Local DNA topology and gene expression: the case of the leu‐500 promoter

Summary Many promoters are sensitive to DNA supercoiling, and it is becoming apparent that this may play an important rote in gene regulation. The twin super ‐coiled‐domain hypothesis (Liu and Wang, 1987) proposes that transcription can lead to local variation in supercoiling. The mutant leu‐500 pro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Molecular microbiology 1991-04, Vol.5 (4), p.779-783
Hauptverfasser: Lilley, D. M. J., Higgins, C. F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 783
container_issue 4
container_start_page 779
container_title Molecular microbiology
container_volume 5
creator Lilley, D. M. J.
Higgins, C. F.
description Summary Many promoters are sensitive to DNA supercoiling, and it is becoming apparent that this may play an important rote in gene regulation. The twin super ‐coiled‐domain hypothesis (Liu and Wang, 1987) proposes that transcription can lead to local variation in supercoiling. The mutant leu‐500 promoter has presented a long‐standing problem to the understanding of the control of promoter function by DNA supercoiling. This promoter is activated by mutations in the gene encoding topoisomerase I, but is apparently unaffected by mutations in the genes encoding DNA gyrase. We propose a model to explain the anomalous regulation of this promoter, based on the twin super‐coiled‐domain model. This allows us to account for the unusual properties of the leu‐500 promoter, and confirms the biological importance of the twin super‐coiled‐domain model. We suggest that such topological coupling between promoters may be general, leading to co‐operativity and anti‐co‐operativity between divergent promoter pairs.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1991.tb00749.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80703990</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>80703990</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4309-28a9b966dfeb72e8191cfac24dada20f9a059d25f8e00ac07be1c201eb6eb1dc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkEtOwzAQhi0EKuVxBCQLCXYJYyeOYxZIiGdRgQ1I7CzHmUCqNC5xKtodR-CMnISUVrBEzMYj_d94Rh8h-wxC1tXRKGRRIgKuRBoypVjYZgAyVuFsjfR_onXSByUgiFL-tEm2vB8BsAiSqEd6LBWSQ9wnN0NnTUXP705p6yaucs9zauqcPmONFGeTBr0vXX1M2xek1nikrvjuK5x-vn8IADpp3Ni12OyQjcJUHndX7zZ5vLx4OLsOhvdXg7PTYWDjCFTAU6MylSR5gZnkmDLFbGEsj3OTGw6FMiBUzkWRIoCxIDNklgPDLMGM5TbaJofLf7vFr1P0rR6X3mJVmRrd1OsUJERKwZ8gEyoWiZQdeLwEbeO8b7DQk6Ycm2auGeiFcT3SC616oVUvjOuVcT3rhvdWW6bZGPPf0aXiLj9Y5cZ3qovG1Lb0v5iSPO2O7biTJfdWVjj_xwX69nYgpYq-AKXSnhI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15945677</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Local DNA topology and gene expression: the case of the leu‐500 promoter</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Lilley, D. M. J. ; Higgins, C. F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lilley, D. M. J. ; Higgins, C. F.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Many promoters are sensitive to DNA supercoiling, and it is becoming apparent that this may play an important rote in gene regulation. The twin super ‐coiled‐domain hypothesis (Liu and Wang, 1987) proposes that transcription can lead to local variation in supercoiling. The mutant leu‐500 promoter has presented a long‐standing problem to the understanding of the control of promoter function by DNA supercoiling. This promoter is activated by mutations in the gene encoding topoisomerase I, but is apparently unaffected by mutations in the genes encoding DNA gyrase. We propose a model to explain the anomalous regulation of this promoter, based on the twin super‐coiled‐domain model. This allows us to account for the unusual properties of the leu‐500 promoter, and confirms the biological importance of the twin super‐coiled‐domain model. We suggest that such topological coupling between promoters may be general, leading to co‐operativity and anti‐co‐operativity between divergent promoter pairs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0950-382X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2958</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1991.tb00749.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1857204</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Bacteriology ; Biological and medical sciences ; DNA, Bacterial - chemistry ; DNA, Bacterial - genetics ; DNA, Superhelical - chemistry ; DNA, Superhelical - genetics ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial ; Genetics ; Microbiology ; Models, Genetic ; Mutation ; Nucleic Acid Conformation ; Promoter Regions, Genetic ; Salmonella typhimurium - genetics ; Transcription, Genetic</subject><ispartof>Molecular microbiology, 1991-04, Vol.5 (4), p.779-783</ispartof><rights>1991 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4309-28a9b966dfeb72e8191cfac24dada20f9a059d25f8e00ac07be1c201eb6eb1dc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4309-28a9b966dfeb72e8191cfac24dada20f9a059d25f8e00ac07be1c201eb6eb1dc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2958.1991.tb00749.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2958.1991.tb00749.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=19728903$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1857204$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lilley, D. M. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higgins, C. F.</creatorcontrib><title>Local DNA topology and gene expression: the case of the leu‐500 promoter</title><title>Molecular microbiology</title><addtitle>Mol Microbiol</addtitle><description>Summary Many promoters are sensitive to DNA supercoiling, and it is becoming apparent that this may play an important rote in gene regulation. The twin super ‐coiled‐domain hypothesis (Liu and Wang, 1987) proposes that transcription can lead to local variation in supercoiling. The mutant leu‐500 promoter has presented a long‐standing problem to the understanding of the control of promoter function by DNA supercoiling. This promoter is activated by mutations in the gene encoding topoisomerase I, but is apparently unaffected by mutations in the genes encoding DNA gyrase. We propose a model to explain the anomalous regulation of this promoter, based on the twin super‐coiled‐domain model. This allows us to account for the unusual properties of the leu‐500 promoter, and confirms the biological importance of the twin super‐coiled‐domain model. We suggest that such topological coupling between promoters may be general, leading to co‐operativity and anti‐co‐operativity between divergent promoter pairs.</description><subject>Bacteriology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>DNA, Bacterial - chemistry</subject><subject>DNA, Bacterial - genetics</subject><subject>DNA, Superhelical - chemistry</subject><subject>DNA, Superhelical - genetics</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Models, Genetic</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Nucleic Acid Conformation</subject><subject>Promoter Regions, Genetic</subject><subject>Salmonella typhimurium - genetics</subject><subject>Transcription, Genetic</subject><issn>0950-382X</issn><issn>1365-2958</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkEtOwzAQhi0EKuVxBCQLCXYJYyeOYxZIiGdRgQ1I7CzHmUCqNC5xKtodR-CMnISUVrBEzMYj_d94Rh8h-wxC1tXRKGRRIgKuRBoypVjYZgAyVuFsjfR_onXSByUgiFL-tEm2vB8BsAiSqEd6LBWSQ9wnN0NnTUXP705p6yaucs9zauqcPmONFGeTBr0vXX1M2xek1nikrvjuK5x-vn8IADpp3Ni12OyQjcJUHndX7zZ5vLx4OLsOhvdXg7PTYWDjCFTAU6MylSR5gZnkmDLFbGEsj3OTGw6FMiBUzkWRIoCxIDNklgPDLMGM5TbaJofLf7vFr1P0rR6X3mJVmRrd1OsUJERKwZ8gEyoWiZQdeLwEbeO8b7DQk6Ycm2auGeiFcT3SC616oVUvjOuVcT3rhvdWW6bZGPPf0aXiLj9Y5cZ3qovG1Lb0v5iSPO2O7biTJfdWVjj_xwX69nYgpYq-AKXSnhI</recordid><startdate>199104</startdate><enddate>199104</enddate><creator>Lilley, D. M. J.</creator><creator>Higgins, C. F.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199104</creationdate><title>Local DNA topology and gene expression: the case of the leu‐500 promoter</title><author>Lilley, D. M. J. ; Higgins, C. F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4309-28a9b966dfeb72e8191cfac24dada20f9a059d25f8e00ac07be1c201eb6eb1dc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Bacteriology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>DNA, Bacterial - chemistry</topic><topic>DNA, Bacterial - genetics</topic><topic>DNA, Superhelical - chemistry</topic><topic>DNA, Superhelical - genetics</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Models, Genetic</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Nucleic Acid Conformation</topic><topic>Promoter Regions, Genetic</topic><topic>Salmonella typhimurium - genetics</topic><topic>Transcription, Genetic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lilley, D. M. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higgins, C. F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Molecular microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lilley, D. M. J.</au><au>Higgins, C. F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Local DNA topology and gene expression: the case of the leu‐500 promoter</atitle><jtitle>Molecular microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>Mol Microbiol</addtitle><date>1991-04</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>779</spage><epage>783</epage><pages>779-783</pages><issn>0950-382X</issn><eissn>1365-2958</eissn><abstract>Summary Many promoters are sensitive to DNA supercoiling, and it is becoming apparent that this may play an important rote in gene regulation. The twin super ‐coiled‐domain hypothesis (Liu and Wang, 1987) proposes that transcription can lead to local variation in supercoiling. The mutant leu‐500 promoter has presented a long‐standing problem to the understanding of the control of promoter function by DNA supercoiling. This promoter is activated by mutations in the gene encoding topoisomerase I, but is apparently unaffected by mutations in the genes encoding DNA gyrase. We propose a model to explain the anomalous regulation of this promoter, based on the twin super‐coiled‐domain model. This allows us to account for the unusual properties of the leu‐500 promoter, and confirms the biological importance of the twin super‐coiled‐domain model. We suggest that such topological coupling between promoters may be general, leading to co‐operativity and anti‐co‐operativity between divergent promoter pairs.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>1857204</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2958.1991.tb00749.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0950-382X
ispartof Molecular microbiology, 1991-04, Vol.5 (4), p.779-783
issn 0950-382X
1365-2958
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80703990
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Bacteriology
Biological and medical sciences
DNA, Bacterial - chemistry
DNA, Bacterial - genetics
DNA, Superhelical - chemistry
DNA, Superhelical - genetics
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial
Genetics
Microbiology
Models, Genetic
Mutation
Nucleic Acid Conformation
Promoter Regions, Genetic
Salmonella typhimurium - genetics
Transcription, Genetic
title Local DNA topology and gene expression: the case of the leu‐500 promoter
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T07%3A09%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Local%20DNA%20topology%20and%20gene%20expression:%20the%20case%20of%20the%20leu%E2%80%90500%20promoter&rft.jtitle=Molecular%20microbiology&rft.au=Lilley,%20D.%20M.%20J.&rft.date=1991-04&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=779&rft.epage=783&rft.pages=779-783&rft.issn=0950-382X&rft.eissn=1365-2958&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2958.1991.tb00749.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E80703990%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15945677&rft_id=info:pmid/1857204&rfr_iscdi=true