed. Statistical analysis showed that the differences between the distances of the screen, from one side, and the theoretical distances and the apparent distances of the entoptic after-images from the other side, were significant. These results were interpreted as a proof that the spaces of the projected and entoptic after-images are not comparable.
The difference between the apparent distances of the entoptic after-images and theoretical distances, predicted on the basis of Emmert's law, was not significant. The latter result was interpreted as a proof that Emmert's law for projected after-images is also valid for the entoptic ones. On the basis of this, it was concluded, that entoptic space can have as many boundaries as different sizes of the entoptic after-images can exist.</description><subject>Afterimage</subject><subject>Distance Perception</subject><subject>Humans</subject><issn>0001-6918</issn><issn>1873-6297</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1970</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtLAzEQx4MotVa_gcKC4OOwOkl287gIUuoDCl7qOWyTWdyyL5NdxW_v1pYePOhpGP6_zEx-hJxSuKFAxS0A0Fhoqq4kXGuARMRij4ypkjwWTMt9Mt4hh-QohNXQJlTTERmliZaUszGhizeMlk1fu8wXGKImj7DumrYrbBTazGKU1S6aVRX67jJEZfZ5TA7yrAx4sq0T8vowW0yf4vnL4_P0fh5bpqCLpVIq4RbSVFnOHLMydUJzoQW6pZWQJ8wOmbAud7lUqXSZ5sBzriVjYin4hFxs5ra-ee8xdKYqgsWyzGps-mAUSMmoSv8FORv2pjQZwPNf4KrpfT18wlAOlDGtgQ5UsqGsb0LwmJvWF1XmvwwFsxZv1lbN2qqRYH7Em_W5Z9vh_bJCt3u0NT3kd5scB2cfBXoTbIG1RVd4tJ1xTfH3gm_Mb44x</recordid><startdate>1970</startdate><enddate>1970</enddate><creator>Fulgosi, Ante</creator><creator>Fulgosi, Ljerka</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Martinus Nijhoff</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ICWRT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1970</creationdate><title>The boundaries of entoptic space and Emmert's law</title><author>Fulgosi, Ante ; Fulgosi, Ljerka</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-788843c0558c32d2c75d693696edbc70f42c5586cdfdf7857da9303f397226b63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1970</creationdate><topic>Afterimage</topic><topic>Distance Perception</topic><topic>Humans</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fulgosi, Ante</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fulgosi, Ljerka</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 28</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta psychologica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fulgosi, Ante</au><au>Fulgosi, Ljerka</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The boundaries of entoptic space and Emmert's law</atitle><jtitle>Acta psychologica</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Psychol (Amst)</addtitle><date>1970</date><risdate>1970</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>516</spage><epage>520</epage><pages>516-520</pages><issn>0001-6918</issn><eissn>1873-6297</eissn><abstract>From each of 34 subjects three measurements were obtained: size of the entoptic after-image, apparent distance of such image and the distance of the screen for the projected after-image of the same size as the entoptic one. From the average size of the entoptic after-images theoretical distances for each subject were computed. Statistical analysis showed that the differences between the distances of the screen, from one side, and the theoretical distances and the apparent distances of the entoptic after-images from the other side, were significant. These results were interpreted as a proof that the spaces of the projected and entoptic after-images are not comparable.
The difference between the apparent distances of the entoptic after-images and theoretical distances, predicted on the basis of Emmert's law, was not significant. The latter result was interpreted as a proof that Emmert's law for projected after-images is also valid for the entoptic ones. On the basis of this, it was concluded, that entoptic space can have as many boundaries as different sizes of the entoptic after-images can exist.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>5497132</pmid><doi>10.1016/0001-6918(70)90046-6</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0001-6918 |
ispartof | Acta psychologica, 1970, Vol.34 (4), p.516-520 |
issn | 0001-6918 1873-6297 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80772185 |
source | MEDLINE; Periodicals Index Online; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Afterimage Distance Perception Humans |
title | The boundaries of entoptic space and Emmert's law |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T04%3A38%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20boundaries%20of%20entoptic%20space%20and%20Emmert's%20law&rft.jtitle=Acta%20psychologica&rft.au=Fulgosi,%20Ante&rft.date=1970&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=516&rft.epage=520&rft.pages=516-520&rft.issn=0001-6918&rft.eissn=1873-6297&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0001-6918(70)90046-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E32693514%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1301229901&rft_id=info:pmid/5497132&rft_els_id=0001691870900466&rfr_iscdi=true |