Joint reply to 'Maternal-infant bonding: a joint rebuttal'
To the Editor.— It is clear that there is some disagreement about the effects of early skin-to-skin contact, and these issues are discussed below. We want to underscore, however, that there is no disagreement about the laudable humanization of birthing practices that Klaus and Kennell helped bring a...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Pediatrics (Evanston) 1983-10, Vol.72 (4), p.574-576 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 576 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 574 |
| container_title | Pediatrics (Evanston) |
| container_volume | 72 |
| creator | Lamb, M E Campos, J J Hwang, C P Leiderman, P H Sagi, A Svejda, M |
| description | To the Editor.—
It is clear that there is some disagreement about the effects of early skin-to-skin contact, and these issues are discussed below. We want to underscore, however, that there is no disagreement about the laudable humanization of birthing practices that Klaus and Kennell helped bring about. All are agreed that the maintenance and extension of these practices is desirable, and that we owe a great deal to Klaus and Kennell for their role in promoting them. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1542/peds.72.4.574 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80637341</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>80637341</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c159t-5885ede4c99492772c2db68a3acf6afa6e3a5696df0dd4f5c9e9c3ea6d5c64873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo90DtPwzAUhmELgUopjIxImejk4PulG6q4qogFZsuxHZQqN2Jn6L8nVSOmM5xH3_ACcItRjjkjD33wMZckZzmX7AwsMdIKMiL5OVgiRDFkCPFLcBXjHiHEuCQLsBBKaST5Emzeu6pN2RD6-pClLlt_2BSG1tawaks7fYqu9VX7s8lstp9pMaZk6_U1uChtHcPNfFfg-_npa_sKd58vb9vHHXSY6wS5Ujz4wJzWTBMpiSO-EMpS60phSysCtVxo4UvkPSu500E7Gqzw3AmmJF2B-9NuP3S_Y4jJNFV0oa5tG7oxGoUElZThCcITdEMX4xBK0w9VY4eDwcgcW5ljKyOJYWZqNfm7eXgsmuD_9RyH_gEW9mUh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>80637341</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Joint reply to 'Maternal-infant bonding: a joint rebuttal'</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Lamb, M E ; Campos, J J ; Hwang, C P ; Leiderman, P H ; Sagi, A ; Svejda, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Lamb, M E ; Campos, J J ; Hwang, C P ; Leiderman, P H ; Sagi, A ; Svejda, M</creatorcontrib><description>To the Editor.—
It is clear that there is some disagreement about the effects of early skin-to-skin contact, and these issues are discussed below. We want to underscore, however, that there is no disagreement about the laudable humanization of birthing practices that Klaus and Kennell helped bring about. All are agreed that the maintenance and extension of these practices is desirable, and that we owe a great deal to Klaus and Kennell for their role in promoting them.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-4005</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-4275</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1542/peds.72.4.574</identifier><identifier>PMID: 6889075</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Female ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Male ; Mother-Child Relations ; Mothers - psychology ; Object Attachment</subject><ispartof>Pediatrics (Evanston), 1983-10, Vol.72 (4), p.574-576</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6889075$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lamb, M E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campos, J J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hwang, C P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leiderman, P H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sagi, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Svejda, M</creatorcontrib><title>Joint reply to 'Maternal-infant bonding: a joint rebuttal'</title><title>Pediatrics (Evanston)</title><addtitle>Pediatrics</addtitle><description>To the Editor.—
It is clear that there is some disagreement about the effects of early skin-to-skin contact, and these issues are discussed below. We want to underscore, however, that there is no disagreement about the laudable humanization of birthing practices that Klaus and Kennell helped bring about. All are agreed that the maintenance and extension of these practices is desirable, and that we owe a great deal to Klaus and Kennell for their role in promoting them.</description><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mother-Child Relations</subject><subject>Mothers - psychology</subject><subject>Object Attachment</subject><issn>0031-4005</issn><issn>1098-4275</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1983</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo90DtPwzAUhmELgUopjIxImejk4PulG6q4qogFZsuxHZQqN2Jn6L8nVSOmM5xH3_ACcItRjjkjD33wMZckZzmX7AwsMdIKMiL5OVgiRDFkCPFLcBXjHiHEuCQLsBBKaST5Emzeu6pN2RD6-pClLlt_2BSG1tawaks7fYqu9VX7s8lstp9pMaZk6_U1uChtHcPNfFfg-_npa_sKd58vb9vHHXSY6wS5Ujz4wJzWTBMpiSO-EMpS60phSysCtVxo4UvkPSu500E7Gqzw3AmmJF2B-9NuP3S_Y4jJNFV0oa5tG7oxGoUElZThCcITdEMX4xBK0w9VY4eDwcgcW5ljKyOJYWZqNfm7eXgsmuD_9RyH_gEW9mUh</recordid><startdate>198310</startdate><enddate>198310</enddate><creator>Lamb, M E</creator><creator>Campos, J J</creator><creator>Hwang, C P</creator><creator>Leiderman, P H</creator><creator>Sagi, A</creator><creator>Svejda, M</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198310</creationdate><title>Joint reply to 'Maternal-infant bonding: a joint rebuttal'</title><author>Lamb, M E ; Campos, J J ; Hwang, C P ; Leiderman, P H ; Sagi, A ; Svejda, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c159t-5885ede4c99492772c2db68a3acf6afa6e3a5696df0dd4f5c9e9c3ea6d5c64873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1983</creationdate><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mother-Child Relations</topic><topic>Mothers - psychology</topic><topic>Object Attachment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lamb, M E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campos, J J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hwang, C P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leiderman, P H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sagi, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Svejda, M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pediatrics (Evanston)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lamb, M E</au><au>Campos, J J</au><au>Hwang, C P</au><au>Leiderman, P H</au><au>Sagi, A</au><au>Svejda, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Joint reply to 'Maternal-infant bonding: a joint rebuttal'</atitle><jtitle>Pediatrics (Evanston)</jtitle><addtitle>Pediatrics</addtitle><date>1983-10</date><risdate>1983</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>574</spage><epage>576</epage><pages>574-576</pages><issn>0031-4005</issn><eissn>1098-4275</eissn><abstract>To the Editor.—
It is clear that there is some disagreement about the effects of early skin-to-skin contact, and these issues are discussed below. We want to underscore, however, that there is no disagreement about the laudable humanization of birthing practices that Klaus and Kennell helped bring about. All are agreed that the maintenance and extension of these practices is desirable, and that we owe a great deal to Klaus and Kennell for their role in promoting them.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>6889075</pmid><doi>10.1542/peds.72.4.574</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0031-4005 |
| ispartof | Pediatrics (Evanston), 1983-10, Vol.72 (4), p.574-576 |
| issn | 0031-4005 1098-4275 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_80637341 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
| subjects | Female Humans Infant, Newborn Male Mother-Child Relations Mothers - psychology Object Attachment |
| title | Joint reply to 'Maternal-infant bonding: a joint rebuttal' |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T16%3A42%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Joint%20reply%20to%20'Maternal-infant%20bonding:%20a%20joint%20rebuttal'&rft.jtitle=Pediatrics%20(Evanston)&rft.au=Lamb,%20M%20E&rft.date=1983-10&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=574&rft.epage=576&rft.pages=574-576&rft.issn=0031-4005&rft.eissn=1098-4275&rft_id=info:doi/10.1542/peds.72.4.574&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E80637341%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=80637341&rft_id=info:pmid/6889075&rfr_iscdi=true |