Effects of weed control practices on surface-dwelling arthropod predators in tomato agroecosystems
Weed control, an important practice in agroecosystems to protect crop production, is usually achieved with herbicides. However, these pesticides are expensive, pose potential risks to the environment, may affect some beneficial organisms indirectly, and decrease overall arthropod biodiversity, inclu...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Phytoparasitica 2002-08, Vol.30 (4), p.379-386 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 386 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 379 |
| container_title | Phytoparasitica |
| container_volume | 30 |
| creator | Yardım, Erdal N. Edwards, Clive A. |
| description | Weed control, an important practice in agroecosystems to protect crop production, is usually achieved with herbicides. However, these pesticides are expensive, pose potential risks to the environment, may affect some beneficial organisms indirectly, and decrease overall arthropod biodiversity, including pests and their natural enemies, by removing weeds that might act as hosts or shelters for many organisms. The activity density response of important surface-dwelling arthropod predators (ground beetles [Coleoptera: Carabidae], ants [Hymenoptera: Formicidae] and spiders [Arachnida: Araneae]) to herbicides (trifluralin and paraquat), and to two alternative weed management practices (rye straw mulch and mechanical treatment to maintain weeds below threshold levels, in comparison with an untreated check), was assessed using pitfall traps. The mulch treatment had the greatest effect on activity density, reducing the number of predators trapped significantly (P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF02979685 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_807278555</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2146952561</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-3d443d739ef066994681054b44f767cd6fe5f7fe8754bf64fb0e486598dc35a33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90c1KAzEQAOAgCtbqxScIHhSE1WTzu0ctrQoFL3pe0uykbtndrElK6dsbqSB48DTDzMcwwyB0SckdJUTdPy5IWalKanGEJlQrWSiq-TGaEMZ4UdKSnaKzGDeESEIomaDV3DmwKWLv8A6gwdYPKfgOj8HY1FrInQHHbXDGQtHsoOvaYY1NSB_Bj77JDhqTfIi4HXDyfc6xWQcP1sd9TNDHc3TiTBfh4idO0fti_jZ7LpavTy-zh2VhGa1SwRrOWaNYBY5IWVVcakoEX3HulFS2kQ6EUw60ykUnuVsR4FqKSjeWCcPYFN0c5o7Bf24hprpvo80LmwH8NtaaqFJpIUSW1_9KqmUpFVMZXv2BG78NQ76izltUgimtM7o9IBt8jAFcPYa2N2FfU1J_f6X-_Qr7AnWxf10</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>754953788</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of weed control practices on surface-dwelling arthropod predators in tomato agroecosystems</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Yardım, Erdal N. ; Edwards, Clive A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Yardım, Erdal N. ; Edwards, Clive A.</creatorcontrib><description>Weed control, an important practice in agroecosystems to protect crop production, is usually achieved with herbicides. However, these pesticides are expensive, pose potential risks to the environment, may affect some beneficial organisms indirectly, and decrease overall arthropod biodiversity, including pests and their natural enemies, by removing weeds that might act as hosts or shelters for many organisms. The activity density response of important surface-dwelling arthropod predators (ground beetles [Coleoptera: Carabidae], ants [Hymenoptera: Formicidae] and spiders [Arachnida: Araneae]) to herbicides (trifluralin and paraquat), and to two alternative weed management practices (rye straw mulch and mechanical treatment to maintain weeds below threshold levels, in comparison with an untreated check), was assessed using pitfall traps. The mulch treatment had the greatest effect on activity density, reducing the number of predators trapped significantly (P<0.05). Herbicide use resulted in significant (P<0.05) reductions in the activity density of ground beetles. Most predators were trapped in the check plots — which had the highest weed biomass, followed in turn by numbers trapped in the threshold weed control treatment, the full herbicide application and the mulch treatment plots.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0334-2123</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1876-7184</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF02979685</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Agricultural ecosystems ; Arachnida ; Araneae ; Arthropoda ; Beetles ; Biodiversity ; Carabidae ; Coleoptera ; Crop production ; Density ; Formicidae ; Herbicides ; Hymenoptera ; Lycopersicon esculentum ; Natural enemies ; Paraquat ; Pesticides ; Pests ; Pitfall traps ; Plant protection ; Predators ; Rye straw ; Tomatoes ; Trifluralin ; Weed control ; Weeds</subject><ispartof>Phytoparasitica, 2002-08, Vol.30 (4), p.379-386</ispartof><rights>Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2002.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-3d443d739ef066994681054b44f767cd6fe5f7fe8754bf64fb0e486598dc35a33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-3d443d739ef066994681054b44f767cd6fe5f7fe8754bf64fb0e486598dc35a33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yardım, Erdal N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Clive A.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of weed control practices on surface-dwelling arthropod predators in tomato agroecosystems</title><title>Phytoparasitica</title><description>Weed control, an important practice in agroecosystems to protect crop production, is usually achieved with herbicides. However, these pesticides are expensive, pose potential risks to the environment, may affect some beneficial organisms indirectly, and decrease overall arthropod biodiversity, including pests and their natural enemies, by removing weeds that might act as hosts or shelters for many organisms. The activity density response of important surface-dwelling arthropod predators (ground beetles [Coleoptera: Carabidae], ants [Hymenoptera: Formicidae] and spiders [Arachnida: Araneae]) to herbicides (trifluralin and paraquat), and to two alternative weed management practices (rye straw mulch and mechanical treatment to maintain weeds below threshold levels, in comparison with an untreated check), was assessed using pitfall traps. The mulch treatment had the greatest effect on activity density, reducing the number of predators trapped significantly (P<0.05). Herbicide use resulted in significant (P<0.05) reductions in the activity density of ground beetles. Most predators were trapped in the check plots — which had the highest weed biomass, followed in turn by numbers trapped in the threshold weed control treatment, the full herbicide application and the mulch treatment plots.</description><subject>Agricultural ecosystems</subject><subject>Arachnida</subject><subject>Araneae</subject><subject>Arthropoda</subject><subject>Beetles</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Carabidae</subject><subject>Coleoptera</subject><subject>Crop production</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Formicidae</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Hymenoptera</subject><subject>Lycopersicon esculentum</subject><subject>Natural enemies</subject><subject>Paraquat</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Pests</subject><subject>Pitfall traps</subject><subject>Plant protection</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Rye straw</subject><subject>Tomatoes</subject><subject>Trifluralin</subject><subject>Weed control</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><issn>0334-2123</issn><issn>1876-7184</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp90c1KAzEQAOAgCtbqxScIHhSE1WTzu0ctrQoFL3pe0uykbtndrElK6dsbqSB48DTDzMcwwyB0SckdJUTdPy5IWalKanGEJlQrWSiq-TGaEMZ4UdKSnaKzGDeESEIomaDV3DmwKWLv8A6gwdYPKfgOj8HY1FrInQHHbXDGQtHsoOvaYY1NSB_Bj77JDhqTfIi4HXDyfc6xWQcP1sd9TNDHc3TiTBfh4idO0fti_jZ7LpavTy-zh2VhGa1SwRrOWaNYBY5IWVVcakoEX3HulFS2kQ6EUw60ykUnuVsR4FqKSjeWCcPYFN0c5o7Bf24hprpvo80LmwH8NtaaqFJpIUSW1_9KqmUpFVMZXv2BG78NQ76izltUgimtM7o9IBt8jAFcPYa2N2FfU1J_f6X-_Qr7AnWxf10</recordid><startdate>20020801</startdate><enddate>20020801</enddate><creator>Yardım, Erdal N.</creator><creator>Edwards, Clive A.</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020801</creationdate><title>Effects of weed control practices on surface-dwelling arthropod predators in tomato agroecosystems</title><author>Yardım, Erdal N. ; Edwards, Clive A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-3d443d739ef066994681054b44f767cd6fe5f7fe8754bf64fb0e486598dc35a33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Agricultural ecosystems</topic><topic>Arachnida</topic><topic>Araneae</topic><topic>Arthropoda</topic><topic>Beetles</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Carabidae</topic><topic>Coleoptera</topic><topic>Crop production</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Formicidae</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Hymenoptera</topic><topic>Lycopersicon esculentum</topic><topic>Natural enemies</topic><topic>Paraquat</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Pests</topic><topic>Pitfall traps</topic><topic>Plant protection</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Rye straw</topic><topic>Tomatoes</topic><topic>Trifluralin</topic><topic>Weed control</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yardım, Erdal N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Clive A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Phytoparasitica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yardım, Erdal N.</au><au>Edwards, Clive A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of weed control practices on surface-dwelling arthropod predators in tomato agroecosystems</atitle><jtitle>Phytoparasitica</jtitle><date>2002-08-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>379</spage><epage>386</epage><pages>379-386</pages><issn>0334-2123</issn><eissn>1876-7184</eissn><abstract>Weed control, an important practice in agroecosystems to protect crop production, is usually achieved with herbicides. However, these pesticides are expensive, pose potential risks to the environment, may affect some beneficial organisms indirectly, and decrease overall arthropod biodiversity, including pests and their natural enemies, by removing weeds that might act as hosts or shelters for many organisms. The activity density response of important surface-dwelling arthropod predators (ground beetles [Coleoptera: Carabidae], ants [Hymenoptera: Formicidae] and spiders [Arachnida: Araneae]) to herbicides (trifluralin and paraquat), and to two alternative weed management practices (rye straw mulch and mechanical treatment to maintain weeds below threshold levels, in comparison with an untreated check), was assessed using pitfall traps. The mulch treatment had the greatest effect on activity density, reducing the number of predators trapped significantly (P<0.05). Herbicide use resulted in significant (P<0.05) reductions in the activity density of ground beetles. Most predators were trapped in the check plots — which had the highest weed biomass, followed in turn by numbers trapped in the threshold weed control treatment, the full herbicide application and the mulch treatment plots.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1007/BF02979685</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0334-2123 |
| ispartof | Phytoparasitica, 2002-08, Vol.30 (4), p.379-386 |
| issn | 0334-2123 1876-7184 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_807278555 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals |
| subjects | Agricultural ecosystems Arachnida Araneae Arthropoda Beetles Biodiversity Carabidae Coleoptera Crop production Density Formicidae Herbicides Hymenoptera Lycopersicon esculentum Natural enemies Paraquat Pesticides Pests Pitfall traps Plant protection Predators Rye straw Tomatoes Trifluralin Weed control Weeds |
| title | Effects of weed control practices on surface-dwelling arthropod predators in tomato agroecosystems |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T00%3A39%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20weed%20control%20practices%20on%20surface-dwelling%20arthropod%20predators%20in%20tomato%20agroecosystems&rft.jtitle=Phytoparasitica&rft.au=Yard%C4%B1m,%20Erdal%20N.&rft.date=2002-08-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=379&rft.epage=386&rft.pages=379-386&rft.issn=0334-2123&rft.eissn=1876-7184&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF02979685&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2146952561%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=754953788&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |