Radionuclide Image Minification Can Compensate for Coarse Digitization: Concise Communication

Although it is common practice to digitize radionuclide images onto the finest matrix available, their low count densities and poor spatial resolution suggest that quite large pixels should be adequate. Observers find these large pixels visually obtrusive, but minification of the image can reduce th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978) 1983-11, Vol.24 (11), p.1046-1054
Hauptverfasser: Pitt, W. Robert, Sharp, Peter F, Chesser, Robert B, Dendy, Philip P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1054
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1046
container_title The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978)
container_volume 24
creator Pitt, W. Robert
Sharp, Peter F
Chesser, Robert B
Dendy, Philip P
description Although it is common practice to digitize radionuclide images onto the finest matrix available, their low count densities and poor spatial resolution suggest that quite large pixels should be adequate. Observers find these large pixels visually obtrusive, but minification of the image can reduce this effect. Experiments reported here have investigated how minification (achieved by increasing viewing distance) affects the perceived quality of images digitized onto different sized matrices. Observers' subjective preference for different pixel sizes was measured at various viewing distances using clinical bone images as test patterns. An objective measure of image quality was made by comparing the detectability of computer-generated focal areas of increased activity both in simple noisy backgrounds and in clinical bone images. The results show that a 128 X 128 matrix is adequate when the image is 8 cm2 and is viewed from 1 and 2 m. A finer matrix failed to produce better results.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80722383</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>80722383</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-h239t-8753a46934cccdc366c438b247518673a79f7bdda57d8b9ce3e62b0908cb66303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkFtLxDAQhYMo67r6E4Q-iS-FXJpLfZP1CiuC6KOENEl3szTpmrSI_nqzbh-GYc75ZmDOEZgjSmhJGePHYA4RQyWlkJ6Cs5S2EEImhJiBGWMEUUzn4PNNGdeHUXfO2OLZq7UtXlxwrdNqyEaxVLl6v7MhqcEWbR_zqGKyxZ1bu8H9_mM3WQzaZTWzfgzT9jk4aVWX7MXUF-Dj4f59-VSuXh-fl7ercoNJPZSCU6IqVpNKa200YUxXRDS44hQJxonidcsbYxTlRjS1tsQy3MAaCt3kTyBZgKvD3V3sv0abBuld0rbrVLD9mKSAHGMiSAYvJ3BsvDVyF51X8UdOeWT_-uBv3Hrz7aKV-2isint4GzyuJEISwYqRP4qAazs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>80722383</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Radionuclide Image Minification Can Compensate for Coarse Digitization: Concise Communication</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Pitt, W. Robert ; Sharp, Peter F ; Chesser, Robert B ; Dendy, Philip P</creator><creatorcontrib>Pitt, W. Robert ; Sharp, Peter F ; Chesser, Robert B ; Dendy, Philip P</creatorcontrib><description>Although it is common practice to digitize radionuclide images onto the finest matrix available, their low count densities and poor spatial resolution suggest that quite large pixels should be adequate. Observers find these large pixels visually obtrusive, but minification of the image can reduce this effect. Experiments reported here have investigated how minification (achieved by increasing viewing distance) affects the perceived quality of images digitized onto different sized matrices. Observers' subjective preference for different pixel sizes was measured at various viewing distances using clinical bone images as test patterns. An objective measure of image quality was made by comparing the detectability of computer-generated focal areas of increased activity both in simple noisy backgrounds and in clinical bone images. The results show that a 128 X 128 matrix is adequate when the image is 8 cm2 and is viewed from 1 and 2 m. A finer matrix failed to produce better results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-5505</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-5667</identifier><identifier>PMID: 6631525</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Soc Nuclear Med</publisher><subject>Bone and Bones - diagnostic imaging ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Radionuclide Imaging - methods</subject><ispartof>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978), 1983-11, Vol.24 (11), p.1046-1054</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6631525$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pitt, W. Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharp, Peter F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chesser, Robert B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dendy, Philip P</creatorcontrib><title>Radionuclide Image Minification Can Compensate for Coarse Digitization: Concise Communication</title><title>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978)</title><addtitle>J Nucl Med</addtitle><description>Although it is common practice to digitize radionuclide images onto the finest matrix available, their low count densities and poor spatial resolution suggest that quite large pixels should be adequate. Observers find these large pixels visually obtrusive, but minification of the image can reduce this effect. Experiments reported here have investigated how minification (achieved by increasing viewing distance) affects the perceived quality of images digitized onto different sized matrices. Observers' subjective preference for different pixel sizes was measured at various viewing distances using clinical bone images as test patterns. An objective measure of image quality was made by comparing the detectability of computer-generated focal areas of increased activity both in simple noisy backgrounds and in clinical bone images. The results show that a 128 X 128 matrix is adequate when the image is 8 cm2 and is viewed from 1 and 2 m. A finer matrix failed to produce better results.</description><subject>Bone and Bones - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Radionuclide Imaging - methods</subject><issn>0161-5505</issn><issn>1535-5667</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1983</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNotkFtLxDAQhYMo67r6E4Q-iS-FXJpLfZP1CiuC6KOENEl3szTpmrSI_nqzbh-GYc75ZmDOEZgjSmhJGePHYA4RQyWlkJ6Cs5S2EEImhJiBGWMEUUzn4PNNGdeHUXfO2OLZq7UtXlxwrdNqyEaxVLl6v7MhqcEWbR_zqGKyxZ1bu8H9_mM3WQzaZTWzfgzT9jk4aVWX7MXUF-Dj4f59-VSuXh-fl7ercoNJPZSCU6IqVpNKa200YUxXRDS44hQJxonidcsbYxTlRjS1tsQy3MAaCt3kTyBZgKvD3V3sv0abBuld0rbrVLD9mKSAHGMiSAYvJ3BsvDVyF51X8UdOeWT_-uBv3Hrz7aKV-2isint4GzyuJEISwYqRP4qAazs</recordid><startdate>198311</startdate><enddate>198311</enddate><creator>Pitt, W. Robert</creator><creator>Sharp, Peter F</creator><creator>Chesser, Robert B</creator><creator>Dendy, Philip P</creator><general>Soc Nuclear Med</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198311</creationdate><title>Radionuclide Image Minification Can Compensate for Coarse Digitization: Concise Communication</title><author>Pitt, W. Robert ; Sharp, Peter F ; Chesser, Robert B ; Dendy, Philip P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-h239t-8753a46934cccdc366c438b247518673a79f7bdda57d8b9ce3e62b0908cb66303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1983</creationdate><topic>Bone and Bones - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Radionuclide Imaging - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pitt, W. Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharp, Peter F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chesser, Robert B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dendy, Philip P</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pitt, W. Robert</au><au>Sharp, Peter F</au><au>Chesser, Robert B</au><au>Dendy, Philip P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radionuclide Image Minification Can Compensate for Coarse Digitization: Concise Communication</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978)</jtitle><addtitle>J Nucl Med</addtitle><date>1983-11</date><risdate>1983</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1046</spage><epage>1054</epage><pages>1046-1054</pages><issn>0161-5505</issn><eissn>1535-5667</eissn><abstract>Although it is common practice to digitize radionuclide images onto the finest matrix available, their low count densities and poor spatial resolution suggest that quite large pixels should be adequate. Observers find these large pixels visually obtrusive, but minification of the image can reduce this effect. Experiments reported here have investigated how minification (achieved by increasing viewing distance) affects the perceived quality of images digitized onto different sized matrices. Observers' subjective preference for different pixel sizes was measured at various viewing distances using clinical bone images as test patterns. An objective measure of image quality was made by comparing the detectability of computer-generated focal areas of increased activity both in simple noisy backgrounds and in clinical bone images. The results show that a 128 X 128 matrix is adequate when the image is 8 cm2 and is viewed from 1 and 2 m. A finer matrix failed to produce better results.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Soc Nuclear Med</pub><pmid>6631525</pmid><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0161-5505
ispartof The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978), 1983-11, Vol.24 (11), p.1046-1054
issn 0161-5505
1535-5667
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80722383
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Bone and Bones - diagnostic imaging
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Radionuclide Imaging - methods
title Radionuclide Image Minification Can Compensate for Coarse Digitization: Concise Communication
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T19%3A53%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radionuclide%20Image%20Minification%20Can%20Compensate%20for%20Coarse%20Digitization:%20Concise%20Communication&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20nuclear%20medicine%20(1978)&rft.au=Pitt,%20W.%20Robert&rft.date=1983-11&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1046&rft.epage=1054&rft.pages=1046-1054&rft.issn=0161-5505&rft.eissn=1535-5667&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E80722383%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=80722383&rft_id=info:pmid/6631525&rfr_iscdi=true