Radionuclide Image Minification Can Compensate for Coarse Digitization: Concise Communication
Although it is common practice to digitize radionuclide images onto the finest matrix available, their low count densities and poor spatial resolution suggest that quite large pixels should be adequate. Observers find these large pixels visually obtrusive, but minification of the image can reduce th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978) 1983-11, Vol.24 (11), p.1046-1054 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1054 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1046 |
container_title | The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978) |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Pitt, W. Robert Sharp, Peter F Chesser, Robert B Dendy, Philip P |
description | Although it is common practice to digitize radionuclide images onto the finest matrix available, their low count densities and poor spatial resolution suggest that quite large pixels should be adequate. Observers find these large pixels visually obtrusive, but minification of the image can reduce this effect. Experiments reported here have investigated how minification (achieved by increasing viewing distance) affects the perceived quality of images digitized onto different sized matrices. Observers' subjective preference for different pixel sizes was measured at various viewing distances using clinical bone images as test patterns. An objective measure of image quality was made by comparing the detectability of computer-generated focal areas of increased activity both in simple noisy backgrounds and in clinical bone images. The results show that a 128 X 128 matrix is adequate when the image is 8 cm2 and is viewed from 1 and 2 m. A finer matrix failed to produce better results. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80722383</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>80722383</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-h239t-8753a46934cccdc366c438b247518673a79f7bdda57d8b9ce3e62b0908cb66303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkFtLxDAQhYMo67r6E4Q-iS-FXJpLfZP1CiuC6KOENEl3szTpmrSI_nqzbh-GYc75ZmDOEZgjSmhJGePHYA4RQyWlkJ6Cs5S2EEImhJiBGWMEUUzn4PNNGdeHUXfO2OLZq7UtXlxwrdNqyEaxVLl6v7MhqcEWbR_zqGKyxZ1bu8H9_mM3WQzaZTWzfgzT9jk4aVWX7MXUF-Dj4f59-VSuXh-fl7ercoNJPZSCU6IqVpNKa200YUxXRDS44hQJxonidcsbYxTlRjS1tsQy3MAaCt3kTyBZgKvD3V3sv0abBuld0rbrVLD9mKSAHGMiSAYvJ3BsvDVyF51X8UdOeWT_-uBv3Hrz7aKV-2isint4GzyuJEISwYqRP4qAazs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>80722383</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Radionuclide Image Minification Can Compensate for Coarse Digitization: Concise Communication</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Pitt, W. Robert ; Sharp, Peter F ; Chesser, Robert B ; Dendy, Philip P</creator><creatorcontrib>Pitt, W. Robert ; Sharp, Peter F ; Chesser, Robert B ; Dendy, Philip P</creatorcontrib><description>Although it is common practice to digitize radionuclide images onto the finest matrix available, their low count densities and poor spatial resolution suggest that quite large pixels should be adequate. Observers find these large pixels visually obtrusive, but minification of the image can reduce this effect. Experiments reported here have investigated how minification (achieved by increasing viewing distance) affects the perceived quality of images digitized onto different sized matrices. Observers' subjective preference for different pixel sizes was measured at various viewing distances using clinical bone images as test patterns. An objective measure of image quality was made by comparing the detectability of computer-generated focal areas of increased activity both in simple noisy backgrounds and in clinical bone images. The results show that a 128 X 128 matrix is adequate when the image is 8 cm2 and is viewed from 1 and 2 m. A finer matrix failed to produce better results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-5505</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-5667</identifier><identifier>PMID: 6631525</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Soc Nuclear Med</publisher><subject>Bone and Bones - diagnostic imaging ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Radionuclide Imaging - methods</subject><ispartof>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978), 1983-11, Vol.24 (11), p.1046-1054</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6631525$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pitt, W. Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharp, Peter F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chesser, Robert B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dendy, Philip P</creatorcontrib><title>Radionuclide Image Minification Can Compensate for Coarse Digitization: Concise Communication</title><title>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978)</title><addtitle>J Nucl Med</addtitle><description>Although it is common practice to digitize radionuclide images onto the finest matrix available, their low count densities and poor spatial resolution suggest that quite large pixels should be adequate. Observers find these large pixels visually obtrusive, but minification of the image can reduce this effect. Experiments reported here have investigated how minification (achieved by increasing viewing distance) affects the perceived quality of images digitized onto different sized matrices. Observers' subjective preference for different pixel sizes was measured at various viewing distances using clinical bone images as test patterns. An objective measure of image quality was made by comparing the detectability of computer-generated focal areas of increased activity both in simple noisy backgrounds and in clinical bone images. The results show that a 128 X 128 matrix is adequate when the image is 8 cm2 and is viewed from 1 and 2 m. A finer matrix failed to produce better results.</description><subject>Bone and Bones - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Radionuclide Imaging - methods</subject><issn>0161-5505</issn><issn>1535-5667</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1983</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNotkFtLxDAQhYMo67r6E4Q-iS-FXJpLfZP1CiuC6KOENEl3szTpmrSI_nqzbh-GYc75ZmDOEZgjSmhJGePHYA4RQyWlkJ6Cs5S2EEImhJiBGWMEUUzn4PNNGdeHUXfO2OLZq7UtXlxwrdNqyEaxVLl6v7MhqcEWbR_zqGKyxZ1bu8H9_mM3WQzaZTWzfgzT9jk4aVWX7MXUF-Dj4f59-VSuXh-fl7ercoNJPZSCU6IqVpNKa200YUxXRDS44hQJxonidcsbYxTlRjS1tsQy3MAaCt3kTyBZgKvD3V3sv0abBuld0rbrVLD9mKSAHGMiSAYvJ3BsvDVyF51X8UdOeWT_-uBv3Hrz7aKV-2isint4GzyuJEISwYqRP4qAazs</recordid><startdate>198311</startdate><enddate>198311</enddate><creator>Pitt, W. Robert</creator><creator>Sharp, Peter F</creator><creator>Chesser, Robert B</creator><creator>Dendy, Philip P</creator><general>Soc Nuclear Med</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198311</creationdate><title>Radionuclide Image Minification Can Compensate for Coarse Digitization: Concise Communication</title><author>Pitt, W. Robert ; Sharp, Peter F ; Chesser, Robert B ; Dendy, Philip P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-h239t-8753a46934cccdc366c438b247518673a79f7bdda57d8b9ce3e62b0908cb66303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1983</creationdate><topic>Bone and Bones - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Radionuclide Imaging - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pitt, W. Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharp, Peter F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chesser, Robert B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dendy, Philip P</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pitt, W. Robert</au><au>Sharp, Peter F</au><au>Chesser, Robert B</au><au>Dendy, Philip P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radionuclide Image Minification Can Compensate for Coarse Digitization: Concise Communication</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978)</jtitle><addtitle>J Nucl Med</addtitle><date>1983-11</date><risdate>1983</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1046</spage><epage>1054</epage><pages>1046-1054</pages><issn>0161-5505</issn><eissn>1535-5667</eissn><abstract>Although it is common practice to digitize radionuclide images onto the finest matrix available, their low count densities and poor spatial resolution suggest that quite large pixels should be adequate. Observers find these large pixels visually obtrusive, but minification of the image can reduce this effect. Experiments reported here have investigated how minification (achieved by increasing viewing distance) affects the perceived quality of images digitized onto different sized matrices. Observers' subjective preference for different pixel sizes was measured at various viewing distances using clinical bone images as test patterns. An objective measure of image quality was made by comparing the detectability of computer-generated focal areas of increased activity both in simple noisy backgrounds and in clinical bone images. The results show that a 128 X 128 matrix is adequate when the image is 8 cm2 and is viewed from 1 and 2 m. A finer matrix failed to produce better results.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Soc Nuclear Med</pub><pmid>6631525</pmid><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0161-5505 |
ispartof | The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978), 1983-11, Vol.24 (11), p.1046-1054 |
issn | 0161-5505 1535-5667 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80722383 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Bone and Bones - diagnostic imaging Evaluation Studies as Topic Radionuclide Imaging - methods |
title | Radionuclide Image Minification Can Compensate for Coarse Digitization: Concise Communication |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T19%3A53%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radionuclide%20Image%20Minification%20Can%20Compensate%20for%20Coarse%20Digitization:%20Concise%20Communication&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20nuclear%20medicine%20(1978)&rft.au=Pitt,%20W.%20Robert&rft.date=1983-11&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1046&rft.epage=1054&rft.pages=1046-1054&rft.issn=0161-5505&rft.eissn=1535-5667&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E80722383%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=80722383&rft_id=info:pmid/6631525&rfr_iscdi=true |